Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 888. (Read 2347659 times)

sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
piss piss piss, someone pissed on the fire? Its starting to stink in here. lol
Yes. Enjoy the piss from the dj.
you started it... and attacking every devs arounds didn't help either...
I just compiled the TP 1.7 release windows x86 cuda65.
Quark is hashing 12,5MHASH. In sp-mod 71 I get 18.2 MHASH (45.6%) faster
This is not an attack. This is just facts..
And without his work, half the functionality would be gone. Speed is NOT the only thing that matters...
Your post might as well be saying, "The engine of my car is better, even though I ripped off his transmission."

Opensource work is based on other peoples work. In the latest ccminer clones, there are many chefs. The problem is that people get angry when their code is forked and optimized. Why should they, when they have done the exact same thing themselfes..

The spmod was forked early tpruvot (1.5.2) release, he forked it from the CCminer release. (the 2 christians) they forked it from pooler cpu-miner and pooler used alot of opensource code from different authors to create his miner.

Now the spmod is forked again by the nicehash dev team. This is good because Nicehash want's to improve the speed of all the miners to ensure that they are using the latest and fastest software.

Tpruvot has done some great things in his fork recently. Solomining is showing the total nethashrate. Poolside the miner is bether than mine
because it supports alot of tricks the pool use to lower the speed and steal from the miner. This is why I want to do a refork and add my fast kernals into the modern ccminer fork. This is borring work, but needs to be done. I expect to be payed. Developers have bills too...

1 copy is sold for 0.1 BTC. And I will sell more copies.


 
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024

And yes, Nvidia mining wouldn't be profitable without SP. Whenever the developers release algos for Nvidia there is a private version that follows shortly there after that almost no one can buy and costs a fuckton. Leaves the small miners to flop around at the bottom of the pool.
We should get Nvidia to sponsor the devs  Grin



I would sponsor the devs with 2% of my hashrate, would you?

I honestly don't know why anyone is against a miner fee at this point given the alternative...
hero member
Activity: 835
Merit: 1000
There is NO Freedom without Privacy

And yes, Nvidia mining wouldn't be profitable without SP. Whenever the developers release algos for Nvidia there is a private version that follows shortly there after that almost no one can buy and costs a fuckton. Leaves the small miners to flop around at the bottom of the pool.
We should get Nvidia to sponsor the devs  Grin

legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
Here SP 0.1 BTC to you - 2d5651a523ae8ca01023aa9361dc6d27f7ce0e4d787314de94531ca46bbf0399

In time I sent PM's to almost all devs around here asking about improved miners/kernels or advices for better hashes...you are the only one who responded... guess that says alot.

Please keep up all the good work you are doing here.
If it wasn't for this thread I don't think I would have been part of this interesting crypto world.

Thank you.

Pretty much... when the going gets tough, the private miner makers come in here and make a stink. DJM and a few others also did not reply to my PMs asking about how much their miners cost or other stats on them.

The whole private miner BS is a sham as I mentioned before, which is why I wanted to shift to a % based miner fee, which I still think can be done and would be a good idea. Everyone copies everyone elses kernels and I'm sure DJM (despite what he says) will get ahold of SPs miner and also try to reverse engineer it too. This is like watching the pot call the kettle black.

And yes, Nvidia mining wouldn't be profitable without SP. Whenever the developers release algos for Nvidia there is a private version that follows shortly there after that almost no one can buy and costs a fuckton. Leaves the small miners to flop around at the bottom of the pool.

SGMINER? --

Whatever happened to Sgminer?  The last official releases are over a year old.

I think the devs pissed in each other's beer.

--scryptr

AMD is all private kernels. You don't even know who is making what anymore because no one advertises, there is no way to compare anything and know what speed you're getting, power usage, or how much people are paying.

It makes me really sad cryptos have come to this. This is the complete opposite of why they were made. I really hope Nvidia GPUs don't fall down the same hole as ASICs and AMD GPUs.

AGREED!!!!! --

On this point we agree.  A few months ago everyone was getting along.  Dig we must...       --scryptr
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Here SP 0.1 BTC to you - 2d5651a523ae8ca01023aa9361dc6d27f7ce0e4d787314de94531ca46bbf0399

In time I sent PM's to almost all devs around here asking about improved miners/kernels or advices for better hashes...you are the only one who responded... guess that says alot.

Please keep up all the good work you are doing here.
If it wasn't for this thread I don't think I would have been part of this interesting crypto world.

Thank you.

Pretty much... when the going gets tough, the private miner makers come in here and make a stink. DJM and a few others also did not reply to my PMs asking about how much their miners cost or other stats on them.

The whole private miner BS is a sham as I mentioned before, which is why I wanted to shift to a % based miner fee, which I still think can be done and would be a good idea. Everyone copies everyone elses kernels and I'm sure DJM (despite what he says) will get ahold of SPs miner and also try to reverse engineer it too. This is like watching the pot call the kettle black.

And yes, Nvidia mining wouldn't be profitable without SP. Whenever the developers release algos for Nvidia there is a private version that follows shortly there after that almost no one can buy and costs a fuckton. Leaves the small miners to flop around at the bottom of the pool.

SGMINER? --

Whatever happened to Sgminer?  The last official releases are over a year old.

I think the devs pissed in each other's beer.

--scryptr

AMD is all private kernels. You don't even know who is making what anymore because no one advertises, there is no way to compare anything and know what speed you're getting, power usage, or how much people are paying.

It makes me really sad cryptos have come to this. This is the complete opposite of why they were made. I really hope Nvidia GPUs don't fall down the same hole as ASICs and AMD GPUs.
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
SOLO-MINE JoinCoin--
I set up solo-mining for JoinCoin.  My GTX 960 gets about 29.9Mh/s with standard PentaBlake ("penta" algo).  Currently, JoinCoin has a block reward of 2 coins, and a difficulty of ~300 for PentaBlake.  If I get any coins in the next few hours, I'll report back.
--scryptr
EDIT:
While I was typing, I got this:

     -snip-

     GTX 960 SSC solo-mining JoinCoin with standard PentaBlake
I will try a while longer.       --scryptr

What does your config look like. Are you sure you have set it to mine penta? Since joincoin is a multi-algo coin, you need to specify the algo in the config file.


This pool works, I mined 120coins in less than 24 hours some days ago with one single 6x 750ti rig.

http://coinspool.cu.cc/info_joincoin-pentablake

JoinCoin CONFIGURATION FILES--

My wallet configuration (in ...appdata/roaming/joincoin):

==========cut line===========
gen=0
listen=1
daemon=1
server=1
rpcuser=yourname
rpcpassword=x
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=9150
rpcconnect=127.0.0.1
algo=pentablake
addnode=gdhtrc7qoh3qowvf.onion:17941
addnode=5k7xsbnnw3mpotx6.onion:17941
addnode=7xbw5q6s4b66hdls.onion:17941
addnode=scfnohgtgod2rzid.onion:17941
addnode=2fsfvfcizsok7sx5.onion:17941
addnode=xdckaipkzzztc7qb.onion:17941
addnode=i5znffoaikqooeyc.onion:17941
addnode=drtevq326tweby2k.onion:17941
addnode=b2mgu5dvcw3m7cxw.onion:17941
addnode=gsmlz6gnk22kdij2.onion:17941
addnode=ufi2euhvrpakwrih.onion:17941
addnode=53zy47p5wly5penk.onion:17941
addnode=nwjw2badoulwc4yi.onion:17941
addnode=im4qpcjdr5uzd7yb.onion:17941
addnode=ecunlzj3niqwaeqs.onion:17941
==========cut line==========

The algo "pentablake" is spelled out completely as per the JoinCoin OP.  My mining configuration follows:

==========cut line===========
{
   "url" : "127.0.0.1:9150",
   "user" : "yourname",
   "pass" : "x",
   "algo" : "penta",
   "intensity" : 20,
   "cpu-mining" : true,
   "cpu-priority" : 5,
   
   "quiet" : false,
   "debug" : false
}
==========cut line===========

My solo-join.conf (above) is called with this batch file:

==========cut line===========
:loop

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -c solo-join.conf

pause
goto loop
==========cut line===========

I am goiing to try whirlpool next.       --scryptr

EDIT:

WHIRLPOOL SUCCESS--

I changed the algo in my solomining configuration to whirlpool (the default JoinCoin algo) and it worked!

      -snip-

--scryptr

Very helpful, some what. Could you make all the corrections in all the right spots above like "whirlpoolx" so it will help others better.

Thanks

Got it working I think after much trail & error. Also not sure if I have the correct algo=xxxxxx in the wallet conf
or is that even really needed in the wallet.conf? Think I still have something incorrectly configured because mine
is showing 12xxxx like your 960 when it got nooo's. Yours is showing 92xx when it found good blocks.



WHIRLPOOL--

JoinCoin uses Whirlpool, not Whirlpoolx.  Spell out "whirlpool" completely in the wallet configuration file.  Type "algo" : "whirl" in the mining configuration file, or "-a whirl" on the launch line.  The Opening Page (OP) for JoinCoin states the Whirlpool is the default wallet algo, so you perhaps could skip it in the wallet configuration.  I did not.

My first attempt was with pentablake algo.  I do not know why it did not work.  Pentablake was very new at the launch for JoinCoin.  I only changed the algo configurations between the two attempts.  My GTX 960 runs at full speed (currently) mining Lyra2v2 and Quark.        --scryptr

P.S.  I now have 2 JoinCoins.     --scryptr
full member
Activity: 231
Merit: 150
SOLO-MINE JoinCoin--
I set up solo-mining for JoinCoin.  My GTX 960 gets about 29.9Mh/s with standard PentaBlake ("penta" algo).  Currently, JoinCoin has a block reward of 2 coins, and a difficulty of ~300 for PentaBlake.  If I get any coins in the next few hours, I'll report back.
--scryptr
EDIT:
While I was typing, I got this:

     -snip-

     GTX 960 SSC solo-mining JoinCoin with standard PentaBlake
I will try a while longer.       --scryptr

What does your config look like. Are you sure you have set it to mine penta? Since joincoin is a multi-algo coin, you need to specify the algo in the config file.


This pool works, I mined 120coins in less than 24 hours some days ago with one single 6x 750ti rig.

http://coinspool.cu.cc/info_joincoin-pentablake

JoinCoin CONFIGURATION FILES--

My wallet configuration (in ...appdata/roaming/joincoin):

==========cut line===========
gen=0
listen=1
daemon=1
server=1
rpcuser=yourname
rpcpassword=x
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=9150
rpcconnect=127.0.0.1
algo=pentablake
addnode=gdhtrc7qoh3qowvf.onion:17941
addnode=5k7xsbnnw3mpotx6.onion:17941
addnode=7xbw5q6s4b66hdls.onion:17941
addnode=scfnohgtgod2rzid.onion:17941
addnode=2fsfvfcizsok7sx5.onion:17941
addnode=xdckaipkzzztc7qb.onion:17941
addnode=i5znffoaikqooeyc.onion:17941
addnode=drtevq326tweby2k.onion:17941
addnode=b2mgu5dvcw3m7cxw.onion:17941
addnode=gsmlz6gnk22kdij2.onion:17941
addnode=ufi2euhvrpakwrih.onion:17941
addnode=53zy47p5wly5penk.onion:17941
addnode=nwjw2badoulwc4yi.onion:17941
addnode=im4qpcjdr5uzd7yb.onion:17941
addnode=ecunlzj3niqwaeqs.onion:17941
==========cut line==========

The algo "pentablake" is spelled out completely as per the JoinCoin OP.  My mining configuration follows:

==========cut line===========
{
   "url" : "127.0.0.1:9150",
   "user" : "yourname",
   "pass" : "x",
   "algo" : "penta",
   "intensity" : 20,
   "cpu-mining" : true,
   "cpu-priority" : 5,
   
   "quiet" : false,
   "debug" : false
}
==========cut line===========

My solo-join.conf (above) is called with this batch file:

==========cut line===========
:loop

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -c solo-join.conf

pause
goto loop
==========cut line===========

I am goiing to try whirlpool next.       --scryptr

EDIT:

WHIRLPOOL SUCCESS--

I changed the algo in my solomining configuration to whirlpool (the default JoinCoin algo) and it worked!

      -snip-

--scryptr

Very helpful, some what. Could you make all the corrections in all the right spots above like "whirlpoolx" so it will help others better.

Thanks

Got it working I think after much trail & error. Also not sure if I have the correct algo=xxxxxx in the wallet conf
or is that even really needed in the wallet.conf? Think I still have something incorrectly configured because mine
is showing 12xxxx like your 960 when it got nooo's. Yours is showing 92xx when it found good blocks.

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
SGMINER? --

Whatever happened to Sgminer?  The last official releases are over a year old.

I think the devs pissed in each other's beer.

--scryptr

Sgminer is maintained by nicehash: when they add an algo to their platform, they also update sgminer. But nobody's submitting optimisations (except some rare occasions like wolf0's whirlpoolx).
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
SGMINER? --

Whatever happened to Sgminer?  The last official releases are over a year old.

I think the devs pissed in each other's beer.

--scryptr
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
Here SP 0.1 BTC to you - 2d5651a523ae8ca01023aa9361dc6d27f7ce0e4d787314de94531ca46bbf0399

In time I sent PM's to almost all devs around here asking about improved miners/kernels...you are the only one who responded... guess that says alot.

Please keep up all the good work you are doing here.
If it wasn't for this thread I don't think I would have been part of this interesting crypto world.

Thank you.
sp puppet account ?  Grin Grin Grin

well... theotherme sent me 10btc for my kernels  Grin
anyway thanks for the good laugh...  Grin

lost already too much time, have better things to think about and to do...

jr. member
Activity: 64
Merit: 1
Here SP 0.1 BTC to you - 2d5651a523ae8ca01023aa9361dc6d27f7ce0e4d787314de94531ca46bbf0399

In time I sent PM's to almost all devs around here asking about improved miners/kernels or advices for better hashes...you are the only one who responded... guess that says alot.

Please keep up all the good work you are doing here.
If it wasn't for this thread I don't think I would have been part of this interesting crypto world.

Thank you.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
piss piss piss, someone pissed on the fire? Its starting to stink in here. lol
Yes. Enjoy the piss from the dj.
you started it... and attacking every devs arounds didn't help either...

I just compiled the TP 1.7 release windows x86 cuda65.
Quark is hashing 12,5MHASH. In sp-mod 71 I get 18.2 MHASH (45.6%) faster

This is not an attack. This is just facts..

 
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
piss piss piss, someone pissed on the fire? Its starting to stink in here. lol

Yes. Enjoy the piss from the dj.
I don't know if it is mine,but your practices really stink...
(and attacking other dev doesn't plead in your favor)
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
piss piss piss, someone pissed on the fire? Its starting to stink in here. lol

Yes. Enjoy the piss from the dj.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I am reforking 1.6.6 and replacing all the kernals.
Anybody who donate 0.1BTC donation will get it. (windows exe file only)
sp - how will this differ from release 71 please?
-pokeytex
Alot of good work has been done to fix all the problems with the pools and the API.
More stable, more algos.  Scrypt N is fixed. I might add some more hashrate as well.  
The gtx960 and 980ti kernals are not tuned correctly. I think I can add 10-20% in most algos.  Grin
Example:
The lyra2v2  980ti  hashrate with sp-mod 71 is only 17.5MHASH
With the the new 1.6.6 fork, I think it will be around 22MHASH
But not linux compatible. And I will probly sell for 0.1 BTC every time I add a few percent.
actually you really start to sound like a scam (you fit pretty well unfortunately in the shady area of crypto.
So I re-post here the pm you sent me yesterday (so may-be you sent a similar one to tsiv  Grin),
but it seems clear you don't have what you claim to be selling...
I honestly think you lost all sense of decency
How fast is it?
I might buy it.
I said I might add hashrate. I want my kernals to be the fastest, and I can buy yours,re-engineer it. And resell it.
if changing kernel parameter is re-engineering for you   Grin

I am modding the opensource version, not the binary.  The binary is only used for study.
not sure to understand what you mean here (in regards to what I wrote...) unless you just dis-assemble binaries...

Yes I dissasseble binaries. I am a master in assembly languages. I am not a cuda developer...
you're definitely not a master in modesty...

I have worked with cuda 1 year.

I have worked with assembly languages/reverse engeneering/cracking more than 20 years.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
I am reforking 1.6.6 and replacing all the kernals.
Anybody who donate 0.1BTC donation will get it. (windows exe file only)
sp - how will this differ from release 71 please?
-pokeytex
Alot of good work has been done to fix all the problems with the pools and the API.
More stable, more algos.  Scrypt N is fixed. I might add some more hashrate as well.  
The gtx960 and 980ti kernals are not tuned correctly. I think I can add 10-20% in most algos.  Grin
Example:
The lyra2v2  980ti  hashrate with sp-mod 71 is only 17.5MHASH
With the the new 1.6.6 fork, I think it will be around 22MHASH
But not linux compatible. And I will probly sell for 0.1 BTC every time I add a few percent.
actually you really start to sound like a scam (you fit pretty well unfortunately in the shady area of crypto.
So I re-post here the pm you sent me yesterday (so may-be you sent a similar one to tsiv  Grin),
but it seems clear you don't have what you claim to be selling...
I honestly think you lost all sense of decency
How fast is it?
I might buy it.
I said I might add hashrate. I want my kernals to be the fastest, and I can buy yours,re-engineer it. And resell it.
if changing kernel parameter is re-engineering for you   Grin

I am modding the opensource version, not the binary.  The binary is only used for study.
not sure to understand what you mean here (in regards to what I wrote...) unless you just dis-assemble binaries...

Yes I dissasseble binaries. I am a master in assembly languages. I am not a cuda developer...
you're definitely not a master in modesty...

is that the way you got your optimized kernel lurking in others people binaries ?
full member
Activity: 231
Merit: 150
piss piss piss, someone pissed on the fire? Its starting to stink in here. lol
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I am reforking 1.6.6 and replacing all the kernals.
Anybody who donate 0.1BTC donation will get it. (windows exe file only)
sp - how will this differ from release 71 please?
-pokeytex
Alot of good work has been done to fix all the problems with the pools and the API.
More stable, more algos.  Scrypt N is fixed. I might add some more hashrate as well. 
The gtx960 and 980ti kernals are not tuned correctly. I think I can add 10-20% in most algos.  Grin
Example:
The lyra2v2  980ti  hashrate with sp-mod 71 is only 17.5MHASH
With the the new 1.6.6 fork, I think it will be around 22MHASH
But not linux compatible. And I will probly sell for 0.1 BTC every time I add a few percent.
actually you really start to sound like a scam (you fit pretty well unfortunately in the shady area of crypto.
So I re-post here the pm you sent me yesterday (so may-be you sent a similar one to tsiv  Grin),
but it seems clear you don't have what you claim to be selling...
I honestly think you lost all sense of decency
How fast is it?
I might buy it.
I said I might add hashrate. I want my kernals to be the fastest, and I can buy yours,re-engineer it. And resell it.
if changing kernel parameter is re-engineering for you   Grin

I am modding the opensource version, not the binary.  The binary is only used for study.
not sure to understand what you mean here (in regards to what I wrote...) unless you just dis-assemble binaries...

Yes I dissasseble binaries. I am a master in assembly languages. I am not a cuda developer...
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
I am reforking 1.6.6 and replacing all the kernals.
Anybody who donate 0.1BTC donation will get it. (windows exe file only)
sp - how will this differ from release 71 please?
-pokeytex
Alot of good work has been done to fix all the problems with the pools and the API.
More stable, more algos.  Scrypt N is fixed. I might add some more hashrate as well. 
The gtx960 and 980ti kernals are not tuned correctly. I think I can add 10-20% in most algos.  Grin
Example:
The lyra2v2  980ti  hashrate with sp-mod 71 is only 17.5MHASH
With the the new 1.6.6 fork, I think it will be around 22MHASH
But not linux compatible. And I will probly sell for 0.1 BTC every time I add a few percent.
actually you really start to sound like a scam (you fit pretty well unfortunately in the shady area of crypto.
So I re-post here the pm you sent me yesterday (so may-be you sent a similar one to tsiv  Grin),
but it seems clear you don't have what you claim to be selling...
I honestly think you lost all sense of decency
How fast is it?
I might buy it.
I said I might add hashrate. I want my kernals to be the fastest, and I can buy yours,re-engineer it. And resell it.
if changing kernel parameter is re-engineering for you   Grin

I am modding the opensource version, not the binary.  The binary is only used for study.
not sure to understand what you mean here (in regards to what I wrote...) unless you just dis-assemble binaries...
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I am reforking 1.6.6 and replacing all the kernals.
Anybody who donate 0.1BTC donation will get it. (windows exe file only)
sp - how will this differ from release 71 please?
-pokeytex
Alot of good work has been done to fix all the problems with the pools and the API.
More stable, more algos.  Scrypt N is fixed. I might add some more hashrate as well.  
The gtx960 and 980ti kernals are not tuned correctly. I think I can add 10-20% in most algos.  Grin
Example:
The lyra2v2  980ti  hashrate with sp-mod 71 is only 17.5MHASH
With the the new 1.6.6 fork, I think it will be around 22MHASH
But not linux compatible. And I will probly sell for 0.1 BTC every time I add a few percent.
actually you really start to sound like a scam (you fit pretty well unfortunately in the shady area of crypto.
So I re-post here the pm you sent me yesterday (so may-be you sent a similar one to tsiv  Grin),
but it seems clear you don't have what you claim to be selling...
I honestly think you lost all sense of decency
How fast is it?
I might buy it.
I said I might add hashrate. I want my kernals to be the fastest, and I can buy yours,re-engineer it. And resell it.
if changing kernel parameter is re-engineering for you   Grin

I am modding the opensource version, not the binary.  The binary is only used for study.
Jump to: