Author

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 370. (Read 6590565 times)

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102
Dummy 4K "headless" emulator / adapters: has anyone found situations where you have to use them?  I see these for anywhere from $3 to $8 for HDMI and $8 and up for true DisplayPort - both of those being the 4096 x 2180 (i.e. "4K UHD") resolution adapters with 60Hz refresh rate.  I see less expensive versions for 1920HD.

I suppose that I am always linking to my ViewSonic XG2704 240MHz refresh display, so I haven't run into the need for them, but I was talking to a friend last night that absolutely insisted that - in order to get the best hash rate - you really should have them for your display-less GPU cards.

Not true. You absolutelly don't need dummy plugs. Best hashrate with them? Bullshit. The gpu with dummy plug connected to it need to render also side by side with mining the picture of the dummy plug, so hashrate can be even worse. On my rigs I have dummy plugs connected just to onboard graphics output to get comfort for remote viewing my rigs, but this is rendered by iGPU, so it is not affecting mining in any way.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
Hey all, i have 4 x Rx570 Armor, how many Verge coins you mine one day with one GPU? Smiley

you have to set -dcri 35 and you will get 4/5000 Mh depend on the overclock. this will bring you south of 18 verge/ day, at the current difficult
newbie
Activity: 312
Merit: 0
I am running 6 RX580s, newest Radeon drivers, Claymore 11.0. When I use the memory and core voltage and clock parameters, they have no effect. This is my command line:
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal ... -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://xvg.eu1.unimining.net:5770 -dwal ... -dpsw c=XVG -allpools 1 -esm 1 -mode 0 -dcoin blake2s -asm 1 -dcri 49 -platform 1 -ftime 0 -tt 65 -ttli 75 -tstop 80 -tstart 50 -mclock 2065,2065,2030,2065,2065,2065 -mvddc 800 -cvddc 850 -mport -10047 -r 1 -dbg 0

Any advice on this?

I have to restart the miner to make the config work.

AMD settings ot trixx running in background?
jr. member
Activity: 84
Merit: 1
Dummy 4K "headless" emulator / adapters: has anyone found situations where you have to use them?  I see these for anywhere from $3 to $8 for HDMI and $8 and up for true DisplayPort - both of those being the 4096 x 2180 (i.e. "4K UHD") resolution adapters with 60Hz refresh rate.  I see less expensive versions for 1920HD.

I suppose that I am always linking to my ViewSonic XG2704 240MHz refresh display, so I haven't run into the need for them, but I was talking to a friend last night that absolutely insisted that - in order to get the best hash rate - you really should have them for your display-less GPU cards.
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
I am running 6 RX580s, newest Radeon drivers, Claymore 11.0. When I use the memory and core voltage and clock parameters, they have no effect. This is my command line:
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal ... -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://xvg.eu1.unimining.net:5770 -dwal ... -dpsw c=XVG -allpools 1 -esm 1 -mode 0 -dcoin blake2s -asm 1 -dcri 49 -platform 1 -ftime 0 -tt 65 -ttli 75 -tstop 80 -tstart 50 -mclock 2065,2065,2030,2065,2065,2065 -mvddc 800 -cvddc 850 -mport -10047 -r 1 -dbg 0

Any advice on this?
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
@mine_phun, i tried SmartCash on your pool but i get Auth error.......
Also would like to see the others opinion is XVG more likely to grow than Smart, as i see 620 workers on NLPool mine blake2s but none mine keccak-Smart
newbie
Activity: 208
Merit: 0
Hi everyone,

I've been using Claymore's Dual miner since July 2017, and I'm a happy miner. I've been mining Ethereum + Decred using 8 rigs totaling 64 video cards (GTX 1070 FFW2 Hybrid), and I am thinkinng about switching to Ethereum + SiaCoin in the next days. What altcoins would you recommend mining when Ethereum becomes too hard to mine?

I would reconsider that. Sia is mined with ASIC ' s , so mining it with a GPU is not profitable and a waste of power.

Your first choice would be mine ETH + Verge , however Verge is way overloaded at the moment.

Example Verge : EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal . -epsw x -etha 0 -dpool  stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -dwal -dpsw c=XVG -dcoin blake2s -r 1 -dcri 45

Your second best choice would be mining Shield ( https://www.shieldx.sh ) , as the coin has almost the same value. Verge and Shield are configured in our Pool NLpool and your can mine it with example:

Example Shield : EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal . -epsw x -etha 0 -dpool  stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -dwal -dpsw c=XSH -dcoin blake2s -r 1 -dcri 45
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Hi everyone,

I've been using Claymore's Dual miner since July 2017, and I'm a happy miner. I've been mining Ethereum + Decred using 8 rigs totaling 64 video cards (GTX 1070 FFW2 Hybrid), and I am thinkinng about switching to Ethereum + SiaCoin in the next days. What altcoins would you recommend mining when Ethereum becomes too hard to mine?
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
Hey all, i have 4 x Rx570 Armor, how many Verge coins you mine one day with one GPU? Smiley
newbie
Activity: 312
Merit: 0
GPU 6 and 8 gets the message:

"GPU XX got incorrect share. If you see this warning often, make sure you did not overclock it too much!"

I have removed OC and running stock voltages.
The 13 cards are all the same and have the same memory. Used PBE last week.

What may cause this?
After removing overclocking, you still get this error for both - or one?  What are the cards and what's the base clock (and what you were using for OC)??

Solved Smiley
Gpu#0 is in real life gpu#1. Had to edit #7 and #9 OC settings.

Another problem. I accidentally kicked the rigg so that some gpu loosened, the rig restarted.
When I start claymore now it seems likt only OC is applied to GPU#0 30.x Mh/s. The other 12 if running stock 24.9 (memstrap)

Any idea?

Connecting through Windows remote desktop.
SOLVED: DDU drivers now and connected a display. I think the display did it. Saw readme file mention rdp not working.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Hello guys,

Can someone help with keccak config? I just can't make it work.
Dualmining with decred / blake2s / pasc works perfect.
With keccak I always receive "authorization failed" . I'm 100% sure that the username/password are valid ( same setup as for decred on suprnova ) and still doesn't work.
I did try to create accounts on different pools, always the same.
I have no clue what I'm doing wrong or what's the issue.
I'm using epools.txt and dpools.txt for my pools, and start.bat to start the miner .
epools.txt: POOL: eu1-etc.ethermine.org:4444, WALLET: 0x72*******************.rig5, PSW: x, ESM: 0, ALLPOOLS: 1
dpools.txt POOL: hub.miningpoolhub.com:20461, PSW: ******, WORKER: *****.rig5, ESM: 0, ALLPOOLS: 1

The -dcoin keccak it's set in start.bat

Same config for decred works, for keccak no.

Thanks.

jr. member
Activity: 84
Merit: 1
Claymore:

Do you make some kind of intelligent checkpoint at the one hour point?  (59 minutes and whatever seconds, maybe?)  I see an inordinate amount of logfiles that are precisely 59:xx long with no apparent reason for the exit.
jr. member
Activity: 84
Merit: 1
GPU 6 and 8 gets the message:

"GPU XX got incorrect share. If you see this warning often, make sure you did not overclock it too much!"

I have removed OC and running stock voltages.
The 13 cards are all the same and have the same memory. Used PBE last week.

What may cause this?
After removing overclocking, you still get this error for both - or one?  What are the cards and what's the base clock (and what you were using for OC)??
newbie
Activity: 312
Merit: 0
GPU 6 and 8 gets the message:

"GPU XX got incorrect share. If you see this warning often, make sure you did not overclock it too much!"

I have removed OC and running stock voltages.
The 13 cards are all the same and have the same memory. Used PBE last week.

What may cause this?
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
-mode 1

EthDcrMiner64.exe -etht 200, -epool http://127.0.0.1:8080, -ewal ---------------------, -epsw x, -ethi 8 -estale 1
-esm 1
-allpools.
...
OK, I am confused: you show commands that look like they are stored in a CONFIG.TXT parameter file, but then you show what appears to be a command-line with parameters.

You can't have both: if there are parameters on the command-line, the CONFIG.TXT file is ignored / not used.  Since "-etht 200" is the default, adding it in CONFIG.TXT or on the command-line just adds one more step to the preparation phase.  Why are you asking it to use "qtminer" mode (-esm 1)?

I think the main problem is that you appear to be shooting for a solo mining configuration, as far as I can tell?  You don't show anything about a process running on your own port 8080 - which normally would be a web-based protocol.  Whassup?
-esm 1" option to enable "qtminer" mode, in this mode pool will display additional information about shares (accepted/rejected), for example:accepted/rejected), for example:
   EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethermine.org:4444 -esm 1 -ewal 0xD69af2A796A737A103F12d2f0BCC563a13900E6F.YourWorkerName -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://yiimp.ccminer.org:3252 -dwal DsUt9QagrYLvSkJHXCvhfiZHKafVtzd7Sq4 -dp

Im forwarding the miner through a proxy config  directly to Dwarfpool as I have been having a wallet changing problem......
https://github.com/Atrides/eth-proxy

###
# Examples of command line for miners:
#
#   ethminer.exe --farm-recheck 200 -G -F http://HOST:PORT/
#   ethminer.exe --farm-recheck 300 -G -F http://HOST:PORT/rig1
#
#   ethminer.exe -G -F http://127.0.0.1:8080/
#   ethminer.exe --farm-recheck 100 -G -F http://192.168.0.33:8080/rig1
#
#  farm-recheck parameter is very individual. Just test different values.
#
#  You can submit shares without workername or
#  You can provide workername:
#   - with url like "/rig1"
#   - or use automatically numbering(integer) based on IP of miner
#
#  Servers:
#    EU-Server:  eth-eu.dwarfpool.com  (France)
#    US-Server:  eth-us.dwarfpool.com  (EastCoast: Montreal,Canada)
#    US-Server:  eth-us2.dwarfpool.com (WestCoast: Las Vegas)
#    RU-Server:  eth-ru.dwarfpool.com  (Moscow)
#    RU-Server:  eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com  (Moscow)
#    CN-Server:  eth-cn.dwarfpool.com  (Shanghai)
#    SG-Server:  eth-sg.dwarfpool.com  (Singapore)
#    AU-Server:  eth-au.dwarfpool.com  (Melbourne)
#    ASIA-Server:  eth-asia.dwarfpool.com  (Taiwan)
#
###

# Select Ethereum ETH or Expanse EXP
COIN = "ETH"

# Host and port for your workers
HOST = "127.0.0.1"
PORT = 8080

# Coin address where money goes
WALLET = "-------------------------------------------"

# To donate please use wallet "0xea7263feb7d8a8ab0a11eedd8f1ce04412ab0820"

# It's useful for individually monitoring and statistic
ENABLE_WORKER_ID = True

# On DwarfPool you have option to monitor your workers via email.
# If WORKER_ID is enabled, you can monitor every worker/rig separately.
MONITORING = True
MONITORING_EMAIL = "[email protected]"

# Main pool
POOL_HOST = "eth-au.dwarfpool.com"
POOL_PORT = 8008

# Failover pool
POOL_FAILOVER_ENABLE = True

POOL_HOST_FAILOVER1 = "eth-ru.dwarfpool.com"
POOL_PORT_FAILOVER1 = 8008

POOL_HOST_FAILOVER2 = "eth-us.dwarfpool.com"
POOL_PORT_FAILOVER2 = 8008

POOL_HOST_FAILOVER3 = "eth-asia.dwarfpool.com"
POOL_PORT_FAILOVER3 = 8008


# Logging
LOG_TO_FILE = True

# Enable debug
DEBUG = False






newbie
Activity: 312
Merit: 0
Doesnt Nicehash support -eworker? So I can assign a rigname.

I found using Claymore directly mining to nicehash more stable than using nicehash.
jr. member
Activity: 84
Merit: 1
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
-mode 1

EthDcrMiner64.exe -etht 200, -epool http://127.0.0.1:8080, -ewal ---------------------, -epsw x, -ethi 8 -estale 1
-esm 1
-allpools.
...
OK, I am confused: you show commands that look like they are stored in a CONFIG.TXT parameter file, but then you show what appears to be a command-line with parameters.

You can't have both: if there are parameters on the command-line, the CONFIG.TXT file is ignored / not used.  Since "-etht 200" is the default, adding it in CONFIG.TXT or on the command-line just adds one more step to the preparation phase.  Why are you asking it to use "qtminer" mode (-esm 1)?

I think the main problem is that you appear to be shooting for a solo mining configuration, as far as I can tell?  You don't show anything about a process running on your own port 8080 - which normally would be a web-based protocol.  Whassup?
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Thanks For your help Claymore.
I was warned about the security issues in the 10.5 I was using at the time.
I wanted to know if possible someone cold take some hashrate or it is a fault on Dwarfpools side?
I'm now using ver11 with ETH-proxy server and there seems do be improvement. I have tried Ethminer but yours has a better hash rate.
keep up the good work and stay on top of the vulnerabilities and I will also be stoping the remote port,
Cheers.  

I'm in touch with most popular pools and we discuss security issues sometimes. Also in many cases I get private reports about vulnerabilities and release new version before they become public.
There are several ways to get problems:
1. Using miner that was downloaded from suspicious source.
2. Using some kind of "nodevfee" tools.
3. Exposing ports for remote management (see my link in previous message) which allows to replace "config.txt" file remotely.
4. Bad guys can even redirect IP of your pool to own pool in some cases, for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BGP_hijacking
Thanks for the info.
Dwarfpool recommended me connecting through  there ETH-proxy server.  But for some reason I could only use HTTP.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Hello Miners

version 11 crashes with the following error at random times. Do you have solution or troubleshooting steps?

``
18:03:14:704   aa4    B2S: 02/25/18-18:03:14 - New job from s.antminepool.com:5766
18:03:14:704   aa4   target: 0x0000000015554000 (diff: 51GH)
18:03:15:579   19cc   GPU 3, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
18:03:15:579   19cc   GPU 3, GpuMiner kx failed 1
18:03:15:594   19cc   Set global fail flag, failed GPU3
18:03:15:594   19cc   GPU 3 failed

```
this is 7*1060 (ASUS strix gtx1060 O6G Gaming) rig with the latest drivers from asus website

OC settings
Power 72%
Core Clock -230
Memory Clock +670



Are you using the correct Claymore miner? please post your .bat file settings and your Hardware specifications to help you out more.




GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
-mode 1

EthDcrMiner64.exe -etht 200, -epool http://127.0.0.1:8080, -ewal ---------------------, -epsw x, -ethi 8 -estale 1
-esm 1
-allpools.

Msi x370 gaming pro carbon M/b.
Amd ryzen 7 cpu.
16g 2667 Fury ram.
M.2 hdd.
x4 msi gaming x rx580 8gb  with modded bios-es .
x2 on ribbon risers in crossfire and x2 on usb risers.
Amd Block chain drivers.
1200w corsair platinum psu

i also use it for gaming that is why it is not a cheap cpu and such.


@Stevross, Are you on the same problem as Kgminer? you are not using the correct pool are you trying to do solo mining without pools?



Are you on the same problem as Kgminer? sorry no Idea. As for the http It would not connect to ETHproxy without it for some reason.and the speed seems to have improved a bit. as for the Allpols I was not sure what to specify. Cheers.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 606
That's how the Dev fee works. Claymore replaces your wallet with his and mines for 36 seconds every hour. You should have asked Dwarfpool the time and duration of when the wallets were switched and compared it to the miner logs.
I know that is how the DEV fee works, However that is not the case as Claymore does not mine at 80mh's when he could mine at my full speed, Also when It is mining at that speed in the logs its not the DEV fee mining and the miner stops, then starts the DEV fee with his wallet.

The speed reported on the pool is also a calculated speed based on the frequency of the valid shares you submit, not the hash rate reported in the miner. It varies depending on share difficulty, stale shares, invalid shares and your latency to the pool. Sometimes it's lower or higher than your reported hash rate. On average it should be close to your reported hash rate.
Jump to: