It’s still a form of promoting gambling, even if the intention is good. It’s similar to the state-sponsored lottery in our country, where the goal is to help the poor, but not all the proceeds actually go to them. “Charity gambling” sounds nice, but if the funds are coming mostly from the poor, since most bettors in these games are from low-income groups...it feels like it could create more problems. Honestly, combining gambling and charity just doesn’t sit well with me. Just my two cents.
Even though it is like a lottery, is the poor actually helped? What I see is that the poor are not helped, they cannot even reach them, everything ends before it is over. I have seen that it is like a state-sponsored lottery to help the poor, but it does not help the poor, it is only run to help them in name, but later the poor do not get any help from it.
Again, where the poor win the game and bet to get a good amount of money, but here it is seen that many poor people bet like this, from here only 1-2 people win, after winning, it is seen that one winner gets the difference between all the poor. I do not like this because with the money of the poor, other poor people are getting it. How do you see this, I think this is not reasonable or self-sufficient.