We might be speaking past each other or I don't really understand the point.
I thought that I was trying to suggest that there were varying kinds of attempts to overthrow core developers, and sure I might not even know enough about whether it is an achievable goal or whatever, so you, pooya87, might be taking this whole subject matter to a place that is beyond anything that I was trying to say.. or even that I know the repercussions of the matter.
I surely don't proclaim to be any kind of expert, and I am not even very familiar with BTC governance beyond my arguments in regards to what various of the segwit opponents and the BIG blocker proponents were trying to achieve, whether we are referring to bcash hardforkers or segwit2x proponents or some other camps that were in the then opposition forces.
I do understand that characterizing something as bitcoin core developers may well imply some kind of unification which was not really my intention.. even if my phraseology may have come out that way.
my point is that there should not be any centralized governance in bitcoin in any form. whether it is centralized mining, centralized nodes or centralized development. just like miners, the bitcoin core developers should also be seen as employees that are working and can be fired or replaced or just move on. and the team has already changed significantly during the 11 year course of bitcoin core's history too (Garzik was a core dev too).
i think what you meant to say was that these groups of people (the "big blockers" if you will) were trying to push bitcoin protocol into a different direction that could very well centralize the network. which i agree with.
SegWit2x didn't reach community consensus for its second part (the hard fork) so it never happened. and i believe the "fail" you are referring to was because as a hard fork there was a rule that the first block after the target height must have had a bigger size (8 MB weight) to "lock in" the hard fork which obviously never happened because 100% of the hashrate was mining bitcoin (SegWit) and there was nobody left to mine a bigger block so those SegWit2x nodes were rejecting anything smaller hence being stuck.
maybe there was something else that i can't remember though, 2017 was chaotic and the internet was filled with misinformation and it is hard to go through all of it to find the correct ones specially about something that is dead.
I still think that you and I, pooya87, were talking past each other, and seems to me that your summary of my points do not capture what I was saying as well as my original posts... Firstly, BIG blocker dweebs were using technical obfuscation to exaggerate their issue and to attempt to appeal to the masses to attempt to get changes in Bitcoin governance to attempt to cause bitcoin to be easier to change.. a kind of corporate takeover. Second, Garzick was largely an incompetent dweeb who tried to control more software upgrade than he should have been with the segwit2x fork, and he fucked it up - whether on purpose or lack of peer review, whatever, the fucktwat was attempting to bypass meaningful consensus that had been working decently well in bitcoin in order to allow participation and allow merit to prosper, and instead Garzick got overly involved in trying to bypass that and to create some bullshit imitation product, that luckily failed... along with his dweeb reputation (that he still is out their pumping nonsense from time to time) .
I think its not an easy strategy to follow .At the beginning time of trading i thought it is an easy to do a trade but i made always loss .It's went more deep .So i think we should need more analysis before trading this way .So its so tough to say every deep will give you profit .
No one hasn't said it was easy. You need to be prepared for trading an not only with skill, knowledge and experience but you also need to have enough funds to buy when it's favourable price. And you will not see results at once, it takes some time and most of your investment will be returned on long term. And not all of us have enough patience for that
Frequently, failures in strategies arise from attempts to get greedy and assigning the wrong probabilities to BTC price direction movements.
There are ways to structure trades in order that they are neither greedy and tend mostly towards profits by largely emphasizing stacking sats and dollar cost averaging.
In other words, like you suggest bitbunny, it tends to take a decently long ass time to get rich, but surely bitcoin allows for that so long as you are mostly betting on upwards and preparing for upwards and not selling too much BTC, mostly buying btc, whether on dips or on regular basis in a kind of dca way. Of course, if the BTC price goes shooting down, and you run out of money to buy, then you just hodl until you get more money, and if you miss the dip, so what? Just don't sell, wait and if you have more money to buy, later on down the road, even if the BTC price might be higher, then you might do it like that or just hold some of that extra fiat and wait for the next dip, that might or might not happen.
I think its not an easy strategy to follow .At the beginning time of trading i thought it is an easy to do a trade but i made always loss .It's went more deep .So i think we should need more analysis before trading this way .So its so tough to say every deep will give you profit .
No one hasn't said it was easy. You need to be prepared for trading an not only with skill, knowledge and experience but you also need to have enough funds to buy when it's favourable price. And you will not see results at once, it takes some time and most of your investment will be returned on long term. And not all of us have enough patience for that
In order to receive a large enough income from cryptocurrency trading, of course, you need to have a large enough start-up capital. But in order to learn how to trade and gain some experience, even 50 or 100 dollars is enough. Although it is not so easy to learn how to do technical analysis and every beginner has to go through a lot of mistakes. It seems to me that one of the best training options is to use the demo version for trading.
Exactly. Many people should not be trading at all.. just building up their BTC holdings by continuing to buy BTC and stacking that BTC aside.
I don't necessarily recommend playing around with demo versions (but I get your point, Arkann), but I do recommend trading with very small amounts of BTC when first getting started and first learning about bitcoin trading. Even as you get more experienced with trading BTC, it is likely best to keep those trades to very small percentages of your total BTC holdings. As you get better and more accustomed to how it works, then you can increase the amount of your capital that you are trading BTC with.
Maybe starting out with $50 or $100 as you mentioned could work in terms of limiting your trading stash or maybe less than .5% of the total value of your BTC holdings. Let's say if you hold 1 BTC, then .5% would be .005 BTC - which would be almost $59.. but if you have to have both dollars and BTC, then that is only $29.5 in dollars and .0025BTC as your trading stash... Of course, the more BTC that you have accumulated, the more that you can have a higher budget for trading, and of course if you have accumulated 2 BTC into your BTC stash, then your trading stash of BTC will have doubled, which would be $59 and .005BTC. Does not seem like a lot, but that would be how I would be recommending to get started by using real money and figuring out ways to stretch your budget, and some platforms do not even allow a trade that is less than $5 in value, so maybe you have to increase your stack of BTC before you are even eligible to trade (in terms of practicality).
It tends to take a damned long time to build wealth, and if you believe that you are going to be able to shortcut the wealth building process by trading, then you better practice first to be able to figure out if your system of trading actually works to increase your trading stash or if you are largely just continuing to want to dig into your stored away stash because you keep losing.... and you need to account for trading fees too, and actually going through the motions of actual trades will allow you to account for all of those factors.
Maybe at some point you will start to feel comfortable to increase the amount or the percentage of your BTC trading stash, and maybe at the most establish a budget of 10% of your BTC holdings as your trading portfolio.. but even when you establish higher percentages of your BTC value to trading, that does not justify all or nothing kinds of betting of that trading stash because you will soon find yourself out of a BTC trading stash... but maybe that could be a way to learn that you do not know how to trade... so you give up on your desires to trade BTC by losing your whole BTC trading stash, rather than continuing to add to your BTC trading stash and depleting the value of your BTC stash.
I have witnessed that a lot of traders are greedy and they want to trade higher and higher amounts, rather than really making sure that they are really profitable.. and like I already mentioned, there are ways to make sure that you are profitable by the way that you set up the trades... and only sell at a profit.