[edited out]
Starting with a small amount of money is fine because it lets you learn about investing without risk too much. I m glad to hear that you started small and then added more money with time. It is impressive that you invest when Bitcoin was worth a lot and when it was worth low. It show that you are dedicated and willing to take smart risks.
Even if a person starts out with what seems to be a large amount to start out his/her investment, the amount may well end up becoming dwarfed by ongoing adding to the investment portfolio, and many times it is not easy to start out with a lump sum amount, even though surely there are circumstances in which guys do end up coming across lump sum amounts of money that provide them with way more choices than they would normally have.
It is similar when many young people first leave the home of their parents, they usually are starting out without very many resources, and it can take a while for them to start to feel that they have built some of their resources and maybe they are not even able to invest anything in the beginning because they are struggling to make sure that their income covers their expenses, and that they might also be building their emergency fund (that they might not have felt that they needed during the time that they were living with their parents).
Also young people are faced with dilemmas regarding whether or not to go to college or maybe to participate in some kind of vocational training that may well cost money and time in the start, but may have the potential to increase their income at later points down the road.
Sometimes people will come across lump sum amounts of money, and they won't be sure what to do with it, but then they might become tempted by going on vacation or buying some consumer good that had earlier been out of their financial reach. It takes quite a bit of discipline and focus to identify an investment rather than to consume.. or even to budget out various places to put the money, and then the lump sum does not seem to be as much if it ends up getting divided into various categories to try to fulfill several wants at the same time.
In bitcoin investment there is nothing like "Instant rich" we must exercise that patient to wait for the maturity date or even having to wait at least 1 year to 4 years time before we could see something very pleasant with out investment.
That is to say after investment we go for more knowledge as we need a sufficient knowledge to know how to manage/guide our investment otherwise we might ends up wasting it when then time is not yet due. Though investment like bitcoin (especially cryptocurrency investment) requires more educational material on the security aspect of our investment to enable us be able hold long time.
1-4 years does not seem like a long time, especially when it comes to something like bitcoin.. 1-4 years seems like someone who is looking for the next peak to be able to cash out some or all of his holdings.
But hey.. do what you like... and there surely are some people who might be concerned about their ability to invest for 4-10 years or longer, and so sure they could still invest, but I would imagine that their position size is going to be smaller if they are investing in shorter timeframes, such as 4 years or less.
Alternatively, there are traders who do look for some opportunities to get in and out of an investment, and surely traders might consider themselves to be investing in the long term when they are investing 1-4 years.. so sure maybe it is a matter of perspective.. .. even though I still consider 4 years as a kind of minimum for investing into bitcoin and if someone does not lump sum in the beginning, but invests over 1-4 years, then any money being invested at the end of the first 4 years, should be considered as being invested for at least 4 years from the time it is invested, not from the time that the investment started... so any new money coming in likely needs 4-10 years or longer, just to grow.. and that would be more in the ballpark of the entry levels to "long term" investing.. and surely if a person is reassessing his investment periodically (perhaps quarterly, perhaps annually, perhaps every few years), he is likely going to find himself in a decently good place if he had been investing for 10 years or longer, and surely is going to have more freedom from having had invested for that period of time, and part of the freedom also comes from being able to make sure that the investment is secured during that whole period..
How much is personally held in some private place, and how much is held with third parties?
With bitcoin, it is likely better to have an overwhelming majority of the investment as privately and securely held.. not necessarily easy to make sure that your keys are secure and to attempt to keep up with which methods of securing keys are sufficiently secure for the size of the portfolio that is being protected..
But for plebs like us who don't manage billions, I believe the difference in profit would not be that large that it wouldn't really matter.
Yeah, every investor will actually earn the profit they deserve. For example, people who buy 1 bitcoin at $20k and if they are still holding up till now and peradventure Bitcoin gets to $100k during the bull market, that means they have made $80k profit, which is a nice one, but we only invest that amount that we can be able to raise and invest freely without causing ourselves any psychological issues. There was a topic I raised in the past about some friends wanting to set competitions among themselves on who would actually invest more in Bitcoin.
In a normal sense, it's a good contest among themselves, but some of them did not realize that their financial income is very small compared to that of their friends.
I always tell people that it's more wise to just invest the amount that you can peacefully hold until any time that you have seen that the price is very bullish and you are satisfied with the profit you are seeing in your portfolio.
Some people see that their friends have bought 0.5 bitcoin, and they also want to buy that same amount of bitcoin without even realizing that their friends are earning more than them and also have fewer responsibilities than them.
Yep. If we are going to compete, we should be competing with either some abstract version of our alternative self or competing with someone of similar financial and psychological circumstances, and surely there are not going to be people with exactly our own same circumstances which is another reason to create standards that are individually tailored.
To me, it is not even good to compete with someone on their bitcoin purchase because you don't know the kind of plans that he had set aside to buy bitcoin that will definitely work for him because he has already strategized it base on his income. Since you are in competition, you will not know his strategy for you to follow and you might even lose focus to come up with your own strategy because all your focus is to have more btc than your friend and before you know it you will buy more aggressively and forgetting that there will be need of emergency funds and reserve funds since you think that the person with the highest bitcoin in his portfolio is the winner, forgetting about important issues that might arise in the later.
That is quite true, and even people with very similar incomes and similar expenses might come out differently in terms of performance, but one of the main performances is also being able to stay in the game and being able to balance a variety of your personal needs, including perhaps your need for insurance, so one person might choose to invest 10% of his income into bitcoin and another person chooses to invest 20% of his income into bitcoin, and surely the one who invested 20% might end up getting ahead, but then he never had a sufficiently-sized emergency fund, and he ended up getting lucky that he did not end up having to experience an emergency.. and the person investing 10% was more prepared for such emergency, even though in the case of this hypothetical, no emergency ended up happening... that is another thing with a sufficiently buttressed emergency fund, it might be less than 5% odds that the emergency fund will ever be needed, and so there are choices about how much to buttress the emergency fund, and realizing the fact that there could be some circumstances in which NOT having a sufficient emergency fund could totally wipe a person out... even though the odds still might be less than 5% that such emergency fund will ever come into need.
And before you know it, you will see yourself selling your bitcoin at a lower price to take care of some challenges, maybe health issues or emergency that must be attend to. This is why it is good to invest based on your capacity and don't be in competition with anyone to make you concentrate and stay focus on your bitcoin accumulation journey with the regular DCA method weekly or monthly. Just do your best and allow things to play out the way it is suppose to be, who knows if you will have a bigger income than the the person that you feel is buying more than you tomorrow, and you will increase your bitcoin purchase size which will be more than his.
Sometimes the mere fact that you are persistent and consistent, you may well outlast others who are in similar positions as you, and people will have differing ideas, and some times some people will get distracted into other areas to put their value, and sometimes we might not notice a difference for many many years.
I know some people who had quite a few advantages over me financially, and I even tried to get them into bitcoin, and they probably would have had been able to invest into bitcoin with way smaller of a fraction of their income (and available assets) than I had done. These days, there is no way that they would be able to come even close to being able to catch up to me, and from time to time, I heard them telling me about some expenses that they had that were part of their life that was not in my life, but much of that is just excuses - especially since there are other areas in their life in which they were always way more consistently spendy than me, so even if it was true that they had some areas in which they had more expenses than me, they made choices regarding where they were investing their time, money and energies, which happened to not at all (or barely) in bitcoin over the years, and even though I did not kill myself in bitcoin, I was moderately more aggressive, and consistent.. and largely just continued to hold my bitcoin through the years, which is nearly impossible for them to be able to purchase even a fraction of my quantity of bitcoin without having to make a lot of sacrifices, and even that probably would not be enough to catch up absent my suffering some kind of "accident" with my coins... which I am truly not ruling out as non-zero.
I am not even really competing.. but I do sometimes think of the comparisons... including another guy that comes up to me on about an annual basis since about 2016, and even I pretty much consistently say the same thing.. get started.. and I cannot even remember my first conversations with him, which he claims was in mid-2014.. which surely could have had been possible... but still outside of my memory... there were a few other guys with whom I supposedly had these kinds of bitcoin conversations in 2014.. even though I don't recall talking about bitcoin to others until late 2014.. but they were claiming that I was talking about bitcoin with them in mid 2014.
Actually one of the really measurable differences will come from seeing that some people will cash out some or all of their investment and strive to get back into the investment later, which surely can end up being an investment killer... it has a tendency to take away a lot of the compounding effects of the investment
[edited out]
This is why newbies need to start with an amount that they will not need for a very long time, maybe 10% or 5% for regular DCA weekly or monthly, and go on a long term ride for let's say 4-10yrs to minimize the risk because it is be easy for them.
Exactly.. a person (newbie into bitcoin/investing) can start out by dedicating 5% to 10% of his income into the investment, and after a few years increase that to higher amounts.. but surely if it remains unfeasible to increase the investment amount to more than 5% to 10%, then such person should just do what he can, and even 5% to 10% will likely add up, even though 5% is likely only equivalent to having had invested a whole year's salary after 20 years of employing such strategy, but 10% has chances of having invested a whole year's salary after 10 years.. and sometimes these higher levels of aggressiveness (when possible) can make really stupendous kinds of differences in therms of the progress made and how the quantities might add up to significant, meaningful and potentially life-changing amounts.