Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 518. (Read 2347659 times)

And what is the agreement? That if another coder decide to optimize the opensource, I need to send out another faster version?
This is not how private kernels work.

My claims are:

(LBRY SP-mod #3 released 3 september)

LBRY sp-mod #3 vs opensource 1.8.1
Faster compute 5.0 +5-7% (750,750ti,960m)
Faster compute 5.2 +10-25% (950,960,970,980,980ti,titanx)
Faster compute 6.1 +5-11% (1070,1080) (gtx 1060 0%)

But after 1.8.3 came on the 28 sept. I haven't recieved any more donations

http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/ccminer-1-8-3/

600 000 SOL/s already on the ZCL

Better this way.

If you quit it would also be better to refund your customers, due your inhability fo fulfill your agreements.

Your reputation, due these bad behaviours, have taken a dive.

I have more than 100 rigs. 4-7 card each. I've told everybody before I would quit after I did the maxwell mod's. The LBRY sp-mod works best on the maxwell cards. When I released it on the 3rd of september, it was faster on the pascal cards as well.

But 3 weeks later, the LBRY team payed a developer to optimize abit for the gtx 1070. And I didn't release #4.

never achieved 322 even with an amp extreme.. 305 max, more or less. If you take into account a 3.3% fee/+0.4/0.8% reconnection issue with lost/invalid hashrate, from 305 we're down to 290. Given that a common 1070 it's working at 290, heavily overclocked, we're talking of 278. Tpruvot 1.8.3 works flawlessly at 290, if not more.. Sorry to say but SP3 it's useless, since the 1.8.3 release, and we'll receive soon 1.8.4.

These are founders edition.




So you're saying that you've had an hashpower of more than 420 gtx 1060 3gb? I am asking why then you're still here releasing kernels at 0.1 then, you should focus on your farm to do more

ps: claymore release have nothing to do with the price. The profit ratio was the main issue, given it's initial potential. Ethereum had a similar pattern, less speculative surely but better in the long term. This isn't the case. You all should know that these releases are just a lemon to be squeezed, like your private kernels customers.


It's called greed, it's good to know that I'm not the only one that thinks that

There's nothing worst than loosing the trust of his customers, but .. alea iacta est. He made money with the "donations" and now he's praising himself; to not speaking about mentioning releases (N'4 SPMOD for lbry and SP9+ for spread - I've received SP9, not the plus) never "released", due excuses, to the ones that paid for them, but being utilized in the private farm tht he owns (with 420+ GTX 1060 equivalent hashpower, as he stated).

Game over guys.

For those of you who missed the ZEC launch, now you have zec classic. ZEC without 4 years of developer fee in the blockchain.  





https://github.com/z-classic/zclassic


Listed on C-CEX yesterday.

https://c-cex.com/?p=zcl-btc

pools:

https://pool.mn/zclassic
https://www2.coinmine.pl/zcl

i'm with this completely, not to mention that for a brand new generation card, the retail value at which you will sell it, it's always around 80% of their original value, and mining does not matter here

i mean even if all coins will be dead new generation card will always retain 80% of their value

Porting it is the start.

 
Running the opencl code as it is only give me 15 sol on the 1060 3gb, so a big rewrite is needed.

#4 has a 20% boost on the gtx 1060. I like to keep this boost in my private farm.. we'll see what I do. The fee code need some bugfixes and improvements, and I have little time to do the job at the moment..

What are your expenses? You already programmed #4. You already received payment through dev fees. Nothing you're saying makes sense dude. Dev fees literally are there for continued support. You provided none of it.

You use a one time fee for a product you're selling that's complete. You use a progressive fee like a dev fee as a 'pay it forward' towards future updates.

As I've mentioned though Lbry hasn't been worth mining for some time now.

you just need this ported to cuda and then we'll have a NVIDIA optimized ZEC miner?  https://github.com/mbevand/silentarmy/blob/master/input.cl

Is there a youtube video or something I can watch and do it?  Sort of joking... sort of not

The value of  LBRY is going down. The fee will not cover my expenses.

1060 3gb is cheaper than 400 bucks.

I mined with 10000 sol the first week of the zcash lunch with only 23sol per card.

Zcash price before claymore: 1-8 btc per coin
Zcash price after claymore(today) 0.35btc

With optimal settings release #3 does 322.

I can't speak for the 280, but my 270x cards are giving 38Sol and drawing well under their 150w design (probably 100w usage)

So by your numbers, the 1060 (@$400) is barely better than a used 270x for $70.

The price of a 1060 (23sol / 43w) you can have 5-270x cards (180sol / ~500w)

Resale value doesn't matter as much as how much you can mine with it while using it. Life expectancy is at least until the next generation of cards (2XXX series for Nvidia) or something major happens, such as AMD mines a crypto a lot better then Nvidia and the cards become worthless as far as mining goes.

Your private Lbry mod does 300 Mh/s per 1070?

Epsylon3's 1.8.1 release does the same.

a system with a 290x and a 280x draws 402 W from the wall (celeron cpu, 50% load), so it should be around 150-175 for the 280x

still waiting for your lbry v4...

Give me one example with your numbers where less power is more profitable than more hash.
Don't get me wrong, I understand it can happen. If it happens here during wintertime I quit mining.

And yes, 250w is too much.