Through more years, there are more possibilities of compounding value, when then can put a person in a place where they are able to either live off their bitcoin or to greatly supplement their income and they are ONLY selling small portions of their bitcoin on a monthly or perhaps some other kind of timeline in which they choose to withdraw some of the value from BTC and convert it into their currency and/or make purchases with it..
So one thing is getting the stash to a large enough level that it starts to have meaning, and the other thing is being in profits and how much in profits, and even if a person might make it through more than a whole cycle, he might be able to consider continuing to mostly accumulate and maybe not having any desperate need to withdraw any value from his holdings until a bit of time has passed, maybe even a couple of cycles or more.
There are some guys willing to accept that they may well be into fairly heavy BTC accumulation for 10 years or more and then maybe to reassess their situation after going through that level of BTC accumulation, which also is likely to mean that their average cost per BTC is likely going to continue to go up, especially if the BTC prices are mostly going up and there is no real expectation of being able to buy on dips, if dips may or may not end up happening from any given price point...even though in retrospect we can see that the last couple of years had been a dip, and some folks did not realize that it was a dip, even though the presence of the dip should have had been fairly obvious.
It sounds as if you have stopped accumulating bitcoin FinePoine0. So does that mean that you have enough bitcoin?
You are not free from the trading mentality if you believe that buying and just sitting on it is going to be enough, and it sounds like you are just considering the point in which you are going to sell.. which also is not a long term commitment...
So yeah if you stopped buying, then you have already likely been losing opportunities because maybe you are either presuming the price is going to come down or you are planning to sell when the BTC price goes up, and then where is that going to put you? Are you going to be better off in the long term or just some short term pleasure that you were able to get from "buying low and selling high?" which is also known as trading.
Diversification is very important to minimize large losses.
There is no need to diversify into shitcoins.
That is nonsense.
Now if you build up your BTC holdings, you might start out just by only building your BTC and your cash, and at some point you might want to consider whether it would be better for you to diversify your investment into other kinds of investments besides dollars and cash (perhaps property, stocks, bonds, commodities and/or cash equivalents), but that does not mean that you would need to get involved in shitcoins at all or that it would be helpful (rather than a waste of time, energy and money) to get involved in shitcoins..
Diversification is very important to minimize large losses.
You don't have to reach fuck you status prior to considering diversification, and so each person needs to try to consider for himself how comfortable he is with ONLY having exposure to bitcoin and cash, and there may be some advantage to having some of that cash that is potentially building up in other kinds of assets... .. so when does that trigger? It will be different for different people. Some people come to bitcoin and they already have other investments, and I am not even necessarily suggesting that any of the other investments into areas such as property, stocks, bonds, commodities and cash equivalents are going to be very helpful, but sometimes the more that any of us builds up our bitcoin holdings, then the more logical it will be to have some off-sets to that which could be cash, but we might feel that we are too vulnerable if we have 5 years of our salary in bitcoin and 1 or 2 years in cash..
And, so yeah if we are thinking about fuck you status as a possible goal, then that generally would be considered 20-30 years worth of income using something like the 200-WMA for valuation of your BTC holdings rather than using BTC's spot price since BTC's spot price tends to be all over the place.. so we would need to be making a reasonable assessment of the value of our BTC based on the bottom price rather than the current price or any potential top prices, even though if we sell any BTC we are going to be selling at spot price and maybe even trying to sell during points in which the spot price is relatively high based on expectations.. but that is once we get there, so we have to get there first in terms of figuring out how much BTC to accumulate and sometimes if we might want to make sure that we don't have all of our value in just one thing, especially once we might get to a point in which we have several years of our income in bitcoin.. and I cannot say exactly what each person might choose before they start to diversify, even though I know diversification is not needed in the beginning, but some level of diversification could even be started before reaching a whole year's accumulation of value in BTC.. and sometimes those diversified assets/currencies could be part of an emergency fund and/or reserves depending on how liquid they might be.. . but they would be things to sell prior to selling BTC since BTC would likely be considered the main thing to be wanting to accumulate the most so not wanting to prematurely selling any of it..
I would not even lump sum if I have the money to do that, because bitcoin price go into correction, so DCA regularly either weekly or monthly and hodli for a very long time, and when the bear market appears again, you can buy dip and hodli. However, this is my personal thoughts that I am sharing, and we all have the right to do whatever we think is best for us, but you will be responsible for your own actions.
If you are brand new to bitcoin, you should consider all three options of accumulation: Lump sum , DCA and buy the dip.
If you are investing for several years, you might not want to consider some of the options, but even if you have been buying for 1-2 years, and if you all of a sudden have extra money. .Let's say you get a $3k pay out for something. .then all of a sudden you have $3k. So how are you going to treat that extra money? I would think that you would want to consider all three categories, even if you might choose not to employ all three categories.. but the default still might be to put 1/3 into each, but if you think that we are more inclined towards up, then you might want to put more into lump sum in order to better prepare for up, since we cannot know if there is going to be further down.. so maybe you end up deciding to put 60% or 70% into lump sum and then divide the remaining part into buying on dips and DCA.
If the income is not more than the demand, how will you meet the basic of the family... First of all you have to keep our family well and then something else.
At the end of the month you can invest your extra money invest in DCA you want but you have to keep the needs of the family in mind first, in this case you can reduce some extra expenses. you have to stick to a atlest DCA target amount that is 10% or more, it's depend on your income.
If this is not achieved then some measures could be taken like
Reduce your outflows
Avoid spending extravagantly
Setting up scale of preference as some can be forgone(or brought down to a new budget list )to come up with a DCA target
Avoiding deficit buget
With these, there should be something for ones DCA
You can also try to figure out ways to increase your income.
Waiting or even lowering your DCA amount may not be a great idea, especially if you already determined that you don't have enough BTC. Yet, for sure, everyone has to make these decisions for themselves, and historically there are a lot of examples of guys reducing the amount of their DCA to wait for dips that never ended up happening, so they end up both screwing up their accumulation but they also screwed up their psychology...so sometimes it is better to just keep buying, even if your average costs per BTC is going up.
Also like you seem to suggest, there are ways to keep buying, but ONLY to reserve part of what you would have otherwise used to buy for the possibility for dips. No one can really say and each of us needs to decide how much to allocate to each of these areas, especially if we are trying to figure out if we have enough BTC or not.. and how we think we might be able to get more BTC and is it worth it to wait with some of it.. because sometimes it does help to have some money for those dips that come at various points, and they might come rapidly and other times we end up getting stuck back down in a correction zone.. but the question never really goes away concerning how much to buy and when and whether we should preserve some of that (and how much) for the possibility of buying on dips.
Before investing in bitcoin, it is mandatory that the basic needs must be met and some funds even set aside as reserve incase of any emergency. Not that you cannot buy bitcoin when basic needs have not been met but calling yourself a long term holder of bitcoin when you have not sorted your basic needs is like self deceit because it will not work. We are advocating for ways people can better invest and hold bitcoin and the suggestion of basic needs and emergency funds is just one of them
Yep, exactly. There are various levels of needs, and some are more basic and some can be deferred until later and some might be considered wants rather than needs, so we surely would need to know which category of the needs we have to satisfy and which ones might be deferred and which ones we might want to balance out in terms of whether to treat ourselves to some of our wants, and those can be personal choices, yet as you suggested, the more basic the need, the more we are going to get ourselves into trouble if we are using our basic needs money to invest and/or to buy bitcoin.. So in that regard, if we do not have enough income (or other resources) to satisfy our basic needs then we are going to have to satisfy those first.
By the way, we could also look up Maslow's heirarchy of needs if we want to consider those kinds of ideas about levels of needs.