Buying every dip is easy to say, but difficult to identify the dip (for me at least!)
Every time the price of bitcoin drops I am afraid of the point that it is going to stop or it will be ongoing for a long time. Looking at charts and trying to make my TA sometimes prove me wrong!
Same problem mate. I already knew the idea of buying in dip however, I can't decide when to do it because I have some thought that what if it goes down a bit more that would really make me regret my decision. I am no expert in this field that is why sometimes I doubt my analysis. But I do always monitor how the market chart behave and fortunately, I am making a good job I think.
Because we plebs are thinking in the short term. Buying the dip also requires HODLing, dollar-cost-averaging, AND a very low time preference.
Plus would it truly matter if you bought Bitcoin at $3,000, $5,000, or $10,000 when it's done with its path to a 6-digit price discovery?
Largely when the price rise works out, the exact purchase price is not going to matter too much, and sometimes fence sitters are toiling over whether BTC prices might drop a few hundred or even $1,000 in terms of their buying threshold.
I recall sharing similar kinds of posts in 2014/2015/2016 when the BTC price had fluctuations that were all over in the triple digits - spending a lot of time bouncing largely between $250 and $700 during that timeframe - and surely, when we zoom out a bit, any of those BTC prices for that whole period seem like a god-damned bargain - whether buying at the high, the low or the middle.. just like you suggest, Wind_FURY.
By the way, on the short term, it may have felt really stressful to have bought a shitload of BTC in early 2014 for around $700 (let's say that you transferred a large portion of your investment portfolio into BTC that amounted to $35k or so, and so you acquired 50 BTC with that money) and then to sit on your hands for those whole three years while BTC prices were mostly below $700.
At the same time, costs per BTC could have been brought down somewhat by continuing to dollar cost average through the subsequent three years of 2014-2015, and perhaps even a modest $100 per month ($3,600) could have fairly easily added another 10 BTC onto the stash, so instead of crying that you bought too high, you actively stuck with your investment with a reasonable amount and brought down your cost per BTC from $700 each to $643 each ($35k + $3,600 = $38,600/60 BTC)..
Of course, a more aggressive DCA practice would have brought down the cost per BTC more, so for example if you had the inclination to lump sum $35k, and that was only intended to use half of your overall budget (on lump sum investing), but then you also planned to spread out the other 50% of the amount that you intended to invest $36k over the next 36 months (which would be $1,000 per month), and you were able to increase your BTC stash by 100 BTC (rather than 10 BTC) then your average per BTC at the end of that period would have been ($35k + $36,000 = $71,000/150 BTC) = $473 per BTC.
Sure currently at $11k per BTC, it may not make a real BIG difference if your cost per BTC was $700 each or $473 each, but still there are ways to have ongoing BTC accumulation practices that will not necessarily break you during the process of accumulating BTC but they will add up during time - even if you do not have any lump sum amount that you can start out investing, you can merely start with investing what you can and letting the value add up over time - even if the amount that you have to work with is only $10 per week. Still adds up over time, and 5 to 10 years later, the amount of BTC (or sats) that you would have stashed away will likely seem like BIG numbers, even if the amounts did not seem like a lot at the time that you were stacking sats.
In early 2015 and even into 2016, I had entered into some cashflow issues that caused me inabilities to buy BTC during quite a bit of that time, even when the BTC price was lower than the amounts that i had paid in 2014 - but I recall some times in 2015, that I would come across an extra $100 or $200, and I would put half of that into my cash reserves and the other half would go into buying BTC. So if the BTC price was around $250 during a lot of the time in 2015, I would either purchase $50 (.2 BTC) or $100 (.4 BTC) in BTC (that's half of my extra cashflow0. I even made those kinds of purchases (of stashing away part of the cash and buying BTC with the other part of the cash) with smaller amounts of extra cashflow value when I had extra cashflow that would come in of $10/$5 (.02 BTC) or $20/$10 (.04 BTC). Seems like a lot of BTC to accumulate now, but at the time, it just seemed like I was just adding piddly amounts of BTC to my BTC stash that might not even go anywhere (that is taking the chance that the ongoing incremental investment might go down rather than up). Also, a lot of people like to think in terms of Satoshis, too, so if you are stacking away thousands or even hundreds of thousands of satoshis, it can start to feel like a lot after a while to have accumulated multiple millions of satoshis, and even reaching in the billions for some (which would be 10 more than BTC).