Author

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 755. (Read 6590718 times)

hero member
Activity: 747
Merit: 502
Does anyone face a problem where the miner just stops? i mean the cards are running and everything is running but the miner just freezes
full member
Activity: 319
Merit: 100
I can't for the life of me get Siacoin to dual mine. Anything obvious I'm doing wrong? Ethereum runs fine, but SC never gets authorized, and my SC hash rate just sits at 0.000 MH/s and I just keep getting SC job timeouts.

My startup script:

Code:
ethdcrminer64.exe -epool eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal ***my ethereum info*** -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal ***my siacoin address***/***miner name***/***email address*** -ftime 10 -dcoin sia
Specify -allpools 1 -allcoins 1 in startup script
sr. member
Activity: 307
Merit: 250
Did you comment out the config file dpools.txt and\or epools.txt? the miner will go check those file first then the parameter in the .bat file.
Please learn to read the readme.txt. The miner only reads the dpools.txt and/or epools.txt if nothing is specified in the start.bat file.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
I can't for the life of me get Siacoin to dual mine. Anything obvious I'm doing wrong? Ethereum runs fine, but SC never gets authorized, and my SC hash rate just sits at 0.000 MH/s and I just keep getting SC job timeouts.

My startup script:

Code:
ethdcrminer64.exe -epool eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal ***my ethereum info*** -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal ***my siacoin address***/***miner name***/***email address*** -ftime 10 -dcoin sia

My output (edited slightly for compactness):

Code:
����������������������������������������������������������������ͻ 
 � Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.7 �
����������������������������������������������������������������ͼ

ETH: 5 pools are specified
Main Ethereum pool is eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999
SC: 5 pools are specified
Main Siacoin pool is sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777
AMD OpenCL platform not found
CUDA initializing...
NVIDIA Cards available: 5
CUDA Driver Version/Runtime Version: 9.0/8.0
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1
Total cards: 5
ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'eth-us-east1.nanopool.org' <158.69.85.38> port 9999
DUAL MINING MODE ENABLED: ETHEREUM+SIACOIN
ETH: eth-proxy stratum mode
ETH: Stratum - Connected (eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999)
Watchdog enabled
  SC: Stratum - connecting to 'sia-us-west1.nanopool.org' <45.32.71.82> port 7777
Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333

  SC: Stratum - Connected (sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777)
ETH: Authorized
Setting DAG epoch #133...
Setting DAG epoch #133 for GPU0
[snip]
Create GPU buffer for GPU0
[snip]
GPU0 DAG creation time - 5327 ms
Setting DAG epoch #133 for GPU0 done
[snip]
 
ETH: 07/09/17-20:52:04 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ETH: Share accepted (140 ms)!
Socket was closed remotely (by pool)
  SC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...

ETH - Total Speed: 155.754 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1(1+0+0+0+0), Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 32.165 Mh/s, GPU1 27.200 Mh/s, GPU2 31.693 Mh/s, GPU3 32.887 Mh/s, GPU4 31.810 Mh/s
  SC - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0(0+0+0+0+0), Rejected: 0
  SC: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s, GPU3 0.000 Mh/s, GPU4 0.000 Mh/s

Notice in there that it says ETH: Authorized, but it never says anything about SC: Authorized? I think this is my problem, but I don't know what else to do about it.

What I've tried so far, none of which have been successful:
  • Generating a new Siacoin wallet address
  • Changing my email address to a Gmail address
  • -dcri intensities from about 1 to 500
  • switching from Nanopool to Miningpoolhub
  • switching to different Nanopool servers
  • Claymore 9.5 and 9.7

Any thoughts?

Did you comment out the config file dpools.txt and\or epools.txt? the miner will go check those file first then the parameter in the .bat file.
afm
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Hi all,

Using the same hardware, i get about 0.5 MH/s using Linux.

Is this normal? If so - why?
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Sinces today i get this error , whats this Sad?
https://i.imgur.com/PeOh4nB.jpg
full member
Activity: 319
Merit: 100
Hi
Does -ttli option works with nvidia cards?
tsg
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 103
But no increase in hashrate after decrease in last period (over 1mhs  a card)
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 503
Just tried new version and I very glad Smiley Really much faster startup miner. Also I have more stability in work. Thanks Claymore!

Upd: have on my nvidia rig +2 Mh per card  Shocked Wow!
tsg
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 103
I would like to mine ethereum and some ethereum forks: etc, expanse, elementrem, ubiq..
Could I specify it in epools.txt to switch by pressing "e" key in miner?
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
@Claymore

Just wanted to say thanks for cleaning up the manager.  Working well now, good job!
full member
Activity: 349
Merit: 102


1200W should be plenty for 6x 1070s. My rigs are setup like that and with PL of 65-70% pull 775W at the wall and the psu doesn't even turn it's fan on most of the time. If his psu kicks the bucket there's something wrong with it!  80% utilisation should not tax a decent gold or platinum psu.

I'd recommend unplugging all the cables and every riser, check them carefully and then add the cards back one at a time, mining on each for 1/2hr or so at stock before adding another. That should at least let you find out at what point things get unstable. If it gets unstable with one card then look to the software, reinstall from scratch or take a known working image from another machine if you have one.

Ok good info, i will try that.
Just to clarify, is it better to run each card alone for 30 mins or do you Think i should start with 1 card and every 30 min I add Another card, for testing.


Adding another card each time to see where things start to lose stability. Hopefully they don't though.
member
Activity: 128
Merit: 10
Something new with the droping hashrate on Radeon cards ?

yes, dump claymore use sgminer instead.

Even if my Vega cards don't work with Claymore's Miner when they get here, I'll wait until they do before I use them to mine.

Saturday I've tested the new Vega Frontier edition with the SGMiner-GM, got max. 10 MH/s at coinotron.com pool with ETH mining.
Now I check my single GTX1060 with Claymore's new v9.7, be after 20 mins at 16 MH/s and I guess I'll reach the 19.9 MH/s as shown from
Claymore's miner on my screen.

I'm in the testing phase to decide which card I'll take to build a larger rig. Any suggestions from experienced miners here?

I hope, that Claymore will tune his miner for the new Vega too. I expected 69 MH/s from this card when I decided to buy one card for tests.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
Well I guess Nvida is just that much better 'cause I got a fried Corsair gold 1200W sitting next to me that tried to power 6x RX cards. (the modded RX cards do 30MH/s and cost $250 while the GTX1070 cost $750 for the same, this was a few months back of course)

edit:

Also, what's up with AMD lately? Are they trying to go out of business? ...and my local computer store only has expensive ultra gourmet Intel CPU's for those nice 7 slot boards, I want a nice $60 Pentium; my worker is doing menial labor not rendering the next Moon landing.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Is there a way to identify multiple wallets and pools without using the epools file?

Thoughts on this?
hero member
Activity: 2492
Merit: 621
So switched to the new v9.7 and now im getting GPU Error "gpuminer cu_k1 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered"

Ive got the latest drivers, win10 is upto date, even reduxed clocks (which were working fine on v9.5)

Also keep getting "ethdcrminer64 blocked from accessing graphics hardware" errors too even though windows defender virus & threat protection is disabled.

Can someone please help?
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0


1200W should be plenty for 6x 1070s. My rigs are setup like that and with PL of 65-70% pull 775W at the wall and the psu doesn't even turn it's fan on most of the time. If his psu kicks the bucket there's something wrong with it!  80% utilisation should not tax a decent gold or platinum psu.

I'd recommend unplugging all the cables and every riser, check them carefully and then add the cards back one at a time, mining on each for 1/2hr or so at stock before adding another. That should at least let you find out at what point things get unstable. If it gets unstable with one card then look to the software, reinstall from scratch or take a known working image from another machine if you have one.

Ok good info, i will try that.
Just to clarify, is it better to run each card alone for 30 mins or do you Think i should start with 1 card and every 30 min I add Another card, for testing.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
I can't for the life of me get Siacoin to dual mine. Anything obvious I'm doing wrong? Ethereum runs fine, but SC never gets authorized, and my SC hash rate just sits at 0.000 MH/s and I just keep getting SC job timeouts.

My startup script:

Code:
ethdcrminer64.exe -epool eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal ***my ethereum info*** -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal ***my siacoin address***/***miner name***/***email address*** -ftime 10 -dcoin sia

[....]

Any thoughts?


Drop the stratum+tcp part of the server name. From my own .bat file:
Code:
-dpool sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777

Thanks--just tried that too, but got the same outcome.
full member
Activity: 349
Merit: 102

www.ubuntu.com, 1200W is definitely too little.

850W for mainboard and 3x cards.
850W for remaining 3x cards.


Do you recommend getting a better psu or does changing to Ubuntu do any difference regarding the Power? Cant imagine that.
But my wattman says 950 when they are all on 100% Power target, that is for the whole rig...

it's like redlining your Porsche, you can go there but don't keep it there. At 950W your 1200W PSU is probably about to kick the bucket.

1200W should be plenty for 6x 1070s. My rigs are setup like that and with PL of 65-70% pull 775W at the wall and the psu doesn't even turn it's fan on most of the time. If his psu kicks the bucket there's something wrong with it!  80% utilisation should not tax a decent gold or platinum psu.

I'd recommend unplugging all the cables and every riser, check them carefully and then add the cards back one at a time, mining on each for 1/2hr or so at stock before adding another. That should at least let you find out at what point things get unstable. If it gets unstable with one card then look to the software, reinstall from scratch or take a known working image from another machine if you have one.
full member
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
I can't for the life of me get Siacoin to dual mine. Anything obvious I'm doing wrong? Ethereum runs fine, but SC never gets authorized, and my SC hash rate just sits at 0.000 MH/s and I just keep getting SC job timeouts.

My startup script:

Code:
ethdcrminer64.exe -epool eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal ***my ethereum info*** -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal ***my siacoin address***/***miner name***/***email address*** -ftime 10 -dcoin sia

[....]

Any thoughts?


Drop the stratum+tcp part of the server name. From my own .bat file:
Code:
-dpool sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777
Jump to: