Anyone, doing any work on the new X11evo algo at moment?
What coin is that for? Thxrevolver, i also missed the launch, apparently it was launched at a bad hour
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 661. (Read 2347641 times)
revolver, i also missed the launch, apparently it was launched at a bad hour
Anyone, doing any work on the new X11evo algo at moment?
What coin is that for? Thx no problem SP!
tpruvot 1.6.7 cuda 8.0 build
Results :/snip
Did you just run each algo one after another manually to get those results ? Wowtpruvot 1.6.7 cuda 8.0 build
Results :/snip
Pretty sure Nicehash miner has a built in benchmark mode and you can drop in exe's to use with it.
Not 30mhash.
32 mhash on the 980ti (single card)
But the latest#6 is tuned for compute 5.0.( I have decided not to release #6 compute 5.2)
have 6 private miners for the people who donate (donators will get updates).
1. 0.1BTC: Pentablake +100-120% (3 releases)
2. 0.1BTC: Cryptonight +10% (one release)
3. 0.1BTC: Spreadcoin +10-20% (with full sourcecode / linux compatible) (9 releases)
4. 0.1BTC: All nicehash algos optimized. 0-10% (6 releases)(x11,x13,x14,x15,x17,nist5,quark,skein,lyra2v2,neoscrypt)
5. 0.1BTC: decred +18-25% (9 releases) (Full sourcecode(linux) 0.4BTC)
6. 0.2BTC: Vcash(+13%+decred(+18-25%) (0.1 btc discount for the decred buyers) (6 releases)
32 mhash on the 980ti (single card)
But the latest#6 is tuned for compute 5.0.( I have decided not to release #6 compute 5.2)
have 6 private miners for the people who donate (donators will get updates).
1. 0.1BTC: Pentablake +100-120% (3 releases)
2. 0.1BTC: Cryptonight +10% (one release)
3. 0.1BTC: Spreadcoin +10-20% (with full sourcecode / linux compatible) (9 releases)
4. 0.1BTC: All nicehash algos optimized. 0-10% (6 releases)(x11,x13,x14,x15,x17,nist5,quark,skein,lyra2v2,neoscrypt)
5. 0.1BTC: decred +18-25% (9 releases) (Full sourcecode(linux) 0.4BTC)
6. 0.2BTC: Vcash(+13%+decred(+18-25%) (0.1 btc discount for the decred buyers) (6 releases)
Are you saying that priv build #6 makes 30MH on quark with single 750Ti ?
Is there a link with ... something like table of these priv builds
build #X - optimized for Y, price Z ?
Is there a link with ... something like table of these priv builds
build #X - optimized for Y, price Z ?
And here is sp-mod #6 tuned for compute 5.2(unreleased)
Since the shadercount is almost the same as a gtx 970+gtx 960 I would expect it to do almost the same results
Since the shadercount is almost the same as a gtx 970+gtx 960 I would expect it to do almost the same results
ok tomorrow test it
Priv6 is slower than priv5 on compute 5.2 devices exept keccak.
Why don't you compare release 74(cuda 6.5) and release 80(cuda 7.5)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
And then priv #5
Why don't you compare release 74(cuda 6.5) and release 80(cuda 7.5)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
And then priv #5
sp, which miner i should use ? Private or Public ?
now i am at home. tomorrow when i will be in work, i can run tests and compare it vs cuda 8.0 results.
here is my small work/project and results in some optimization ccminer in Nicehashminer`s (960+970 standard clocks) - you can get this results for basis in cuda 6.5 and 7.5
tomorrow i compare all algos in my project`s program and write there results
now i am at home. tomorrow when i will be in work, i can run tests and compare it vs cuda 8.0 results.
here is my small work/project and results in some optimization ccminer in Nicehashminer`s (960+970 standard clocks) - you can get this results for basis in cuda 6.5 and 7.5
Could you run the same test with the cuda 6.5 and 7.5 build please?
This results in mixed cuda 6.5 and 7.5 depend on algorithmtomorrow i compare all algos in my project`s program and write there results
No. That is quark on 2 cards total. Gtx 970+gtx 960. I just tested my latest private. It does over 30mhash on standard clocks.
no problem SP!
