After trying a lot of different driver versions, we have it running with CUDA 6.5 and Miner 6.1
Geforce Driver: 350.12
ETH - Total Speed: 21.970 Mh/s, Total Shares: 26, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:08
ETH: GPU0 12.659 Mh/s, GPU1 9.311 Mh/s
SC - Total Speed: 329.548 Mh/s, Total Shares: 36, Rejected: 0
SC: GPU0 189.889 Mh/s, GPU1 139.659 Mh/s
GPU0=GTXTitanX
GPU1=GTX970
----------
Current batfile is this:
ethdcrminer64.exe -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal user.worker -epsw x -esm 3 -dpool sia.suprnova.cc:7777 -dwal worker.user -dpsw x -dcoin sia -allpools 1
We got it running at Windows 7 x64 now.
GPU #0: GeForce GTX TITAN X, 12288 MB available, 24 compute units, capability: 5.2
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4096 MB available, 13 compute units, capability: 5.2
ETH - Total Speed: 34.305 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
ETH: GPU0 15.662 Mh/s, GPU1 18.674 Mh/s
Still, the GTX 970 is faster than the GTX TitanX, both in single as in dual mode?
How is this possible?
think it's case Pascal drivers are not enough optimised now
and in my eye, it's better not to use new and old Nvidia in one rig
case they likes different drivers
example: 980 takes 180Mh with 970, but with 1070 980 makes 150Mh only (not ETH, just for numbers)
i'm saw better results with a same cards in a rig
and btw, look at memClocks, 970 can be 20-22Mh/Eth