Well, I'd like to see your questions awnsered too.
I now understand D9 strategy as I spent really a long time on the IRC, twitter, facebook and bctalk. He just won't tell you or anyone but CANN team, it's as simple as that.
Not saying CANN is a scam, I wouldn't support it since 3 month if I thought so, just saying that D9 is focusing on the final thing (and yeah i'm quite bored to be forced to use the word "thing" and not "CANNlab", "colorado event" for example) and doesn't give a single fuck about investors.
The difference with me and some people here is that i'm patient. I also like the project obviously
The problem is the Dev is telling and uninformative which results in confused community members seeking transparency.
individuals were told of a CANNDY facility in Pheonix, harvest should be nearing but again the facility is not 100% CANN. We were told of some off grid 100% can facility in north phoenix... They were told MMJ Pay is coming..we were told new CANNDY strains being bred.. we were told of something big to happen during the holiday season...we have been told there is a new grower but no future duties or roles he will play...
But I say, what is it? That's all...
If I am moderated for asking, why not question the motive...would it do no good to have others asking the same questions which we see now happening given so much time and no information...?
There is obviously a lack of transparency in this coin, which resulted in myself discovering a pre-mine within the source code. I identified the wallets with the help of CryptoID Block Explorer's rich list and diagraemed it for the rest of the communities information to understand the coin's history. This results in me being banned from the community and not allowed to speak. The dev took offense to my information posted and has taken it personally since. It's technical and non personal issues I am bringing to the table here..
I would like to openly participate in this discussion as a community member without being singly targeted because of personal feelings by the dev. I wish to join you and everyone in this discussion which is why I resort to creating an alternative account. In doing so I was able to avoid being singled out by the dev and have my voice expressed here. I encourage you to read the postings thoroughly and see they're not to troll, but to participate in the conversation and this coins community development. I am happy you're here to join me and question my motives, at least we can talk about it openly.. instead of being moderating and not even allowing us to reach some sort of resolution. Because I think, thats what this is all about, finding some common ground in the same community.
I'll check every single message you posted on this forum, you and your other account because I'd like to make my own opinion of you, I was not really here during the CCN/CANN drama and I don't really care about it.
The only thing I saw here is that I have nothing negative to say about your whole message.
Especially this :
The problem is the Dev is telling and uninformative which results in confused community members seeking transparency.
I know D9 strategy is to tell nothing revelant, I just can't figure out why. Even if I like the project, I don't think it's good for the coin. But D9 probably has his reasons, that's what i'm telling to myself.