Author

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 771. (Read 6590565 times)

newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
I'm trying this miner for the first time and I'm getting these unstable Mh/s

ETH: 07/02/17-20:38:52 - New job from eu2.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 63.816 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:03
ETH: GPU0 5.487 Mh/s, GPU1 20.439 Mh/s, GPU2 5.204 Mh/s, GPU3 18.170 Mh/s, GPU4 9.374 Mh/s, GPU5 5.142 Mh/s

These should read minimum of 21Mh/s

I'm running windows 10 x64
G4400 CPU
TB250-BTC v6
6 x 1060 3GB GPUS
Latest Nvidia Driver
PSU Cougar 1050

Any help would be appreciated.




Make sure Windows 10 is updated to the latest version through Windows Update then uninstall the drivers in safe mode using DDU and reinstall the latest driver.

It is updated.

Just to provide more information, I unplugged all the GPUs and plugged them 1 by 1 and tested the miner for every card. All stable 21 Mh/s, when connected together starts the unstable Mh/s.

I read somewhere that new versions of windows are giving problems with more that 4 GPUs, they just don't like miners, got a 5 card rig that is giving me problems just after the last Windows 10 update.

I went back to an older version of the Nvidia drivers and is much better now. Will try and go further back to see if it keeps more stable.
newbie
Activity: 72
Merit: 0
I'm trying this miner for the first time and I'm getting these unstable Mh/s

ETH: 07/02/17-20:38:52 - New job from eu2.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 63.816 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:03
ETH: GPU0 5.487 Mh/s, GPU1 20.439 Mh/s, GPU2 5.204 Mh/s, GPU3 18.170 Mh/s, GPU4 9.374 Mh/s, GPU5 5.142 Mh/s

These should read minimum of 21Mh/s

I'm running windows 10 x64
G4400 CPU
TB250-BTC v6
6 x 1060 3GB GPUS
Latest Nvidia Driver
PSU Cougar 1050

Any help would be appreciated.




Make sure Windows 10 is updated to the latest version through Windows Update then uninstall the drivers in safe mode using DDU and reinstall the latest driver.

It is updated.

Just to provide more information, I unplugged all the GPUs and plugged them 1 by 1 and tested the miner for every card. All stable 21 Mh/s, when connected together starts the unstable Mh/s.

I read somewhere that new versions of windows are giving problems with more that 4 GPUs, they just don't like miners, got a 5 card rig that is giving me problems just after the last Windows 10 update.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
I'm trying this miner for the first time and I'm getting these unstable Mh/s

ETH: 07/02/17-20:38:52 - New job from eu2.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 63.816 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:03
ETH: GPU0 5.487 Mh/s, GPU1 20.439 Mh/s, GPU2 5.204 Mh/s, GPU3 18.170 Mh/s, GPU4 9.374 Mh/s, GPU5 5.142 Mh/s

These should read minimum of 21Mh/s

I'm running windows 10 x64
G4400 CPU
TB250-BTC v6
6 x 1060 3GB GPUS
Latest Nvidia Driver
PSU Cougar 1050

Any help would be appreciated.




Make sure Windows 10 is updated to the latest version through Windows Update then uninstall the drivers in safe mode using DDU and reinstall the latest driver.

It is updated.

Just to provide more information, I unplugged all the GPUs and plugged them 1 by 1 and tested the miner for every card. All stable 21 Mh/s, when connected together starts the unstable Mh/s.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 606
I'm trying this miner for the first time and I'm getting these unstable Mh/s

ETH: 07/02/17-20:38:52 - New job from eu2.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 63.816 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:03
ETH: GPU0 5.487 Mh/s, GPU1 20.439 Mh/s, GPU2 5.204 Mh/s, GPU3 18.170 Mh/s, GPU4 9.374 Mh/s, GPU5 5.142 Mh/s

These should read minimum of 21Mh/s

I'm running windows 10 x64
G4400 CPU
TB250-BTC v6
6 x 1060 GPUS
Latest Nvidia Driver
PSU Cougar 1050

Any help would be appreciated.




