Sometimes based on personal circumstances, cash flow circumstances or just getting caught up in the BTC (FOMO) hype, people will end up investing more into BTC (in kind of lump sum ways) at certain times, so there could be cases in which a person invested way more into BTC at the top of BTC prices in 2021, so then that person may well end up still being in the negative because they are having to make up for their having had front loaded their BTC investment at times that ended up being higher prices than they are currently. Those kinds of mistakes do sometimes end up happening, and maybe some of those kinds of persons might end up DCA investing into bitcoin 3-4 years (or even more) before they finally start getting into profits. Of course, no matter what there are not any guarantees that your BTC portfolio will end up in profits, even though many of us have certain levels of confidence that bitcoin is amongst the best of investments currently available, if not the best investment, and because of our assessment of bitcoin, we continue to buy into it, even if it might take a while for our holdings to get into profits (an might not ever get into profits if something ends up negativing bitcoin's positive investment thesis).
Mistakes like these can happen and it may take several years or more for someone to start seeing profits from their BTC investment. It is crucial to acknowledge that there are no guarantees in the market even though many of us have confidence in Bitcoin as a long-term investment. Despite our positive assessment it's possible that external factors could negatively impact Bitcoin's investment thesis. But if we believe in Bitcoin so definitely we will be happy after a certain.
But the thing is that if anyone is DCAing with time to time so this strategy will recover the mistakes which he/s made at the time of FOMO. If anyone invested on the top when Bitcoin was at $69000. And still DCAing so I am sure that he has recovered almost 80% to 90% loss and if he will hold and continue the strategy so he/s will be in profit when Bitcoin will cross ATH again.
Maybe we can try to explore different kinds of investors in regards to ways that they might accumulate BTC and perhaps we don't even need to go too far down the path of comparing BTC accumulators to traders.
The most that a person who is ONLY buying (and not using leverage and/or trading) can screw up is to have an average BTC price at the top of the market, so just by definition, if someone buys at the top and continues to buy, his average cost per BTC is going to ultimately end up coming down, and in order to be profitable - in terms of the average, then the price that BTC needs to reach will continue to go down as more buys are made, so profitability will come into existence quite long before reaching the ATH again. Of course, the purchase that was made at the top will not get into profits until after reaching the ATH again, and so there can be some variance in terms of whether someone might measure whether they are in profits in terms of transaction by transaction or if they also might consider their average price per BTC, and there should be no reason not to be able to engage in both kinds of practices in order to better understand how to manage the BTC that you have accumulated in terms of how profitable it is - while at the same time, there are some folks who are not very detailed in their keeping track of their BTC, so they might ONLY have ballpark ideas regarding the extent to which their BTC holdings might be profitable or not.
Of course, someone who bought at the top and then did not buy any more BTC will be stuck waiting for the BTC price to get back above the ATH in order to get into profits.
There could be other ways in which a person continues to buy, but the cost per BTC does not continue to go down, and that would come after a person were to keep buying and to lower his cost per BTC from $69k to let's say $30k or $40k, but then after the BTC price is above $30k or $40k, then he keeps buying BTC, so his average cost per BTC is no longer getting lower upon each purchase, and there likely is nothing wrong with your average cost per BTC increasing, as long as you might be meeting other goals, which might be just wanting to increase your BTC stash and/or continuing to appreciate that BTC remains a good place to store value, even if the price might fluctuate quite a bit and sometimes your BTC stash is not in profits, but there is a bit of speculation (perhaps based on an understanding of BTC being sound money and scarce) that a person holding BTC is likely going to have more financial options in the future as compared with someone who chooses not to hold BTC.
Maybe it could be worth it to briefly contrast what the trader does? Instead of continuing to buy BTC on a regular basis and continuing to go long, the trader engages in practices to try to lower his cost per BTC, but if he ends up NOT being successful, he could end up raising his cost per BTC, even when he is fucking around with his trades at prices that are way lower than the ATH, or even lower than his average cost per BTC... so a person engaging in trading may well end up having to make up for his trading mistakes by hoping that the BTC price goes higher than the previous ATH or even if he is able to bring down his cost per BTC, he may well might not have had been able t bring down his cost per BTC as much as the person who is strictly buying BTC on a regular basis, so the trader might have been trying to engage in short-cuts to lower his average cost per BTC in a faster way than the person who is merely buying BTC on a regular basis, but the end effect is that his cost per BTC might not lower as quickly and there could even end up being circumstances in which he unduly causes his cost per BTC to raise, even higher than the ATH.
Of course, there are different intensities in which a person might trade, gamble or even to employ leverage, and there could likely be some prudent ways to trade, gamble and employ leverage to increase likelihood for better results as compared with the person who merely buys BTC on a regular basis... yet we are not talking about those matters in this thread, and we should expect and understand that the techniques for trading, gambling and leveraging are more complicated than the ones for buying persistently, consistently, ongoingly, regularly and in accordance with one's own financial/psychological circumstances including the considerations of cashflows and expenses.
But the thing is that if anyone is DCAing with time to time so this strategy will recover the mistakes which he/s made at the time of FOMO. If anyone invested on the top when Bitcoin was at $69000. And still DCAing so I am sure that he has recovered almost 80% to 90% loss and if he will hold and continue the strategy so he/s will be in profit when Bitcoin will cross ATH again.
Alright I think I get your point here,you mean if anyone trys to DCA when the Bitcoin reaches $69k he/she could recover profits when the next ATH comes.
If you are ONLY buying BTC after buying at the ATH, then it is guaranteed that you will be in profits when the next ATH comes (if it comes).
Well I guess if I'm not mistaken Bitcoin is still volatile and predicting it just like that mightnot work
It is not guaranteed that a person will ONLY buy and it is not guaranteed that an ATH will come again... yeah, if someone screws around with buying and selling or otherwise engaging in gambling or leverage then he could well end up raising his costs per BTC rather than lowering them. Lower costs per BTC is guaranteed to happen as long as you are buying below your average costs per BTC, yet at the same time, sometimes people are sloppy in their ways of keeping track of these kinds of matters including keeping track of the costs and quantities of their buys, and if they end up trading then they can really end up screwing up their accounting - especially if they might already be engaging in sloppy accounting practices.
as we could be expecting something else by then but Bitcoin is not just any type of coin and not too volatile,there's still a chance for DCA maybe but the future will determine.Thus, you wanna consider DCA then start now
That sounds correct in regards to the best time to get involved in bitcoin was yesterday, and since you cannot go back in time, then the second best time would be to get involved today. In other words, gets started as soon as possible and make some kind of a plan and start to follow the plan and then tweak the plan along the way as you are learning more about your own financial/psychological circumstances (including accounting for the 9 factors that I mentioned in
this post) in order to employ a personally tailored approach.
[edited out]
The fear of missing out has cause a lot of investors to regret, I will say this act is commonly done by new comers who doesn't know anything about the market but due to the hype alot of them decide to buy with huge sum and end up with high expectations from the market, concerning the hype what will make a newbie to follow the hype they have heard something about bitcoin before they made such decision, the hype about bitcoin is just too much and
anyone who can't control their emotions they should just stay out from investing.Investors who find themself in this circumstances some can't even wait for 2_3 years before the next ATH that's why they choose to follow the hype, when it comes to FOMO this kind investment choice is never right not only bitcoin investment other investment too, for example a newbie who doesn't know how the market works how can that person make a proper investment. I will go with the opinion to continue using the DCA strategy not minding the hype cause during this season a lot of investors take high risk spending more.
Ways to control your emotions is by establishing techniques that deal with moderating and managing position size. I don't see any reason that anyone should stay out of bitcoin, and in fact everyone should get into bitcoin by at least getting off zero, so even if that is only a 1% allocation or something modest. So getting out and staying out, does not seem to be the solution for most people, and of course, if a person does not have any discretionary income, then he is not able to invest into bitcoin or anything else, so there are needs to sort out a persons discretionary income in order to make sure that he is able to invest and that he is not going to need the money.. which again brings us back to moderating emotions by moderating and managing position size, which is not necessarily zero..and actually probably should not be considered to be zero..