Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 189. (Read 2145059 times)

Hello to All!

First: Claymore Thanks for Miner is Great! Work great on my Rig1, Rig2 is a problem
I have 4x MSI R9 280x, mobo msi 890fxa-gd70, Sempron 140, 8 GB RAM, psu 1200 Corsair.

My .bat:
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT =100

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth.coinmine.pl:4000 -ewal xxxx.xxxx -esm 2 -epsw password -allpools 1 -dpool stratum+tcp://dcr.coinmine.pl:2222 -dwal xxxx.xxxx -dpsw password

I got this from LoG file:
1)
ETH: 1 pool is specified
00:59:42:936   f04   Main Ethereum pool is eth.coinmine.pl:4000
00:59:42:936   f04   DCR: 1 pool is specified
00:59:42:936   f04   Main Decred pool is dcr.coinmine.pl:2222
00:59:43:669   f04   OpenCL platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
00:59:43:684   f04   OpenCL initializing...

00:59:43:684   f04   AMD Cards available: 2
00:59:43:684   f04   GPU #0: Tahiti, 512 MB available, 32 compute units - !!!!!why only this? !!!!
00:59:43:684   f04   GPU #1: Tahiti, 512 MB available, 32 compute units
00:59:43:684   f04   POOL/SOLO version

2)
00:59:56:352   f70   eth: job changed
00:59:56:352   f70   new buf size: 0
00:59:56:352   f70   ETH: 10/14/16-00:59:56 - New job from eth.coinmine.pl:4000
00:59:56:352   f70   target: 0x00000002dd01fc06 (diff: 1500MH), epoch #81
00:59:56:352   f70   ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 - No speed?
00:59:56:352   f70   ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s
00:59:56:352   f70    DCR - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0
00:59:56:352   f70    DCR: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s
00:59:56:430   f78   got 524 bytes

Ok Try mining XMR ( I know that this topic is for ETH, but i dony want to repeat)
I got this:
01:00:43:760   bf0   parse packet: 303
01:00:43:760   bf0   new buf size: 0
01:00:43:760   6b4   DevFee: Pool Diff 50000.2
01:00:43:760   bf0   Pool Diff 18000
01:00:43:760   bf0   df has same pool, skip
01:00:43:838   a4c   Round
01:00:43:838   670   Round
01:00:43:838   a68   Round
01:00:43:854   bac   Round
01:00:44:852   a4c   GPU 0: HashCnt = 32, time = 997 ms, hashrate = 32 h/s
01:00:44:852   a4c   Round
01:00:44:899   a68   GPU 1: HashCnt = 32, time = 1032 ms, hashrate = 31 h/s
01:00:44:899   a68   Round
01:00:45:819   670   GPU 0: HashCnt = 32, time = 946 ms, hashrate = 33 h/s
01:00:45:819   670   Round
01:00:45:866   bac   GPU 1: HashCnt = 32, time = 946 ms, hashrate = 33 h/s - it is slow i think?

Thanks for help. J.
01:00:45:866   bac   Roun

@ claymore.

still looking for version that does not test the xmr address upon start, any update?


note:  still the most stable miner i have had since btc:

all rigs very stable, this rig is two 290x's


this one is 3 7970's


Anyone else have more then 1080 hours??
JIm

What causes 'Invalid Share' to be sent to my mining pool?  I have a few so far.  They deduct some from my total when it happens, so I want to prevent or reduce it as much as possible.
[UPDATE] I researched this problem and it is usually overclocking errors or bugs in mining software; others have posted that this miner may send them, though typically only when combined with certain GPUs.

I was guessing h/s.

You mean kh/s not mh/s i think

FIRST aeon is cryptonite light algo dosent work with this miner second have you ever Read the readme.txt file in your miner foulder?  when not, do it! 

With an RX 480 Sapphire Nitro+ OC 8gb stock-settings mining XMR I get 645 h/s; I took recommendations from the Eth. board and overclocked memory by 200, reduced Voltage by 48 which resulted in a stable 724 h/s, 'good enough.  Well, perhaps the newest GPUs (Pascal GTX 1000s and Polaris RX 400s) and their drivers are in line for mining software optimization by some crafty programmer.

hello, I want to know what would be the commands to mine aeon GPU,
I tried to make a bat, I'm atualmente minergate:
NsGpuCNMiner, or stratum + tcp: //aeon.pool.minergate.com: 45690 my email -u -p x

but it does not work presents claymore error as a result null = Invalid shares:415

I would also like to know the steps for mining etherum dual-xmr with claymore 9.6
gpu rx 480 for 8gb

I could get 620mh with 4gb rx 470 and 750mh with 8gb rx 470 both sapphire nitros

Is it typical for all RX 400 series cards to mine XMR with a maximum hash rate of ~550 h/s stock like with my 470 & 480 cards and the same experiences of someone with similar results on the previous page?   When is it planned for this miner to take advantage of these new RADEON GPUs and Catalyst?  At least this and ccminer work with the new GPUs; I was using Minergate, but it's GPU miner crashes on RX 400s and GTX 1000s.  It's awesome that Claymore is coding a Linux version as I'm building a miner/server with 8 GPUs, 2 CPUs (20 core, 40 hyperthread, E5-2630 v4) and I'll be using both of Claymore's CPU & GPU miners.

I have tried it at my old computer with Windows XP and miner doesn't work for me.

as long as 64bit Windows OS -- it should install.... however, good luck getting AMD drivers for XP

What do you do if it uses 100% CPU?  Is there a way to change that?  I have it on low priority in Task Manager.  I have 6 megs of Ram and a ACPI x64-based PC, AMD radeon 6410. 

Does this work on Windows XP SP 3 ?

I am wondering, do you think I would i get different result using a different pool? or it wouldn't matter, i would get the same result

i think it is because they can only estimate your hashrate by the success shares. 

General question about pool and hash rates.

How come i see on the pool's website my hash rate between 2 to 3kh/sec
when i know that i generate at least 3.5 kh/s ( 5 x RX 480 (~650 h/s each + ~230 for my i7 cpu + ~100 for an other cpu )

is it because the pool is not stable/efficient or is it lag/packet loss causing this discrepancy?

thank you sir.

I need to change devfee system for this miner to support all pools, it takes some time, also I'm working on Linux version, so be patient please, I think it will be done in a week.

THIS:   needed for MRR too:  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16440489