ckpool.org CLOSED - page 6. | Bitcointalksearch.org

gcanelson

member

Activity: 110

Merit: 56

Quote from: vickersja on March 01, 2020, 11:16:53 AM

Ok - stupid question of the day.....

How is the Active Miner tab sorted? I cannot see the pattern. I am number 17 but not sure by what criteria. Thanks!

The headings at the top are what is listed:
H/s 1h - H/s 1d - H/s 1w are your hour, day and week hashrate averages.
But...
My old and failing memory says that in order to keep things somewhat `current', the H/s over the latest 5 minute period (updated every 2 minutes?) is what the list is sorted by...
It's not a stupid question because if it's not actually listed then its not actually obvious...
Your 5 minute rate, which can vary quite widely, is shown on your User page, if your curious about that value...

vickersja

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 34

To be the man, you gotta beat the man...... WOOOOO

Ok - stupid question of the day.....

How is the Active Miner tab sorted? I cannot see the pattern. I am number 17 but not sure by what criteria. Thanks!

vickersja

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 34

To be the man, you gotta beat the man...... WOOOOO

Congratulations! Hopefully this block will drive more miners to this pool!

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: gcanelson on March 01, 2020, 01:47:25 AM

BLOCK!

"solvedby": "36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V",
"date": "[2020-03-01 06:15:45.912]",
"hash": "0000000000000000000af0d7cc0cae1b8f1b9cc45618fdb7426cf81d779ad529",
"shares": 26604234795544,
"diff": 171.8

\o/ - Break out whatever you've been saving for this occasion! Thanks everyone and...

Mine On!

"height": 619631,
"reward": 12.57710793,
"fee": 0.0

Yes - as always, fee is zero... Props to the pool master! Thanks -ck.

Persistence has finally paid off. Here's hoping for a faster block next time! Congratulations to all miners.

Code:

[2020-03-01 06:15:45.806] Possible block solve diff 25726717143682.394531 !
[2020-03-01 06:15:45.901] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2020-03-01 06:15:45.928] Solved block 619631 by 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0
[2020-03-01 06:15:45.928] User 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V:{"hashrate1m": "516T", "hashrate5m": "530T", "hashrate1hr": "546T", "hashrate1d": "369T", "hashrate7d": "353T"}
[2020-03-01 06:15:45.928] Worker 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0:{"hashrate1m": "516T", "hashrate5m": "530T", "hashrate1hr": "546T", "hashrate1d": "369T", "hashrate7d": "353T"}
[2020-03-01 06:17:28.089] Hash for block height 619631 confirms block was CONFIRMED

https://btc.com/0000000000000000000af0d7cc0cae1b8f1b9cc45618fdb7426cf81d779ad529

Miners paid:

Code:

{
"height": 619631,
"reward": 12.57710793,
"fee": 0.0,
"payouts": {
"32LA7cmsj35LH7cK1MjvwyoLEmYpuWAD9k": 3.23043342,
"36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V": 2.45394366,
"1JPo4Na3LVTKSU311ny1k4pYGa9LSNTnR": 1.12974692,
"3PN6ayfq3cqsmAmMLs6Ld4sw6eGXoGXnkX": 0.78050112,
"1FXusfoiNV7QTVrAwWd5bnuxxvZ5Hzf7md": 0.70883769,
"1EcH7pHYTHLo3cbdXfkf6e6Zh5JzCPGumc": 0.56005282,
"3FE6XwqYfeYEwXcL1mngBsKb1jBZBaDQvQ": 0.53468357,
"18tzNBX9G6DTJUSxN9C5BUmgLAQtgvthnG": 0.34399092,
"1J17t8CjjVwegqn6Y4JC7osA8fNsuz8z5D": 0.25878491,
"19JA7giZstK8ZJhXja5vMURsBpUDKbiytT": 0.15623187,
"3CsdpkawMuhSqBrdvCcHacSyuzmjzHVTTR": 0.1521802,
"3QQVkgdqrMc7Tmk6oWtCc5odf9LeHD8UNa": 0.14863895,
"3EPHxk2dyctm8ywAxRX4zmjvE27y4JP3ks": 0.11008764,
"33eCMf1i5ydJkEdcFTy2PqtPiGAJMktKwd": 0.09985898,
"1KZmmKKxJk4xtFrLjZZyuRUmu95PPEWJsi": 0.08921151,
"16vV8JJ6rHFmo7gcNxDqyUb5wdpJVQkU7W": 0.07816772,
"1JsCVv3KDhgHXdqTPsDeXWiUwgkhanJNUT": 0.0737872,
"3JRkF9zRNyxRWoUd95BzyzMmnHCyGdndK3": 0.07261205,
"1AZfQnZ65STWmkds8SrQizNmQWk5YrdHK8": 0.0706377,
"37q2jQpjmv6gFnd6AMJNkawqtruuyeBsNE": 0.06084526,
"33Jc6Ry4wQaYSv9TNPqKPvNfsqrAup6QW7": 0.06008487,
"16dhPYBsUgQK4WuKBdbQfcohYbm6y7CDgh": 0.05392887,
"1AdhsrYDv5XQpmuDPXoiv2zkFNqisjQV9r": 0.05224731,
"187Mu38hNetJFXpEREr278rVszuDfUctAf": 0.04794568,
"17euZ7nWGpcsqiWzX18oFHNvMXvzXq5zJW": 0.04669538,
"3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP": 0.04012468,
"bc1qalu0j2xkk3x0j6m56f8jaztcv9azs4z8k3r4yq": 0.036374,
"1QDZb8KYjH2DpAuiTvu3noxKvJSAnXAoSM": 0.03570198,
"1E6AMWXnSAYYjKrHMVkhePJy8cNf3VcuoQ": 0.03306942,
"1DXTCBWr8KUtErVG464jNa2BnL2PSKdSWk": 0.0324625,
"3KacaPRLR18UgCbKn8fRZHJ1HPsQ8cbAUf": 0.03197218,
"1Q8ToDV8MV6Ur4oSEJxGM3hvKVS5q8zpmN": 0.03119367,
"1Lk8bxo8Bfyaz1d8rtGMUnRmzmgaSQwW7u": 0.03095638,
"1G8UA6DaQ8YkH3U8ngQC8nY7me82uiAXQE": 0.03094644,
"3QRZahE19MNqGFfgHZngUzGFVrmgkrFeuX": 0.03040779,
"1FEpVZeLsAf6zknM5nqp118WM1VG6ZXmTk": 0.02998927,
"1HhgiCUr8D6p4JfJ6yBRgW2w1pSzhcGuSM": 0.02996114,
"1EnwSdEBLkfAJnW5FkFzayw3zthr98g1YT": 0.02945034,
"1ECgbwPrfj1d2yMwHTtWxEzxQWdgu2qiUJ": 0.02922985,
"1FTwbE7DagdmaCbuCFW3yb9FHZsUgdRoSa": 0.02909774,
"31sAhuGerBxTv9AjW7XW6gFjgFFoUd4xYw": 0.0276519,
"38AqVxEXiwVu4Lv9J9JAPSZPuRxhDdUnGr": 0.02595364,
"3B6DZQ6fNvmbnd4owzdgVuA63ctRbTHPjp": 0.02580326,
"18q73zRgxN7CDCNBr3QCHoqH8LQiCCYY2k": 0.02055354,
"338cwU9R5GGH6FcmfVJZheb3TXEp994HmQ": 0.02013639,
"33HDcFMrD91T1ZnGwu9E8g3Fzad5RLsvZS": 0.01975391,
"12uoAzU3xjQ8HNxgZtCpUjJVyh67ZBiMwK": 0.01895178,
"16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr": 0.01855565,
"17Vx6k9omD9icR7oy377DoWSFEw1g6pws2": 0.01800469,
"12zUQuBAC9V3gE9jQbhmBWsg36xVEMG5Bd": 0.01661182,
"3GBJ3Uo2fMadoGXPDnjd97QAsYSCT41vAW": 0.01623696,
"3LBNBZhccFZshmBW6enaVtgQabu39q6Sw6": 0.0161545,
"35T1iYekr4CmJnf1T5hbwupvJwFvh3upve": 0.01484011,
"13E7AF1BPMeeohwEjxGD16Jhtve79d5TL9": 0.01464681,
"3EaJxWv49mPqiSXvGrM28Dt63hSsfhzsyw": 0.01417098,
"bc1qz2yy3qfv02y8fl0pz9uasettuvdtw2vk045s7v": 0.01408518,
"1LkpR3TUszdWnm3Zr3wnZ7cc8m3at8mSRR": 0.01355196,
"39L5ipkkGqtsuvtKrR1nKyoayfaRkcuB78": 0.01310892,
"35WPSAh7FR27cUUsuS8ikeLhcRm1B5vPpV": 0.01309993,
"1GbTy3ft2Ekjht23sjCfmdMgaUYxBRRQzt": 0.01276185,
"1FEZ2qs9JiKVpMjLU4B1TUiueScSisCaEF": 0.01257647,
"15QLEbGceMokJwmAPCLXuNeQd7JBcBPGAx": 0.01221875,
"1NNEoL2cirzYfPVJrRjAEpz2WUB46ThC3t": 0.01204259,
"32WateUEijR9x59bNjVYyKLqDoq334xXVC": 0.01121528,
"3C2qFKaUToNZ6rQdsZMydwbVb4wD2Per7w": 0.01116079,
"34YecE1y8VkxPdjYW9pXocQmsenWtEBRWe": 0.01071094,
"1BfBCpvwGdG84etz9YzmmLKm49ieU9t8s": 0.01050903,
"3CNiWrUxWvLuHekXhs2houCQYAjUZwQ5dR": 0.01037704,
"3JmLh5HWXrPGRD1r43rkmoLctBqgUqNjZB": 0.01034452,
"1FmWtf8ZnhP4ZznqkGARZYAgVXeq3b24yh": 0.01033984,
"1CU9oJ1NgosmVJDaQpjLS7tGPLQNoLoo9P": 0.0099049,
"1AXPAiCexLzeudtpKchRgzkM2XZZC4518a": 0.00976913,
"12kMKLVH5kwu14mcLxTzdEPV39i3dtUwwp": 0.00973465,
"1FLpEFv2FkWtSM1PZYa7dVJj1SkbuQThEd": 0.00967766,
"3CKK6RuHiEx1paRA1dwef9DpX1NLRYcRwd": 0.00939905,
"13VFfMjz2iX5LNHJJNBuWFp97uCWaPp1Dz": 0.00931171,
"19nbUE1HcMjR7nvL31TyDcg7SkTdFzBs7R": 0.00921976,
"1PMwJwnpykzgMUJqYh8rb4jRnK5nn5D38b": 0.00909981,
"17Vh7W1kYnGGZEkySpv1xQzhtTurEVVVkK": 0.00892702,
"3LAFurQkpfbV2oRQKcrg7QuyeVeuNHFeaG": 0.00889321,
"1Dj4xxJz6ww4WqTwrD45QWQXRukiyiuVCR": 0.00887278,
"1DMaRKbvatnTcNXxCJSBPnkobZAQJe7h2U": 0.00887273,
"12Ro9Yc7PRkgKobPcGur8M8RSdjb2s6GKv": 0.00876437,
"1DrzjGXSadXhXsi5aqDCTUMe1zFwJBYRZZ": 0.00849495,
"1K2HN7bfvvCmR3bhW5mktKEzRaKQ7phHG2": 0.00842848,
"1HbK1hKEvREc5FT3BFLAAmoL6SfTDzgkc4": 0.00831202,
"1JcNSwfaxD3xmf9jYWoCZ8KoSY2KueVsGD": 0.00806626,
"1dJsYpxmgv3A4LQypi2w9UxuoYuy8z6iB": 0.00800827,
"12ECb25JSxwUEntF9viAXBDVJStgS6Wr8p": 0.00799721,
"1NZQEGPB9iBugTWFLrYzCkQFRF827qj1ZU": 0.00782172,
"181C3iQ2wuwLTiCiddiHvpav1Hp7FdusWo": 0.00767438,
"bc1qjzrzwlgjreqmthe73e2hkq6hmfsd65ucljnsl7": 0.00765868,
"32PVcLk5JoUV7Tp7Wfwg7kwVD4kKUYjMVi": 0.00742758,
"1PbVLnqkBjxaxFTzsnrULkDp1o9uHRh8zn": 0.00740979,
"3EyrehLWPAgohjq6UxAKL5ewS5gY6yxXR8": 0.00725611,
"3DaH13tWVbaDZCsyBXPQP2AZJzDs7ANWH5": 0.00723966,
"3MEhaTqSYXwZJmBJVV3Ma398MKQms16V5M": 0.00717935,
"15t9YpjonexLTEB2GQ2mwMoWeZXhsQvMuS": 0.00707459,
"3Kfi5ZKnm8BJmpaDGdbjawPXEwEJ7FAWkD": 0.00698552,
"17zyuMZzuD4cd4WCP24WcnnMcBkYiRc3es": 0.00687615,
"172iGnrRmmVT9tPNUr6ZcW9zg6iQiFvKg6": 0.00029918,
"1CeDLRk1bGRBTMGebAYfMn8BbBt2UH6Aew": 0.00029477,
"197eiWU6JwnAxDwGR8xqtha6cWHKqxe72m": 0.00024565,
"1HdWBxEfoqoVigdWpCqrXVbiJSnf529hGf": 0.00024063,
"39GHGU1mqJZDzJk4qoJJjuz27fC6UCp6AV": 0.00022338,
"3QSwXZk6FVS2gjUE39yuoeiwKwLvP89s6u": 0.00019463,
"166FHtqTTGjmbx2X1PmNkvkhsdMU2N9xXe": 0.00018957,
"39gHEYJUsCiLab6Trh2Jjb861e2DG6qdxh": 0.00018116,
"19xZ4Qxj7js9aUfHsCrXaZG3RpgtxkgKHN": 0.00016594,
"3FahXtBj5edwJaZEzMKRgemEQHH8YnomW5": 0.00016183,
"37MVWvz6FvTkoceZsx8qhWhaXGCFb5Rkzc": 0.00015846,
"14vTLK4hng7PMfnQW1WaLUP7fVPQTFxoFN": 0.00015022,
"3D8QzwEg2teGeiXRwnEFXbnAeTnhnYHxh1": 0.00014813,
"19mw43PTHaPKsbCNiM2QxYKWK39pxWC5FZ": 0.00014802,
"12zjb7JMjT3CTSbLtyankfwRuybEXAcgBf": 0.00014731,
"1QK8ibAKHwtcAH77Zn7CuTJ9hyv33Kp95f": 0.00014355,
"1Q2ACZEgGLFU9DMwpQ6ZGavD986bok4B2d": 0.00014046,
"19hjg93dUD5es4QGzEK12KXrhxykGNnM4V": 0.00013219,
"1Fcc1Rm4DBsvFtg65iS8SoJ56s4jHHwHFj": 0.00012898,
"3724FxGhCGXLYzL8bWsAEP3KsFPxZWt7He": 0.00011529,
"3AWZcugbuuWpAgSd2ZoM1gj4h73KDJq4K5": 0.00011138,
"1HKb8VMi4y4hrNeq2YK2pdKadtqeYgTrE6": 0.00010841,
"1KRe5gwNufpaizfXjrVztZ9XgPEJmzqCXd": 0.00010452,
"18zfevJum4tnspwzwM1QAgm2Xxi1anrWo6": 9.283e-5,
"1Np1uyqNz8G2dV1j64gQo8qUz1APRTF41e": 8.513e-5,
"3KFUp1t7GcQkfMvavU5k8Kmsasei2YjWuw": 7.772e-5,
"17CDEXU3CCF7prSnGstUv7cLTKfXwowTTK": 7.533e-5,
"19y6DnxzjyYHDw8qNyKxdKDoNpaXpkfcQf": 7.316e-5,
"1JzhZfhhdKRN1TFME6QAvtkMS5f5aKePF5": 7.314e-5,
"1Bhtb1Lxb39JaDXeo6q4ksWVN59AGjq9vd": 7.238e-5,
"1K3vPRwcxkFaeJfwtPbvvjSqoDKEBZhffV": 7.126e-5,
"1KTfa8SyM6jUApHAJgUn5ySAyzmCUSYxYD": 6.6e-5,
"3GFwjTRnUP3VXPsgJCRoFwrUpyExKvEA6S": 6.324e-5,
"322sB4ARgrw1qwoV7MLnuzPuZxEuKH6wUb": 6.18e-5,
"1GgXHcvGBxCm2b7JMsC9YSkqi9kNXp52bd": 6.16e-5,
"36coz3nYojkPsL45YBaDKZqPpz9tqBHLmd": 6.049e-5,
"1HJK3ZojPJAvGxNzwqL2p8Mn3rm9D6tn8g": 5.975e-5,
"36Kr7cSKqLQJwUHj9EQ79nkrS9zgddvsxt": 5.861e-5,
"14iGADd2pLwe8BxXV4VNeR4T6NBBupA2wc": 5.842e-5,
"1232mE3UzJzDsiJpz8xRRUyFqqcjicpUQP": 5.748e-5,
"16hXftC4WsJfE1i74bDerVdjidEDYdSjkS": 4.911e-5,
"16wBhmmnb3j92WnrKb96xkdV6We1vRhwEY": 4.632e-5,
"18MvX1ymVvoyBy9nrhSUZgCdz4zgS2V43N": 4.546e-5,
"1EDSqhei9rkAfHWwHdY2rNgLCa73spcccU": 4.514e-5,
"13PznWfSFgseGs3o8TMG2WhkbdYbKH9LKv": 4.4e-5,
"1HLpou291TuJ943PwG9X7SwsBCci4wFoFF": 4.371e-5,
"3AVvSrXMDfpY4SdwCqKSZ7inVVvTjzvgZE": 4.368e-5,
"1NQCqTbv6rD7KQBRyABHYbbXzcqEmChefZ": 4.291e-5,
"3J7JZcpJp7xEMEh2tcdbHSVtz5urHxqNQ6": 4.238e-5,
"13dVS74FiuNeNWt51Yn5DjiSHtk6PMAvZi": 4.236e-5
},

gcanelson

member

Activity: 110

Merit: 56

BLOCK!

"solvedby": "36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V",
"date": "[2020-03-01 06:15:45.912]",
"hash": "0000000000000000000af0d7cc0cae1b8f1b9cc45618fdb7426cf81d779ad529",
"shares": 26604234795544,
"diff": 171.8

\o/ - Break out whatever you've been saving for this occasion! Thanks everyone and...

Mine On!

"height": 619631,
"reward": 12.57710793,
"fee": 0.0

Yes - as always, fee is zero... Props to the pool master! Thanks -ck.

texasHedge

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

Quote from: evade_57 on February 28, 2020, 12:47:07 PM

One of my S17 rentals had the same problem
They solved it and it had something to do with the firmware on the S17
They had no problems with their S9's also
The vendor is based in the US and is on eBay
Sorry, I have no further details

Thanks!

evade_57

member

Activity: 93

Merit: 11

One of my S17 rentals had the same problem
They solved it and it had something to do with the firmware on the S17
They had no problems with their S9's also
The vendor is based in the US and is on eBay
Sorry, I have no further details

texasHedge

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

Anyone have issues connecting an S17Pro (50TH) miner to the pool? My S9's connect and run no problem, but for some reason I can't get my S17's to connect. I've tried all the ports/and servers. Haven't dug very deep into whats going on but figured I'd throw it out to the group. Thanks.

vickersja

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 34

To be the man, you gotta beat the man...... WOOOOO

Hello Everyone,

My graph used to be scaled to show my hashrate so I could monitor and see historical data. However, now it appears to be scaled much higher, in the PH/s which shows flat for me. Any ideas how I can revert back to a graph that shows my hashrate? Thank you.

https://s1065.photobucket.com/user/vickersja/media/Capture_1.jpg.html

Edit: It appears to be browser based. Chrome scales fine. Edge does not.

DaCryptoRaccoon

hero member

Activity: 1241

Merit: 623

OGRaccoon

Quote from: -ck on February 15, 2020, 10:57:06 PM

Quote from: Artemis3 on February 14, 2020, 09:42:54 AM

I don't know what better improvements could stratum have, is the Slush v2 proposal worth it?

To be honest, nothing much, and not really... Most of the issues with Stratum are really more about the syntax, and order of messaging, and so on. It's efficient enough for any sized mining, and having it in readable text is always going to be more useful than binary. The gains from binary communications really aren't worth it as stratum just doesn't use much bandwidth at all. There's no meaningful improvement in V2 with anonymity, efficiency, decentralisation, or anything really, but I didn't want to discourage development. However I doubt I'll ever "upgrade" to V2, and don't really see much point for anyone else doing it. The pool-client relationship is here to stay as is. People are tied to a pool, they don't want insane complexity.

I know we are straying a little off topic here but what are your thoughts on this paper CK?

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.06545.pdf

I don't recall this getting much attention at the time but some of the attacks it can mitigate against are real threats, I wondered why I had not seen the proposals in this document being discussed on the forum at any point and I would love to know your thoughts on the paper.

Magic

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: Artemis3 on February 14, 2020, 09:42:54 AM

I don't know what better improvements could stratum have, is the Slush v2 proposal worth it?

To be honest, nothing much, and not really... Most of the issues with Stratum are really more about the syntax, and order of messaging, and so on. It's efficient enough for any sized mining, and having it in readable text is always going to be more useful than binary. The gains from binary communications really aren't worth it as stratum just doesn't use much bandwidth at all. There's no meaningful improvement in V2 with anonymity, efficiency, decentralisation, or anything really, but I didn't want to discourage development. However I doubt I'll ever "upgrade" to V2, and don't really see much point for anyone else doing it. The pool-client relationship is here to stay as is. People are tied to a pool, they don't want insane complexity.

gcanelson

member

Activity: 110

Merit: 56

Quote from: DaCryptoRaccoon on February 12, 2020, 01:22:08 PM

How about a signature campaign or some advertising of the pool?

Big respect to you CK for keeping it rolling for the community but it's a two way thing we should be getting out there spreading the word I for one won't mine on other pools never have I think a lot of us would be more than happy to try get some more people to the pool and signatures may help some what obviously on a voluntary system to show the support for your efforts CK.

Thoughts?

I'm still here.
I'm quiet, but I'm still here.
I'm a senior citizen. So, in my life, I've learned that things take time. I started mining as something to keep my mind busy while I recovered from a heart attack. It took several months for me to find -ck and this pool. Tonight, I'm looking back at some early spreadsheets... end of May 2018 - 5 2Pacs and 1 shiny new R808! Sitting 579 places away from my first payment. In those days, I was filling out spreadsheets 6 or 8 times a day. But after all this time, I now only do that once or twice a day. Why? The GS equipment I have from sidehack is boring. It just works! And -ck's pool and solo are boring. They just work. For me, that's what I was looking for. Things that worked and worked well enough to be boring. These days, I'm often in the top 50 - just waiting for the next block. I'm not bored... I'm patient. I've found what works best, and I'm staying with it. Thank you -ck for this pool. I tell all my co-workers, friends and relatives. In addition to using it, that's what I do for this pool.

y_virtual

sr. member

Activity: 377

Merit: 251

Note to self: it's not you doing it, it's us.

Quote from: -ck on February 10, 2020, 03:16:12 PM

Quote from: y_virtual on February 10, 2020, 11:50:38 AM

Quote from: -ck on February 03, 2020, 11:00:41 PM

Every bit's appreciated, but we really need more like 2EH.

So 2 blocks in one week with (less than) 2PH and then even less than 1PH... or am I wrong? At least that's what https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin reported anyway...

Mining difficulty is now lightyears higher than it was back then, and the pool was bigger for periods during (the now defunct) halongmining burn in.

https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin
29. ckpool.org

1.13 PH/s

617393
7 hours

Artemis3

legendary

Activity: 2030

Merit: 1573

CLEAN non GPL infringing code made in Rust lang

Quote from: minefarmbuy on February 13, 2020, 10:42:18 AM

We have links on our site and do some twitter posts every so often.

I love hearing that ckpool doesn't have the bells and whistles others have when others lack so much.
Nothing is as anonymous, no fee, others hold your coins for you, and getting paid from coinbase to node has no better joy than seeing a pick axe on your core UI.

Essentially with stratum protocol as it is you can't do better. Largest hashers always get their money and little guys will creep into payout eventually. Same as a pool who would charge you to hold your coins anyway, likely with a minimum withdrawal.

That minimal withdrawal is terrible for the smaller miner. Many of those pools only allow 0.01₿ withdraws which can easily take a couple of months with a 10THs miner.

And most take a 4% pool fee...

I don't know what better improvements could stratum have, is the Slush v2 proposal worth it? I personally like the compression part, or having your farm use a (local) proxy that does it for you.

vickersja

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 34

To be the man, you gotta beat the man...... WOOOOO

I just want to point out that we were at 999TH/s. I turned on my Antminer S5 and we are sitting at 1.01PH/s.

So, you're welcome.

Happy mining everyone!

minefarmbuy

full member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 221

We are not retail.

We have links on our site and do some twitter posts every so often.

I love hearing that ckpool doesn't have the bells and whistles others have when others lack so much.
Nothing is as anonymous, no fee, others hold your coins for you, and getting paid from coinbase to node has no better joy than seeing a pick axe on your core UI.

Essentially with stratum protocol as it is you can't do better. Largest hashers always get their money and little guys will creep into payout eventually. Same as a pool who would charge you to hold your coins anyway, likely with a minimum withdrawal.

DaCryptoRaccoon

hero member

Activity: 1241

Merit: 623

OGRaccoon

How about a signature campaign or some advertising of the pool?

Big respect to you CK for keeping it rolling for the community but it's a two way thing we should be getting out there spreading the word I for one won't mine on other pools never have I think a lot of us would be more than happy to try get some more people to the pool and signatures may help some what obviously on a voluntary system to show the support for your efforts CK.

Thoughts?

evade_57

member

Activity: 93

Merit: 11

S17 rental added for 24 hours

Added to my awesome 1.2Ths daily hashing Roll Eyes

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: y_virtual on February 10, 2020, 11:50:38 AM

Quote from: -ck on February 03, 2020, 11:00:41 PM

Every bit's appreciated, but we really need more like 2EH.

So 2 blocks in one week with (less than) 2PH and then even less than 1PH... or am I wrong? At least that's what https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin reported anyway...

Mining difficulty is now lightyears higher than it was back then, and the pool was bigger for periods during (the now defunct) halongmining burn in.

PassThePopcorn

sr. member

Activity: 463

Merit: 309

Quote from: TheYankeesWin! on February 10, 2020, 01:59:10 PM

Quote from: PassThePopcorn on February 10, 2020, 12:30:29 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on February 10, 2020, 12:15:22 PM

Quote from: y_virtual on February 10, 2020, 11:50:38 AM

Quote from: -ck on February 03, 2020, 11:00:41 PM

Every bit's appreciated, but we really need more like 2EH.

So 2 blocks in one week with (less than) 2PH and then even less than 1PH... or am I wrong? At least that's what https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin reported anyway...

BTW my recent observations on multiple pools reveal a completely different/opposite picture than the popular opinion goes. Looks like smaller pools with fewer competing miners improve the overall pool efficiency, I guess it could be due to small pools by design/usage "relieve" the inevitable technical bottlenecks any large pool has. Just an intuitive guess of mine.

certainly looks to be a reporting error on someones part.

blockchain.info has that block at unknown not ckpool

If you look at the "pool" that blockchain.com says found it, it is 32LA7cmsj35LH7cK1MjvwyoLEmYpuWAD9k which is also the top (#1) payout on ckpool. Not 100% on what it reports or who's account that is but it is a ckpool user at the very least.

I get this info

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/block/00000000000000000007c7186fd29956197dc96222b8db62334d73054efc33fc

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/3P8sR3K8wAk3bom7tqpr5VrzCz9TVYNTQd

that address you mention is here

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/32LA7cmsj35LH7cK1MjvwyoLEmYpuWAD9k

does not show a block for 616785

Hmm didn't know 616785 was one from ckpool, I just went to ckpool.org and clicked on the blocks found. When I reattempt now I get a different page that has the list of each block and not a redirect to btc.com/pools/ckpool like before. Kind of seems like a server error being thrown or something being changed.

Topic: ckpool.org CLOSED - page 6. (Read 162933 times)