Definitely not. But, claiming the reverse is a shitty line of thinking as well. If a game has paid previously, does it increase its chance of scam?
That's a terrible non sequitur you're using. I have not claimed the reverse but rather was provoking your thought process: you are stating that there is no reason not to pay a user since chain-bet has paid over 1 BTC multiple times before.
I'm simply stating that if that is true, then it paradoxically creates a reason to scam. If it is common knowledge that if a casino has paid before, it will not scam, then would it not be consequence-free to do just that? Scam?
This is kind of similar to some lines of game theory. Say you're playing poker and the flop comes Ks Qs Js. Let's suppose a 10% chance of your opponent having two spades. If it's commonly thought that you would only raise if you have a flush here, would it not be advantageous to just always raise?
Suppose you raise 1x the pot.
That's a 90% chance of a pot-sized return and a 10% chance of a pot-sized loss if your opponent calls.
Since its inception one year ago, there is not a single scam accusation against chain-bet.com. And u, appearing from nowhere, claiming that because it paid before it will scam now? Are u mentally stable?
Never said that. Don't put words in my mouth.
