Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 890. (Read 2347659 times)
i'm not against that, and a lot less aggressive than you today... Look like you want to declare a war... nothing better to do ? like learning my 7 letters github account syntax ?
I just sold another copy. Wan't one epsylon3?
I have optimized your over pentablake kernal over 100% faster. When people earn more money, they donate.
This is simple math. When you publish opensource work, you should be proud that someone else is improving it for you.
I have optimized your over pentablake kernal over 100% faster. When people earn more money, they donate.
This is simple math. When you publish opensource work, you should be proud that someone else is improving it for you.
ooouch, i remember why i prefer to read this thread only once per week... Only ennemies in crypto lol... to you maybe
He is french : he is one of my neighbors ;-)
Down and down everything goes, this is the worst I've seen algos in a long time...
Thats why you need to mine algos that aren't supported by nicehash / multipools..
I have continued to mod pentablake now. 90MHASH on the gtx970..
the opensource does 15MHASH on the 750ti.
So with my modded kernal 1 gtx970 is producing the same as 6 750ti's running the opensource kernal.
@200 MHASH i get around 82 Joincoins/day (0.02BTC / day)
Pentablake is X5. (5 rounds of (blake-512 16 rounds))
The 80MHASH@970 kernal is for sale. it does 32MHASH on the 750ti. (More than 100% faster than the open source)
The price is 0.3BTC
pm for details.
I have sold 5 copies. Who want's a copy?
Most of what you wrote lately is either copied from tpruvot for the general framework of ccminer or (actually both) from myself for the kernels (and sometimes with error, reason why solo mining wasn't working for a few coins 
), and to be honest this is in part the reason why I don't release so often my new kernels.
), and to be honest this is in part the reason why I don't release so often my new kernels.Good that you don't release anything. Please stop it. More profit for the private kernals.
5% loss Made in France
You could have avoided that... tpruvot did so much (and is still doing) to cpuminer and ccminer!I see no real optimalizations. All he does is to copy from others.
That's nonsense.
You copied from him much more than he did from you. You initially copied the whole miner.... Then some fixes, some enhancements, etc.
Tpruvot is improving ccminer every day and doesn't ask for a penny.
lol seriously ? (this is a comment over sp message obviously... )He is probably the most active dev working on ccminer (I am very lazy compared to him
) but yeah you commit more often than him (which is a record in itself... but hey... if the release doesn't work that doesn't count ). Most of what you wrote lately is either copied from tpruvot for the general framework of ccminer or (actually both) from myself for the kernels (and sometimes with error, reason why solo mining wasn't working for a few coins
), and to be honest this is in part the reason why I don't release so often my new kernels.furthermore, you are the one asking for donations anytime you commit a new (broken or not) release, you never see tpruvot doing that (... nor myself for that matter actually... even though I complain a lot about the absence of donation in general
), which is kinda pathetic...So at some point it would be nice that at least you stop biting the hands you are using to get "food" in your own name (whatever I might mean
)
sp, are you chinese?
Some time ago when quark was paying 0.7BTC/GHASH:
Nicehash lyrav2 currently paying 2.6896btc ..Dropped to 0.50
Up to 0.9296 now..https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=miners&a=14&l=0
The top miner just switched from mining quark to lyra2v2 5,4 gigash all NVIDIA. I wonder if he is using the DJM-34 version or the sp-mod.
This farm is making 3.274 BTC a day on this adress..
Pretty good..
No donations to the developers.
If you release your faster lyra2v2 kernal djm34, he will upgrade and the profit will go away.
Massive hashrate...
equal to around 1300 750ti's @ 40watt (52,000 watt)
But I think this company has some older compute cards. So the power usage is probobly twice as much as the competition. And all the rigs are linux based.
There are big miners out there. I can sell a 50% faster quark kernal for alot of Bitcoins..
The GM miner on nicehash is currently earning around 4BTC per day with almost only NVIDIA RIGS.
With a modded kernal he will make 6BTC per day. ($543 120 a year)
A modded kernal will ROI a 980ti card in 200days with power included.
With the current prices the profit is down from 4BTC a day to 2,32BTC a day.
5% loss Made in France
You could have avoided that... tpruvot did so much (and is still doing) to cpuminer and ccminer!You copied from him much more than he did from you. You initially copied the whole miner.... Then some fixes, some enhancements, etc.
Tpruvot is improving ccminer every day and doesn't ask for a penny.
Tpruvot has forked CCminer. Please read the credits. It's based on poolers work and the two Christians (CC)..
Tpruvot has added a remote control feature and buffer overflows, and a few new algos copied from djm34.
Sp, I know that, I've been around for quite some time, and been working on miners for almost two years ;-)
We all know that tpruvot enhanced the miner a lot (you forgot the pools, just looks at his github to see how many commits there are) and you enhanced the cuda code a lot.
I really see no reason to say bad things about each other.
[...]
Greed is driving you.
That's why you are here..
Go get those COINS and stop complaining.
Greed is driving you.
That's why you are here..
Go get those COINS and stop complaining.
Sorry mate, I'm not at all driven by greed. I understand why you'd think that is the case, but in this instance, you're dead wrong. I'm here for plenty of reasons, and making money sits very low on that list.
Your coding for the nvidia mining community is much appreciated, and there's no point taking this conversation any further.
Cheers!
5% loss Made in France
You could have avoided that... tpruvot did so much (and is still doing) to cpuminer and ccminer!You copied from him much more than he did from you. You initially copied the whole miner.... Then some fixes, some enhancements, etc.
Tpruvot is improving ccminer every day and doesn't ask for a penny.
Tpruvot has forked CCminer. Please read the credits. It's based on poolers work and the two Christians (CC)..
Tpruvot has added a remote control feature and buffer overflows, and a few new algos copied from djm34.
5% loss Made in France
You could have avoided that... tpruvot did so much (and is still doing) to cpuminer and ccminer!I see no real optimalizations. All he does is to copy from others.
That's nonsense.
You copied from him much more than he did from you. You initially copied the whole miner.... Then some fixes, some enhancements, etc.
Tpruvot is improving ccminer every day and doesn't ask for a penny.
5% loss Made in France
You could have avoided that... tpruvot did so much (and is still doing) to cpuminer and ccminer!Tpruvot has done - a F^#@#%ng lot - more than copy from others.
From extending miner functionality (api stuff, backup pool support, conditional mining) to adding new algorithms (some public, some private), he's done quite a lot for this community. No wonder that it gets hard to have any meaningful collaboration going between developers.
Edit: There will be no followup from me, I'm done with the pissing contest.
I still don't understand why people are using a miner that is 30% slower in most algos.
The purpose of a miner is to MINE. There are no friends in crypto. Only enemies. Less developers is bether, because then my private kernals are more profitable.
Greed is driving you.
That's why you are here..
Go get those COINS and stop complaining.
5% loss Made in France
You could have avoided that... tpruvot did so much (and is still doing) to cpuminer and ccminer!I see no real optimalizations. All he does is to copy from others.
As someone using from both forks at different times, it's been funny to experience that plenty of times, the made in France is actually faster as reported poolside, for the same compilation/execution environment, and as long as launched with the same intensity (I hear that in France, they are more conservative about default intensities)...
Tpruvot has done - a F^#@#%ng lot - more than copy from others.
From extending miner functionality (api stuff, backup pool support, conditional mining) to adding new algorithms (some public, some private), he's done quite a lot for this community. No wonder that it gets hard to have any meaningful collaboration going between developers.
Edit: There will be no followup from me, I'm done with the pissing contest.
5% loss Made in France
You could have avoided that... tpruvot did so much (and is still doing) to cpuminer and ccminer!I see no real optimalizations. All he does is to copy from others.
5% loss Made in France
You could have avoided that... tpruvot did so much (and is still doing) to cpuminer and ccminer!
What card is this (memclock/coreclock)? And how long did you run the benchmark
it's a gigabyte on default clocks (3505/1278)each test ran for one minute...
since profits are very low, i'll maybe repeat the tests today on a 5 minutes timeframe while hashing on nicehash
You get bether rates under windows x86 builds. Asus strix 960 should do above 6MHASH on lyra2v2 and 10.7 in quark. (cuda 6.5)
no windows here...For more accurate benchmarking you should use the --timelimit option.
ccminer -a quark --benchmark --timelimit 500 (will mine for 500 seconds and then exit)
i'm using the api for getting the hash rate just before killing the process as it's more convenient than parsing the outputccminer -a quark --benchmark --timelimit 500 (will mine for 500 seconds and then exit)
If your card trottle, (hashrate is decreasing over time) The gpu-clock is downlocked automaticly and hashrate is lost. To avoid trottling reduce the intenstiy, increase the tdp in the bios, increase the temp limits of the card. (overclock) make sure that you always run in p0 mode.
no, it doesn't throttle as the hashrate always increase after starting and then stays constant without decreasesInteresting that my junior asus strix 750ti with +200 on the mem-clock/gpu-clock is almost running faster than your gtx 960 in lyra. I get 5.4MHASH.
(640 shaders vs 1024)
yes, the card performance is disappointing but was cheap... (640 shaders vs 1024)
Jump to: