check if the problem is gone.
Gone, many thanks 
Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1391. (Read 6590215 times)
April 16, 2016, 05:07:30 PM
April 16, 2016, 05:00:22 PM
Tried DCR stratum on yiimp.ccminer.org:4252
One rejected share after each new job unit (((
Then all accepts till new job.
Update: not after each new job (rejected) ... need more testing ...
One rejected share after each new job unit (((
Then all accepts till new job.
Update: not after each new job (rejected) ... need more testing ...
It is called "stale shares".
April 16, 2016, 04:58:10 PM
Quote
Sorry, this application cannot run under a Virtual Machine
although I run it on the host systemThe same problem when Hyper-V service is active, also on the host.
v1.2 is free of this problem.
I made some changes in exe packer to get less false alarms from paranoid antiviruses, but it caused this issue. I re-uploaded v2.0, download it again and check if the problem is gone.
April 16, 2016, 04:54:22 PM
Mr. Claymore, can you, please, add -dbg option or another one to duplicate the console output to the separate log file. The current dbg 0 is really too wordy.
April 16, 2016, 04:48:27 PM
Quote
Sorry, this application cannot run under a Virtual Machine
although I run it on the host systemThe same problem when Hyper-V service is active, also on the host.
v1.2 is free of this problem.
April 16, 2016, 04:44:39 PM
Thanks for this update!
How to find in the log when -r option is activated? I mean, if something wrong with a GPU, how to find it in the log file. To understand the statistics.
How to find in the log when -r option is activated? I mean, if something wrong with a GPU, how to find it in the log file. To understand the statistics.
April 16, 2016, 04:42:37 PM
Tried DCR stratum on yiimp.ccminer.org:4252
One rejected share after each new job unit (((
Then all accepts till new job.
Update: not after each new job (rejected) ... need more testing ...
One rejected share after each new job unit (((
Then all accepts till new job.
Update: not after each new job (rejected) ... need more testing ...
April 16, 2016, 04:31:29 PM
v2.0:
- Added Stratum support for Decred.
- Added "-esm 2" option for "miner-proxy" Stratum version - for such pools like coinotron, coinmine, etc.
- Default "-dbg" value is "0" now, log file is created by default. You can disable it with "-dbg -1" option.
- If GPU thread hangs and its speed is not updated, miner shows zero speed for that card.
- Added "-wd" option.
- Added "-r" option.
- Additional checks related to DAG files: checking disc space, removing invalid DAG files.
- Bug fixes.
- Added Stratum support for Decred.
- Added "-esm 2" option for "miner-proxy" Stratum version - for such pools like coinotron, coinmine, etc.
- Default "-dbg" value is "0" now, log file is created by default. You can disable it with "-dbg -1" option.
- If GPU thread hangs and its speed is not updated, miner shows zero speed for that card.
- Added "-wd" option.
- Added "-r" option.
- Additional checks related to DAG files: checking disc space, removing invalid DAG files.
- Bug fixes.
Quote
Sorry, this application cannot run under a Virtual Machine
although I run it on the host system April 16, 2016, 04:28:24 PM
v2.0:
- Added Stratum support for Decred.
- Added "-esm 2" option for "miner-proxy" Stratum version - for such pools like coinotron, coinmine, etc.
- Default "-dbg" value is "0" now, log file is created by default. You can disable it with "-dbg -1" option.
- If GPU thread hangs and its speed is not updated, miner shows zero speed for that card.
- Added "-wd" option.
- Added "-r" option.
- Additional checks related to DAG files: checking disc space, removing invalid DAG files.
- Bug fixes.
- Added Stratum support for Decred.
- Added "-esm 2" option for "miner-proxy" Stratum version - for such pools like coinotron, coinmine, etc.
- Default "-dbg" value is "0" now, log file is created by default. You can disable it with "-dbg -1" option.
- If GPU thread hangs and its speed is not updated, miner shows zero speed for that card.
- Added "-wd" option.
- Added "-r" option.
- Additional checks related to DAG files: checking disc space, removing invalid DAG files.
- Bug fixes.
Thank you for the update, impressive work! Any plans of what to do for the next update?
Also, does it delete old DAG files when generating new ones?
EDIT: Btw, how much fees are you collecting, i.e, how much hashing power is generated from your miner in total?
April 16, 2016, 04:18:36 PM
Nice, will try cointron now 
April 16, 2016, 04:02:31 PM
v2.0:
- Added Stratum support for Decred.
- Added "-esm 2" option for "miner-proxy" Stratum version - for such pools like coinotron, coinmine, etc.
- Default "-dbg" value is "0" now, log file is created by default. You can disable it with "-dbg -1" option.
- If GPU thread hangs and its speed is not updated, miner shows zero speed for that card.
- Added "-wd" option.
- Added "-r" option.
- Additional checks related to DAG files: checking disc space, removing invalid DAG files.
- Bug fixes.
- Added Stratum support for Decred.
- Added "-esm 2" option for "miner-proxy" Stratum version - for such pools like coinotron, coinmine, etc.
- Default "-dbg" value is "0" now, log file is created by default. You can disable it with "-dbg -1" option.
- If GPU thread hangs and its speed is not updated, miner shows zero speed for that card.
- Added "-wd" option.
- Added "-r" option.
- Additional checks related to DAG files: checking disc space, removing invalid DAG files.
- Bug fixes.
April 16, 2016, 03:47:25 PM
It's not all about hash, more important are shares submitted.
True, but in this case they are the same. I was citing fully realized 24 hour effective hashrate, which is derived entirely from ... shares submitted. Most important of all is that the pool I am in is paying at the new rate- instead of mid 1.8'ish daily ethereum going into my account, finally it is the full 2-something eth that napkin math and eth calculators always said I should be getting.
Because miners, calculators, and pools all seem to have slightly different ideas about the hashrates rigs actually generate, the truest measure of gpu mining ability is how much ethereum is paid over time. In my rigs, running the Claymore instead of Ethminer, I get more pay.
Check my post right before yours. Both miners are generating pretty much the same amount of money. They changed lead several times and right now the original qtminer got the lead with 0.015 ethers. Its almost 24 hours now. You cant make good comparison if you run the miners one after another. They should be on equals rigs, same time, same pool as I did. Once Claymore release the 1.3 version i will try the eth-proxy mode.
April 16, 2016, 03:35:59 PM
It's not all about hash, more important are shares submitted.
True, but in this case they are the same. I was citing fully realized 24 hour effective hashrate, which is derived entirely from ... shares submitted. Most important of all is that the pool I am in is paying at the new rate- instead of mid 1.8'ish daily ethereum going into my account, finally it is the full 2-something eth that napkin math and eth calculators always said I should be getting.
Because miners, calculators, and pools all seem to have slightly different ideas about the hashrates rigs actually generate, the truest measure of gpu mining ability is how much ethereum is paid over time. In my rigs, running the Claymore instead of Ethminer, I get more pay.
But effective hash rate depends to some degree on luck, right? What pool are using now?
April 16, 2016, 03:28:41 PM
Is there any performance gain on ethereum in terms of faster GPU kernel?
April 16, 2016, 03:19:10 PM
It's not all about hash, more important are shares submitted.
In my rigs, running the Claymore instead of Ethminer, I get more pay.
Same here, but only in pure ETH mode. If I start dual mining mode, I'll lose a significant number of ETH shares. At current DCR prices I don't think it will pay off to spend the extra watts while at the same time decrease ETH income. Just my two cents
April 16, 2016, 02:49:10 PM
It's not all about hash, more important are shares submitted.
True, but in this case they are the same. I was citing fully realized 24 hour effective hashrate, which is derived entirely from ... shares submitted. Most important of all is that the pool I am in is paying at the new rate- instead of mid 1.8'ish daily ethereum going into my account, finally it is the full 2-something eth that napkin math and eth calculators always said I should be getting.
Because miners, calculators, and pools all seem to have slightly different ideas about the hashrates rigs actually generate, the truest measure of gpu mining ability is how much ethereum is paid over time. In my rigs, running the Claymore instead of Ethminer, I get more pay.
April 16, 2016, 02:10:51 PM
I put the original qtminer and claymores miner in qtminer mode on separate wallets in the very same time and on the same rigs 20 hours ago.
Original qtminer: http://ethermine.org/miners/0xb6ff214f13443b55b404d31a646c09cb568218e0
claymores miner in qtminer mode : http://ethermine.org/miners/0xf9883c988a05c8b2a4d8a54966ba45dd566617b2
Cant imagine more equal performance. The changed the lead several times but neither got ahead with more than 0.02 Ethers
Equal temperatures too. Both stable, the original got 1-2% invalids, the Claymores got 1% fee so I guess it doesnt matter which one to use in only ethereum mining.
I will put the claymores in eth-proxy mode once the next version is released and test again.
Original qtminer: http://ethermine.org/miners/0xb6ff214f13443b55b404d31a646c09cb568218e0
claymores miner in qtminer mode : http://ethermine.org/miners/0xf9883c988a05c8b2a4d8a54966ba45dd566617b2
Cant imagine more equal performance. The changed the lead several times but neither got ahead with more than 0.02 Ethers
Equal temperatures too. Both stable, the original got 1-2% invalids, the Claymores got 1% fee so I guess it doesnt matter which one to use in only ethereum mining.
I will put the claymores in eth-proxy mode once the next version is released and test again.
April 16, 2016, 12:48:19 PM
It's not all about hash, more important are shares submitted.
April 16, 2016, 12:33:42 PM
Another hashrate test: 1 280x + 2 380. 24 hour effective hashrate rose to 60.3 with Claymore Miner, from previous ~ 55 hashrate range with Ethminer.
Yesterdays different rig of 4 380 cards that rose by 6.6 total hash at expense of 23 extra watts settled own slightly to be gaining 6.4.
Combined, 2 rigs, 7 cards total, gained 11.7 real 24 hour effective hashrate, just slightly less than 9% extra profit even after the devfee, but not considering the 3-4% extra electricity cost.
Yesterdays different rig of 4 380 cards that rose by 6.6 total hash at expense of 23 extra watts settled own slightly to be gaining 6.4.
Combined, 2 rigs, 7 cards total, gained 11.7 real 24 hour effective hashrate, just slightly less than 9% extra profit even after the devfee, but not considering the 3-4% extra electricity cost.
April 16, 2016, 11:00:32 AM
Thanks for the answer guys, yeah DCR and ETH is a good match. I'm just holding all my DCR. When I get enough i'll buy tokens and start the POS. anybody know how much they cost ? I havent d/l the client yet.
https://dcrstats.com
Jump to: