Hi Claymore!
Please, add option -minspeed as in dual miner
Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 47. (Read 2145056 times)
^^^ this, with NH updates. ..
Please provide Linux updated miner Claymore 
Anyone knows the best intensity on Vega ?
CM not optimized for Vega yet, use Cast XMR, 1900H+ (CM gets ~1400). Use blockchain driver, and every reboot need to disable/enable card in device manager. Cast XMR stable though, haven't had to reboot in weeks. CM will probably optimize at some point, but hasn't yet.
Claymore, is there a way to NOT CRASH in case of Internalservererror? https://i.imgur.com/fHhQtiL.png
Ok, 11.2 does not crash in this case. Please check as there may be others wrong pool replies.
Thank you, no changes to -h were needed. Btw, does -li work in this miner?
Ok, 11.2 does not crash in this case. Please check as there may be others wrong pool replies.
Thank you, no changes to -h were needed. Btw, does -li work in this miner?
Anyone knows the best intensity on Vega ?
Hey Claymore, on your ETH dual miner there is an argument: -ejobtimeout 1. Why we don't have it on CryptoNote miner? It is necessary when using unstable connection, for example 3G/LTE modems. 2-3 times a day there is a situation when modem reconnects to the cellular network (it may be that ip address is switching) and pool connection become broken, but miner still thinks it is ok and sends shares to the pool but the pool is not responding with accept or reject. The better solution would be to reset a connection if there is no response from the pool.
i mine with usb cellar modem (3G EVDO with verizon)) and dont get this with any of my miners. and i dont have that flag set on cdm, and no special flags on my other miners, had this 3g/evdo setup for years. running dstm, ccminer, ewbf, cdm, no issues, even back when gpu btc mining with cgminer. it might time out for a minute maybe but all miners always come back and shares are accepted normally..
maybe its a setting your router or usb modem? i had to use a special router for my usb 3g modem. or maybe its the pool doesnt like it? using mhp at the moment, and nicehash before they took a digger.
Hey Claymore, on your ETH dual miner there is an argument: -ejobtimeout 1. Why we don't have it on CryptoNote miner? It is necessary when using unstable connection, for example 3G/LTE modems. 2-3 times a day there is a situation when modem reconnects to the cellular network (it may be that ip address is switching) and pool connection become broken, but miner still thinks it is ok and sends shares to the pool but the pool is not responding with accept or reject. The better solution would be to reset a connection if there is no response from the pool.
Partially solved in 11.2
Claymore, stability problem!
Almost once a day on different pools, different hardware located on different farms some miner instances suddenly stops at the same time (when on same pool) and blocks batch file from further execution: https://i.imgur.com/leifBzr.png
- i use one miner per card, but even on 1-card farm it may stop
- miner versions are 10.2 and 11
- stops only some of miners but not all, one miner with same card and same settings may stop while other works
- typical period between stops is 12-18h
- rig uptime is not likely to be related
- h values are fine-tuned for each card for better performance, but are 16-fold (h%16==0)
Claymore, stability problem!
Almost once a day on different pools, different hardware located on different farms some miner instances suddenly stops at the same time (when on same pool) and blocks batch file from further execution: https://i.imgur.com/leifBzr.png
- i use one miner per card, but even on 1-card farm it may stop
- miner versions are 10.2 and 11
- stops only some of miners but not all, one miner with same card and same settings may stop while other works
- typical period between stops is 12-18h
- rig uptime is not likely to be related
- h values are fine-tuned for each card for better performance, but are 16-fold (h%16==0)
Hello maybe someone can help me. I'm looking in my rig a broken (too hot) card. In the clay more this is the GPU0 in the GPU Z however the GPU 1. See I in the HWinfo this is then the GPU5. So I can not set a card because it is usually the wrong one. Is there a logic in the numbering of PCI slots? It makes no sense if I set the card 0 in the Claymore 11.1 and 9.7 and the card 1 is controlled. Does anyone have an idea to get that?
Hey guys,
Haven't posted in a while
Is anyone mining Electroneum on Nanopool? What sort of H/s should I be expecting from Rx480s 4Gbs? Just testing so far but from initial setup only getting 750/card.
Thanks in advance.
Haven't posted in a while
Is anyone mining Electroneum on Nanopool? What sort of H/s should I be expecting from Rx480s 4Gbs? Just testing so far but from initial setup only getting 750/card.
Thanks in advance.
That seems ballpark correct if you aren't overclocked or bios modded. the 470 I had (completely stock) did a bit less than that
Thanks for feedback. Yeah currently OC and getting around 28.5MH dual Mining ETH and something else.
Guess no really worth mining Electroneum at the moment. Better off ETH and exchanging it.
HD 7800? methinks those are more than 2 years old, however I've never seen a 7800 before so I could be mistaken...
I retired my HD 7950 a few weeks ago. God bless that thing, it mined a lot of coins!
I retired my HD 7950 a few weeks ago. God bless that thing, it mined a lot of coins!
Hey guys,
Haven't posted in a while
Is anyone mining Electroneum on Nanopool? What sort of H/s should I be expecting from Rx480s 4Gbs? Just testing so far but from initial setup only getting 750/card.
Thanks in advance.
Haven't posted in a while
Is anyone mining Electroneum on Nanopool? What sort of H/s should I be expecting from Rx480s 4Gbs? Just testing so far but from initial setup only getting 750/card.
Thanks in advance.
That seems ballpark correct if you aren't overclocked or bios modded. the 470 I had (completely stock) did a bit less than that
Just bumping this post. Would love to know if the below behavior is due to the older cards and will be gone when my 1080s arrive - or if it's my config. TIA
Need help understanding behavior of Claymore with 2 Graphics cards
I have 2 old graphics cards (I am testing code while new cards where ordered)
AMD Radeon HD 7800 (x2)
When i have both cards in the machine and run NsGpuCNMiner.exe GPU 0 gets 25 h/s, but GPU 1 gets 336 h/s.
If I take out GPU 0 and run with Just GPU 1 it only runs at 55 h/s
I have set all the environment variables correctly per the instructions.
Anyone encounter this before - or if you know what I am doing wrong, please let me know!
Thanks,
Chris
I have 2 old graphics cards (I am testing code while new cards where ordered)
AMD Radeon HD 7800 (x2)
When i have both cards in the machine and run NsGpuCNMiner.exe GPU 0 gets 25 h/s, but GPU 1 gets 336 h/s.
If I take out GPU 0 and run with Just GPU 1 it only runs at 55 h/s
I have set all the environment variables correctly per the instructions.
Anyone encounter this before - or if you know what I am doing wrong, please let me know!
Thanks,
Chris
i can mining Bitcoin or Etherium with GTX 750ti 
? , u can help me?
? , u can help me?
Hey guys,
Haven't posted in a while
Is anyone mining Electroneum on Nanopool? What sort of H/s should I be expecting from Rx480s 4Gbs? Just testing so far but from initial setup only getting 750/card.
Thanks in advance.
Haven't posted in a while
Is anyone mining Electroneum on Nanopool? What sort of H/s should I be expecting from Rx480s 4Gbs? Just testing so far but from initial setup only getting 750/card.
Thanks in advance.
Fixed the seg fault with NH?
I cannot see this bug (don't have it in Windows and don't have access to Linux system currently), but I found possible reason and fixed it. So need someone who sees this bug in Windows and can confirm that it is fixed in latest update. Or I will check it on Linux system directly in a few days.It usually happens right after payment processing when the system disconnects all the miners for a second for some reason. The miner reconnects but the NH server isn't quite initialized and sends malformed stratum data. I'm guessing this data is stored in an undeclared variable and causes a buffer overflow but alas my coding skills are crap and I don't know shit haha...
Fixed the seg fault with NH?
I cannot see this bug (don't have it in Windows and don't have access to Linux system currently), but I found possible reason and fixed it. So need someone who sees this bug in Windows and can confirm that it is fixed in latest update. Or I will check it on Linux system directly in a few days. Claymore is closing itself (or crashing)?
...
...
What is the hashrate on vega compared to cast-xmr ?
Shall we use blockchain drivers or the official ones ?
After that, the miners is closed. The error handler should try reconnect infinitely after x seconds instead.Shall we use blockchain drivers or the official ones ?
Redownload v11.2:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.27361119
Have you fixed the linux seg fault issue with NH or is this just the windows version that's fixed? I've lost over 15% of my hashrate using gatelessgate....
Guys,
New to mining, have 3 x RX 570 4GB.
Edited config file for like below:
-xpool stratum+ssl://xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433
-xwal *myaddress*
-xpsw x
-allpools 1
-h 800
-dmem 1
-tt 75
Currently only getting hash rate of 650 per card. What changes do I need to make to improve performance?
No overclocking yet.
14:03:04:209 94c ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ»
14:03:04:214 94c º Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.0 º
14:03:04:219 94c ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ
14:03:04:224 94c
14:03:04:228 94c b517
14:03:04:436 94c XMR: 1 pool is specified
14:03:04:446 94c Main Monero pool is xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433
14:03:04:975 94c OpenCL platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
14:03:04:983 94c OpenCL initializing...
14:03:04:988 94c driver 10.0.2442.12
14:03:04:993 94c AMD Cards available: 3
14:03:04:997 94c GPU #0: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
14:03:05:040 94c GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
14:03:05:045 94c card 0, m1 4096, m2 2880 w 256
14:03:05:050 94c GPU #1: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
14:03:05:125 94c GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
14:03:05:133 94c card 1, m1 4096, m2 2880 w 256
14:03:05:142 94c GPU #2: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
14:03:05:151 94c GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
14:03:05:160 94c card 2, m1 4096, m2 2880 w 256
New to mining, have 3 x RX 570 4GB.
Edited config file for like below:
-xpool stratum+ssl://xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433
-xwal *myaddress*
-xpsw x
-allpools 1
-h 800
-dmem 1
-tt 75
Currently only getting hash rate of 650 per card. What changes do I need to make to improve performance?
No overclocking yet.
14:03:04:209 94c ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ»
14:03:04:214 94c º Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.0 º
14:03:04:219 94c ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ
14:03:04:224 94c
14:03:04:228 94c b517
14:03:04:436 94c XMR: 1 pool is specified
14:03:04:446 94c Main Monero pool is xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433
14:03:04:975 94c OpenCL platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
14:03:04:983 94c OpenCL initializing...
14:03:04:988 94c driver 10.0.2442.12
14:03:04:993 94c AMD Cards available: 3
14:03:04:997 94c GPU #0: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
14:03:05:040 94c GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
14:03:05:045 94c card 0, m1 4096, m2 2880 w 256
14:03:05:050 94c GPU #1: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
14:03:05:125 94c GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
14:03:05:133 94c card 1, m1 4096, m2 2880 w 256
14:03:05:142 94c GPU #2: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
14:03:05:151 94c GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
14:03:05:160 94c card 2, m1 4096, m2 2880 w 256
Jump to: