Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1224.

citronick

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1080

---- winter*juvia -----

Quote from: fredeq on July 12, 2016, 06:19:47 PM

Quote from: citronick on July 12, 2016, 04:27:58 PM

Quote from: fittsy on July 12, 2016, 03:26:26 PM

Quote from: joaocha on July 12, 2016, 03:16:56 PM

Which Pcie Riser is better?

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/PCI-e-X1-TO-X16-Adapter-PCIe-1X-TO-16X-risers-card-with-1m-USB3-0/32614044969.html?spm=2114.30010308.3.122.lUDoYl&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_10,searchweb201602_5_10017_405_404_407_406_10040,searchweb201603_7&btsid=8abc1a8d-e054-43fd-94dd-9f97c801e506

Much better. 60 CM USB cable is about 23.6 inches. Plenty of length so you can spread your GPUs apart. They'll get better airflow.

Not to mention those ribbon cables are shady. They're put together poorly. The USB riser cards are more robust.

And you didn't ask but there is a cheaper USB riser on the bottom left in the similar product section. It's the $4.09. It is version 1. The one you are linking to is version 1.4 (you can actually see it written on the x16 board.) Version 1 only has 2 capacitors. Version 1.4 has 3 capacitors. Version 1 has the USB on one side and power on the other. Version 1.4 has them side by side on a wider circuit board. This makes the bottom flat so you can support the back of the gpu with a piece of wood. I think the one you've linked to is the right one for several reasons. Definitely worth an extra 20 cents each. Don't try to save the money.

Ensure that its the USB3 version (white USB cable) - humble lessons learnt from me.

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/10pcs-lot-PCI-E-PCI-E-Express-1X-to-16X-Riser-Card-USB-3-0-Extender/1679698470.html

It says USB 3.0 on the former auction as well. Cable is also marked as 3.0 on pictures.
Any other reason to go for the ones with green board and white cable?

I have tried several types of risers (USB3 only) and the best (ie. works 100%) is the one with white cable USB3.
I use them for my 390s, Nanos and 480s - so far no issues.
I have tried some with black USB3 cable and out of 10 cables, 2 defects.
You may get lucky with a good batch.
Just sharing my own experience and save you some trouble (and white hair) Grin

un4given

full member

Activity: 192

Merit: 100

does any1 also have problems in ETH/SIA Mode? SIA shares arent being submitted to nanopool eventhough the job is done and shown done in miner

i've got ethermine.org/nanopool combination any1 out there with the same who can post their bat file?

thx in advance

qqqq

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1011

ver 5.0 can't work even with ETH\DCR mode which is working in previous versions (v4.7 v4.5), just copied the .bat

Code:

DUAL MINING MODE ENABLED: ETHEREUM+DECRED
ETH: HTTP SOLO mode
Ethereum HTTP requests time (-etht) is set to 200 ms
Watchdog enabled
Remote management is enabled on port 3333

Setting DAG epoch #62...
 DCR: Stratum - connecting to 'dcr.pool.mn' <136.243.50.159> port 4800

And than it crashed.

uncaer9

sr. member

Activity: 413

Merit: 250

Quote from: Myffas on July 12, 2016, 09:59:05 PM

Anybody worried about this ? It's from an online virus scanning site of the lastest v5.0:

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/001d46762cb177e5bce9df7ed6fae27acaa210e6c65874fbe5e4f5a461e19209/analysis/

3/51 rate this file as unsafe:

AegisLab   Troj.W32.Siscos.lThw
Baidu   Win32.Trojan.WisdomEyes.151026.9950.9975
Ikarus   Trojan.Win64.CoinMiner

Im waiting confirmation from Charloz24 befre update my claymore.

qqqq

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1011

Why it crashed everytime while DAG's generating in ETH SOLO\SIA Pool mode ? Can't make it work on two of my Farm.

Code:

00:12:08:501	44dc	DUAL MINING MODE ENABLED: ETHEREUM+SIACOIN

00:12:08:506	44dc	ETH: HTTP SOLO mode
00:12:08:506	f94	Setting DAG epoch #62...
00:12:08:508	255c	 SC - connecting to sia-eu1.nanopool.org:9980/miner/header?address=e325c219e6acb9e57b8f5adf5c60def3028ecb12f9b25a0c78cbf59ba97e4104c2ad1c5183fb
00:12:08:522	255c	http send request: 
00:12:08:523	44dc	Ethereum HTTP requests time (-etht) is set to 200 ms

00:12:08:528	44dc	Watchdog enabled
00:12:08:532	44dc	Remote management is enabled on port 3333
00:12:08:537	44dc	

00:12:08:689	255c	http got answer: 0000000015fd7fe17964955fdef1ed34a2a73ae91e5fe71947db5116127c069e0000000000000362170123931ced3ee9259ff6ee8fac2da4adaa998211ac248000000000000000008c5d855700000000e37c71cb3294135a70e7ed13f45204947c1b0dd295c0efdd549717c41866509b
00:12:08:713	255c	 SC: Connected (sia-eu1.nanopool.org:9980/miner/header?address=e325c219e6acb9e57b8f5adf5c60def3028ecb12f9b25a0c78cbf59ba97e4104c2ad1c5183fb)
00:12:08:714	255c	SIA job updated

fittsy

sr. member

Activity: 441

Merit: 252

Quote from: citronick on July 12, 2016, 04:27:58 PM

Ensure that its the USB3 version (white USB cable) - humble lessons learnt from me.

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/10pcs-lot-PCI-E-PCI-E-Express-1X-to-16X-Riser-Card-USB-3-0-Extender/1679698470.html

Can you tell us more about the problem you had? I thought the problem with slower hashrates wasn't the USB but the miner. (Cuda miner)

dannygroove

sr. member

Activity: 306

Merit: 250

I dont know why but Im getting 1MH/s less on my XFX R9 380's using latest 5.0 version.
Any ideas?

joaocha

full member

Activity: 254

Merit: 100

Quote from: GH on July 12, 2016, 10:04:37 PM

Quote from: Charloz24 on July 12, 2016, 09:33:29 PM

Quote from: joaocha on July 12, 2016, 06:44:44 PM

Do you think that a 750w (bronze psu) can handle 2 290x?

Yes it will be fine.

It may work with a good quality PSU, but it's too close for my taste. No headroom for overclocking and/or GPUs running hot and low efficiency and reduced lifetime under full load - I would not do it (again).

Reduced lifetime for gpu or psu? maybe i can put a 290x and a 390 together.

GH

member

Activity: 117

Merit: 10

Quote from: Charloz24 on July 12, 2016, 09:33:29 PM

Quote from: joaocha on July 12, 2016, 06:44:44 PM

Do you think that a 750w (bronze psu) can handle 2 290x?

Yes it will be fine.

It may work with a good quality PSU, but it's too close for my taste. No headroom for overclocking and/or GPUs running hot and low efficiency and reduced lifetime under full load - I would not do it (again).

Myffas

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 10

Anybody worried about this ? It's from an online virus scanning site of the lastest v5.0:

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/001d46762cb177e5bce9df7ed6fae27acaa210e6c65874fbe5e4f5a461e19209/analysis/

3/51 rate this file as unsafe:

AegisLab   Troj.W32.Siscos.lThw
Baidu   Win32.Trojan.WisdomEyes.151026.9950.9975
Ikarus   Trojan.Win64.CoinMiner

Charloz24

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 501

Quote from: joaocha on July 12, 2016, 06:44:44 PM

Do you think that a 750w (bronze psu) can handle 2 290x?

Yes it will be fine.

ushba

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

Hi!

Is some way to mix Sia and Decres pools in dpools.txt? Cannot find answer...
Thank you!

Marvell1

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 1102

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: ps_jb on July 12, 2016, 08:22:03 PM

Can anybody share stable settings for R9 390 for dual mining ETH and SIA?

ETH on the level of ~30Mhs (overclocked) and the rest is for SIA

I've spent whole evening yesterday, thought that found it - and rig died in the middle of the night

lool and i though my 30 rigs was crazy lol

ps_jb

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Can anybody share stable settings for R9 390 for dual mining ETH and SIA?

ETH on the level of ~30Mhs (overclocked) and the rest is for SIA

I've spent whole evening yesterday, thought that found it - and rig died in the middle of the night

pikachuy

sr. member

Activity: 544

Merit: 250

Quote from: Ichskill on July 12, 2016, 06:46:00 PM

Quote from: Ajeto on July 12, 2016, 03:57:36 PM

Any idea why this happens every time after several minutes of opened app? Is the huge number of rigs a problem (350)? I have to kill process with Task Manager every time. Other groups with less rigs don't have this problem..

Wait.. 350 Rigs ? Shocked

Real question is not how many rigs, it's how many GPU's. I can turn my (1) 6 gpu rig, into a (6) rig but with 1 gpu each =).

For all we know, it could be 2 gpu per rig, or 1 gpu per rig, but regardless anyway, even if that's 1 gpu per rig, that is minimum 350 gpu's, still awesome. Best case scenario, 2100 gpu's, super awesome.

lol

Ichskill

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

Quote from: Ajeto on July 12, 2016, 03:57:36 PM

Any idea why this happens every time after several minutes of opened app? Is the huge number of rigs a problem (350)? I have to kill process with Task Manager every time. Other groups with less rigs don't have this problem..

https://i.imgur.com/HAKOo8s.jpg

Wait.. 350 Rigs ? Shocked

joaocha

full member

Activity: 254

Merit: 100

Do you think that a 750w (bronze psu) can handle 2 290x?

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

Quote from: elzium on July 12, 2016, 06:34:06 PM

The best reason is that you can power them from any psu unlike them ribbon risers.

I was comparing USB riser from link 1 with USB riser with link 2:
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/PCI-e-X1-TO-X16-Adapter-PCIe-1X-TO-16X-risers-card-with-1m-USB3-0/32614044969.html?spm=2114.30010308.3.122.lUDoYl&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_10,searchweb201602_5_10017_405_404_407_406_10040,searchweb201603_7&btsid=8abc1a8d-e054-43fd-94dd-9f97c801e506

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/10pcs-lot-PCI-E-PCI-E-Express-1X-to-16X-Riser-Card-USB-3-0-Extender/1679698470.html

My question was to citronick, as to why he recommends the second one.

elzium

member

Activity: 96

Merit: 10

Quote from: fredeq on July 12, 2016, 06:19:47 PM

Quote from: citronick on July 12, 2016, 04:27:58 PM

Quote from: fittsy on July 12, 2016, 03:26:26 PM

Quote from: joaocha on July 12, 2016, 03:16:56 PM

Which Pcie Riser is better?

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/PCI-e-X1-TO-X16-Adapter-PCIe-1X-TO-16X-risers-card-with-1m-USB3-0/32614044969.html?spm=2114.30010308.3.122.lUDoYl&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_10,searchweb201602_5_10017_405_404_407_406_10040,searchweb201603_7&btsid=8abc1a8d-e054-43fd-94dd-9f97c801e506

Much better. 60 CM USB cable is about 23.6 inches. Plenty of length so you can spread your GPUs apart. They'll get better airflow.

Not to mention those ribbon cables are shady. They're put together poorly. The USB riser cards are more robust.

And you didn't ask but there is a cheaper USB riser on the bottom left in the similar product section. It's the $4.09. It is version 1. The one you are linking to is version 1.4 (you can actually see it written on the x16 board.) Version 1 only has 2 capacitors. Version 1.4 has 3 capacitors. Version 1 has the USB on one side and power on the other. Version 1.4 has them side by side on a wider circuit board. This makes the bottom flat so you can support the back of the gpu with a piece of wood. I think the one you've linked to is the right one for several reasons. Definitely worth an extra 20 cents each. Don't try to save the money.

Ensure that its the USB3 version (white USB cable) - humble lessons learnt from me.

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/10pcs-lot-PCI-E-PCI-E-Express-1X-to-16X-Riser-Card-USB-3-0-Extender/1679698470.html

It says USB 3.0 on the former auction as well. Cable is also marked as 3.0 on pictures.
Any other reason to go for the ones with green board and white cable?

The best reason is that you can power them from any psu unlike them ribbon risers.

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

Quote from: citronick on July 12, 2016, 04:27:58 PM

Quote from: fittsy on July 12, 2016, 03:26:26 PM

Quote from: joaocha on July 12, 2016, 03:16:56 PM

Which Pcie Riser is better?

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/PCI-e-X1-TO-X16-Adapter-PCIe-1X-TO-16X-risers-card-with-1m-USB3-0/32614044969.html?spm=2114.30010308.3.122.lUDoYl&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_10,searchweb201602_5_10017_405_404_407_406_10040,searchweb201603_7&btsid=8abc1a8d-e054-43fd-94dd-9f97c801e506

Much better. 60 CM USB cable is about 23.6 inches. Plenty of length so you can spread your GPUs apart. They'll get better airflow.

Not to mention those ribbon cables are shady. They're put together poorly. The USB riser cards are more robust.

And you didn't ask but there is a cheaper USB riser on the bottom left in the similar product section. It's the $4.09. It is version 1. The one you are linking to is version 1.4 (you can actually see it written on the x16 board.) Version 1 only has 2 capacitors. Version 1.4 has 3 capacitors. Version 1 has the USB on one side and power on the other. Version 1.4 has them side by side on a wider circuit board. This makes the bottom flat so you can support the back of the gpu with a piece of wood. I think the one you've linked to is the right one for several reasons. Definitely worth an extra 20 cents each. Don't try to save the money.

Ensure that its the USB3 version (white USB cable) - humble lessons learnt from me.

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/10pcs-lot-PCI-E-PCI-E-Express-1X-to-16X-Riser-Card-USB-3-0-Extender/1679698470.html

It says USB 3.0 on the former auction as well. Cable is also marked as 3.0 on pictures.
Any other reason to go for the ones with green board and white cable?

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1224. (Read 6590565 times)