I have 2 x R9 Nanos stock, running 27MHs and 8Mhs after tryingout CDM v6.0
Strange this.... 8Mhs, anybody got similar situation?
Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1164. (Read 6590565 times)
August 18, 2016, 04:08:39 PM
August 18, 2016, 04:02:00 PM
Plugged in my 290x on the default settings and got 29.5 MHs.
Plugged in my 2 480s, and got 18 MHs on each.
Also I noticed that after I run the claymore miner, my AMD catalyst controller always crashes and resets the settings on GPU 0. GPU 1 is unaffected.
Thanks for any input.
Plugged in my 2 480s, and got 18 MHs on each.
Also I noticed that after I run the claymore miner, my AMD catalyst controller always crashes and resets the settings on GPU 0. GPU 1 is unaffected.
Thanks for any input.
August 18, 2016, 03:43:51 PM
on 6.1.3, after starting my fans resets to autospeed, but if I set the option -tt 0 I can`t keep track of temperatures
Try this:
https://mega.nz/#!HphjhRyI!ynSMiXk4NfNWsLbjmD03noY93Zk5mboCq1UacB-S570
Excellent !!! everything is working
OK, after 15 hours solo I have 9 blocks rejections and no one confirmed that something was wrong with 6.1.4b+parity 1.3
I go back to Genoil ....
even getwork error has fixed in this version, but, still have an error when submit share,
I want confirm that something happened with solo ETH (geth 1.4.10) on last revisions of miner. 10 days and no blocks with 150-300 mhs. Claymore could you confirm that ETH solo is ok ? ETC seems fine with accepted blocks (Of course i know about different diffs but anyway).
If 5.3 worked for you, 6.1.4b will work too. However, all versions won't work with parity, I fixed it in 6.1.5b only, refer to this msg: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15963217
1.4.11 was released 4 hours ago. Will test 6.1 beta5 with 300 Mh\s on ETH solo.
August 18, 2016, 03:36:48 PM
ON THE PREVIOUS PAGE, A POSTER CLAIMED 36MH/s WITH HIS 1070--
So I am doubtful of some claims. 980ti cards don't do well on Dagger-Hashimoto. --scryptr
I will try to do same too
But i have Gigabyte 1070 - it have one 8-pin only, so i will be unable to get a high DTP (connectors will be overloaded)
in any way 1070 have high mem oveclock ability, but 980ti have a twice wider memory bus than 1070
980ti CARDS DON'T DO WELL ON DAGGER HASHIMOTO--
My 980ti cards has 2 8-pin connectors, each on a separate PCIe cable. I have overclocked the memory +320, more than my 970 cards or my 960 cards could handle. It only gets 22MH/s. Most reports I read say the same, I have never heard of a 32MH/s 980ti.
GTX 1070 cards can be overclocked far higher. I don't have one, but they can truly outperform a GTX 970. I'll worry about a 1070 when the sales and rebates start showing up. --scryptr
August 18, 2016, 02:35:54 PM
ON THE PREVIOUS PAGE, A POSTER CLAIMED 36MH/s WITH HIS 1070--
So I am doubtful of some claims. 980ti cards don't do well on Dagger-Hashimoto. --scryptr
I will try to do same too
But i have Gigabyte 1070 - it have one 8-pin only, so i will be unable to get a high DTP (connectors will be overloaded)
in any way 1070 have high mem oveclock ability, but 980ti have a twice wider memory bus than 1070
August 18, 2016, 02:29:30 PM
Still no linux version of 6.1?
Happy running 5.3 with AMD GPUs but I'd like to try it with NVIDIA GPUs too.
Happy running 5.3 with AMD GPUs but I'd like to try it with NVIDIA GPUs too.
Within 24 hours I will release v6.2, this version will have Linux build too. Note Linux version is linked to cuda 7.5 so recent drivers are required.
August 18, 2016, 02:26:35 PM
Still no linux version of 6.1?
Happy running 5.3 with AMD GPUs but I'd like to try it with NVIDIA GPUs too.
Happy running 5.3 with AMD GPUs but I'd like to try it with NVIDIA GPUs too.
August 18, 2016, 02:08:04 PM
EVGA CLASSIFIED 980ti--
And I've never seen a report of any 980ti getting 32MH/s. a GTX 1070 might attain 32+MH/s, but 980ti cards will not. The top-end GTX cards do not "scale" with the number of CUDA units when hashing Dagger-Hashimoto, the way they would with a compute-intensive algorithm. The only card bigger and better than a 980ti is a Titan, and the Titan does not do well with Dagger-Hashimoto, either. --scryptr
i had 06G-P4-4996 (EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+)
i was able to reach it at with a bios mod (DTP, voltage, mem and gpu clock up)
but it was 85C hot, so i decide to use 2pcs MSI 970 which are 22Mh at 73C (power was for free. mean just utilize give-or-pay contract)
P.S. i'm not sure that GTX 1070 can meet 32+Mh due to thin memory bandwith. think it will be just little highter than 970
ON THE PREVIOUS PAGE, A POSTER CLAIMED 36MH/s WITH HIS 1070--
So I am doubtful of some claims. 980ti cards don't do well on Dagger-Hashimoto. --scryptr
August 18, 2016, 01:42:10 PM
on 6.1.3, after starting my fans resets to autospeed, but if I set the option -tt 0 I can`t keep track of temperatures
Try this:
https://mega.nz/#!HphjhRyI!ynSMiXk4NfNWsLbjmD03noY93Zk5mboCq1UacB-S570
Excellent !!! everything is working
OK, after 15 hours solo I have 9 blocks rejections and no one confirmed that something was wrong with 6.1.4b+parity 1.3
I go back to Genoil ....
even getwork error has fixed in this version, but, still have an error when submit share,
I want confirm that something happened with solo ETH (geth 1.4.10) on last revisions of miner. 10 days and no blocks with 150-300 mhs. Claymore could you confirm that ETH solo is ok ? ETC seems fine with accepted blocks (Of course i know about different diffs but anyway).
If 5.3 worked for you, 6.1.4b will work too. However, all versions won't work with parity, I fixed it in 6.1.5b only, refer to this msg: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15963217
August 18, 2016, 01:33:33 PM
EVGA CLASSIFIED 980ti--
And I've never seen a report of any 980ti getting 32MH/s. a GTX 1070 might attain 32+MH/s, but 980ti cards will not. The top-end GTX cards do not "scale" with the number of CUDA units when hashing Dagger-Hashimoto, the way they would with a compute-intensive algorithm. The only card bigger and better than a 980ti is a Titan, and the Titan does not do well with Dagger-Hashimoto, either. --scryptr
i had 06G-P4-4996 (EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0+)
i was able to reach it at with a bios mod (DTP, voltage, mem and gpu clock up)
but it was 85C hot, so i decide to use 2pcs MSI 970 which are 22Mh at 73C (power was for free. mean just utilize give-or-pay contract)
P.S. i'm not sure that GTX 1070 can meet 32+Mh due to thin memory bandwith. think it will be just little highter than 970
August 18, 2016, 01:25:11 PM
on 6.1.3, after starting my fans resets to autospeed, but if I set the option -tt 0 I can`t keep track of temperatures
Try this:
https://mega.nz/#!HphjhRyI!ynSMiXk4NfNWsLbjmD03noY93Zk5mboCq1UacB-S570
Excellent !!! everything is working
OK, after 15 hours solo I have 9 blocks rejections and no one confirmed that something was wrong with 6.1.4b+parity 1.3
I go back to Genoil ....
even getwork error has fixed in this version, but, still have an error when submit share,
I want confirm that something happened with solo ETH (geth 1.4.10) on last revisions of miner. 10 days and no blocks with 150-300 mhs. Claymore could you confirm that ETH solo is ok ? ETC seems fine with accepted blocks (Of course i know about different diffs but anyway).
August 18, 2016, 01:04:22 PM
My 980ti is only slightly better than a 970, 22MH/s vs. 20MH/s, and again, the memory design is slightly different between the two cards. Other algorithms see a big difference in performance.
The cards were not designed to hash Dagger-Hashimoto. --scryptr
The cards were not designed to hash Dagger-Hashimoto. --scryptr
Sorry, what is your 980ti manufacturer?
it must be near a 32Mh...
EVGA CLASSIFIED 980ti--
And I've never seen a report of any 980ti getting 32MH/s. a GTX 1070 might attain 32+MH/s, but 980ti cards will not. The top-end GTX cards do not "scale" with the number of CUDA units when hashing Dagger-Hashimoto, the way they would with a compute-intensive algorithm. The only card bigger and better than a 980ti is a Titan, and the Titan does not do well with Dagger-Hashimoto, either. --scryptr
August 18, 2016, 01:01:58 PM
Hi Claymore,
first of all thank you for creating such a great software.
I have been using dual miner 6.1 on my GTX 1060s. Win 10 anniversary edition. WDDM 2.1. getting 21Mh/s
Memory controller load is 100%
Memory used is 1936MB out of 6GB available.
GPU load is 100%
I have OCed 0/+700
Am I getting bottlenecked at the memory controller? Can you do something to allocate more memory and decrease load on the controller?
Thank you
first of all thank you for creating such a great software.
I have been using dual miner 6.1 on my GTX 1060s. Win 10 anniversary edition. WDDM 2.1. getting 21Mh/s
Memory controller load is 100%
Memory used is 1936MB out of 6GB available.
GPU load is 100%
I have OCed 0/+700
Am I getting bottlenecked at the memory controller? Can you do something to allocate more memory and decrease load on the controller?
Thank you
Please tell me a version driver u use .. cause i try 1060 x2 use all claymore 6.0, 6.1 still 4 mh/s
Hello, I am using 369 (latest version) Make sure you go to nvidia website and install CUDA toolkit 7.5 or 8.0 whichever you like.
Perform a clean install of drivers when drivers are getting installed (you will have to select "custom installation" option) and then you will get a clean installation prompt. Have you installed anniversary windows 10 update? You will HAVE TO install that before you install new drivers.
so 1) Uninstall current nvidia drivers
2) install windows 10 anniversary edition
3) install latest nvidia drivers
4) install nvida CUDA toolkit
and you should be good to go.
Non OC version gets me 17 Mh/s while OC (just memory OC is necessary) will give you about 20-22 Mh/s variable
Good luck
August 18, 2016, 12:47:09 PM
My 980ti is only slightly better than a 970, 22MH/s vs. 20MH/s, and again, the memory design is slightly different between the two cards. Other algorithms see a big difference in performance.
The cards were not designed to hash Dagger-Hashimoto. --scryptr
The cards were not designed to hash Dagger-Hashimoto. --scryptr
Sorry, what is your 980ti manufacturer?
it must be near a 32Mh...
August 18, 2016, 12:30:43 PM
Guys i have problem with my hashrate, i have 390x sappphire nitro and 390 gigabyte g1, but my sapphire card goes downclock and 390 g1 stable. I am using claymore dual miner, my other components are ssd 250gb samsung, 16gb ram, z68s-g43 (g3), i5 3570, LEPA MaxBron B1000...ati drivers 15.12... How to solve this i tried power limit 23+ on sapphire and then is stable ,is it safe to do this and is there another way, bcs when i raise powerl limit vrm goes 89-92c??? Gpu 0 is 390x and gpu1 is 390 https://s3.postimg.org/evxh82zrn/gpu.png
August 18, 2016, 11:57:27 AM
Hi Claymore,
first of all thank you for creating such a great software.
I have been using dual miner 6.1 on my GTX 1060s. Win 10 anniversary edition. WDDM 2.1. getting 21Mh/s
Memory controller load is 100%
Memory used is 1936MB out of 6GB available.
GPU load is 100%
I have OCed 0/+700
Am I getting bottlenecked at the memory controller? Can you do something to allocate more memory and decrease load on the controller?
