Claymore XPM GPU Miner discussion - page 34.

jollyriffic

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: Judgment on April 23, 2014, 08:17:19 PM

Ok im seeing Total/Valid blocks 1 / 1 now. So I found a block?

Still no change in wallet balance though, maybe it takes a while to update?

Edit: i'm using Claymore solo edition wallet but in readme it now says: 1. Use official Primecoin wallet with this miner. Should I switch?

no, you use claymore wallet
the part about the official primecoin wallet is you need an official primecoin wallet so claymore can connect to the actual wallet data file
check your immature coins. if you've found a block you should see 7.686 XPM in there. this takes 3200 confirmations to be usable.
to find out how many you've got, just hover over the recent transaction that has two hammers.

Judgment

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Ok im seeing Total/Valid blocks 1 / 1 now. So I found a block?

Still no change in wallet balance though, maybe it takes a while to update?

Edit: i'm using Claymore solo edition wallet but in readme it now says: 1. Use official Primecoin wallet with this miner. Should I switch?

SpeedDemon13

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: Claymore on April 23, 2014, 05:28:10 PM

Quote from: SpeedDemon13 on April 23, 2014, 03:57:24 PM

What's new about v3.1b?

+5% faster than v3.0. v3.1 was unstable so I removed it.

Oh ok.

Do you have plans to optimize the miner with driver 14.3 and up?

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: Judgment on April 23, 2014, 04:02:19 PM

49h solo 3x 290.. no blocks with combined average CPD 8. Angry

Trying the 3.1b for couple days, going back to pooled mining if I'll find no blocks.

Edit: I'm getting TRT values of about 245 per card (1150mhz core) is this normal?

I get TRT 215 on 290X core 1050 memory 1350, CPD is 2.4-2.6.

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: SpeedDemon13 on April 23, 2014, 03:57:24 PM

What's new about v3.1b?

+5% faster than v3.0. v3.1 was unstable so I removed it.

Judgment

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

49h solo 3x 290.. no blocks with combined average CPD 8. Angry

Trying the 3.1b for couple days, going back to pooled mining if I'll find no blocks.

Edit: I'm getting TRT values of about 245 per card (1150mhz core) is this normal?

SpeedDemon13

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: Claymore on April 23, 2014, 03:06:44 PM

Quote from: jgle on April 23, 2014, 02:59:41 PM

Quote from: jgle on April 23, 2014, 02:47:18 PM

Quote from: Claymore on April 23, 2014, 02:44:38 PM

Quote from: jgle on April 23, 2014, 02:19:54 PM

"Less values are better, you can overclock cards or do anything you to minimize these values."at "Readme!!!.txt" but 1 280X and 2 280X 4CH a lot of difference, speed depends on the minimum value of M? Or 4CH?

Second card is under v3.1b, it uses v3.1 so it does work . Trust 4ch/h value more than TRT values.

TKS

As time increases, 4CH value in reduction of M is reduced so normal? You are the last answer, I understand should be calculated speed with 4CH value. If I continue to use the 3 SOLO?

4ch/h value can varies, but not too much. E.g. if after 5min you see 150K 4ch/h it cannot become 100K or 200K later.

What's new about v3.1b?

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: jgle on April 23, 2014, 02:59:41 PM

Quote from: jgle on April 23, 2014, 02:47:18 PM

Quote from: Claymore on April 23, 2014, 02:44:38 PM

Quote from: jgle on April 23, 2014, 02:19:54 PM

"Less values are better, you can overclock cards or do anything you to minimize these values."at "Readme!!!.txt" but 1 280X and 2 280X 4CH a lot of difference, speed depends on the minimum value of M? Or 4CH?

Second card is under v3.1b, it uses v3.1 so it does work . Trust 4ch/h value more than TRT values.

TKS

As time increases, 4CH value in reduction of M is reduced so normal? You are the last answer, I understand should be calculated speed with 4CH value. If I continue to use the 3 SOLO?

4ch/h value can varies, but not too much. E.g. if after 5min you see 150K 4ch/h it cannot become 100K or 200K later.

jgle

member

Activity: 85

Merit: 10

Quote from: jgle on April 23, 2014, 02:47:18 PM

Quote from: Claymore on April 23, 2014, 02:44:38 PM

Quote from: jgle on April 23, 2014, 02:19:54 PM

"Less values are better, you can overclock cards or do anything you to minimize these values."at "Readme!!!.txt" but 1 280X and 2 280X 4CH a lot of difference, speed depends on the minimum value of M? Or 4CH?

Second card is under v3.1b, it uses v3.1 so it does work . Trust 4ch/h value more than TRT values.

TKS

As time increases, 4CH value in reduction of M is reduced so normal? You are the last answer, I understand should be calculated speed with 4CH value. If I continue to use the 3 SOLO?

jgle

member

Activity: 85

Merit: 10

Quote from: Claymore on April 23, 2014, 02:44:38 PM

Quote from: jgle on April 23, 2014, 02:19:54 PM

"Less values are better, you can overclock cards or do anything you to minimize these values."at "Readme!!!.txt" but 1 280X and 2 280X 4CH a lot of difference, speed depends on the minimum value of M? Or 4CH?

Second card is under v3.1b, it uses v3.1 so it does work properly. Trust 4ch/h value more than TRT values.

TKS

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: jgle on April 23, 2014, 02:19:54 PM

"Less values are better, you can overclock cards or do anything you want to minimize these values."at "Readme!!!.txt" but 1 280X and 2 280X 4CH a lot of difference, speed depends on the minimum value of M? Or 4CH?

Second card is not under v3.1b, it uses v3.1 so it does not work properly. Trust 4ch/h value more than TRT values.

jgle

member

Activity: 85

Merit: 10

triton0550

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: Claymore on April 23, 2014, 01:49:30 PM

Yes, this problem confirmed and fixed, check my folder on MEGA and download v3.1b.

thank you

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

triton0550

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: Claymore on April 23, 2014, 11:49:20 AM

I've uploaded a small update v3.1, +5% speed for 290/290X, so CPD for these cards is about 2.5 now. For other cards probably you will see even less improvement, so just wait for better update

After 27 minutes of not looking for blocks
R9 290X Tri-x
miner v3.1
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Wed Apr 23 22:38:14 2014
New Block: 507483 - Current Diff: 10.816298
Total/Valid blocks: [ 0 / 0 ] - Max diff: 8.916014
[ 4ch] [ 7ch] [ 8ch] [ 9ch] [ 10ch] [ 11ch] [ 12ch]
Total: [ 93K] [ 58] [ 4] [ 0] [ 0] [ 0] [ 0]
ch/h: [ 200552] [124.564] [ 8.591] [ 0.000] [ 0.000] [ 0.000] [ 0.000]
Estimated CPD: 2.1477, Average CPD: 0.0000, Mining time: 00:27
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
sieve: 128, fermat: 2, total: 136 Total Round Time (TRT): 136
sieve: 128, fermat: 1, total: 136 Total Round Time (TRT): 136
sieve: 128, fermat: 2, total: 137 Total Round Time (TRT): 137
sieve: 128, fermat: 2, total: 137 Total Round Time (TRT): 137
sieve: 128, fermat: 2, total: 137 Total Round Time (TRT): 137
sieve: 128, fermat: 2, total: 138 Total Round Time (TRT): 138
sieve: 128, fermat: 2, total: 136 Total Round Time (TRT): 136
sieve: 128, fermat: 2, total: 137 Total Round Time (TRT): 137
sieve: 128, fermat: 2, total: 137 Total Round Time (TRT): 137

tristartek

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Been at it for about 18hrs with solo on 290x cards and only for 2 blocks for 8 cards. I think pool might be better unless I find another block in next 6 hours.

aistto

legendary

Activity: 1001

Merit: 1005

Quote from: Croak on April 23, 2014, 10:43:22 AM

10ch has to be higher than the current difficulty. In your screenshot, you would need higher than 10.815227 to find a block.

+100500

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

I've uploaded a small update v3.1, +5% speed for 290/290X, so CPD for these cards is about 2.5 now. For other cards probably you will see even less improvement, so just wait for better update

slimdim

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: triton0550 on April 23, 2014, 10:32:19 AM

Quote from: Strannik-74 on April 23, 2014, 10:16:41 AM

11ch = This is block, 10ch - do not block
(10ch это нифига не блок, а вот 11ch это уже блок))

Так у многих он и между 10ch и 11ch появляется. Он засчитывается в 10ch и соответственно пишет найден блок.
У самого вчера было 7 блоков 10ch и 1 всего засчитан. ypool имеет 95% - 97% всех решений, скорее всего они быстрее успевают решить, а у нас увы )

у меня в кошеле тож появился блок - нашел - а потом пропал

кароче надо на пул уходить мужики =)

(had a block - found - and then was gone

in short the hectare should leave a pool men =)))

Croak

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

10ch has to be higher than the current difficulty. In your screenshot, you would need higher than 10.815227 to find a block.

Topic: Claymore XPM GPU Miner discussion - page 34. (Read 142120 times)