Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 120. (Read 3839201 times)

hero member
Activity: 835
Merit: 502
What's the deal with 11+ dropping random cards to 0 hash now and then? Is there a known fix. Lower intensity doesn't do it.

Maybe the new miner stresses the card more. You need to reduce the clock frequency to tr.
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 250
What's the deal with 11+ dropping random cards to 0 hash now and then? Is there a known fix. Lower intensity doesn't do it.
hero member
Activity: 722
Merit: 500
hey guys, how can I report to the development team?
I have a XFX HD7990 video card. are working perfect in Claymore's Zcash AMD GPU Miner V11.1 (Windows 10 64bit), It gets speed about 259 h/s on GPU 0 and 1, total about 520 h/s. But in the GPU miner V12 are all not working on my video car, GPU 0 get 0 h/s and GPU 1  less 100 h/s. I have been change the different radeon drive V15, V16, V17 still not working.

MY another 2 video card HD7950 are working perfect in GPU miner V12 and get 280 h/s in over core clock 1100mhz.

please help my HD7990 fly up in V12

thanks,

You need to reduce the intensity to 5 or 4.
sr. member
Activity: 954
Merit: 250
hey guys, how can I report to the development team?
I have a XFX HD7990 video card. are working perfect in Claymore's Zcash AMD GPU Miner V11.1 (Windows 10 64bit), It gets speed about 259 h/s on GPU 0 and 1, total about 520 h/s. But in the GPU miner V12 are all not working on my video car, GPU 0 get 0 h/s and GPU 1  less 100 h/s. I have been change the different radeon drive V15, V16, V17 still not working.

MY another 2 video card HD7950 are working perfect in GPU miner V12 and get 280 h/s in over core clock 1100mhz.

please help my HD7990 fly up in V12

thanks,
I have working 7990 (=600s/s) with stock on 12.3 with -i 3. Driver 15.12. In case you modded memory try to return to original bios.
rpg
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
rx580  300H/S already test Smiley
rx5xx almost as fast as rx4xx Cheesy

You wish.  RX 580 delayed until mid April at least.
http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-580-570-launch-delay-rumor/

Like the price on the 580 at under $200
sr. member
Activity: 441
Merit: 252
rx580  300H/S already test Smiley
rx5xx almost as fast as rx4xx Cheesy

You wish.  RX 580 delayed until mid April at least.
http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-580-570-launch-delay-rumor/
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
rx580  300H/S already test Smiley
rx5xx almost as fast as rx4xx Cheesy
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Good Morning people.
I have a problem with Claymore, He starts work is fine, but later he crash and freezing all the Rig. Install windows again, download a new version of Claymore and stay the same.

Need help.

claymore miner issue fixes:
 
  - read the "readme.txt" for other settings
  - make sure you are using the right drivers
  - watch and play with your overclocks
  - look at your "-i" options, make sure your intensity is not too high

other issues: (getting into GPU mining has a prerequisite which is you should know how to troubleshoot OS and PC hardware) -> i believe this is not claymore's problem anymore

 - riser issues
 - PSU issues
 - motherboard issues
 - GPU issues
 - HDD issues
 - RAM issues
 - temperature issues

yesterday one of my rig freezes and windows crashed after mining started for a few seconds...it was a HDD bad sector issue.. find the source of problem, you can do it.

Thanks my friend. I believe my rig is stable, 12 hours stable. I was change the line command in .bat

Thank for you answer.
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
Hey guys, would appreciate an honest answer here please.

I was about to buy a few RX 470 8GB cards to mine either zcash or ETH but have been hearing about these new cards about to be released....Will there be a massive difference in speed from the 470/480s compared to these new cards?

I dont want to build a rig that gets me 1800 - 2100H/s then get blown away by a new miner with new cards that gets double + speeds..

I remember claymore mentioning that he cant do much because of the following..

Memory bandwidth:

RX480: 256 GB/s

If these new cards have the same bandwidth then does that mean no real big speed improvement?

Thanks.

Would like to know more about it too, maybe Claymore can explain this to us.

Claymore please, we need your attention here!

I cannot comment unreleased cards. Changes in hardware can improve or kill speed on such complex PoW as ZEC, there is no way to know until real tests.
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
bought a new desktop rig, not for dedicated mining purposes, just because I've come into some fat stacks, yo, Jesse.

Decided to go for a good value/on special Gigabyte 1060 6G, I run it along side my old GTX 960.


HOWEVER - a few days earlier I was browsing around and came across an Asus Strix RX 470 - I was running a Sapphire Nitro+ RX480 4GB card along side the GTX960. So - new rig - 2x nvidia. Old rig RX480/new RX470.

The RX470 cost me $190NZD - I'd just like to share with you how fkn impressed I am with its performance - pulling in consistent 260-290 Sol/s giving a total of 560 Sol/s+ with only minor Wattman alterations (stock BIOS's).

http://iforce.co.nz/i/mznl50fs.zyz.jpg

Moral of the story is - if you're not retarded and can undervolt/overclock and maintain consistency then $190 for the RX470 was a fkn steal.



note: very high whilst typing this. please disregard over-analysis.

Quote
-zpool stratum+tcp://zec-us.suprnova.cc:2142
-zwal yoyo123.rx480
-zpsw x
-dbg -1
-di 0,1
-i 8,8
-wd 1

Claymore says:
This miner is free-to-use, however, current developer fee is 2% if you use secure SSL/TLS connection to mining pool, every hour the miner mines for 72 seconds for developer.
If you use unsecure connection to mining pool, current developer fee is 2.5%, every hour the miner mines for 90 seconds for developer.


So if you're using suprnova pool, I'd use ssl://zec.suprnova.cc:2242 

Regards
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Did you see the roonies on him???
Hey guys, would appreciate an honest answer here please.

I was about to buy a few RX 470 8GB cards to mine either zcash or ETH but have been hearing about these new cards about to be released....Will there be a massive difference in speed from the 470/480s compared to these new cards?

I dont want to build a rig that gets me 1800 - 2100H/s then get blown away by a new miner with new cards that gets double + speeds..

I remember claymore mentioning that he cant do much because of the following..

Memory bandwidth:

RX480: 256 GB/s

If these new cards have the same bandwidth then does that mean no real big speed improvement?

Thanks.

Would like to know more about it too, maybe Claymore can explain this to us.

Claymore please, we need your attention here!
full member
Activity: 162
Merit: 104
Hello,

I have 2 Nano,  1 R9 280x and 1 RX480, is there a driver version where i can mix them and use -asm 1 for all cards?

if i use 15.12 i can not use RX480
if i use 16.12.2 i can not user nano with -asm 1

Thank you

No. Either split cards to different rigs, or use Linux version (but amd-pro drivers don't support 280x).

And what about 2 directories?
Driver 16.12.2
The first directory with miner for 480 and 280
The second directory with the necessary OpenCL libraries from previous drivers for the nano
will it work?
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
Hey guys, would appreciate an honest answer here please.

I was about to buy a few RX 470 8GB cards to mine either zcash or ETH but have been hearing about these new cards about to be released....Will there be a massive difference in speed from the 470/480s compared to these new cards?

I dont want to build a rig that gets me 1800 - 2100H/s then get blown away by a new miner with new cards that gets double + speeds..

I remember claymore mentioning that he cant do much because of the following..

Memory bandwidth:

RX480: 256 GB/s

If these new cards have the same bandwidth then does that mean no real big speed improvement?

Thanks.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Hi, Could Somenne help with this?

One R9 280x Drops hashrate from 285 to 150 after some time shows this "WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hanges in OpenCL call, exit" and miners restart.




put monitor cable on that 280 card.
i was faced same problem last month and with this method my problem solved

I wonder if a dummy plug would work in that situation??

maybe it will work i diidnt try this.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
hi claymore

I'm using ubuntu 16.04 with and 16.60 driver
only get around 150h on an rx480 8g
try the different setting but no luck.
working fine on windows.

any idea?

Same OS and driver as me, but I have R9 270X and only getting 10h/s.  I think it's all down to needing the exact right OS and driver combo as per Claymore posts.  I think you have to use 15.10 and proprietary AMD driver (Ubuntu 16.40 uses new amdgpu-pro stack).  Can't get any of my other zcash miners to work at all on this set up.

I have rx480 , ubuntu 16.04, 16.60 drivers and doing 300 H/S on my card.  Maybe reinstall OS/drivers.  My 380x on same rig doing 193-200H/S.  Any problems I mentioned before had nothing to do with Claymore - all Hardware issues like bad risers.  Claymore makes a solid product.

If you do not stress your graphics cards, Clayjmore runs smoothly.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
hi claymore

I'm using ubuntu 16.04 with and 16.60 driver
only get around 150h on an rx480 8g
try the different setting but no luck.
working fine on windows.

any idea?

Same OS and driver as me, but I have R9 270X and only getting 10h/s.  I think it's all down to needing the exact right OS and driver combo as per Claymore posts.  I think you have to use 15.10 and proprietary AMD driver (Ubuntu 16.40 uses new amdgpu-pro stack).  Can't get any of my other zcash miners to work at all on this set up.

I have rx480 , ubuntu 16.04, 16.60 drivers and doing 300 H/S on my card.  Maybe reinstall OS/drivers.  My 380x on same rig doing 193-200H/S.  Any problems I mentioned before had nothing to do with Claymore - all Hardware issues like bad risers.  Claymore makes a solid product.
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
hi claymore

I'm using ubuntu 16.04 with and 16.60 driver
only get around 150h on an rx480 8g
try the different setting but no luck.
working fine on windows.

any idea?

Same OS and driver as me, but I have R9 270X and only getting 10h/s.  I think it's all down to needing the exact right OS and driver combo as per Claymore posts.  I think you have to use 15.10 and proprietary AMD driver (Ubuntu 16.40 uses new amdgpu-pro stack).  Can't get any of my other zcash miners to work at all on this set up.
legendary
Activity: 3444
Merit: 1061
Good Morning people.
I have a problem with Claymore, He starts work is fine, but later he crash and freezing all the Rig. Install windows again, download a new version of Claymore and stay the same.

Need help.

claymore miner issue fixes:
 
  - read the "readme.txt" for other settings
  - make sure you are using the right drivers
  - watch and play with your overclocks
  - look at your "-i" options, make sure your intensity is not too high

other issues: (getting into GPU mining has a prerequisite which is you should know how to troubleshoot OS and PC hardware) -> i believe this is not claymore's problem anymore

 - riser issues
 - PSU issues
 - motherboard issues
 - GPU issues
 - HDD issues
 - RAM issues
 - temperature issues

yesterday one of my rig freezes and windows crashed after mining started for a few seconds...it was a HDD bad sector issue.. find the source of problem, you can do it.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Good Morning people.
I have a problem with Claymore, He starts work is fine, but later he crash and freezing all the Rig. Install windows again, download a new version of Claymore and stay the same.

Need help.
legendary
Activity: 3444
Merit: 1061
I wonder why my Sapphiry Fury Nitro show 0 sols with asm algo. Anyone experienced this?

You need to reduce the intensity to -i 6 or lower.
That does not help. Tried even intensity 1. With - asm 0 I get 400 sols.

With this card, i only tried (-asm 1) and i get 430+ sols, using 15.12 drivers.
Quick guess, double check your driver version, as Windows loves to forcefully update the driver.

I think the problem is with the driver.

driver 15.12, -i 6, win7 64bit here, getting 470H/s with overclock

Hi Could you please show the capture of the overclock params for the fury


i think it is getting ~460+ H/s using optiminer
Jump to: