Your interpretation of those two sentences above as "contradictory" is just indicative of your communist background. You are finding it hard to understand the idiomatic usage of "All voices are allowed space", when talking about Freedom of expression in the context of Democracy as opposed to the controlled flow of information and Party high-handedness in such matters in your communist utopia.
Please elaborate on your logical line of thinking. I don't know how you reasoned from A to B. If you do not have Alzheimer's disease, please edit your words again.
the idiomatic usage.Hearing you say that, I can probably understand your mentality as a far-right stubborn person.Others include: habits, management, tradition, and don’t change are all commonly used words in your mouth.
That rhetoric and whataboutery adds nothing to the debate of Freedom vs Communist Control. Like I said in my previous post, the free people of the world can see through the Chinese agenda of trying to portray their "system" as superior. The world has been through this charade multiple times. Stop jailing your businessmen for "picking quarrels" and maybe we'll talk.
You didn't answer my question.Since you can't answer the above complicated questions, I will ask you some simpler questions.If you propose that your country repair toilets, will it be effective?If you propose to clean up the Ganges river, will this proposal pass?If you propose to increase the punishment for raping women, will this pass?
If not, then maybe the freedom you are talking about is verbal freedom. You have the right to speak, and your government ignore you.
I haven't "corrected" myself. Its just idiomatic usage that I wouldn't expect a CCP puppet to understand. You are forgiven for your ignorance. Lets move on.
Mention idiomatic usage again.Dear members of the extreme right. Do you wash your hands before eating curry every day?
doesn't mean that...,means that....Wow, you tell me that this sentence pattern is not correcting something? I suggest you go to kindergarten again.
I don't know what you mean by "extreme liberalism in your mouth". From my understanding of the playbook of CCP handles like yours, I guess you are trying to strengthen your argument by quoting the constant Conservative vs Liberalism debate of western democracies as some sort of weakness.
Of course you don't understand, you have been brainwashed by Western capitalists.
The country is regarded by you as a passive thing. Its function is the function of the "police" and the function of the "night watchman". In addition to maintaining social order, the country should not control too much.However, the result of this laissez-faire view of the country in practice is that freedom has become the privilege of a few people, and monopolistic organizations have become the masters of society.
No it isn't. Those in power everywhere have always looked for ways to exploit cheap labor enabled by the masses. Capitalism looks for reducing costs and optimizing profitability doesn't mean that the Chinese haven't exploited labor.
Since this is a common problem in various sovereign countries, please do not attack a certain country.You are forgiven for your ignorance. Lets move on.
Duh..Stop comparing intellect dude. Say what you want to say. You aren't convincing anyone on the forum that you aren't a CCP handle or that China's system of control and monitoring is somehow a glowing example for the rest of the world to emulate.
Duh..Stop comparing intellect dude.I did not convince anyone on the forum. Please don't set up a false enemy.You reminded me of taking out a can of washing powder to responsibilities that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction.I understand, the freedom in your mouth means what you want to do, no reason is needed.