tpruvot 1.6.7 cuda 8.0 build
Results :
970+960 Stock clock:
blake 2370
Blake2s 1700
blakecoin 4120
bmw 1077
c11 11.53
decred 2271
deep 32.80
dmd-gr 35.12
fresh 13.66
fugue256 404
groestl 35.35
heavy 42.16
jackpot 20.50
luffa 262
lyra2 2600
lyra2v2 14.33
mjollnir 42.21
myr-gr 55.50
neoscrypt 515
nist5 38.60
penta 91.50
quark 20.45
qubit 17.25
sib 2568
scrypt -jane 558.17
skein 349
skein2 235
s3 33.28
x11 11.36
x13 9055
x15 7900
x17 7900
vanilla 3964
whirlcoin 21.72
whirlpool 21.56
zr5 4725
That quark ... is that on the 970? thx I use that for a reference... sp did good on quark for one. tpruvot 1.6.7 cuda 8.0 build
Results :
970+960 Stock clock:
blake 2370
Blake2s 1700
blakecoin 4120
bmw 1077
c11 11.53
decred 2271
deep 32.80
dmd-gr 35.12
fresh 13.66
fugue256 404
groestl 35.35
heavy 42.16
jackpot 20.50
luffa 262
lyra2 2600
lyra2v2 14.33
mjollnir 42.21
myr-gr 55.50
neoscrypt 515
nist5 38.60
penta 91.50
quark 20.45
qubit 17.25
sib 2568
scrypt -jane 558.17
skein 349
skein2 235
s3 33.28
x11 11.36
x13 9055
x15 7900
x17 7900
vanilla 3964
whirlcoin 21.72
whirlpool 21.56
zr5 4725
tpruvot, has made a command to benchmark all the algos. I don't have it in my fork. (1.5.80)
That would be a usefull thing to have. Would help send tests to you.
Anyone, doing any work on the new X11evo algo at moment?
tpruvot, has made a command to benchmark all the algos. I don't have it in my fork. (1.5.80)
no problem SP!
tpruvot 1.6.7 cuda 8.0 build
Results :/snip
Did you just run each algo one after another manually to get those results ? Wow tpruvot 1.6.7 cuda 8.0 build
Results :/snip
Could you run the same test with the cuda 6.5 and 7.5 build please?
no problem SP!
tpruvot 1.6.7 cuda 8.0 build
Results :
970+960 Stock clock:
blake 2370
Blake2s 1700
blakecoin 4120
bmw 1077
c11 11.53
decred 2271
deep 32.80
dmd-gr 35.12
fresh 13.66
fugue256 404
groestl 35.35
heavy 42.16
jackpot 20.50
luffa 262
lyra2 2600
lyra2v2 14.33
mjollnir 42.21
myr-gr 55.50
neoscrypt 515
nist5 38.60
penta 91.50
quark 20.45
qubit 17.25
sib 2568
scrypt -jane 558.17
skein 349
skein2 235
s3 33.28
x11 11.36
x13 9055
x15 7900
x17 7900
vanilla 3964
whirlcoin 21.72
whirlpool 21.56
zr5 4725
tpruvot 1.6.7 cuda 8.0 build
Results :
970+960 Stock clock:
blake 2370
Blake2s 1700
blakecoin 4120
bmw 1077
c11 11.53
decred 2271
deep 32.80
dmd-gr 35.12
fresh 13.66
fugue256 404
groestl 35.35
heavy 42.16
jackpot 20.50
luffa 262
lyra2 2600
lyra2v2 14.33
mjollnir 42.21
myr-gr 55.50
neoscrypt 515
nist5 38.60
penta 91.50
quark 20.45
qubit 17.25
sib 2568
scrypt -jane 558.17
skein 349
skein2 235
s3 33.28
x11 11.36
x13 9055
x15 7900
x17 7900
vanilla 3964
whirlcoin 21.72
whirlpool 21.56
zr5 4725
Cuda 8.0RC is out and it produce shit hashrates for the maxwell cards as expected. Anyone want to share their results?
Just want to make miners aware. I know there are not to many X13 coins out there.
New X13 Coin launching at 12:00 (Noon) Eastern Today.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annmnmlaunched-mineum-x13-pow-started-1461341
New X13 Coin launching at 12:00 (Noon) Eastern Today.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annmnmlaunched-mineum-x13-pow-started-1461341
actually it make sense, when you use more gpu, the motherboard need additional current, so there is a bit of more consumption for that, and the cpu will work a bit harder, we are not talking about crazy vlaue, but those additional 10-20w are there
there was even an article in cryptoblog saying that
for smi, you need to check the last version, it's pretty accurate, you can do it your test, even another user was surprised when he tried again, recently, and anyway like i've said i've tested with the wattmeter to be sure, and they are around the same
also gpu efficiency matter here, i have the 1500i, which has one of the best efficiency out there, so overall the consumption is lower by few watt because of this
there are many variable that simply can not be ignored, it's not so straightforward like many think
55% tdp, but the first gpu crash it seems, it crashed today, intensity is at default, everyhting at default, minuc oc at +150/+150 on afterburner
Also PSU efficiency matters, but the efficiency changes with the load. Most PSU have a chart showing peak efficiency. If you have too low of a load on a PSU it can lower efficiency just as much as too high of a load. The 1500i has a chart
So it's the most efficient IF you use 55-60% load. That's pretty much the same with most 80 plus rated PSU
I've used dual PSU on one MB, not for efficiency but necessity in the past, but I don't see why it wouldn't increase efficiency by balancing loads on two PSU
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-Dual-PSU-Power-Supply-24-Pin-ATX-Motherboard-Adapter-Cable-Mining-Litecoin-/201587699757
I don't know what load you're using Amph, wasn't directing that to you just throwing my two satoshi's in on PSU efficiency for mining. SP's thread has become a mining tips thread
Jump to: