Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 325. (Read 3839210 times)

newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
I'm running Claymore version 9.1. Everything is running stable:

Code:
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:21 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 374.633 H/s, Total Shares: 12364, Rejected: 61, Time: 18:59
ZEC: GPU0 201.921 H/s, GPU1 172.712 H/s
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:30 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:42 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:57 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:59 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:01 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=53C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:26 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:32 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:33 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (202 ms)!
ZEC: Share accepted (218 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:37 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:38 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (437 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:50 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:52 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (374 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:45:02 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 375.053 H/s, Total Shares: 12386, Rejected: 61, Time: 19:01
ZEC: GPU0 201.920 H/s, GPU1 173.142 H/s
This line concerns me:
GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
I have 2 GPU's running: 2x HD 7950

GPU1 seems to be acting lazy. How comes that the fan is only at 16% and t = 52C? It seems to me like the card is not performing as it should. Is this behavior normal?

There does not seem to be any ouput  about the amount of sols. Is there a way I can calculate this looking at the amount of Hashes per second?

I'm concerned about the fanspeed of GPU 0 as well, it's about 87%. What is the normal fan speed while mining?
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 250
9.1 going to be slow...nvidia card take over ZCASH...

there are maybe 1/10th as many nVidia cards in mining operation as AMD, and they cost roughly 2.5x as much to reach equivalent hash rate. It won't even be noticeable.
legendary
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003
Anyone here using 9.1 with nicehashminer ? I am still at v9.0 and didn't update it yet. Is it working good with that software and is there any improvements at all if I update ?
fees are 5 too 3% if i remember, so yes  you get more after update
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
legendary
Activity: 1891
Merit: 3096
All good things to those who wait
Hi to all

why my share found very very hight  327ms-1200ms--120ms--its Different why???

My memoory rom 4GB---and--cpu g3240 3.1Ghz..motherboard b85 asus

im tested all connection in pool drawfpool...but not fixed...what are you doing ...this see picture

in realy this problem in flypool i have......my problem where???




Кo peчe, кo?
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
Hi to all

why my share found very very hight  327ms-1200ms--120ms--its Different why???

My memoory rom 4GB---and--cpu g3240 3.1Ghz..motherboard b85 asus

im tested all connection in pool drawfpool...but not fixed...what are you doing ...this see picture

in realy this problem in flypool i have......my problem where???




My god, those poor fans.

sr. member
Activity: 290
Merit: 250
Hi to all

why my share found very very hight  327ms-1200ms--120ms--its Different why???

My memoory rom 4GB---and--cpu g3240 3.1Ghz..motherboard b85 asus

im tested all connection in pool drawfpool...but not fixed...what are you doing ...this see picture

in realy this problem in flypool i have......my problem where???


newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Anyone here using 9.1 with nicehashminer ? I am still at v9.0 and didn't update it yet. Is it working good with that software and is there any improvements at all if I update ?
hero member
Activity: 1386
Merit: 504
Claymore; are you planning to fix the stability issues in 9.1? my rigs are still crashing in this version but work fine with 8.0.

They question has been answered already. There's no issues with the miner. Make sure your PSU's have plenty of capacity or downgrade to v8 as future releases will probably push GPU cards more.
Sometimes can help driver uninstalling after DDU cleaning...
btw i have 2xCorsair cs850m for 6xSapphire 390 - -30mv at the afterburner power consumtion 1140 core and 1500 mem. -1830 sols with -i 6
This rig always starts ok and crashes very seldom - 1-3 times per month

There is nothing wrong with the driver. You just need to reduce the core or the memory frequency. It will be fine then.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1002

NVDIA's miner did huge progress. Worry they will be better for ZCASH mining. Lots of AMD users may be upset.


 On a $/hash basis, Claymore v9.1 on my RX 470s leads the Nicehash eqm miner on my 1070s by a fair bit even though I haven't worked with settings on the RX 470s as much - but the advantage got a LOT narrower with the .3a eqm version, and the 1070 does win now on hash/watt by a narrow margin if you aim for max efficiency.


 I don't think the AMD fanboys have much to worry about, nor do the NVidia fanboys have a lot to crow over.


 Just out of curiosity though, I would be interested in seeing what a Titan X Pascal could do on sol/s. 8-O


Please, stop spaming. Use edit button.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Claymore PLS drop new ver today! <3
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
On flypool they use fix difficulty (2000) for default setting. You can set it manually in password parameter.

Should I set the diff higher for a 6*RX400 rig?

Is vardiff better than using fix difficulty?

For the 6X RX 400 cards, it is better to use the default 2000 difficulty level so you send out one share about 1.5  second.

test with 32768

1 share = 2000 (diff) real share
1 share = 32768 (diff) real share
full member
Activity: 254
Merit: 100
Mostly of Problems in stabilty are in Psu or the Pcie Riser power cable,

I have 7 Rigs, 2 of them was getting freeze/reboot problems,

*What i Did, replaced all Pcie Riser power cable, almost all of them have the yellow cable pretty burned or destroyed (chinese crapy)

*On my 5x480 Rig, I have 2 Corsair 750W,  1 PSU for 3x480 and 1 PSU for 2x480 + motherboard, everything is pretty smooth now
member
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
9.1 going to be slow...nvidia card take over ZCASH...
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030

NVDIA's miner did huge progress. Worry they will be better for ZCASH mining. Lots of AMD users may be upset.


 On a $/hash basis, Claymore v9.1 on my RX 470s leads the Nicehash eqm miner on my 1070s by a fair bit even though I haven't worked with settings on the RX 470s as much - but the advantage got a LOT narrower with the .3a eqm version, and the 1070 does win now on hash/watt by a narrow margin if you aim for max efficiency.


 I don't think the AMD fanboys have much to worry about, nor do the NVidia fanboys have a lot to crow over.


 Just out of curiosity though, I would be interested in seeing what a Titan X Pascal could do on sol/s. 8-O
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
What kind of hashes should I except with r9 270x 2gb?


This are actualy prety good..  135 - 140 sols - v9.1. Good ratio w/sol.. Specialy if undervolted

138-140 me too for 270x

 The R9 270x was a rebadged HD 7870 with faster RAM.
 I see 125-130 on my HD 7870s with v9.1

legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
Guys, what are you using to switch between zcash and the other coins automatically?

Maybe someone has a way to switch coins using only claymore's miner?

 The only "automatic" switching I do is the machines I have running NiceHash.

 Otherwise it's "whattomine" early in the morning with a custom hashrate setting bookmark, and manualy switch if profitability has changed enough to matter.

legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
If I were you I would use DDU, uninstall the drivers and reinstall 15.12 drivers only.


what is DDU?Huh

ALSO HOW I CAN INSTALL 15.12
because i can not install these version of drivers?

 IMO on Windows go with the 16.10.1 drivers, they support all current cards and work with equal efficiency as the 15.12 drivers.

legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030

I would say measure the output at the wall of the 390s using a kill-a-watt. The're cheep, every miner should have at least one. I don't have any 390s myself, yet(getting a 295x2 tonight) but they say they pull around 300 watts. If this is close to true you need another PSU to take the load. Keep in mind if your on the 120v North american standard your close 15 amps. Most households use 15 amps as the standard for each circuit.

If you want to try to change the core voltage or lower the clocks to save power, or take one of them out of the rig and see if it still crashes.

 R9 390 was a rename, a bios update, faster "default" stock clock, and a bit faster memory vs the R9 290 - my 290s pull close to 300 watts with undervolting via TheStilt bios upgrade but significantly overclocked while mining ETH, should pull a little less on ZEC even with v9.1 Claymore.

 The largest capasity ATX power supplies I am aware of are rated for 1600 watts at gold efficiency - and will push a standard household 110V 15 Amp US power circuit AND the outlet right up to it's max rating if the PS is 100% loaded. NOT a real good idea for a miner, you need to allow some "derate" for continuous usage.

 Higher capasity server PS are ALWAYS designed for 220v input - and tend to be derated a lot on max capasity when used on 110V input IF they work at all on 110.

full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 106
On flypool they use fix difficulty (2000) for default setting. You can set it manually in password parameter.

Should I set the diff higher for a 6*RX400 rig?

Is vardiff better than using fix difficulty?

For the 6X RX 400 cards, it is better to use the default 2000 difficulty level so you send out one share about 1.5  second.
Jump to: