Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 340. (Read 3839163 times)

newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Dwarfpool EU server again @ 3000ms+ Sad

well if you have problems with dwarf eu server just change the server to US server.... worked well for mee this morning, even with 200-250 ms connection of shares......

same advice in future, just change the server, dont have to change the pool....



THX! Did work well for me to
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0

thanks friend.

What do you think of nanopool?

Flypool theft my actions.
member
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
Dwarfpool EU server again @ 3000ms+ Sad

well if you have problems with dwarf eu server just change the server to US server.... worked well for mee this morning, even with 200-250 ms connection of shares......

same advice in future, just change the server, dont have to change the pool....
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
I do not know the settings for dwarfpool does anyone help me?
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
Dwarfpool EU server again @ 3000ms+ Sad
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0

So 15.12 is more stable?

Yes, 15.12 works perfectly. 0 crashes on win 10.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
DevFee: start mining (90sec)   ------  instead   72sec instead

Only if you use SSL.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
yes they had a web server problem but shares were still being collected and were recalculated correctly.  I have been allocated what I would expected to earn so I do not see a problem with staying on the pool

Their hash rate is climbing quickly. I certainly will keep on dwarfpool as it's considerably more profit even through the hiccups. Set and forget.
full member
Activity: 139
Merit: 100
I do not see that devfee was less devfee DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'equihash.eu.nicehash.com' <5.153.50.217> p
ort 3357 (unsecure)
DevFee: Pool sets new share target: 0x001e1e1e (diff: 2176H)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (6895 ms)!
DevFee: start mining (90sec)   ------  instead   72sec instead
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:19 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:19 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (109 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (234 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)!
ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:31 - New job from equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 481.104 H/s, Total Shares: 141, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:15
ZEC: GPU0 164.042 H/s, GPU1 165.742 H/s, GPU2 151.320 H/s
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
noobs miner flooding in every way, and good buyer catching all noobs dumper  Grin Grin Grin Grin
zcash bringing to much noobs miner out from his big pocket
sr. member
Activity: 857
Merit: 262
since all the stink about flypool payouts, which feels like promotional effort on the part of dwarfpool or whatever...

...been mining there since day 1, with a few days on nanopool due to constant crashing of some early genoils miner
So far it seems fair to me, as I'm able to get what my daily target numbers are.
I'm pointing my rigs to different algos to get the best results.
The current situation is well balanced: dagger-hashimoto, equihash and cryptonight are very neatly aligned so the final decision could be your own vision of the coin's future.

Now will do focused check of zec on flypool and report back here.  
full member
Activity: 139
Merit: 100
I do not see that devfee was less devfee DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'equihash.eu.nicehash.com' <5.153.50.217> p
ort 3357 (unsecure)
DevFee: Pool sets new share target: 0x001e1e1e (diff: 2176H)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (6895 ms)!
DevFee: start mining (90sec)   ------  instead   72sec instead
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:19 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:19 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (109 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (234 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)!
ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:31 - New job from equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 481.104 H/s, Total Shares: 141, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:15
ZEC: GPU0 164.042 H/s, GPU1 165.742 H/s, GPU2 151.320 H/s
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
hero member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 667
@Claymore
Rig 6xR9 390 1150/1500

v.1.0 - v.8.0 - 0 crashes for all the time.

v.9.0/9.1 – crashes each 10-15 min, various GPUs. (any -i value)

Something is wrong with this version.
Rollback on v.8 returns stability.

Again and again.
Problems can be:
1. PSU  wattage load
2. PSU ripple suppression
3. PSU voltage regulation at different load variations
4. Bad risers and other cables. (Least likely if still working in other versions)
5. Incorrectly configuring windows

Answer to myself, maybe be helpful for someone.

The problem was in Radeon driver. If all of previous versions worked fine with v. 16.10 (including Claymore's ethereum miner), the version 9/9.1 in some configurations (including my 6xR9 390) works only* with drivers v. 15.12.
For sporting interest, made few clean re-installation to purity of the findings.

310 h/s from 1 GPU (-i 8 )  now.

2. Tips in 1-5 - utter nonsense and completely useless demagoguery. Only misleads readers.

So 15.12 is more stable?
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
@Claymore
Rig 6xR9 390 1150/1500

v.1.0 - v.8.0 - 0 crashes for all the time.

v.9.0/9.1 – crashes each 10-15 min, various GPUs. (any -i value)

Something is wrong with this version.
Rollback on v.8 returns stability.

Again and again.
Problems can be:
1. PSU  wattage load
2. PSU ripple suppression
3. PSU voltage regulation at different load variations
4. Bad risers and other cables. (Least likely if still working in other versions)
5. Incorrectly configuring windows

Answer to myself, maybe be helpful for someone.

The problem was in Radeon driver. If all of previous versions worked fine with v. 16.10 (including Claymore's ethereum miner), the version 9/9.1 in some configurations (including my 6xR9 390) works only* with drivers v. 15.12.
For sporting interest, made few clean re-installation to purity of the findings.

310 h/s from 1 GPU (-i 8 )  now.

2. Tips in 1-5 - utter nonsense and completely useless demagoguery. Only misleads readers.
legendary
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
anyone on coinmine.pl ?
the site seems to be off, in pools thread no one is saying anything, what is there ssl address ?
newbie
Activity: 89
Merit: 0
We need to do all the monitoring of the pool which is currently mined ZCASH, for example, take a speed of 1000 x / c .....
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
Any output for XFX Fury X ? thank you.
sr. member
Activity: 353
Merit: 251
Yep, me too. No losses due to the failure. But the pool lost some big miners and that is a shame...
Sad but true. But smart miners come back.

The feature of Dwarfpool is that it collects all shares from worldwide servers and stores them into database. It takes a time after every hour, that's why its stats are not instant and not realtime. But due to that it never loses work done, and even if no stats were shown, all stats were collected and it is a matter of time to recalculate them. Unlike some PPLNS pools, it uses simple hour-based rounds, and does not average your earnings. Downside is that payments are not too often and amounts are not equal. But you get exactly what you gave, no fussy login behind. Personally I like it. KISS, keep it simple, s... :-)
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
Dwarf appears to be fully functional again. Most users believe it to be better than flypool but unfortunately lost a lot of miners a few hours ago due to a web server failure
But my shares were calculated for all downtime, and my last 24hrs earnings are the same as before.
The same here. Everything recalculated and recovered.

Yep, me too. No losses due to the failure. But the pool lost some big miners and that is a shame...

This happens quite often lately on different dwarf pools. Usually after few hours their web is back showing all correct shares. People should get used to this when mining on dwarf.
Jump to: