Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 119. (Read 3839201 times)

full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
First DJ to play gigs for Bitcoin & Crypto Guru
Good Morning people.
I have a problem with Claymore, He starts work is fine, but later he crash and freezing all the Rig. Install windows again, download a new version of Claymore and stay the same.

Need help.

claymore miner issue fixes:
  
  - read the "readme.txt" for other settings
  - make sure you are using the right drivers
  - watch and play with your overclocks
  - look at your "-i" options, make sure your intensity is not too high

other issues: (getting into GPU mining has a prerequisite which is you should know how to troubleshoot OS and PC hardware) -> i believe this is not claymore's problem anymore

 - riser issues
 - PSU issues
 - motherboard issues
 - GPU issues
 - HDD issues
 - RAM issues
 - temperature issues

yesterday one of my rig freezes and windows crashed after mining started for a few seconds...it was a HDD bad sector issue.. find the source of problem, you can do it.

good post

i mix and match quite a bit and even have risers from when the first came out (never the ribbons tho)

first always check the riser and power supplies, that sata connection is dead important not to have too much load on a single line

if claymores software encounters an issue then it will be in the logs.... start with one card and test over 12/24 hrs, adding one more card at a time, might also be good to clean up drivers and reg entries using DDU

was having a few windows issues recently as well, tried loads of things to fix it and to my surprise all it needed was a rollback using system restore settings, perfect after 3/4 hrs reinstalling and testing lol

i have my 80gb HDDs cloned, any HDD issue I encounter, I just unplug the problematic HDD and plug a clone.

the problematic HDD will go through a file system test and bad sector test (results will determine if it will be reused or trashed), if windows is unstable due to corruption of files etc..it will be overwritten by a clone...my HDDs clone each other, as long as the good HDD is always the source.

my last windows 7 64bit installation for my mining rigs was in 2013..cloning saves time and utilizes a proven windows setup. 

always have extra risers, PSUs, HDDs, RAMs etc...having identical motherboards in your rigs is a plus too.

awesome mining advice!

back in 2012/13 i was using USB and Linuxs, no HDD's what-so-ever!

quick tip if miners wanna save some cash on spare HDD's, find people giving away old sky+ boxes or any media items that can record and play TV, they all have a HDD in them u can plug out!
full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
First DJ to play gigs for Bitcoin & Crypto Guru
it does not seem to effect my hashrate

but recently been getting these sometimes on one GPU in a rig, the first lines are coloured red, and red means stop usually lol, so can anyone tell me?

Code:
15:36:28:040 bf8 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! 20ee04
15:36:29:696 1c0 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! 29afa1
15:36:29:696 1c0 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! e8550e74
15:36:29:696 1c0 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! 819f92d2
15:36:30:243 bf8 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! ff99ba8e
15:36:34:821 1c0 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! b2c34f24
15:36:36:118 bf8 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! 2d7abb
15:36:36:837 bf8 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! 33037e
15:36:36:837 bf8 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! 27bf9c
15:36:36:837 bf8 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! 26c8b3
15:36:44:181 bf8 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! 39065b
15:36:53:525 1b90 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! 34a605
15:36:54:978 1b90 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! 2fa854
15:36:54:978 1b90 GPU #3 returned incorrect data! 33e8ce
15:36:57:057 adc GPU0 t=65C fan=70%, GPU1 t=64C fan=52%, GPU2 t=75C fan=79%, GPU3 t=73C fan=70%
15:36:57:057 adc em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 63,
15:36:57:072 adc watchdog - thread 0, hb time 515

anyone else have this issue?

Claymore can u tell me more about this?
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
hey guys, how can I report to the development team?
I have a XFX HD7990 video card. are working perfect in Claymore's Zcash AMD GPU Miner V11.1 (Windows 10 64bit), It gets speed about 259 h/s on GPU 0 and 1, total about 520 h/s. But in the GPU miner V12 are all not working on my video car, GPU 0 get 0 h/s and GPU 1  less 100 h/s. I have been change the different radeon drive V15, V16, V17 still not working.

MY another 2 video card HD7950 are working perfect in GPU miner V12 and get 280 h/s in over core clock 1100mhz.

please help my HD7990 fly up in V12

thanks,
I have working 7990 (=600s/s) with stock on 12.3 with -i 3. Driver 15.12. In case you modded memory try to return to original bios.

Thanks -i 3 worked. now get 290 h/s on GPU 0,1.  try before -i 4 or 5 having problems

Is that 290 h/s for one card?

290 is for one core of the card. A 7990 does ~600 H/s.

I had a similar issue with the 7990, to keep it worked I had to reduce intensity, I was using win 7, but it disappeared when I switched to win 10.

It seems that the 7990 is much better than the RX 470 or 480.

It's also at least 3x the cost and probably 2x the power usage lol.
newbie
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
hey guys, how can I report to the development team?
I have a XFX HD7990 video card. are working perfect in Claymore's Zcash AMD GPU Miner V11.1 (Windows 10 64bit), It gets speed about 259 h/s on GPU 0 and 1, total about 520 h/s. But in the GPU miner V12 are all not working on my video car, GPU 0 get 0 h/s and GPU 1  less 100 h/s. I have been change the different radeon drive V15, V16, V17 still not working.

MY another 2 video card HD7950 are working perfect in GPU miner V12 and get 280 h/s in over core clock 1100mhz.

please help my HD7990 fly up in V12

thanks,
I have working 7990 (=600s/s) with stock on 12.3 with -i 3. Driver 15.12. In case you modded memory try to return to original bios.

Thanks -i 3 worked. now get 290 h/s on GPU 0,1.  try before -i 4 or 5 having problems

Is that 290 h/s for one card?

290 is for one core of the card. A 7990 does ~600 H/s.

I had a similar issue with the 7990, to keep it worked I had to reduce intensity, I was using win 7, but it disappeared when I switched to win 10.

It seems that the 7990 is much better than the RX 470 or 480.
hero member
Activity: 729
Merit: 513
hey guys, how can I report to the development team?
I have a XFX HD7990 video card. are working perfect in Claymore's Zcash AMD GPU Miner V11.1 (Windows 10 64bit), It gets speed about 259 h/s on GPU 0 and 1, total about 520 h/s. But in the GPU miner V12 are all not working on my video car, GPU 0 get 0 h/s and GPU 1  less 100 h/s. I have been change the different radeon drive V15, V16, V17 still not working.

MY another 2 video card HD7950 are working perfect in GPU miner V12 and get 280 h/s in over core clock 1100mhz.

please help my HD7990 fly up in V12

thanks,
I have working 7990 (=600s/s) with stock on 12.3 with -i 3. Driver 15.12. In case you modded memory try to return to original bios.

Thanks -i 3 worked. now get 290 h/s on GPU 0,1.  try before -i 4 or 5 having problems

Is that 290 h/s for one card?

290 is for one core of the card. A 7990 does ~600 H/s.

I had a similar issue with the 7990, to keep it worked I had to reduce intensity, I was using win 7, but it disappeared when I switched to win 10.
jr. member
Activity: 32
Merit: 1
hey guys, how can I report to the development team?
I have a XFX HD7990 video card. are working perfect in Claymore's Zcash AMD GPU Miner V11.1 (Windows 10 64bit), It gets speed about 259 h/s on GPU 0 and 1, total about 520 h/s. But in the GPU miner V12 are all not working on my video car, GPU 0 get 0 h/s and GPU 1  less 100 h/s. I have been change the different radeon drive V15, V16, V17 still not working.

MY another 2 video card HD7950 are working perfect in GPU miner V12 and get 280 h/s in over core clock 1100mhz.

please help my HD7990 fly up in V12

thanks,
I have working 7990 (=600s/s) with stock on 12.3 with -i 3. Driver 15.12. In case you modded memory try to return to original bios.

Thanks -i 3 worked. now get 290 h/s on GPU 0,1.  try before -i 4 or 5 having problems

Is that 290 h/s for one card?
legendary
Activity: 3444
Merit: 1061
Good Morning people.
I have a problem with Claymore, He starts work is fine, but later he crash and freezing all the Rig. Install windows again, download a new version of Claymore and stay the same.

Need help.

claymore miner issue fixes:
  
  - read the "readme.txt" for other settings
  - make sure you are using the right drivers
  - watch and play with your overclocks
  - look at your "-i" options, make sure your intensity is not too high

other issues: (getting into GPU mining has a prerequisite which is you should know how to troubleshoot OS and PC hardware) -> i believe this is not claymore's problem anymore

 - riser issues
 - PSU issues
 - motherboard issues
 - GPU issues
 - HDD issues
 - RAM issues
 - temperature issues

yesterday one of my rig freezes and windows crashed after mining started for a few seconds...it was a HDD bad sector issue.. find the source of problem, you can do it.

good post

i mix and match quite a bit and even have risers from when the first came out (never the ribbons tho)

first always check the riser and power supplies, that sata connection is dead important not to have too much load on a single line

if claymores software encounters an issue then it will be in the logs.... start with one card and test over 12/24 hrs, adding one more card at a time, might also be good to clean up drivers and reg entries using DDU

was having a few windows issues recently as well, tried loads of things to fix it and to my surprise all it needed was a rollback using system restore settings, perfect after 3/4 hrs reinstalling and testing lol

i have my 80gb HDDs cloned, any HDD issue I encounter, I just unplug the problematic HDD and plug a clone.

the problematic HDD will go through a file system test and bad sector test (results will determine if it will be reused or trashed), if windows is unstable due to corruption of files etc..it will be overwritten by a clone...my HDDs clone each other, as long as the good HDD is always the source.

my last windows 7 64bit installation for my mining rigs was in 2013..cloning saves time and utilizes a proven windows setup. 

always have extra risers, PSUs, HDDs, RAMs etc...having identical motherboards in your rigs is a plus too.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
hi claymore

I'm using ubuntu 16.04 with and 16.60 driver
only get around 150h on an rx480 8g
try the different setting but no luck.
working fine on windows.

any idea?

Same OS and driver as me, but I have R9 270X and only getting 10h/s.  I think it's all down to needing the exact right OS and driver combo as per Claymore posts.  I think you have to use 15.10 and proprietary AMD driver (Ubuntu 16.40 uses new amdgpu-pro stack).  Can't get any of my other zcash miners to work at all on this set up.

I have rx480 , ubuntu 16.04, 16.60 drivers and doing 300 H/S on my card.  Maybe reinstall OS/drivers.  My 380x on same rig doing 193-200H/S.  Any problems I mentioned before had nothing to do with Claymore - all Hardware issues like bad risers.  Claymore makes a solid product.

Thx.  Have tried again and now getting ~66h/s with my 270x.

I have two R9 270 (not x) in a Linux 14.04 box with the 15.12 drivers. Using 12.3.  I am getting 172 H/s for each card.
Make sure you set the environment variables as stated in the readme (see script below).
When the zecminer64 starts it reduces the intensity to 4.

bash script:
#!/bin/bash   
export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=1
export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
/home/me/ClaymoreZCashGPUMinerv12.3/zecminer64



Yes I have all of those set in my start.bash.  Mine auto adjusts the intensity back to 3:

Code:
OpenCL initializing...
AMD Cards available: 1
GPU #0: Pitcairn, 1688 MB available, 10 compute units
POOL version
GPU #0 is going to use too high intensity (6), not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (3)
GPU #0 algorithm ASM, intensity 3
Total cards: 1


Looks like your 270x only has 10 compute units and memory is limited.

This is for the 270 cards:
Code:
OpenCL platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
OpenCL initializing...                               
AMD Cards available: 2                               
GPU #0: Pitcairn, 1984 MB available, 20 compute units
GPU #0 recognized as Radeon 270/270X                 
GPU #1: Pitcairn, 2014 MB available, 20 compute units
GPU #1 recognized as Radeon 270/270X
POOL version                                                                                     
b535                                                                                             
Platform: Linux                                                                                 
start building OpenCL program for GPU 0...                                                       
done                                                                                             
start building OpenCL program for GPU 1...                                                       
done                                                                                             
GPU #0 is going to use too high intensity (6), not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (4)
GPU #0 algorithm ASM, intensity 4                                                               
GPU #1 is going to use too high intensity (6), not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (4)
GPU #1 algorithm ASM, intensity 4                                                               
Total cards: 2                                                                                     
           
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
hi claymore

I'm using ubuntu 16.04 with and 16.60 driver
only get around 150h on an rx480 8g
try the different setting but no luck.
working fine on windows.

any idea?

Same OS and driver as me, but I have R9 270X and only getting 10h/s.  I think it's all down to needing the exact right OS and driver combo as per Claymore posts.  I think you have to use 15.10 and proprietary AMD driver (Ubuntu 16.40 uses new amdgpu-pro stack).  Can't get any of my other zcash miners to work at all on this set up.

I have rx480 , ubuntu 16.04, 16.60 drivers and doing 300 H/S on my card.  Maybe reinstall OS/drivers.  My 380x on same rig doing 193-200H/S.  Any problems I mentioned before had nothing to do with Claymore - all Hardware issues like bad risers.  Claymore makes a solid product.

Thx.  Have tried again and now getting ~66h/s with my 270x.

I have two R9 270 (not x) in a Linux 14.04 box with the 15.12 drivers. Using 12.3.  I am getting 172 H/s for each card.
Make sure you set the environment variables as stated in the readme (see script below).
When the zecminer64 starts it reduces the intensity to 4.

bash script:
#!/bin/bash   
export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=1
export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
/home/me/ClaymoreZCashGPUMinerv12.3/zecminer64



Yes I have all of those set in my start.bash.  Mine auto adjusts the intensity back to 3:

Code:
OpenCL initializing...
AMD Cards available: 1
GPU #0: Pitcairn, 1688 MB available, 10 compute units
POOL version
GPU #0 is going to use too high intensity (6), not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (3)
GPU #0 algorithm ASM, intensity 3
Total cards: 1
member
Activity: 114
Merit: 20
I will test the new version, ty Claymore.
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
Hey guys, would appreciate an honest answer here please.

I was about to buy a few RX 470 8GB cards to mine either zcash or ETH but have been hearing about these new cards about to be released....Will there be a massive difference in speed from the 470/480s compared to these new cards?

I dont want to build a rig that gets me 1800 - 2100H/s then get blown away by a new miner with new cards that gets double + speeds..

I remember claymore mentioning that he cant do much because of the following..

Memory bandwidth:

RX480: 256 GB/s

If these new cards have the same bandwidth then does that mean no real big speed improvement?

Thanks.

Would like to know more about it too, maybe Claymore can explain this to us.

Claymore please, we need your attention here!

I cannot comment unreleased cards. Changes in hardware can improve or kill speed on such complex PoW as ZEC, there is no way to know until real tests.

The new Vega cards are supposed to have half the memory bus width but a higher speed (2048-bit @ 1600MHz effective vs. 4096-bit @ 1000MHz effective) than Fury X, but with the same 4096 compute cores (although probably at a higher clock and lower power draw with perhaps some architectural improvements too).

I believe Claymore said that the 4096-bit bus width of Fury is too wide to be taken advantage of, but the 512-bit bus of Hawaii can be fully taken advantage of...so worst case scenario (Fury is bottlenecked by its compute performance) it should perform at least a little better than Fury X. Best-case (Fury is bottlenecked by its memory) I would assume as much as 60% faster than Fury just considering the memory frequency increase alone but this is just speculation on my part.


Might grab a few extra 470s while I can get them at these low prices...Worst case I just buy a few new cards to add onto the miner.

Thanks bardacuda and claymore.

full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
First DJ to play gigs for Bitcoin & Crypto Guru
odd request maybe

i got hold of a HD7990 by powercolour, its a huge card and runs quite 'slow' @ 935/1350 on both chips

its the black model

does anyone have new bios to get better performance out of this?
full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
First DJ to play gigs for Bitcoin & Crypto Guru
Good Morning people.
I have a problem with Claymore, He starts work is fine, but later he crash and freezing all the Rig. Install windows again, download a new version of Claymore and stay the same.

Need help.

claymore miner issue fixes:
  
  - read the "readme.txt" for other settings
  - make sure you are using the right drivers
  - watch and play with your overclocks
  - look at your "-i" options, make sure your intensity is not too high

other issues: (getting into GPU mining has a prerequisite which is you should know how to troubleshoot OS and PC hardware) -> i believe this is not claymore's problem anymore

 - riser issues
 - PSU issues
 - motherboard issues
 - GPU issues
 - HDD issues
 - RAM issues
 - temperature issues

yesterday one of my rig freezes and windows crashed after mining started for a few seconds...it was a HDD bad sector issue.. find the source of problem, you can do it.

good post

i mix and match quite a bit and even have risers from when the first came out (never the ribbons tho)

first always check the riser and power supplies, that sata connection is dead important not to have too much load on a single line

if claymores software encounters an issue then it will be in the logs.... start with one card and test over 12/24 hrs, adding one more card at a time, might also be good to clean up drivers and reg entries using DDU

was having a few windows issues recently as well, tried loads of things to fix it and to my surprise all it needed was a rollback using system restore settings, perfect after 3/4 hrs reinstalling and testing lol
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
hi claymore

I'm using ubuntu 16.04 with and 16.60 driver
only get around 150h on an rx480 8g
try the different setting but no luck.
working fine on windows.

any idea?

Same OS and driver as me, but I have R9 270X and only getting 10h/s.  I think it's all down to needing the exact right OS and driver combo as per Claymore posts.  I think you have to use 15.10 and proprietary AMD driver (Ubuntu 16.40 uses new amdgpu-pro stack).  Can't get any of my other zcash miners to work at all on this set up.

I have rx480 , ubuntu 16.04, 16.60 drivers and doing 300 H/S on my card.  Maybe reinstall OS/drivers.  My 380x on same rig doing 193-200H/S.  Any problems I mentioned before had nothing to do with Claymore - all Hardware issues like bad risers.  Claymore makes a solid product.

Thx.  Have tried again and now getting ~66h/s with my 270x.

I have two R9 270 (not x) in a Linux 14.04 box with the 15.12 drivers. Using 12.3.  I am getting 172 H/s for each card.
Make sure you set the environment variables as stated in the readme (see script below).
When the zecminer64 starts it reduces the intensity to 4.

bash script:
#!/bin/bash   
export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=1
export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
/home/me/ClaymoreZCashGPUMinerv12.3/zecminer64

newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
hi claymore

I'm using ubuntu 16.04 with and 16.60 driver
only get around 150h on an rx480 8g
try the different setting but no luck.
working fine on windows.

any idea?

Same OS and driver as me, but I have R9 270X and only getting 10h/s.  I think it's all down to needing the exact right OS and driver combo as per Claymore posts.  I think you have to use 15.10 and proprietary AMD driver (Ubuntu 16.40 uses new amdgpu-pro stack).  Can't get any of my other zcash miners to work at all on this set up.

I have rx480 , ubuntu 16.04, 16.60 drivers and doing 300 H/S on my card.  Maybe reinstall OS/drivers.  My 380x on same rig doing 193-200H/S.  Any problems I mentioned before had nothing to do with Claymore - all Hardware issues like bad risers.  Claymore makes a solid product.

Thx.  Have tried again and now getting ~66h/s with my 270x.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
can anyone post a link for modding bios for a gigabyte hd 7950. (Hynix memory)
i'm getting about 500 sols with gpu settings at 900/1250 and using about 400 watts, thinking I could do alot better
running on a h81 pro btc windows 7
legendary
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
hello.

i am buying a rig.

what is better for mining  zcash regarding ROi:

rx 470 4 GB  preice per card: 215 €
rx 470 8 gb                         220 €
rx 480 4 gb                        220€
rx 480 8 gb                       260 €

i will try to put up to 6 gpus per rig. if any one have 7, is system stabile?

any recomendation for motherboard? h81 pro BTC for 6 gpu or any better, maybe for 7 gpus?

thanky  for help


You should really mine ETH and alike with polaris cards. I would get 480 8gb.
h81 pro btc are fine, not sure where are we with 7gpu rigs those days - think it needs win10 / linux
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
hello.

i am buying a rig.

what is better for mining  zcash regarding ROi:

rx 470 4 GB  preice per card: 215 €
rx 470 8 gb                         220 €
rx 480 4 gb                        220€
rx 480 8 gb                       260 €

i will try to put up to 6 gpus per rig. if any one have 7, is system stabile?

any recomendation for motherboard? h81 pro BTC for 6 gpu or any better, maybe for 7 gpus?

thanky  for help
sr. member
Activity: 430
Merit: 254
Hey guys, would appreciate an honest answer here please.

I was about to buy a few RX 470 8GB cards to mine either zcash or ETH but have been hearing about these new cards about to be released....Will there be a massive difference in speed from the 470/480s compared to these new cards?

I dont want to build a rig that gets me 1800 - 2100H/s then get blown away by a new miner with new cards that gets double + speeds..

I remember claymore mentioning that he cant do much because of the following..

Memory bandwidth:

RX480: 256 GB/s

If these new cards have the same bandwidth then does that mean no real big speed improvement?

Thanks.

Would like to know more about it too, maybe Claymore can explain this to us.

Claymore please, we need your attention here!

I cannot comment unreleased cards. Changes in hardware can improve or kill speed on such complex PoW as ZEC, there is no way to know until real tests.

The new Vega cards are supposed to have half the memory bus width but a higher speed (2048-bit @ 1600MHz effective vs. 4096-bit @ 1000MHz effective) than Fury X, but with the same 4096 compute cores (although probably at a higher clock and lower power draw with perhaps some architectural improvements too).

I believe Claymore said that the 4096-bit bus width of Fury is too wide to be taken advantage of, but the 512-bit bus of Hawaii can be fully taken advantage of...so worst case scenario (Fury is bottlenecked by its compute performance) it should perform at least a little better than Fury X. Best-case (Fury is bottlenecked by its memory) I would assume as much as 60% faster than Fury just considering the memory frequency increase alone but this is just speculation on my part.
member
Activity: 128
Merit: 10
That's some crazy speed.  wish i had some good GPUs to play with. 

electricity can now be paid for after the zec price increase.  how much is the price of gpus now compare to few months ago.
we'll i just saw it's 30% cheaper.

Jump to: