I think that if BestChange takes the Ethereum or Litecoin addresses of the campaign participants and makes 1-2 payments in these coins, due to the large commissions on the Bitcoin network, then this will not be a big violation.
You are right about litecoin, but Ethereum transaction fee is also high, litecoin can help reduce the much delay in payment confirmation. For me it would be better he pays with usdt-trc20
There are as many opinions as there are campaign participants. Some agree to pay in ETH or LTC, others in USDT-TRC20, and still others in other tokens. Maybe the manager should add a separate column in the table next to each participant with the crypto name (for personal sending to him in this cryptocurrency)?
This is of course a joke.
this another cheapest means to send out payment maybe after 1-3 weeks when the network congestion may have reduced then he could start paying back with bitcoin as usual
This option looks the most rational, because why waste the campaign budget once again on overpriced feess, which would be more prudently spent on more useful needs.
I think this suggestions has been made before we don't need to stress over this anymore I believe the manager knows what to do at this moment.
If he had known, he would not have arranged the survey quite recently. This is a normal phenomenon when, in response to difficulties that arise, they look for the most profitable solution.
In general, this whole situation amuses me a little. I hope the bestchange manager noticed how concerned the participants of this signature campaign are about the project budget
, while this problem doesn't directly affect them. People don' remain indifferent, but try to contribute at least with a word.
The only thing it would cost him is just to moved the topic to altcoin service section, maybe when we gets back to Bitcoin he may then move it back to where it's now.
It seems to me that these unnecessary section changes will create some headaches and reputational costs. Not critical, but why does a project with 16 years of experience need these movements in order to save a couple of hundred bucks.
If my vote counted, I would vote to delay compensation until the commissions become acceptable. I understand that the company will not be poorer even by paying such high fees, but it is better to use these funds for the rational needs of this project.