Thank you
first of all thank you for creating such a great software.
I have been using dual miner 6.1 on my GTX 1060s. Win 10 anniversary edition. WDDM 2.1. getting 21Mh/s
Memory controller load is 100%
Memory used is 1936MB out of 6GB available.
GPU load is 100%
I have OCed 0/+700
Am I getting bottlenecked at the memory controller? Can you do something to allocate more memory and decrease load on the controller?
Thank you
Please tell me a version driver u use .. cause i try 1060 x2 use all claymore 6.0, 6.1 still 4 mh/s
August 18, 2016, 11:42:22 AM
Hi Claymore,
first of all thank you for creating such a great software.
I have been using dual miner 6.1 on my GTX 1060s. Win 10 anniversary edition. WDDM 2.1. getting 21Mh/s
Memory controller load is 100%
Memory used is 1936MB out of 6GB available.
GPU load is 100%
I have OCed 0/+700
Am I getting bottlenecked at the memory controller? Can you do something to allocate more memory and decrease load on the controller?
Thank you
first of all thank you for creating such a great software.
I have been using dual miner 6.1 on my GTX 1060s. Win 10 anniversary edition. WDDM 2.1. getting 21Mh/s
Memory controller load is 100%
Memory used is 1936MB out of 6GB available.
GPU load is 100%
I have OCed 0/+700
Am I getting bottlenecked at the memory controller? Can you do something to allocate more memory and decrease load on the controller?
Thank you
August 18, 2016, 11:36:58 AM
If the miner doesn't work with some pool - let me know its address and port, I'll check it.
Hi,
I have tested with Parity v1.3.0,
with Miner 6.1 version can support eth_getWork() but, I think, you have forgot to update eth_submitWork()
Code:
22:56:51:051 8e0 eth: job is the same
22:56:51:051 8e0 new buf size: 0
22:56:51:082 1398 ETH: put share nonce cac153d80d7fd593
22:56:51:082 1398 ETH round found 1 shares
22:56:51:097 8e0 ETH: 08/17/16-22:56:51 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
22:56:51:097 8e0 http send request: {"id":4,"method":"eth_submitWork","params":["0xcac153d80d7fd593","0xd53369c5e3fa6087c7513a92e666643c3289f0027ddaf38a07434b610076c121","0x22d5cfb6500ef4654c3347dd60a67bd05783f209bc623dc595f86c7e50490223"]}
22:56:51:097 8e0 http got answer: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32600,"message":"Invalid request","data":null},"id":null}
22:56:51:097 8e0 ETH: Submitted share rejected!
22:56:51:269 8e0 parse packet: 253
It is the same error which has been before
Fixed, please confirm:
https://mega.nz/#!WoYEDLzb!2wBQPWVdvqOfkkRMoR8LJ_TgO76cTvtVXL5dpRI1h24
August 18, 2016, 11:34:39 AM
Clock control with rx480 is working great in 6.x, but i miss voltage control. Sometimes my miners lose power due to a external problem with some kind of spike of some factory in the neighborhood (when it happens, its always the same hour in the morning). Miners restart and launch claymore miner, but Wattman returns to default settings. This is 21mh/s instead of 27mh/s per card (rx480 4gb). I need to set memory to 2200mhz with 900mV and also underclock gpu in all steps.
Its possible to implement voltage control with claymore miner with the new ADL version?
Its possible to implement voltage control with claymore miner with the new ADL version?
yeah this would be huge for me as well
August 18, 2016, 11:27:15 AM
on 6.1.3, after starting my fans resets to autospeed, but if I set the option -tt 0 I can`t keep track of temperatures
Try this:
https://mega.nz/#!HphjhRyI!ynSMiXk4NfNWsLbjmD03noY93Zk5mboCq1UacB-S570
Excellent !!! everything is working
OK, after 15 hours solo I have 9 blocks rejections and no one confirmed that something was wrong with 6.1.4b+parity 1.3
I go back to Genoil ....
even getwork error has fixed in this version, but, still have an error when submit share,
Jump to: