Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 78. (Read 2145056 times)
It would be very good to have a nvidia version
Tha latest version run perfectly under Linux with 2 RX580 8Gb
https://i.imgur.com/xzYzwcc.png
Is there any plan to add dual mining support?
https://i.imgur.com/xzYzwcc.png
Is there any plan to add dual mining support?
Hello,
What are your settings for the RX580 8G? Core Speed/Mem Speed/Voltage? What do you have your -h set at? Are you running SMOS?
I'm wondering if you are able to get it stable for longer than 24hrs. I can usually get my RX580 8G rigs stable for 5-8 hrs but then it will reset so I end up getting 3-4 resets in a day. When I was mining ETH with the same rig, it would be stable for 24hr+. Right now my settings are 1200/2000/1000mV with a -h of 1600 running SMOS. I am also running RX570 4G rigs and they are a little more stable at 1-2 resets a day. Not sure why the higher memory cards are having issues. Settings for the 4G cards are 1200/1750/1000mV with a -h of 850 running SMOS.
Both of my rigs are using 11 GPUs, 8G of RAM, z270 chipset.
Cheers,
Hi,
I tried switching to monero from eth mining and it works fine on one of my rig getting 800h/s per gpu but my other rig gets 300ish mhs on all card for 1 second than all but the first card drop 2 0mhs. They're both identical except for GPU brands XFX GTS 580s 8gb vs nitro+ 580 8gb.
Any idea? Ethereum is working fine on both.
I tried switching to monero from eth mining and it works fine on one of my rig getting 800h/s per gpu but my other rig gets 300ish mhs on all card for 1 second than all but the first card drop 2 0mhs. They're both identical except for GPU brands XFX GTS 580s 8gb vs nitro+ 580 8gb.
Any idea? Ethereum is working fine on both.
Check your virtual memory is set high enough, from what I can remember Claymore's Cryptonote miner needs 8GB virtual memory PER CARD to work , or at least work to its best abilities.
Try your setup with a different miner, this might help fault find where the problem is. I prefer to use SGminer for Monero https://github.com/genesismining/sgminer-gm/releases .
Tha latest version run perfectly under Linux with 2 RX580 8Gb
https://i.imgur.com/xzYzwcc.png
Is there any plan to add dual mining support?
https://i.imgur.com/xzYzwcc.png
Is there any plan to add dual mining support?
Hi,
I tried switching to monero from eth mining and it works fine on one of my rig getting 800h/s per gpu but my other rig gets 300ish mhs on all card for 1 second than all but the first card drop 2 0mhs. They're both identical except for GPU brands XFX GTS 580s 8gb vs nitro+ 580 8gb.
Any idea? Ethereum is working fine on both.
I tried switching to monero from eth mining and it works fine on one of my rig getting 800h/s per gpu but my other rig gets 300ish mhs on all card for 1 second than all but the first card drop 2 0mhs. They're both identical except for GPU brands XFX GTS 580s 8gb vs nitro+ 580 8gb.
Any idea? Ethereum is working fine on both.
On my 380 4G claymore 10.2 works but sometimes stops accepting shares after few hours. So I am with sgminer - no problems but speed is slower.
on my 380 2G there was no difference in speed with blockchain driver
Yes, this is the problem I mentioned above. As Carlo said, it's not flawless on older R9 cards, specifically Pitcairn (78xx and 270) and Tahiti (280X, 79xx, etc.), I do find it works fine on the 285/380 (Tonga GCN 3rd series). 10.2 is important as my cards run a lot cooler with less power, but that might just be because they're churning out rubbish. I might rebuild my rigs and put all the older cards in one rig running 9.7 and all the newer, stable stuff into another and run 10.2 - sounds like a great plan but I bet I'm more likely to end up with everything broken...
Interesting that your cards run significantly cooler on 10.2. I haven't noticed any difference in temperatures and both versions of the miner run very cool: I get temps of 50-60C with my fans at 45%. Hashrate is 2020h/s running 4x R9 280x's.
The 270/X Pitcairn cards were cooler by about 10C. My office is now so hot they run at about 65-70C at 100% fans on a good day. The hashrate is also better, about 440H/s vs 400 on 9.7. Obviously this is all a moot point if they're slinging out bad data all the time.
Cryptonote is also a lot cooler than Equihash I noticed.
Finally, the Beta Blockchain drivers on Win10 took my R9 380s from 17.7MH/s to 19.5MH/s in ETH as well as making them respond properly to Power Limit controls in MSI AB so they are slightly underclocked as ETH doesn't seem core speed sensitive on those cards, it is memory speed sensitive though.
Yes, this is the problem I mentioned above. As Carlo said, it's not flawless on older R9 cards, specifically Pitcairn (78xx and 270) and Tahiti (280X, 79xx, etc.), I do find it works fine on the 285/380 (Tonga GCN 3rd series). 10.2 is important as my cards run a lot cooler with less power, but that might just be because they're churning out rubbish. I might rebuild my rigs and put all the older cards in one rig running 9.7 and all the newer, stable stuff into another and run 10.2 - sounds like a great plan but I bet I'm more likely to end up with everything broken...
Interesting that your cards run significantly cooler on 10.2. I haven't noticed any difference in temperatures and both versions of the miner run very cool: I get temps of 50-60C with my fans at 45%. Hashrate is 2020h/s running 4x R9 280x's.
Hi. Help please, I'm from Venezuela.
I have a rig of 470, 460 cards.
I use the v10.2 and blockchain drivers in win 10. Value -h not defined.
I receive many share rejected. Nicehash pool. Europe, USA, Brazil in all I receive a lot of "share rejected"
Excuse my bad English.
It's not claymore I get rejected shares and pool interrupts on sgminer and GG it's nicehash I have a rig of 470, 460 cards.
I use the v10.2 and blockchain drivers in win 10. Value -h not defined.
I receive many share rejected. Nicehash pool. Europe, USA, Brazil in all I receive a lot of "share rejected"
Excuse my bad English.
Is anyone else having 'GPU ## found incorrect share" errors using this miner w/ Nicehash ?
Probably around 10% of my shares are incorrect. Changing the '-h' value doesn't make it better nor worse.
I'm using Radeon R9 280x's with 16gb virtual memory, and "-h 700 -dmem 1".
Probably around 10% of my shares are incorrect. Changing the '-h' value doesn't make it better nor worse.
I'm using Radeon R9 280x's with 16gb virtual memory, and "-h 700 -dmem 1".
Yes, this is the problem I mentioned above. As Carlo said, it's not flawless on older R9 cards, specifically Pitcairn (78xx and 270) and Tahiti (280X, 79xx, etc.), I do find it works fine on the 285/380 (Tonga GCN 3rd series). 10.2 is important as my cards run a lot cooler with less power, but that might just be because they're churning out rubbish. I might rebuild my rigs and put all the older cards in one rig running 9.7 and all the newer, stable stuff into another and run 10.2 - sounds like a great plan but I bet I'm more likely to end up with everything broken...
r9 series need to stay on 9.7, they bug on 10.x except the 390
Agree, I didn't find the way to work 10.x with older cards.
I updated to the new Nicehash Legacy 1.8.1.5, which has the option to switch to Claymore's Cryptonight v9.7.
Running 9.7, everything seems to work fine now.
Thanks!
Agree, I didn't find the way to work 10.x with older cards.
Is anyone else having 'GPU ## found incorrect share" errors using this miner w/ Nicehash ?
Probably around 10% of my shares are incorrect. Changing the '-h' value doesn't make it better nor worse.
I'm using Radeon R9 280x's with 16gb virtual memory, and "-h 700 -dmem 1".
Probably around 10% of my shares are incorrect. Changing the '-h' value doesn't make it better nor worse.
I'm using Radeon R9 280x's with 16gb virtual memory, and "-h 700 -dmem 1".
r9 series need to stay on 9.7, they bug on 10.x except the 390
Is anyone else having 'GPU ## found incorrect share" errors using this miner w/ Nicehash ?
Probably around 10% of my shares are incorrect. Changing the '-h' value doesn't make it better nor worse.
I'm using Radeon R9 280x's with 16gb virtual memory, and "-h 700 -dmem 1".
Probably around 10% of my shares are incorrect. Changing the '-h' value doesn't make it better nor worse.
I'm using Radeon R9 280x's with 16gb virtual memory, and "-h 700 -dmem 1".
last msi afterburner works with blockchain driver but speed on r9 series won't change
but not working on win7
but stay on 9.7
i tested xmr stak but not stable and not faster, even slower on some model , did not find any good setting
also not good on rx460-560
but not working on win7
but stay on 9.7
i tested xmr stak but not stable and not faster, even slower on some model , did not find any good setting
also not good on rx460-560
I don't see any difference in speed with blockchain driver and Crimson 15.12 with my old cards 79xx, 380's. Even with blockchain driver on some of cards were missing settings like powerune in AB, so I am sticking with 15.12.
I just wanted to add that I'm suffering issues with Pitcairn based cards (270/270X), they seem fine on 10.2 but get incorrect shares, on 9.7 they are fine but hash slower and run hotter. As they are part of other mixed rigs I've just run them on 10.2 anyway but I'd rather not be wasting shares. I am at the stage now where all my spare cards are in use, I could deal with losing a bit of hashrate if they run cooler and stable on 10.2. The obvious solution is to buy newer RX cards but why waste what is still a very powerful piece of hardware and I'm not convinced that long-term buying more cards now is a smart move - I also found RX cards present their own issues.
If anyone has a temporary fix for Pitcairn cards please post it (other than using 9.7), I was looking at other miners but Claymore just seems simple, stable and easy to configure.
Try xmr-stark-amd and sgminerIf anyone has a temporary fix for Pitcairn cards please post it (other than using 9.7), I was looking at other miners but Claymore just seems simple, stable and easy to configure.
Thanks, I read up on that but also read conflicting information on stability and SGMiner not being in development any more and XMR-STAK-AMD not being supported on Nicehash. I could be wrong about all this but concluded that the time I spend fiddling with the machines and time offline might be offset by the shares I'm losing due to being incorrect.
Also on another note, are the Blockchain drivers better for older cards - 200/300 series? My R9 380 have seen a slowdown on ETH to about 17MH/s from 20MH/s few months back. I could try them but am reluctant to fiddle if it's stable and working.
Thanks
I just wanted to add that I'm suffering issues with Pitcairn based cards (270/270X), they seem fine on 10.2 but get incorrect shares, on 9.7 they are fine but hash slower and run hotter. As they are part of other mixed rigs I've just run them on 10.2 anyway but I'd rather not be wasting shares. I am at the stage now where all my spare cards are in use, I could deal with losing a bit of hashrate if they run cooler and stable on 10.2. The obvious solution is to buy newer RX cards but why waste what is still a very powerful piece of hardware and I'm not convinced that long-term buying more cards now is a smart move - I also found RX cards present their own issues.
If anyone has a temporary fix for Pitcairn cards please post it (other than using 9.7), I was looking at other miners but Claymore just seems simple, stable and easy to configure.
Try xmr-stark-amd and sgminer If anyone has a temporary fix for Pitcairn cards please post it (other than using 9.7), I was looking at other miners but Claymore just seems simple, stable and easy to configure.
I just wanted to add that I'm suffering issues with Pitcairn based cards (270/270X), they seem fine on 10.2 but get incorrect shares, on 9.7 they are fine but hash slower and run hotter. As they are part of other mixed rigs I've just run them on 10.2 anyway but I'd rather not be wasting shares. I am at the stage now where all my spare cards are in use, I could deal with losing a bit of hashrate if they run cooler and stable on 10.2. The obvious solution is to buy newer RX cards but why waste what is still a very powerful piece of hardware and I'm not convinced that long-term buying more cards now is a smart move - I also found RX cards present their own issues.
If anyone has a temporary fix for Pitcairn cards please post it (other than using 9.7), I was looking at other miners but Claymore just seems simple, stable and easy to configure.
If anyone has a temporary fix for Pitcairn cards please post it (other than using 9.7), I was looking at other miners but Claymore just seems simple, stable and easy to configure.
Jump to: