Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 519. (Read 2347659 times)

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer

Compare it to claymores the 280x use 250.watt and.produce 45 sol.
I do 133 sol with the same watt.

sp_ is just spamming his own thread haha!

pallas, where is that break even point wattage/ buying costs?

Depends on too many factors.
You must find out yourself, and continually adapt to the conditions.
Btw I don't think Claymore does 250W on the 280x. I think much less.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015

Compare it to claymores the 280x use 250.watt and.produce 45 sol.
I do 133 sol with the same watt.

sp_ is just spamming his own thread haha! Is that is the reason why I have so much snow in my backyard? You went to ´powersavescandinavia' mode?

pallas, what is that break even point wattage/ buying costs?
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Thats why I like the 10603gb cards bether than the 1070.
 I get 23 sol/s on the 1060 with only 43 watt.
Compare it to claymores the 280x use 250.watt and.produce 45 sol.
I do 133 sol with the same watt.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
Any tahiti can do 40-50 sols/s.

But what power consumption?
The cost of the card is not nearly as important as how much it draws.

Power consumption hasn't mattered in close to a year due to income per card. You'd have to have some pretty expensive power for it to be up there. Closest it was to power usage was before Zcash launch, but even then it was only (for me) 30% of my revenue. January before all the new algos took off was really bad, but that was a long time ago.

Power draw might matter again this January after Ethereum is dead, but a decent amount can happen between then and now.

The cost of the power a card will use thru its life will likely be more than its value. For sure much more than its cost minus the resale price.
Hence the power usage matters more than the buying cost.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Any tahiti can do 40-50 sols/s.

But what power consumption?
The cost of the card is not nearly as important as how much it draws.

Power consumption hasn't mattered in close to a year due to income per card. You'd have to have some pretty expensive power for it to be up there. Closest it was to power usage was before Zcash launch, but even then it was only (for me) 30% of my revenue. January before all the new algos took off was really bad, but that was a long time ago.

Power draw might matter again this January after Ethereum is dead, but a decent amount can happen between then and now.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
Guys, this is sp_'s cuda thread so please stop spamming here. I will.

To be on topic, there will be sp_ time, in near future.
member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
Any tahiti can do 40-50 sols/s.

But what power consumption?
The cost of the card is not nearly as important as how much it draws.

undervolted, pulling less than 100 watts. 7950 with custom bios doing 45 sol/s as well.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
Any tahiti can do 40-50 sols/s.

But what power consumption?
The cost of the card is not nearly as important as how much it draws.

Yes I know, it is just that I have been looking after bensams journey to higher sols/s.

If you need heating during winter you pay for that, one way or another.

full member
Activity: 279
Merit: 104
Any tahiti can do 40-50 sols/s.

But what power consumption?
The cost of the card is not nearly as important as how much it draws.

My cards were consuming 150Watts mining Ethereum.  A little less when Zcash mining.
Undervolted cards running 1000/1500 and 45Sols/s
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
If somebody port the silent army kernel to cuda I will take a look and optimize.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
Any tahiti can do 40-50 sols/s.

But what power consumption?
The cost of the card is not nearly as important as how much it draws.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
What are the Nvidia devs even doing?

Bensam, do not go to panic mode  Grin

Any tahiti can do 40-50 sols/s.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Would be nice if someone made a fee based Nvidia miner for Zcash or Zcoin. I've been back on Ethereum since Saturday... It's silly, since launch of Pascal there really hasn't been any optimized miners for it besides Lbry and that died out shortly there after as Wolf made a comparable miner for ancient AMD stuff.

I have $400 GPUs that make as much as $200 ones. I can't even buy software to make it better. It's not like it's too expensive, it just doesn't fucking exist so I don't even have the option to buy it.

Like that 10% miner that was taken down. It offered 50sol on a 1070 and a 10% dev fee, so 45. Still better then what we're working with, but people axed it right away.

That miner is still in out there and will be improved upon.  Check the zcash forum for a link.

Last I looked at it it was really buggy and no Windows binaries. I know there is still a thread on the Zcash forums, but it didn't look like the developer was still working on it after his Git got shut down.


What are the Nvidia devs even doing? Assuming DJM had legitimate speeds (which were contested), why haven't there been any other releases by other Nvidia devs?
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
I have $400 GPUs that make as much as $200 $70 ones.

Made that correction for you.

I guess it is safe to say they didn't change the world of mining.



280s aren't making as much as 470s, not close. I can get as much hash out of my 1070s as a 480 comparable to Ethereum, 470 is the better deal though.

LBRY is +14% today with sp-mod private #3 you make $2,4 a day with the gtx 1070 (300MHASH)
$3.2 on the gtx 1080 (400MHASH)

You should mine and donate so I can release #4 with more hash and bugfixes...

Yeah dude, not going to happen. That's what the dev fee was for. That being said, Epsylons earn just as much except for 970s... On top of that, Lbry isn't making as much as Ethereum is right now. It hasn't for a long time. I can use Genoil's with a memory OC or Claymores for a extra $.2 per card.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
LBRY is +14% today with sp-mod private #3 you make $2,4 a day with the gtx 1070 (300MHASH)
$3.2 on the gtx 1080 (400MHASH)

You should mine and donate so I can release #4 with more hash and bugfixes...

Wont you release it to the subscribers , at least ...
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
LBRY is +14% today with sp-mod private #3 you make $2,4 a day with the gtx 1070 (300MHASH)
$3.2 on the gtx 1080 (400MHASH)

You should mine and donate so I can release #4 with more hash and bugfixes...
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
I have $400 GPUs that make as much as $200 $70 ones.

Made that correction for you.

I guess it is safe to say they didn't change the world of mining.

legendary
Activity: 1068
Merit: 1020
Would be nice if someone made a fee based Nvidia miner for Zcash or Zcoin. I've been back on Ethereum since Saturday... It's silly, since launch of Pascal there really hasn't been any optimized miners for it besides Lbry and that died out shortly there after as Wolf made a comparable miner for ancient AMD stuff.

I have $400 GPUs that make as much as $200 ones. I can't even buy software to make it better. It's not like it's too expensive, it just doesn't fucking exist so I don't even have the option to buy it.

Like that 10% miner that was taken down. It offered 50sol on a 1070 and a 10% dev fee, so 45. Still better then what we're working with, but people axed it right away.

That miner is still in out there and will be improved upon.  Check the zcash forum for a link.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Would be nice if someone made a fee based Nvidia miner for Zcash or Zcoin. I've been back on Ethereum since Saturday... It's silly, since launch of Pascal there really hasn't been any optimized miners for it besides Lbry and that died out shortly there after as Wolf made a comparable miner for ancient AMD stuff.

I have $400 GPUs that make as much as $200 ones. I can't even buy software to make it better. It's not like it's too expensive, it just doesn't fucking exist so I don't even have the option to buy it.

Like that 10% miner that was taken down. It offered 50sol on a 1070 and a 10% dev fee, so 45. Still better then what we're working with, but people axed it right away.
hero member
Activity: 711
Merit: 500
Thanks to all those who explained why they prefer Claymore/Windows over silentarmy/Linux.

To rednoW who said "And Claymore is faster, especially on Tahiti" -> this is not true, silentarmy matches or surpasses Claymore even on Tahiti (especially when taking into account its 2.5% dev fee).

Anyway it is apparent to me that many features (temp/fan monitoring, pool failover, Windows support, etc) are what you guys want in a miner. So I will take this into consideration to prioritize my future developments. But on the other I agree with the 80/20 rule: like Bitcoin in its early GPU mining days, it seems 80% of the hashrate comes from 20% of people who operate large Linux mining farms, while 20% of the hashrate is from 80% of people who operate smaller hobbyist Windows mining farms.


So if i get you right, you'd rather be pragmatic and benevolent to the 80% of miners who run 20% of the hashrate, instead of just feeding the 20% who already own 80% of the hash rate? Smiley
Normal,80%  of the people is more important than 20% of people.
Jump to: