yes and it does 222MH, which is almost 2 eth? no... so what's your point?
aside form this it was 132-135w at 80w each nano, which is 480 plus system, here we have 222MH at 840w plus system
Hey Amph,
I modified that rom even more, it's 140Mh or 23.5Mh per card at the same rate(wattage).
Further, you said, and i quote
with pascal we can kill the diff for another month or two, so no need to worry
1 rig full of 6 x 1070 is currently earning 0.037 a day, and consume only 900w or less which is better than anything else at the moment
I guess you miss typed there?
0.037 eth per day is nothing.. to get that you would need only 5Mh.. So yeah, you must have miss typed
Anyhow, 222Mh for a 6x 1070 rig? That's around 37Mh per card. It "could" be true, but i seriously doubt it..
haven't seen any proof of that on any forums.. But again, i could be wrong.
Btw, especially when only using -900watt.. if that would be true, those 1070 would already be sold out until the end of the year..
Greetings
i think the nano is just a special case, it's really impressive that it can perform so well, but remember that there are other profitable algorithm, and i dobut you can do so well outside of ethereum? what about neoscrypt or lyra2v2 with the nano?
that earning is in bitcoin, not ethereum, i forgot to say 0.037 btc
here the proof
http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/7780/gtx1070-linux-installation-and-mining-clue-goodbye-amd-welcome-nvidia-for-miners#latestyes you can say "i don't believe it" but why he should lie? you think that he is pro nvidia, he don't care, everyone here is for the profit, also it make no sense for him to post such a guide and lie shamelessly
he say that you can even push it even farther than 37, a little bit more
i also contacted him and he tweaked and fixed the instability problem, so it's possible to have it stable at those rate
Hey Amph,
Thx for that link, i must have missed that!
A quote from that post
As you can see here i am doing +200 on the clock and +1500 on the memory, some notes you might find handy:
single card: +285 & +1800 is the max, single card pushes you to 37.19MH/s with Cuda or 32,66MH/s with OpenCL
multi card: + 275 & + 1775 is the max, but not stable (read: 6 hourely crashes) and pushes 4MH/s per card
multi card: +200 & + 1600 semi stable, needs more testing but this might be better and pushes another 3MH/s per card
again, these settings might not work for you, but gets you in the ballpark.
So basically, he will do around 30 per card, which is still very impressive to say the least!
Anyhow, you asked me for another algo for my nano's?
i think the nano is just a special case, it's really impressive that it can perform so well, but remember that there are other profitable algorithm, and i dobut you can do so well outside of ethereum? what about neoscrypt or lyra2v2 with the nano?
Well.. Siacoin is doing very good..
My 390's do 1200 (avarage) Mh at default clocks.
My 290's do around 1100Mh
My 380 does around 800 with a slight memory over clock.
My nano at core clock 650! does 1100Mh as well. Consuming only 70 watt!
If i crank that baby up to 950 core, it will hit 1650Mh and at around 1100 core it does 1850Mh.
Haven't tested neoscrypt or lyra on my nano's tbh, Ethereum has been to profitable for me to even try..
Thx again for that link, i seriously missed that post..
Greetings!