Make sure Windows 10 is updated to the latest version through Windows Update then uninstall the drivers in safe mode using DDU and reinstall the latest driver.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
I'm trying this miner for the first time and I'm getting these unstable Mh/s

ETH: 07/02/17-20:38:52 - New job from eu2.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 63.816 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:03
ETH: GPU0 5.487 Mh/s, GPU1 20.439 Mh/s, GPU2 5.204 Mh/s, GPU3 18.170 Mh/s, GPU4 9.374 Mh/s, GPU5 5.142 Mh/s

These should read minimum of 21Mh/s

I'm running windows 10 x64
G4400 CPU
TB250-BTC v6
6 x 1060 GPUS
Latest Nvidia Driver
PSU Cougar 1050

Any help would be appreciated.


sr. member
Activity: 340
Merit: 250
Maybe its the new vs? Or is eth getting to difficult to dual mine?
sr. member
Activity: 340
Merit: 250
Has anyone noticed their computers lagging out since the recent difficulty increase? I have two seperate alienware auroa r6 mining, both are lagging out only when gpu mining.

A week ago this didnt happen i could even game while mining. Now fps is 10 from 110 on d3 while mining.
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
Anyone else having problems with Remote Manager 3.3?  The configuration file doesn't save (or read) properly and it drops miner entries and settings when closed and re-opened.

I can copy an old config over the options.ini file from a previous version and it will read it, but once closed it comes back partial and I have to re-enter most of the miners again.  Then it doesn't save the changes and comes back different again.  I have also tried re-entering the miner list from a clean install and still the same problem.

In short - unusable.

What gives?
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
So i know this post is for Claymore miner, but i was having such issues, I moved to nicehash, does anyone else on here use nicehash with multiple gpus. It benchmarks all the algo's fine. When i go to start, it starts mining and then 20-30 min into mining the computer locks up. It doesn't turn off , or give any error message. It just locks , no mouse or keyboard. I have to then hard shut down the pc, and start mining over and it does it again. I don't know if it is certain algo's causing it or not, i tried most of them individually and it seems to do the same thing. I just want my rig mining already and i am having so many issues with the software configuration. any help is appreciated. Even if it is claymore code that will allow me to mine nicehash stratum links.

When mining any Ethash coin Nicehash miner uses Claymore so you have accomplished nothing. It is just a shell running the typical mining software depending on coin being mined.


ok so , i have now switched back to mining just eth on claymore miner. Still the computer just locks after 30 min or so of mining. Any suggestions of what can cause that?
member
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
Hi all,
since v9.6 I used -ejobtimeout 1 (1 minute timeout on new job) on nanopool ETH.
1 minute without any job seems long with 12 seconds Ethereum round, but I see a dozen of timeout per hour.

Is it just normal (should increase timeout), or a problems with nanopool, or with my network ?
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 104
Knowledge must be free !
nope .. same results like 9.6

ETH - Total Speed: 242.455 Mh/s, Total Shares: 10, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
ETH: GPU0 34.263 Mh/s, GPU1 34.960 Mh/s, GPU2 34.230 Mh/s, GPU3 34.273 Mh/s, GPU4 34.906 Mh/s, GPU5 34.916 Mh/s, GPU6 34.908 Mh/s

I've also tried with other drivers. I'm afraid I'll have to go back to w1nd0ze for eth
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Hi guys,

I'm testing a 1080tis rig and I get around 38Mh/s on win 10 and around 35Mh/s on ubuntu 16.04 with claymore 9.6 only eth mining. Did you see same slowness on linux or are you aware of any fixes ?
Thanks
try with claymore 8.1  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin you get full power  Shocked
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 104
Knowledge must be free !
Hi guys,

I'm testing a 1080tis rig and I get around 38Mh/s on win 10 and around 35Mh/s on ubuntu 16.04 with claymore 9.6 only eth mining. Did you see same slowness on linux or are you aware of any fixes ?
Thanks
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 606
hi all

I have just received gtx 1080 ti in adition to my rx 480 8gb

I have connected gtx to monitor and the other one with second pci-e slot and I have installed only the nvidia drivers and removed amd drivers

the problem comes when I want to overclock both cards, I have used always msi afterburner for rx 480 but it seems that now I can only do oc to gtx 1080

anyone knows how can I solve that?

thanks in advance

You have to connect a monitor or dummy plug to the AMD card to be able to use Afterburner and for the drivers to read and set the temerature and fan speed.

dummy plug? like those dvi to vga adapters for example?

You could build your own, but it's easier to use an HDMI connector with an EDID chip built in.

http://www.geeks3d.com/20091230/vga-hack-how-to-make-a-vga-dummy-plug

https://www.amazon.com/CompuLab-4K-Display-Emulator-fit-Headless/dp/B00JKFTYA8
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
hi all

I have just received gtx 1080 ti in adition to my rx 480 8gb

I have connected gtx to monitor and the other one with second pci-e slot and I have installed only the nvidia drivers and removed amd drivers

the problem comes when I want to overclock both cards, I have used always msi afterburner for rx 480 but it seems that now I can only do oc to gtx 1080

anyone knows how can I solve that?

thanks in advance

You have to connect a monitor or dummy plug to the AMD card to be able to use Afterburner and for the drivers to read and set the temerature and fan speed.

dummy plug? like those dvi to vga adapters for example?
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
I added a couple Nvidia GPU's to my rig and now the temp/fan output line doesn't parse correctly and then it crashes my monitoring app when I go to use it.

It doesn't show the info for GPU0 (AMD).  It shows "; GPU1 t-56 fan-40%, GPU2 t-57 fan-40%"  (just the Nvidia's)

I've search around and haven't found an answer.  Any ideas?

I shifted my AMD card to mine Zcash and put the 2 NVIDIA's on Claymore's Dual.  The temp/fan info now shows correctly with the 2 GPU's and no longer crashes the monitoring app.

How can I add back in my AMD card to Claymores Dual and get it to output correctly?

Maybe a screenshot will help?  Am I the only one with this problem while running AMD and Nvidia GPUs?

http://i63.tinypic.com/24465w9.png
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 606
@Claymore

check this new video from BitsBeTrippin

https://youtu.be/ZzAbECBnJmY?t=4836

AMD confirm about DAG issue with Email .

@Guys if anyone can make a test using SGminer with OpenCL 2.0 on Linux it will be very helpful

Thanks

AFAIK, you can't benchmark future epoch's in SGminer like you can with the Claymore miner.

we can run it and compare current hashrates, no need to benchmark at all

At the current epcoh, the difference in hash rate is not significant enough to be able to make a conclusion. There are always hash rates diffrences when using different miners. One way to get some indication if SGminer will be affected would be to mine ETH and then ETC, which is at higher epcoh.

My rig, at it best times, could mine 168 mh/s with claymore miner, now it is 165 mh/s. SO if this SGminer can give me 168 mh/s back, it is all obvious, I don't need to do a benchmark

Among other things, the hash rate you get is also dependent on the miner optimizations, settings and configuration options you use in the miner. Claymore's miner and SGminer are completely different miners and use different configuration options. A few MH/s difference for a rig between two different miners is normal and doesn't show anything except which miner is faster, it doesn't tell you WHY. e.g. Claymore's Zcash miner gives me ~320 H/s on a RX 480, with the Silent Army miner I don't get even half that. The only way to conclusively test whether SGminer is affected by the epoch hash drop is to test a future epoch or see if your hash drops with the next epoch using the SAME miner and settings.
member
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
hello. these are my stat mining on ethermine. i have another rig elsewhere and seems more constant hashrate. Can someone tell me please if this seems correct? thanks for helping.
ps. first time upload img here  Shocked
https://pasteboard.co/Gz4bL8F.jpg

Men... your hash rate... Can you share your rig specs?
just 2 rigs (as you cann see there are 2 workers) one x7 rx 470 other with x6 same gpu because amd shortage  Angry
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
hello. these are my stat mining on ethermine. i have another rig elsewhere and seems more constant hashrate. Can someone tell me please if this seems correct? thanks for helping.
ps. first time upload img here  Shocked
https://pasteboard.co/Gz4bL8F.jpg

Men... your hash rate... Can you share your rig specs?

I think there are 5x1080 or 7-8 other cards with sligth OC
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
@Claymore

check this new video from BitsBeTrippin

https://youtu.be/ZzAbECBnJmY?t=4836

AMD confirm about DAG issue with Email .

@Guys if anyone can make a test using SGminer with OpenCL 2.0 on Linux it will be very helpful

Thanks

AFAIK, you can't benchmark future epoch's in SGminer like you can with the Claymore miner.

we can run it and compare current hashrates, no need to benchmark at all

At the current epcoh, the difference in hash rate is not significant enough to be able to make a conclusion. There are always hash rates diffrences when using different miners. One way to get some indication if SGminer will be affected would be to mine ETH and then ETC, which is at higher epcoh.

My rig, at it best times, could mine 168 mh/s with claymore miner, now it is 165 mh/s. SO if this SGminer can give me 168 mh/s back, it is all obvious, I don't need to do a benchmark
Jump to: