Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 159.

stealth2600

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

Quote from: Benchman on February 14, 2017, 01:44:56 PM

maybe tonga with modified bios?

I didn't modified bioses for tongas because my cards don't have dual switch bios. My Tahitis and Polaris are all modified.

Me either, I have stock bios on all my 380x cards. That could be the difference, hopefully Dr_Victor can share the details of his setup with us.

Benchman

full member

Activity: 220

Merit: 100

maybe tonga with modified bios?

I didn't modified bioses for tongas because my cards don't have dual switch bios. My Tahitis and Polaris are all modified.

stealth2600

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

Quote from: Dr_Victor on February 14, 2017, 12:42:41 PM

Quote from: Benchman on February 14, 2017, 09:58:37 AM

^You aren't only one with Tonga.

It's true that this chip is inferior than Tahiti's, but man 160 hash/s is pretty low. Make it at least 220-230 h/s.

I have 220 with R9 380 (w/o 'x') on v.12.

How do you reach 220 h/s? The only way I've been able to achieve that rate is by running optiminer with my Gigabyte Radeon R9 380x 4GB OCed to the 1080/1550 with the 15.12 driver. The same setup with Claymore only produces 196 - 200 h/s for me. I can't use optiminer though, it constantly BSODs Windows 10 on my box or the optiminer thread hangs and has to be restarted. This happens to me every 2-3 hours, which is why I have stayed loyal to Claymore, it's just more stable for me. Please share how your achieving 220 h/s with a Radeon R9 380 on Claymore v12. Thanks!

Demented247

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Im getting 325 -328 h/s rinning v12 with RX480 (Bios Mod)

peteycamey

legendary

Activity: 1185

Merit: 1021

me too. Tonga here also. needs improvement.

Benchman

full member

Activity: 220

Merit: 100

Say whaaaaaaaat? Cheesy

Can you please post your .bat file?

And which version of 380? 2 or 4gb?

Thanks.

Dr_Victor

sr. member

Activity: 954

Merit: 250

Quote from: Benchman on February 14, 2017, 09:58:37 AM

^You aren't only one with Tonga.

It's true that this chip is inferior than Tahiti's, but man 160 hash/s is pretty low. Make it at least 220-230 h/s.

I have 220 with R9 380 (w/o 'x') on v.12.

Benchman

full member

Activity: 220

Merit: 100

Quote from: stealth2600 on February 14, 2017, 10:53:02 AM

Quote from: Benchman on February 14, 2017, 09:58:37 AM

^You aren't only one with Tonga.

It's true that this chip is inferior than Tahiti's, but man 160 hash/s is pretty low. Make it at least 220-230 h/s.

It looks like there's at least 4 of us with Tonga chipsets who have replied to this thread. Claymore can you please see about making some improvements for this chipset? Sending a little love towards the "budget" miners using Tonga cards would be much appreciated. These cards really are capable of a lot more speed. Thanks again for all the hard work you do for the community!

And much much more people out of btc talk.

I personally know a few guys who have more than 50 Tongas in mining farm.

Everyone who have problems with electricity and have tahitis gpu, sell them and buy new tongas (no money for polaris).

mamboOo

member

Activity: 76

Merit: 10

Cryptonote for RX please!!

sezyumx

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Sandblock - Customer satisfaction on blockchain

Thank you so much i will try it now.

AriesIV10

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1006

Mine for a Bit

Claymore's Performance is Up, but is Profitability Up with the degradation of the ZEC Price?

stealth2600

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

Quote from: Benchman on February 14, 2017, 09:58:37 AM

^You aren't only one with Tonga.

It's true that this chip is inferior than Tahiti's, but man 160 hash/s is pretty low. Make it at least 220-230 h/s.

It looks like there's at least 4 of us with Tonga chipsets who have replied to this thread. Claymore can you please see about making some improvements for this chipset? Sending a little love towards the "budget" miners using Tonga cards would be much appreciated. These cards really are capable of a lot more speed. Thanks again for all the hard work you do for the community!

Benchman

full member

Activity: 220

Merit: 100

^You aren't only one with Tonga.

It's true that this chip is inferior than Tahiti's, but man 160 hash/s is pretty low. Make it at least 220-230 h/s.

Spectr12341234

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

Quote from: Pennywis3 on February 14, 2017, 04:09:52 AM

Quote from: Spectr12341234 on February 14, 2017, 03:35:44 AM

Pleas up speed r9 380 Cry

r9 380 4gb memory have 190 h/s, in game testing is 10 to 15 percent less R9 280, 280 but we 295 h/s Undecided

R9 380 has a 256 bit memory bus, while the R9 280 has a 384 bit bus.
Thats why is hashing faster, not much you can do about it.

no please noooo!!! Cry

cryptowhat

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

My fury dropped to about 200 hash on -i 8, 300 hash-i 7, and increased to 420 hash from ~400 on -i 6.

I was hitting 400~ on 11.1 on -i 8.

Thanks for the work clay Wink

This is on win7 15.12

hmmmmm Actual submitted shares 100 hash. Went back to 11.1.

IOTUSA

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 250

Quote from: lrdo_rvaen on February 13, 2017, 07:15:14 PM

For me v12 is slover than optiminer. 4x r9 270x 740 on claymore while 780 on optiminer. Sad

Ver 12 is far more heavily tied to ASM and running ASM correct drivers than earlier versions.

citronick

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1080

---- winter*juvia -----

Quote from: rpg on February 14, 2017, 07:46:07 AM

@claymore

You should make the -li 1 default. It does have a major impact on temperature and I guess power usage with no meaningful decrease on hashrate. In fact Tahiti and Hawaii have no hashrate decrease at all. Ellesmere shows a decrease of 4 or 5 hashes.

I have been experimenting with all the -i switches to lower down intensity/heat without too much impact on hash, and I got the same results like the above.

-li 1 gives me more less same hash but temps are down (not great as great as XMR mining, but good enough temps reduction).

My Nanos and 390s are doing very well with v12 on Linux.

I left the RX480 mining on ETH to compensate the drop in ZEC profitability.

It will be great if we can have an update on your XMR / Cryptonight miner.

XMR profitability is better than ZEC, and slightly lower than ETH.

Afternote: the hash does gets lower over time -- so -li will impact hash as per expected.

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

I can confirm bug with wrong hashrate if you use "-li" or "-ttli" options. These options add delays after every GPU round, so GPU is free for some time and therefore it becomes cool. But v12 measures GPU round time not including these delays so you see same hashrate. I will fix it in next update. This bug was added during porting miner to Linux, I don't remember exact version number.

ffthomas

full member

Activity: 160

Merit: 100

Quote from: rpg on February 14, 2017, 07:46:07 AM

@claymore

You should make the -li 1 default. It does have a major impact on temperature and I guess power usage with no meaningful decrease on hashrate. In fact Tahiti and Hawaii have no hashrate decrease at all. Ellesmere shows a decrease of 4 or 5 hashes.

Did you experience significantly lower temperature and/or lower power consumption? I never used low intensity mode and can't test my rigs now with "-li 1" parameter.

XPM-guru

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

Quote from: rpg on February 14, 2017, 07:46:07 AM

@claymore

You should make the -li 1 default. It does have a major impact on temperature and I guess power usage with no meaningful decrease on hashrate. In fact Tahiti and Hawaii have no hashrate decrease at all. Ellesmere shows a decrease of 4 or 5 hashes.

I dont know about it. Tried -li 1 and it does really improve temps while keeping the hashrate the same, but now pool shows much less that before...

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 159. (Read 3839201 times)