Although the translation from another language is imperfect, the original article does a very good analysis of the situation. This could very well be a subject in itself. The fact that the article is by a Russian publication means that they must know what they are talking about. Some very good points here. It starts with speculating about the future of Chinese model to which we already have a reply from a Chinese well-wisher or probably just one of those CCP handles.
what will happen to China in the coming years? The collapse of the economy and the existing economic freedoms, or will the government still give preference to development rather than preserving their places and subordinating those who want to think and live as a free person?
First of all, I want to talk about "who want to think and live as a free person". We accuse China of not being free, but on the other hand, China implements 9-year compulsory education. So that everyone, whether you are poor or rich, must complete 9 years of basic learning.
My dear Chinese puppet, when people in the rest of the world talk about "thinking and living as a free person", it is not about getting education or some other facility from a government. It is simply about having the freedom to express yourself as a human being. All humans are different. Nobody is perfect. In a free society, all of those voices are allowed space and expression and collectively, they decide on a path forward. Its definitely not perfect but that does not mean that one body making decisions for everybody while nobody is allowed to criticise the said hallowed body is not the way of free people.
You definitely find it hard to understand as is evident from another one of your stupid arguments.
“suffering”?If it makes my life better and better, I would rather “suffer”.Not unemployed at home.
Just this acceptance that material prosperity can somehow make up for freedom of choice and expression is the problem with your whole argument.
Moving on from this obvious CCP sockpuppet, the article makes some very interesting points.
The CCP, after decades of being a freeman named Deng Xiaoping, is tightening the screws on all of its entrepreneurs.
Chinese elders want international investments to enter China not where it is profitable for them, but where the CCP needs.
The age-old question of whether capital provides gradual democratization has once again been answered that, yes, it does. And now, within the framework of China's new path, this democratization is curtailed - along with capital, which did not even have time to really generate it. "
The CCP's control over capital will significantly add the tactical fortress of the Chinese model and strengthen Xi Jipin's power, but strategically it is encapsulation. Chinese capital is being forcibly torn away from the world. Separate non-transparent rules of the game and social obligations are imposed on them.
The problem is that the Chinese Communist Party realized that "the people received a lot of freedom, and began to adopt Western freedoms, and consider it natural. This means that there is no totalitarian power, there is no total submission, there is no total control. This means that the weight of the CCP is losing its influence. "
These points very effectively explain the recent actions of CCP against a host of its own entrepreneurs. More importantly, i think it also provides an interesting explanation to the CCPs insistence of use of a CBDC while acting against Bitcoin. Bitcoin is the very essence of power to people and open-ness. You can never fully suppress or control it. The CCP, shrewd as always, understands that the world is moving to digital currencies and is probably just pre-empting for this scenario of ending up as compartmentalized.