testing without -X parameter ...
edit ... same results ...
dont forget sp - this is the opensource one - NOT - your private kernel thats running here ...
...
-------
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11955 (T= 68C F= 49% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] Stratum difficulty set to 4
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11930 (T= 69C F= 50% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] accepted: 231/231 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] accepted: 232/232 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11969 (T= 67C F= 48% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11937 (T= 67C F= 48% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] accepted: 233/233 (100.00%), 47799 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] accepted: 234/234 (100.00%), 47799 kH/s yes!
-------
obviously this is just a quick test - so it will increase over time ( which is why i test for 25mins at a time ) but the hashrate is no where near what you are stating it can do ...
am i doing something wrong on my end? ...
#crysx
edit ... same results ...
dont forget sp - this is the opensource one - NOT - your private kernel thats running here ...
...-------
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11955 (T= 68C F= 49% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] Stratum difficulty set to 4
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11930 (T= 69C F= 50% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] accepted: 231/231 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] accepted: 232/232 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11969 (T= 67C F= 48% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11937 (T= 67C F= 48% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] accepted: 233/233 (100.00%), 47799 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] accepted: 234/234 (100.00%), 47799 kH/s yes!
-------
obviously this is just a quick test - so it will increase over time ( which is why i test for 25mins at a time ) but the hashrate is no where near what you are stating it can do ...
am i doing something wrong on my end? ...
#crysx
Here is the private on the gtx g1 970: (+100 on the core)
Could be a problem with the 64bit buids / linux?
in the scanhash_lyra2v2
if (strstr(props.name, "980 Ti"))
{
intensity = 256 * 256 * 18;
tpb = 10;
}
try to change find the optimal tpb by chinging to to 7,8,9,10, 11, 12, 13 ,14,15
Code:
extern "C" int scanhash_lyra2v2(int thr_id, uint32_t *pdata,
const uint32_t *ptarget, uint32_t max_nonce,
unsigned long *hashes_done)
{
const uint32_t first_nonce = pdata[19];
uint32_t intensity = 256 * 256 * 8;
uint32_t tpb = 18;
cudaDeviceProp props;
cudaGetDeviceProperties(&props, device_map[thr_id]);
if (strstr(props.name, "970"))
{
tpb = 10;
intensity = 256 * 256 * 18;
}
else if (strstr(props.name, "980 Ti"))
{
intensity = 256 * 256 * 18;
tpb = 10;
}
Their support is also a joke... Always the same shitty responses.