~Snip~
No JJG I am not opposing what you said but maybe I conveyed it too concisely with the way I delivered it. Apart from that I support everything you have described and it allows many users to learn the best way to invest in the right way. Indeed, sometimes there is a need for a discussion that might be more interesting and that will give rise to a very good point to take and apply in the investment journey.
Apart from that I also learned all about what you said and I applied it in my long term investments. I want to improve the performance of the investments I have made in Bitcoin and want to correct the mistakes of the past that sold Bitcoin just to gamble. Yes, maybe I will change that as best as possible because I am determined to invest for a long period of time.
Sometimes, we might agree with a lot of the same points, but we express ourselves differently, and other times there are actual material differences in what we are saying. I don't claim to know all of the answers, and sometimes I might even get confused and/or contradict myself in terms of what I thought that I wanted to say or how I am saying it... and some members (to the extent that any of them are reading our posts) might be able to relate more to the ways that you are saying things, and others might be able to relate more to the ways that I am saying things.
I do believe that it can become confusing to get into describing (or predicting) probabilities for future performance as compared with what might actually end up happening.
For example, if I say that I believe that there is a greater than 75% chance that BTC prices will break the current ATH before the end of 2025, then if I am trying to account for all of the possible outcomes, then I have to try figure out how to frame the remaining less than 25%. Since we are talking in terms of breaking the high, then we can maybe figure out how we might want to figure some of the current ranges.
So maybe I could say that I believe that there is a 10% chance that BTC will not break $40k before the end of 2025, and then I believe that there is a less than 15% chance that BTC will top out somewhere between $40k and $69k before the end of 2025.
That kind of framing would cover all of the possibilities, but it still does not mean that I am right in my numbers since I am kind of guessing a bit, too... so if some of the facts change or maybe some of my ideas change, then I might have to adjust my predictive numbers, but since there surely is quite a bit of time between now and the end of 2025, I could likely stick with my predictive numbers and framework for quite a long time (maybe 6 months or longer) before I might feel any need to adjust the numbers that I have just given..
Now if we get to the middle of 2025 and the price had not yet gone above $50k, I might start to get worried, especially if BTC prices were then around current prices, so it seems that other parts of my whole view of bitcoin is playing out differently than I had expected... but I still might feel that I need to stick to my guns with my earlier prediction, even though the price had already gone past $40k, so that 10% would need to be removed from any revised prediction since at some point between now and mid 2025, the BTC price had ended up going above $40k.
Another thing is that once the whole of 2025 passes, and if the BTC price did not end up going any higher than $50k, then my 15% scenario would have had ended up playing out, and so then that 15% scenario ended up becoming 100% since that is what ended up playing out. So if I were to try to make another prediction regarding what BTC might do in 2026 and 2027, then I would have to take into account what actually ended up happening, rather than what had been my earlier greater than 75% scenario did not end up playing out but ended up being 0% in terms of what had actually ended up happening.
Maybe it is not a great example, yet it does end up being a bit gloomy and doomy if facts were to end up playing out in the minority case of my current prediction, but it still should be something that I am prepared for both financially and psychologically, even if I consider both the combination of no higher than $40k and topping in the $40k to $69k to be less than 25%.
We can do this for down scenarios too., but I don't really like to talk about the minority cases, but instead focus on the current more likely direction, even though the down scenarios should be contained within how much value that we place into BTC and also the various ways that we are psychologically and financially prepared for those down scenarios, even though they are part of our view of events that is less likely to play out. We could really get reckt financially and psychologically if we did not account for the negative scenarios... but even though we are prepared for them, we might not need to put very much of our finances into such negative scenarios.
Have "we" beaten this to death enough, yet? I understand that guys are likely going to get overly enthusiastic, and surely I hate to be the one who is saying to be careful if you are putting 100% into up.. or even using language that seems to describe that you are overly prepared for UP without being prepared for both, whether we are talking short, medium or long term.. even going out 20-30 years... if BTC were to perform badly for the next 10 years, for example, it may not mean that it has to fix itself so that in the long term it performs positively. We have to assess what is going on at various times along the way to attempt to figure out if there might be parts of our investment thesis that are not playing out as we had expected and if we might need to change our investments based on such or if we stick with the same original plan that we had.