Author

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 285. (Read 6590565 times)

newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
hihi all

I have updates it to v11.6 but it says

eth stratum connected eth-eu nanopool.org:9999 (unsecure)

Whats with the unsecure part?

I have already read the readme file but i cant find the solution?

can you help me the noob guys Cheesy

its a connection between your miner and the pool, if you want it more secured then use the SSL port

otherwise its a default connection where I also use it

Is it safe to use it "unsecure"?
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 297
Grow with community
hihi all

I have updates it to v11.6 but it says

eth stratum connected eth-eu nanopool.org:9999 (unsecure)

Whats with the unsecure part?

I have already read the readme file but i cant find the solution?

can you help me the noob guys Cheesy

its a connection between your miner and the pool, if you want it more secured then use the SSL port

otherwise its a default connection where I also use it
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
Cпacибo зa тo, чтo пpиcлyшивaeтecь к пoльзoвaтeлям (tnx for your accept customer requests)!!!
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
hihi all

I have updates it to v11.6 but it says

eth stratum connected eth-eu nanopool.org:9999 (unsecure)

Whats with the unsecure part?

I have already read the readme file but i cant find the solution?

can you help me the noob guys Cheesy
member
Activity: 137
Merit: 10
new versions crash at the stage of card definition NVIDIA in Windows 7, if there are more than 6 cards in the rig. The latest version that works with 6+ cards is 11.0.

Claymore log:

Code:
09:54:05:318	b94	
09:54:05:318 b94 ЙHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH»
09:54:05:319 b94 є                Claymore's Dual GPU Miner - v11.6               є
09:54:05:319 b94 є              ETH + DCR/SIA/LBC/PASC/BLAKE2S/KECCAK             є
09:54:05:320 b94 ИHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHj
09:54:05:320 b94
09:54:05:320 b94 b571
09:54:05:521 b94 You enabled full remote management, but did not specify -mpsw option to protect it by password, please do it, otherwise you can be attacked if you share remote management port to internet! Or use negative -mport value to enable read-only remote management mode, see Readme for details.
09:54:10:521 b94 ETH: 1 pool is specified
09:54:10:522 b94 Main Ethereum pool is eu1.ethermine.org:4444
09:54:10:522 b94 B2S: 1 pool is specified
09:54:10:523 b94 Main Blake2s pool is xvg.eu1.unimining.net:5770
09:54:10:685 b94 OpenCL platform: Intel(R) OpenCL
09:54:10:685 b94 OpenCL platform: NVIDIA CUDA
09:54:10:686 b94 AMD OpenCL platform not found
09:54:10:888 b94 CUDA initializing...

09:54:10:889 b94 NVIDIA Cards available: 7
09:54:10:889 b94 CUDA Driver Version/Runtime Version: 9.1/9.1
09:54:10:930 b94 GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 1:0:0)

09:54:10:933 b94 GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 2:0:0)

09:54:10:938 b94 GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 3:0:0)

09:54:10:942 b94 GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 5:0:0)

09:54:10:946 b94 GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 6:0:0)

09:54:10:949 b94 GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 7:0:0)

Windows log:

Code:
- EventData 

   EthDcrMiner64.exe
   0.0.0.0
   5abe1013
   ntdll.dll
   6.1.7601.23915
   59b94ee4
   c0000005
   000000000004b0a4
   fb4
   01d3c8bd0da3dc10
   C:\Shara\Claymore's Dual Ethereum+Decred_Siacoin_Lbry_Pascal_Blake2s_Keccak AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.6\EthDcrMiner64.exe
   C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll
   50392d50-34b0-11e8-9250-38d547aacba9

member
Activity: 413
Merit: 17

phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo

Yes, you are correct.
I forgot to put in the fees with Claymore at 1% and Phoenix at .65%
Just about evens out on that front.




Ummm, 2% stale vs 4-8% stale? So 0.35% fee is worth losing 4% on stales? at that point just use ethminer....
Stales mostly depend on the pool's luck. Try running them side by side on similar machines for 24-48h, and then check the stales.
full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 132

phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo

Yes, you are correct.
I forgot to put in the fees with Claymore at 1% and Phoenix at .65%
Just about evens out on that front.




Ummm, 2% stale vs 4-8% stale? So 0.35% fee is worth losing 4% on stales? at that point just use ethminer....
on my nvidia rig after 24 hours stales repoted by phoniex is 1.2

Is that number from the pool or the display in the miner window ?

Edit:
Never mind I see you said it was reported by Phoenix.
Here is the truth about that number.
It is totally worthless. The miner has almost no idea if a share was stale at the pool.
Phoenix even states that if you read all the post's from them about that number.
Trouble is, few actually read more than one page back in a thread.

They rarely mention it because they don't want everyone to know or remember that little fact.
So, everyone sees that and accepts it is the actual stale share rate. I've brought that up to them on
multiple occasions.

In the miner window this is how that message should read:

The stale share number about to be displayed is fictional and is presented for entertainment purposes only.
Your actual stale share rate can only be know at the pool, not in the miner.
Please ignore the above message an tell everyone that this is my stale share rate.







https://www.ethermine.org/miners/a57EeFabb76Bfd1E9E6ee606999b76BD123aFe32/worker/marvell9-117

it says 3% at the pool so yeah the miner lies, I just upgraded to the new phonenix , seema i was on 2.7c
ill check stales in 24 hrs
jr. member
Activity: 170
Merit: 6

phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo

Yes, you are correct.
I forgot to put in the fees with Claymore at 1% and Phoenix at .65%
Just about evens out on that front.




Ummm, 2% stale vs 4-8% stale? So 0.35% fee is worth losing 4% on stales? at that point just use ethminer....
on my nvidia rig after 24 hours stales repoted by phoniex is 1.2

Is that number from the pool or the display in the miner window ?

Edit:
Never mind I see you said it was reported by Phoenix.
Here is the truth about that number.
It is totally worthless. The miner has almost no idea if a share was stale at the pool.
Phoenix even states that if you read all the post's from them about that number.
Trouble is, few actually read more than one page back in a thread.

They rarely mention it because they don't want everyone to know or remember that little fact.
So, everyone sees that and accepts it is the actual stale share rate. I've brought that up to them on
multiple occasions.

In the miner window this is how that message should read:

The stale share number about to be displayed is fictional and is presented for entertainment purposes only.
Your actual stale share rate can only be know at the pool, not in the miner.
Please ignore the above message an tell everyone that this is my stale share rate.






jr. member
Activity: 170
Merit: 6

phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo

Yes, you are correct.
I forgot to put in the fees with Claymore at 1% and Phoenix at .65%
Just about evens out on that front.




Ummm, 2% stale vs 4-8% stale? So 0.35% fee is worth losing 4% on stales? at that point just use ethminer....
on my nvidia rig after 24 hours stales repoted by phoniex is 1.2

Is that number from the pool or the display in the miner window ?

full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 132

phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo

Yes, you are correct.
I forgot to put in the fees with Claymore at 1% and Phoenix at .65%
Just about evens out on that front.




Ummm, 2% stale vs 4-8% stale? So 0.35% fee is worth losing 4% on stales? at that point just use ethminer....
on my nvidia rig after 24 hours stales repoted by phoniex is 1.2
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 297
Grow with community
Claymore's Dual Ethereum + Decred/Siacoin/Lbry/Pascal/Blake2s/Keccak AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner.
=========================

Latest version is v11.6:

- improved hashrate for weak Nvidia cards by about 1%.
- zero devfee for 3GB cards in Windows 10, same as for all 2GB cards.
- applied some tricks to increase available memory for 3GB cards in Windows 10 so you can mine ETH a bit longer.
- now you can press "y" key to turn on "Compute Mode" in AMD drivers for all cards (Windows only).
- Linux version: removed openssl library dependency.
- improved "-logfile" option, now you can use it to specify a folder for log files, use slash at the end to do it, for example, "-logfile logs\".
- added "-epoolsfile" and "-dpoolsfile" options.
- remote management: now "miner_getstat2" command also returns PCI bus index for every GPU.
- a few minor bug fixes and improvements.





But where is the Claymore's CryptoNight AMD GPU Miner update???

this is a piderast, while quote all post

and you do the same, you two deserve a kick in the @ss!  Cheesy

Hey @Maxmidnite, there is a Search Box on the upper right side of the forum, its somewhat useful

Like this one

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=search2

but if you are looking for an update, I guess its in Claymore's waiting list


newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Upgraded to 11.6 on my nvidia rig. But there is no difference in Linux. 6 x 1060 3gb and 2 x 1050 ti.
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
Thanks for the nice update to 11.6, Mr. Claymore!


On another note - Im sure most, if not all of you might find this info important.  

Please vote to help keep Ethereum and hopefully other Ethash coins ASIC resistant.   I'm sure Claymore wont mind that I bring this up in his thread.

Please log into github (make an account if you have to) and hit the thumbs up button.

https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/958
sr. member
Activity: 449
Merit: 251

phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo

Yes, you are correct.
I forgot to put in the fees with Claymore at 1% and Phoenix at .65%
Just about evens out on that front.




Ummm, 2% stale vs 4-8% stale? So 0.35% fee is worth losing 4% on stales? at that point just use ethminer....
jr. member
Activity: 170
Merit: 6
How do you guys figure? The stale shares are 2-6% more yet the devfee is only 0.35% higher.

184.5 x 97.02% = 179 claymore
184.2 x 95.376% =  175.7 Phoenix high
184.2 x 91.4% = 168.4 Phoenix low

Can't argue with that.
I was simply saying it about equals out becaue of the lower fee.
Phoenix would have to produce a higher hash rate on the same number of cards to over come the higher stale rate as you have shown.

That's one reason I'm staying with Claymore.

jr. member
Activity: 170
Merit: 6
How do you guys figure? The stale shares are 2-6% more yet the devfee is only 0.35% higher.

If the pool you are mining at pays something for stale shares ( Ethermine pays .65% for a stale share ) then
you loose .35% for every stale share. But if the miner is only charging you .65% instead of 1% then it helps overcome the stale share loss.

However, if you mine where the pool does not pay anything for a stale share then it's really bad to have many stale shares.
Some pools pay something for stales, others do not. I don't know the list of which do or don't except for Ethermine.
member
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
How do you guys figure? The stale shares are 2-6% more yet the devfee is only 0.35% higher.

184.5 x 97.02% = 179 claymore
184.2 x 95.376% =  175.7 Phoenix high
184.2 x 91.4% = 168.4 Phoenix low
jr. member
Activity: 170
Merit: 6

phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo

Yes, you are correct.
I forgot to put in the fees with Claymore at 1% and Phoenix at .65%
Just about evens out on that front.

full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 132
I always test the latest Claymore against the latest PhoenixMiner.
I have 6 AMD Cards on Windows 10 Pro Build 16299

Update:

Claymore (11.6)      Phoenix Miner (2.8c)

HashRate                 HashRate
184.5                        184.2     ( Phoenix was highter almost 186.5 but memory errors required me to lower the mem clocks to eleminate that problem )
I have no memory errors with Claymore or Phoenix at those speeds.

Stale Shares             Sale Shares
2%                            4% to 8%

Stability                    Stability
Solid                          Solid

Avg GPU Temp         Avg GPU Temp
67C                           65C

Those are the most important stats for me that I measure.
When you add all the extra features offered by Claymore, including the auto tuning it's a solid win for me to use Claymore.


phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo
jr. member
Activity: 170
Merit: 6
I always test the latest Claymore against the latest PhoenixMiner.
I have 6 AMD Cards on Windows 10 Pro Build 16299

Update:

Claymore (11.6)      Phoenix Miner (2.8c)

HashRate                 HashRate
184.5                        184.2     ( Phoenix was highter almost 186.5 but memory errors required me to lower the mem clocks to eleminate that problem )
I have no memory errors with Claymore or Phoenix at those speeds.

Stale Shares             Sale Shares
2%                            4% to 8%

Stability                    Stability
Solid                          Solid

Avg GPU Temp         Avg GPU Temp
67C                           65C

Those are the most important stats for me that I measure.
When you add all the extra features offered by Claymore, including the auto tuning it's a solid win for me to use Claymore.

Jump to: