Don't hate the brand, hate the coins.
Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1394. (Read 6590215 times)
April 15, 2016, 01:17:53 PM
Still no comment on Nvidia OCL support?
Don't hate the brand, hate the coins.
Don't hate the brand, hate the coins.
April 15, 2016, 12:56:18 PM
Glad to see that there are quite a few people wanting solo mining ability. Hopefully that bumps up priority for Claymore! I'm sure there are quite a few GH/s worth of miners out there that would be happy to pay the 2% fee to use his superior miner solo ETH pool DCR mode.
April 15, 2016, 12:46:40 PM
Can the miner be configured to work with ethermine.org/
me too...all good
April 15, 2016, 12:46:20 PM
OK, so I actually took the time to look through the thread for Claymore's comments on creating a solo version. Seems he wants to do it, but it isn't a priority for him.
Here are good reasons to support solo mining:
Decentralization and overall ETH health (People, get off of dwarf FFS!!)
No loss of revenue due to pool mining. I ALWAYS come out ahead solo mining VS pool mining with ETH, I've done a lot of testing. If you have over 100MH/s and greater patience than a 3 year old, you should SOLO. (eth just isn't made for pool mining with it's crazy fast blocks)
No trust needed in pool operators (hacks, hiding blocks, hidden fees, human error, etc)
Much funner than mining on a pool.
In an ideal world, your solo miner would work with this solo proxy because of the added statistics it provides. Not sure I'd solo without it.
So, I ran 500MH/s on nano/supr in dual mode over night. Love your miner. Switching back to solo, though. Now I await your solo version to switch my 2GH/s over to your miner.
Here are good reasons to support solo mining:
Decentralization and overall ETH health (People, get off of dwarf FFS!!)
No loss of revenue due to pool mining. I ALWAYS come out ahead solo mining VS pool mining with ETH, I've done a lot of testing. If you have over 100MH/s and greater patience than a 3 year old, you should SOLO. (eth just isn't made for pool mining with it's crazy fast blocks)
No trust needed in pool operators (hacks, hiding blocks, hidden fees, human error, etc)
Much funner than mining on a pool.
In an ideal world, your solo miner would work with this solo proxy because of the added statistics it provides. Not sure I'd solo without it.
So, I ran 500MH/s on nano/supr in dual mode over night. Love your miner. Switching back to solo, though. Now I await your solo version to switch my 2GH/s over to your miner.
I was posting a few same phrases in the thread about advantages also. Totally agree with you.
April 15, 2016, 12:41:01 PM
Can the miner be configured to work with ethermine.org/
Sure, i'm using it on ether mine.org
works fine!
April 15, 2016, 12:38:48 PM
+1 wanting a solo miner version of this 
April 15, 2016, 12:26:43 PM
Can the miner be configured to work with ethermine.org/
April 15, 2016, 11:46:08 AM
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth.f2pool.com:8008 -ewal 0xwallet -eworker 290 -epsw x -ethi 8 -dpool dcr.pool.mn:4722 -dwal worker -dpsw pass -dcri 33 -dcrt 15
Trying it on my 290 now!! Thanks
April 15, 2016, 11:45:43 AM
Miner in the dough a little more than a day. It's okay for now. Over time, fading farm name on the pool. Usually after work to the author.
Supernova and stable work https: //dcr.maxminers.net and https://pool.mn/dcr. Less mistakes.
Supernova and stable work https: //dcr.maxminers.net and https://pool.mn/dcr. Less mistakes.
If you mean, that the miner suddenly stops sending worker name, then I confirm. Just saw this. It should be rig1 and rig2. But actually looks like an empty name.
I confirm this also.
April 15, 2016, 11:29:15 AM
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth.f2pool.com:8008 -ewal 0xwallet -eworker 290 -epsw x -ethi 8 -dpool dcr.pool.mn:4722 -dwal worker -dpsw pass -dcri 33 -dcrt 15
April 15, 2016, 11:17:08 AM
GPU0-290x, GPU1-390, -dcri 33
April 15, 2016, 10:59:05 AM
ETH - Total Speed: 60.566 Mh/s, Total Shares: 102, Rejected: 9, Time: 01:06
ETH: GPU0 28.849 Mh/s, GPU1 31.716 Mh/s
DCR - Total Speed: 999.332 Mh/s, Total Shares: 832, Rejected: 34 - https://pool.mn/dcr/
DCR: GPU0 476.015 Mh/s, GPU1 523.317 Mh/s
GPU0-290x, GPU1-390, -dcri 33
ETH: GPU0 28.849 Mh/s, GPU1 31.716 Mh/s
DCR - Total Speed: 999.332 Mh/s, Total Shares: 832, Rejected: 34 - https://pool.mn/dcr/
DCR: GPU0 476.015 Mh/s, GPU1 523.317 Mh/s
GPU0-290x, GPU1-390, -dcri 33
April 15, 2016, 10:54:16 AM
OK, so I actually took the time to look through the thread for Claymore's comments on creating a solo version. Seems he wants to do it, but it isn't a priority for him.
Here are good reasons to support solo mining:
Decentralization and overall ETH health (People, get off of dwarf FFS!!)
No loss of revenue due to pool mining. I ALWAYS come out ahead solo mining VS pool mining with ETH, I've done a lot of testing. If you have over 100MH/s and greater patience than a 3 year old, you should SOLO. (eth just isn't made for pool mining with it's crazy fast blocks)
No trust needed in pool operators (hacks, hiding blocks, hidden fees, human error, etc)
Much funner than mining on a pool.
In an ideal world, your solo miner would work with this solo proxy because of the added statistics it provides. Not sure I'd solo without it.
So, I ran 500MH/s on nano/supr in dual mode over night. Love your miner. Switching back to solo, though. Now I await your solo version to switch my 2GH/s over to your miner.
Here are good reasons to support solo mining:
Decentralization and overall ETH health (People, get off of dwarf FFS!!)
No loss of revenue due to pool mining. I ALWAYS come out ahead solo mining VS pool mining with ETH, I've done a lot of testing. If you have over 100MH/s and greater patience than a 3 year old, you should SOLO. (eth just isn't made for pool mining with it's crazy fast blocks)
No trust needed in pool operators (hacks, hiding blocks, hidden fees, human error, etc)
Much funner than mining on a pool.
In an ideal world, your solo miner would work with this solo proxy because of the added statistics it provides. Not sure I'd solo without it.
So, I ran 500MH/s on nano/supr in dual mode over night. Love your miner. Switching back to solo, though. Now I await your solo version to switch my 2GH/s over to your miner.
April 15, 2016, 10:48:08 AM
HD 7950 +280X TOXIC
eth:0 rejects ethi 16
dcr:less then 3% with diff 64 (( suprnova )) dcri 25
eth:0 rejects ethi 16
dcr:less then 3% with diff 64 (( suprnova )) dcri 25
April 15, 2016, 10:35:51 AM
Miner in the dough a little more than a day. It's okay for now. Over time, fading farm name on the pool. Usually after work to the author.
Supernova and stable work https: //dcr.maxminers.net and https://pool.mn/dcr. Less mistakes.
Supernova and stable work https: //dcr.maxminers.net and https://pool.mn/dcr. Less mistakes.
If you mean, that the miner suddenly stops sending worker name, then I confirm. Just saw this. It should be rig1 and rig2. But actually looks like an empty name.
April 15, 2016, 10:25:20 AM
Miner in the dough a little more than a day. It's okay for now. Over time, fading farm name on the pool. Usually after work to the author.
Supernova and stable work https: //dcr.maxminers.net and https://pool.mn/dcr. Less mistakes.
Supernova and stable work https: //dcr.maxminers.net and https://pool.mn/dcr. Less mistakes.
April 15, 2016, 10:09:17 AM
better hasrate or stbbility using OC comands from minner or use amdoverdrive instead?
download msi afterburner
April 15, 2016, 10:03:38 AM
better hasrate or stbbility using OC comands from minner or use amdoverdrive instead?
April 15, 2016, 09:50:20 AM
Claymore, first of all, thank you for all your great miners! I've been using them for a while, for various crypto currencies, but this must be the one I've been expecting the most.
I do have a question though, I'm not sure this is a bug or it has something to do with my AMD card (hope it's not failing!). I'm talking about a R9 390.
This happens rather seldom when mining on miningpoolhub.com, but extremely often on dwarfpool.com.
Extract from the log, this is what I'm talking about :
16:48:29:200 b50 ETH: 04/15/16-16:48:29 - New job (target 0x0000001ec1e0492c) from europe1.ethereum.miningpoolhub.com:20536
16:48:29:200 b50 ETH - Total Speed: 32.431 Mh/s, Total Shares: 63, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:11
16:48:29:200 b50 ETH: GPU0 32.431 Mh/s
16:48:29:293 99c Job changed, drop current round
16:48:31:325 8f0 Cannot find any AMD adapters
16:48:31:325 8f0 Cannot find any AMD adapters
16:48:31:747 4d0 Job changed, drop current round
16:48:31:747 99c ETH: put share nonce 7397df404abad4b
16:48:31:747 99c ETH round found 1 shares
16:48:31:762 b50 ETH: 04/15/16-16:48:31 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
As you can see, the miner is submitting shares and they're all accepted just fine, that's not the issue.
The command I'm using is:
EthDcrMiner64.exe -dbg 0 -mode 1 -epool europe1.ethereum.miningpoolhub.com:20536 -ewal MY_WALLET -eworker MY_WORKER -epsw x
I do have a question though, I'm not sure this is a bug or it has something to do with my AMD card (hope it's not failing!). I'm talking about a R9 390.
This happens rather seldom when mining on miningpoolhub.com, but extremely often on dwarfpool.com.
Extract from the log, this is what I'm talking about :
16:48:29:200 b50 ETH: 04/15/16-16:48:29 - New job (target 0x0000001ec1e0492c) from europe1.ethereum.miningpoolhub.com:20536
16:48:29:200 b50 ETH - Total Speed: 32.431 Mh/s, Total Shares: 63, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:11
16:48:29:200 b50 ETH: GPU0 32.431 Mh/s
16:48:29:293 99c Job changed, drop current round
16:48:31:325 8f0 Cannot find any AMD adapters
16:48:31:325 8f0 Cannot find any AMD adapters
16:48:31:747 4d0 Job changed, drop current round
16:48:31:747 99c ETH: put share nonce 7397df404abad4b
16:48:31:747 99c ETH round found 1 shares
16:48:31:762 b50 ETH: 04/15/16-16:48:31 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
As you can see, the miner is submitting shares and they're all accepted just fine, that's not the issue.
The command I'm using is:
EthDcrMiner64.exe -dbg 0 -mode 1 -epool europe1.ethereum.miningpoolhub.com:20536 -ewal MY_WALLET -eworker MY_WORKER -epsw x
April 15, 2016, 09:25:20 AM
edit: coinmine has lower rejects, but i'm getting some disconnects here and there...
So far on diff 8 : 74 accepted, rejected 3.
So far on diff 8 : 74 accepted, rejected 3.
I was still at 10%+ rejects when I tested coinmine for DCR.
Damn that sucks. AFter 12 hours i'm at 5% rejects, so a little better I suppose.
Jump to: