~snip~
So the point is I think the method is a bit strange, but yes for the purpose, yes I support that, but if there is another way that makes more sense to be used as an intermediary for collecting funds, then I think it is much better than gambling.
maybe they think they can take some money from the bookies to donate. but it seems all that is in vain. because the bookies will not provide continuous wins. even the system they create is to bankrupt their players.
so I agree, rather than sharing the results of gambling winnings for charity, it is better to give their gambling capital to charity directly.
Yes, that's what I mean, my friend, we know what and how gambling really is, most people who make gambling a place to make money often experience the opposite, in the sense that the majority of them actually lose almost all their money slowly and maybe we also often hear many people, especially those here, who say that gambling should not be used as a place to make money, understand that gambling is nothing more than a playground in your spare time, like an entertainment event when you have boring free time and is not something that should be done seriously.
The reason is clear that all the gamblers' winnings have been arranged by the casino, the gamblers play on the casino's advantage, another thing that I also question is where will the group get the money for the gambling capital? I'm not sure that there are people or parties who really want to sacrifice their money to be used as capital for activities that run based on probability, and of course I also quite agree with what you said that it is much better to donate the capital directly without having to put it in gambling first.