Pages:
Author

Topic: Claymore's miner ETH fee removed (Win 64bit only) - page 4. (Read 8770 times)

member
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
You're a dumb ass and should change your name to Thief_Saver
newbie
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
Your program does not work as you say:

 First DevFee ->User Wallet
 Second DevFee -> User Wallet
 Thrid Devfee -> User Wallet
 Fourth Devfee-> Your Wallet (0x951B737cc259f5d05286183b75eF8C544B4c3772)
 Fifth Devfee -> Your Wallet 0x951B737cc259f5d05286183b75eF8C544B4c3772
.....
Repeat.



Summary Devfee:

60% User
40% For you.




I don't recommend using this program.

 

It should be 4 for user 1 for me for first 2 days then 9/1. number of fees mined is divided by 5 then by 10.. it's maybe a mistake I will look into that. There will be new version soon which will support all pools exept nicehash.

Ok, unpacking GZIP inside the exe file and doing some unknown things s kinda tricky.

...

I dont want it to be resold by other users thats why I packed it. As you see it took about 1 day to find somebody who tried unpack it. I think there was more people who tried that but they just didn't report back if they were successful or not.


Yet you have no issue ripping off Claymore's work...you're a total class act dude. C U Next Tuesday.

I don't know what should I expect next Tuesday?! Some people think its the other way around that he is ripping off everybody else by unreasonably high fees. If he didn't do that and set the fee lower nobody would bother with making such programs nobody would even want to use them..  But you have to understand that 2% is just too high just think about it for example this pool takes 0.2% https://www.alpereum.ch/ for operating pool, providing support, paying hosting etc.. for 1/500 of your earning but he takes additional 1/50 of your earnings just for recompiling the miner when better source emerges.
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
Ok, unpacking GZIP inside the exe file and doing some unknown things s kinda tricky.

...

I dont want it to be resold by other users thats why I packed it. As you see it took about 1 day to find somebody who tried unpack it. I think there was more people who tried that but they just didn't report back if they were successful or not.


Yet you have no issue ripping off Claymore's work...you're a total class act dude. C U Next Tuesday.
newbie
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
Ok, unpacking GZIP inside the exe file and doing some unknown things s kinda tricky.

From the first glance it seems that program is ok, but who knows. Maybe it patches claymore fee to your wallet, but also it can forward some portion of your own shares to another wallet as another fee for patcher - i wouldnt be a big surprise.

And then you can not say is it just a random spike/slide of current effective rate of your worker or it is "patch" working)

I dont have proper qualification to check except for basic diassembly until i see some unpacking of GZIP into unknown shit)

Anyway if this thing forces develper to reduce fees - i am ok with that.

I dont want it to be resold by other users thats why I packed it. As you see it took about 1 day to find somebody who tried unpack it. I think there was more people who tried that but they just didn't report back if they were successful or not.

If you are unsure that I am stealing your normal shares you can check your connection with wireshark for example.  You will see to which wallet you send your shares. If you don't want to mess with wireshark or similar program which monitor your connections. You can just check your miner log. You can find my wallet in your log 0x951B737cc259f5d05286183b75eF8C544B4c3772 everytime it connect to pool and mines dev fee for me.
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
Your program does not work as you say:

 First DevFee ->User Wallet
 Second DevFee -> User Wallet
 Thrid Devfee -> User Wallet
 Fourth Devfee-> Your Wallet (0x951B737cc259f5d05286183b75eF8C544B4c3772)
 Fifth Devfee -> Your Wallet 0x951B737cc259f5d05286183b75eF8C544B4c3772
.....
Repeat.



Summary Devfee:

60% User
40% For you.




I don't recommend using this program.

 
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Ok, unpacking GZIP inside the exe file and doing some unknown things s kinda tricky.

From the first glance it seems that program is ok, but who knows. Maybe it patches claymore fee to your wallet, but also it can forward some portion of your own shares to another wallet as another fee for patcher - i wouldnt be a big surprise.

And then you can not say is it just a random spike/slide of current effective rate of your worker or it is "patch" working)

I dont have proper qualification to check except for basic diassembly until i see some unpacking of GZIP into unknown shit)

Anyway if this thing forces develper to reduce fees - i am ok with that.
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
No worries.  I'd like to simulate something similar on Linux, but I may have to go another route.  Thank you.

newbie
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
Hello - I dual mine Sia with claymore but this is not allowing me to - I see the following error

UNKNOWN OPTION -d

How else should I specify "-dcoin sia" which is the parameter that is being omitted?  

Thanks

Hi can you send me your config? I would like to test it.
I tried this and it work. Its example from Claymore himself I just changed etherpool to ethermine

StartupArguments=-epool eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal 0xD69af2A796A737A103F12d2f0BCC563a13900E6F.YourWorkerName -epsw x -dpool http://sia-eu1.nanopool.org:9980/miner/header?address=3be0304dee313515cf401b8593a0c1df905ed13f0adaee89a8d7337d2ba8209e5ca9f297bbc2 -dcoin sia

Ah I see - even the dual coins must be mined on nanopool?  Is that the issue?



I have found the issue with startup arguments I will make a test run atleast 12hours and then I will upload fixed version it seems like your startup arguments were very long right?

Yes.  Any updates?

Hi I know about your issue and I hope it will be soon! I thought that I will make next release with support for nicehash but I couldn't make it work yet. Huh If I don't get it working tomorow I will release next version just with new config.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
oh he did his work, embedded an obfuscated dll in gzip converted to a byte array, which then uses ReadProcessMemory and WriteProcessMemory from kernel32.dll.
I think it's pretty nice, wonder does claymore detect it some way.

But it's just not as sexy as an eight-byte patch~
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 297
Grow with community


**5. Why did you do this?**
I made it for my own use because I wanted to try if its possible or how hard it would be. It turned out to be doable so I did it and used it for few days myself and then I decided I would share it.
I have rewrote it to make it useable for all users and make their mining easier. I have added about 60% code to check for stupid things users may do and much better error handling to ensure your mining will be absolutely flawless.


I guess you know what is proprietary CopyRights Infringement? you want us to involve with your illegal ways. better take it to yourself

Copyright infringement is the use of works protected by copyright law without permission, infringing certain exclusive rights granted to the copyright holder, such as the right to reproduce, distribute, display or perform the protected work, or to make derivative works.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement



Quote

The "ethical" issue of this thing..
If you have problem with this and you think this modification is not ethical. I have to say if Claymore didn't make milions dollars monthly of your 1-2% fees I would have agreed but in this case NO I don't think this is problem.
I doubt he could even notice! Why? Well I left a debug feature for people just like you this feature shows Claymore's wallets and show them in your miner console. So you can check his wallets and see for yourself how many bitcoins he make daily.
He has many wallets on many pools here is just one of them there is maybe 30+ of these you can look them up yourself. https://etherscan.io/address/0xc1c427cd8e6b7ee3b5f30c2e1d3f3c5536ec16f5


That is the fruit of his innovative and support approach, I am not actually defending claymore as I know him or not, its juts that he deserves what he got for writing friendly user miner.

why don't you wrote your own miner? there are open source ready for modifications out there.






rofl doubt claymore has it copyrighted or ANYTHING even close

LOL...ROFL...I bet you're not using Claymores miner aren't you? or rather you're not reading License.txt included

Copied From Claymore's License.txt

Claymore's Dual Miner License Agreement
==========

Copyright (c) 2016-2017 Claymore

1. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, you are granted a revocable, non-exclusive, non-transferable, limited and worldwide license to use this software for the internal use only.

2. You may not sell, transfer, rent, assign, lease, loan, sublicense, lend, resell, redistribute or otherwise share this software.
Further, you shall not modify, make derivative works based upon, recreate, generate, disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer, reverse assemble,
reverse compile or otherwise attempt to derive the human-readable form of the source code of any parts of this software.

3. You may not cancel, reduce, change, remove, block, or redirect built-in developer fee in any way (except using "-nofee" option).

4. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
Hello - I dual mine Sia with claymore but this is not allowing me to - I see the following error

UNKNOWN OPTION -d

How else should I specify "-dcoin sia" which is the parameter that is being omitted?  

Thanks

Hi can you send me your config? I would like to test it.
I tried this and it work. Its example from Claymore himself I just changed etherpool to ethermine

StartupArguments=-epool eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal 0xD69af2A796A737A103F12d2f0BCC563a13900E6F.YourWorkerName -epsw x -dpool http://sia-eu1.nanopool.org:9980/miner/header?address=3be0304dee313515cf401b8593a0c1df905ed13f0adaee89a8d7337d2ba8209e5ca9f297bbc2 -dcoin sia

Ah I see - even the dual coins must be mined on nanopool?  Is that the issue?



I have found the issue with startup arguments I will make a test run atleast 12hours and then I will upload fixed version it seems like your startup arguments were very long right?

Yes.  Any updates?
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
Same thing I said on the Eth forums:

Quote from: Wolf0
LOL - virustotal says it's clean, so totally not malware! I mean, not saying it IS - but virustotal means nothing at all. I find it amusing also that all these NoFee hacks are just that - cheap hacks. At least do a *little bit* of work and RE it enough to patch out the fee, or whatever you like...


they're cheap hacks *little  bit of work* because that's all they require.

Have some pride in your work, jeez.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Any plans to allow other mining pools? I've been setup on Nanopool for the longest and wanted to test out a cheaper pool. I was interested in trying AlpEreum (https://www.alpereum.ch/join-pool/) with it's 0.2% mining fee and 0 transaction fees.
hero member
Activity: 2548
Merit: 626
oh he did his work, embedded an obfuscated dll in gzip converted to a byte array, which then uses ReadProcessMemory and WriteProcessMemory from kernel32.dll.
I think it's pretty nice, wonder does claymore detect it some way.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
Same thing I said on the Eth forums:

Quote from: Wolf0
LOL - virustotal says it's clean, so totally not malware! I mean, not saying it IS - but virustotal means nothing at all. I find it amusing also that all these NoFee hacks are just that - cheap hacks. At least do a *little bit* of work and RE it enough to patch out the fee, or whatever you like...
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
Same thing I said on the Eth forums:

Quote from: Wolf0
LOL - virustotal says it's clean, so totally not malware! I mean, not saying it IS - but virustotal means nothing at all. I find it amusing also that all these NoFee hacks are just that - cheap hacks. At least do a *little bit* of work and RE it enough to patch out the fee, or whatever you like...


they're cheap hacks *little  bit of work* because that's all they require.
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
Didn't Claymore already say that there's a way to remove the fee, and if you remove it the hashrate goes down. And plus, it's only 1%, it's not that bad of a fee to pay.
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
please dont steal peoples programs, maybe devfee little high but they must take it. Because they are "developers"

strongly agree!

then just dont download it and support the guy who re-edit it to his liking.
full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 105
please dont steal peoples programs, maybe devfee little high but they must take it. Because they are "developers"

strongly agree!
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0

I have found the issue with startup arguments I will make a test run atleast 12hours and then I will upload fixed version it seems like your startup arguments were very long right?

Yes, my startup arguments were very long.  I include all of my -mvdcc and -cvdcc , and plenty of other things.  Here you go:

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethermine.org:14444 -ewal [no thanks.nope] -epsw x -dpool lbry.suprnova.cc:6256 -dwal [nope again] -dpsw x -allpools 1 -dcoin lbry -dcri 36,36,36,5,36 -tt 70 -ttdcr 83 -ttli 85 -fanmin 85,85,55,85,95 -r 1 -cvddc 900,0,900,940,900 -mvddc 900,0,940,940,940 -cclock 1126,0,1295,1250,1330 -mclock 1876,0,2220,2050,2150 -powlim -12,15,-10,-6,-10 -di 0124 -mport  [nope]
Pages:
Jump to: