Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 517. (Read 2347659 times)

GTX 960 AND CRYPTONIGHT--

I get somewhat similar results.  The GTX 960 is slightly faster, but not by much.       --scryptr

does anyone have a good -l launch config for a gtx 960 on ccminer-cryptonighht ... im getting better results from a 750ti..so i must have something wrong

Interesting... It's been mentioned a few different times that Trumps miners are all adaptations of the CPU miner and aren't very well optimized. I'd assume that would also apply to NHEQ as the performance for it isn't that amazing.

Not relevant to equihash, but cpuminer hashes one nonce per thread. It's possible because of the reatively low number
of threads as each nonce needs it's own working buffer. On a GPU you can only hash as many nonces as resources allow.
With thousands of cores the cpuminer model won't work but you can run multiple threads cooperatively
hashing the same nonce.

I don't know how multithreading works with nheqminer.

ooooo ok     thx

are you working on something about zcash?

You need to rewrite the miner :-)

pallas  how do you run multiple nonces per iteration plz?  thx

On my 4 core.. 1 750ti gives 23 sol/s
2 750ti  38 sols/s
2 750ti  plus  -t 3  40 sols/s

It is curious, even after all of this time, Ethereum reigns king. I don't think anyone can dispute that. However, despite this, none of the Nvidia developers have put out Ethereum miners. Not so much that we need another Ethereum miner, rather a dual miner that is made and optimized for Nvidia would definitely be a great idea considering how we have to keep going back to Ethereum.

That being said, there are still other coins I've already mentioned before the Zcash launch that no one has taken a look at that really need Nvidia miners, they need to be fixed, or they need to be optimized. Like there are options. You don't need to do what everyone else is doing. Pallas's XCN miner is still dangling in the wind for the last 4-5 months? Others and myself have already mentioned that we'd be willing to donate and we can't even throw money at it.

+1

we will for sure. Other than mechanical solutions, my team have developed an alternative version of USB riser, that could be powered also with 6 and 8 pin PCI connector, but also custom cables with gold pins and 16/12AWG standards (compatibile with the power delivery that we're studying, up to 2400w platinum for the VGA's and alternative riser/riser card - that I would like to create up to 7/8 VGA per 4U/5U chassis). I'll send you details soon, also a report about my projects in the mid and long term. Thank you for the kind words, as you can see even with my sign I am putting my face and reputation in these projects. Thankfully it seems that we won't even need to resell them, due a massive, mid-term, usage in iceland.

I'll contact you later on skype. Take care.


yep, totally agree 

That is exactly how it works. The incentive for you to continue providing support and updates to your program is the 3.3% fee. If there is no continued support, there doesn't need to be any incentive.

"But after 1.8.3 came on the 28 sept. I haven't recieved any more donations"

What is a dev fee for 500 bob. I'm sure it didn't 100% stop after Epsylons came out. On top of it, if you released a faster version you'd get your 3.3% back.


Learn to encrypt shit dude and protect your work. Claymore does it. Not our problem as customers.


Yup and cards that cost half as much as producing the same amount of hashrate. It has nothing to do with resale prices. On top of that they aren't super inefficient. Efficiency matters only when we start getting anywhere close to the price of power, which we haven't (assuming $.1 Kwh, which is average in the US).

You payed for speadminer #1 and got 8 free updates. In the latest update you need to fix the makefile because some of the filenames have changed. I have made a cuda 8.0 build for you for free. (exe file)

1. Compare the visual studio project file from version 7 to version 9
2. Add the changes in the makefile by renaming the files like I have done in the Windows project file

It will take you 10 minutes.

nikolaj - i did this a long time ago ... sp got 'donation' after 'donation' from me - as well as mining - as well as buying private miners - as well as massive amounts of time and effort testing these miners he has released ... and he STILL refuses to fix the spreadminer-spmod9 saying that its good exercise for me to fix his mistakes in the makefile ... come on ...

sp - read above mate ... look and learn that the community members that once were behind you 100% - are now totally against you because you have become the ONE thing you said you would never be - one hell of a greedy bastard ...

the last couple of months have been great - as we have made leaps and bounds surpassing your hashrates with our miner ... for MONTHS ... you heard right ...

ive asked and asked and asked for your help and for the sources / miners you promised - until i gave up ... which is what built that farm you have - completely off our backs ... and you wont even supply us a miner that compiles? ... you have a broken source and you supply that? ... then tell me i need to fix it? ...

hehehe ... if that isnt pure and utter gluttony on your part - i dunno what is ...

retire - and live off what you make from this farm of yours ... because soon - thefarm and the design and the hashrate - is going to make your look a kiddies toy ...

im just waiting for the 1080ti to be released before i bulk buy and build ...

btw - did mention a few hundred times already that the spreadminer-spmod9 STILL doesnt compile ... how about supplying a product that works - when we pay for it and boost your farm cashflow ...

nikolaj - i would be happy to discuss further developments with you mate ... you sound like an honest hard worker ... let me know - maybe we could do something here ...

#crysx

it depend, if you have a big farm that can produce tons of coins each day and your mining activity is profitable, it's never better to buy directly

buy directly, for holding, it's only good if you want a great amount of coins because you think that alt is going to skyrocket

From a miner's perspective, the future success of a coin doesn't matter.
If you wanna hold, you'd better buy.
Mining is about hashrate and efficiency.
Mine and sell: you make more money and you can buy whatever coins you want with that (even non-pow ones).

Don't understand what the arguing is about.

The way how fast paced all these coins and algorithms are does it really matter that your 1070 is making $3/day or that the 270x uses less than 100Watts.

Whats matters is how these cards will perform in the long term. In 6 months? In 12 months?

Nobody really cares about the ZEC power consumption because who knows if that coins will ever be successful. Same with the LBRY, both these coins are near the all time lows as we speak.

Only coin that has a chance is ETH and probably for maybe 6 more months due to POS. ETC, ZEC, LBRY don't have enough miners revenue to make mining profitable.

Most likely we will all get second hand S9 and A7 by then.

 

No, dear. WE still loose, especially if we pay YOU to keep developing kernels for YOUR farm. Who really losses it's you; 0.2 (didn't remember if I paid you more before, another 0.1 for another kernel..) instead of a potential collaboration in the long term, I am creating a farm in iceland and needed honest devs. You will be totally delisted from my projects, regarding mining and any other venture. Good for you indeed

Take care, you won't get any more dime from me.

As bensam said, your words doesen't make any sense, anymore (like this thread)

And after I release #4, the opensource will be optimized by somebody else. And you still loose.

To keep supporting the ones that paid you. Congrats.. sincerely. Another perfect example of the human nature, "homo homini lupus (est)"


Sure, this phrase it's the testament of your greed. I feel scammed from you, as many others.