Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 343. (Read 3839163 times)
Added more samples to OP for encrypted connection:
miningpoolhub SSL/TLS connection (this pool detects encryption automatically so it uses same port as for unencrypted connection):
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool ssl://us-east.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20570 -zwal YourLogin.YourWorkerName -zpsw YourWorkerPassword
coinmine SSL/TLS connection:
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool ssl://zec.coinmine.pl:7017 -zwal YourLogin.YourWorkerName -zpsw YourWorkerPassword
miningpoolhub SSL/TLS connection (this pool detects encryption automatically so it uses same port as for unencrypted connection):
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool ssl://us-east.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20570 -zwal YourLogin.YourWorkerName -zpsw YourWorkerPassword
coinmine SSL/TLS connection:
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool ssl://zec.coinmine.pl:7017 -zwal YourLogin.YourWorkerName -zpsw YourWorkerPassword
On this topic. What pool do people see the most consistent earning with? Seems flypool has ran on 'bad luck' (if you believe that) for weeks now. Getting sort of tired of it.
I think that zec.nanopool.org absolutely not bad and it is working properly
This happens sometimes, but usually all shares counted and it will be recalculated later. At least no isses with recalc for this year on Dwarf (ETH).
I hope you're right. Sent email to support and no reply yet.
EWBF miner 300 h/s 1080 61 C.... total power 73 %
So what...? With the price a 1080 cost I could get 3-4 rx470 so 600 to 800 sols/s
1070 can do 310 sol with 100watt, or 370 sol with 150watt, that is better than any amd out there, i'm still laughing thinking that there are poeple that believe amd is better...
1080 refurbished can be bought at around 550 euros, fury x around 350 euros.
Both are good. But the fury x was mining at better speed since a few weeks...
This happens sometimes, but usually all shares counted and it will be recalculated later. At least no isses with recalc for this year on Dwarf (ETH).
EWBF miner 300 h/s 1080 61 C.... total power 73 %
So what...? With the price a 1080 cost I could get 3-4 rx470 so 600 to 800 sols/s
1070 can do 300 sol with 100watt, or 370 sol with 150watt, that is better than any amd out there, i'm still laughing thinking that there are poeple that believe amd is better...
AMD is better in terms of $/hash, that's all they have right now until Vega comes out. I don't consider nVidia to be a better option, just too expensive for nothing. They will be easier to resell, though.
I like my 1070s, but I didn't buy them to mine with because they aren't a good choice on a $/hash basis for pretty much any profitable cryptocoin (the ONE exception isn't anywhere near as profitable as the current basket of ETH/ZEC/ETC).
I just mine with them 'cause RIGHT NOW they're more profitable to do that with then what I bought them FOR.
i have a very old HD7790 cards
ZEC: GPU0 85.628 H/s, GPU1 85.425 H/s
ZEC: GPU0 85.628 H/s, GPU1 85.425 H/s
Pretty much in line with my pair of single-card HD7870 rigs - 1024 cores instead of 896, 105 sol/s appx with v8 (haven't gotten v9.1 to work but seems to be a "not enough system ram" issue with v9.x on the systems they're in, and v9 just does not work on ANYTHING I've tried it on to date).
HD 7750s at 512 cores but only 800/1125 clocks manage 45ish sol/s with v8
can any one tell me what does this red text means?
i think it means if the miner has not been active for a full hour or more and is an estimate
i may be wrong tho....
Alert: doing an audit at dwarf shares to find they were not being counted. Set mport to zero and restarted the miner. Now the count is right on. Either my mport was hacked claymore has a overnight job or dwarf is ignoring shares. Any idea?
Claymore,
what is causing this issue? I'm seeing this problem on multiple rigs with V9 and V9.1
19:20:52:148 13fc srv: remove pck 4
19:20:52:148 13fc srv bs: 4
19:20:52:148 13fc srv buf: \r\n
19:20:52:148 13fc sent: 151
19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0
19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6
19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12
19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18
19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24
19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0
19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6
19:20:57:866 1568 recv: 54
19:20:57:867 1568 srv pck: 50
19:21:05:139 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12
19:21:05:156 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18
19:21:05:324 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24
19:21:05:325 c5c em hbt: 15, fm hbt: 93,
19:21:05:326 c5c watchdog - thread 0, hb time 103218
19:21:05:372 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:374 c5c watchdog - thread 1, hb time 103281
19:21:05:481 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:482 c5c watchdog - thread 2, hb time 103078
19:21:05:588 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:589 c5c watchdog - thread 3, hb time 103156
19:21:05:710 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:711 c5c watchdog - thread 4, hb time 103843
19:21:05:747 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:749 c5c watchdog - thread 5, hb time 104093
19:21:05:805 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:807 c5c watchdog - thread 6, hb time 104031
19:21:05:861 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:887 c5c watchdog - thread 7, hb time 103328
19:21:05:924 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:925 c5c watchdog - thread 8, hb time 104171
19:21:05:957 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:958 c5c watchdog - thread 9, hb time 104062
19:21:05:993 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:994 c5c watchdog - thread 10, hb time 104218
19:21:06:034 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:035 c5c watchdog - thread 11, hb time 104109
19:21:06:072 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:073 c5c watchdog - thread 12, hb time 103125
19:21:06:111 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:113 c5c watchdog - thread 13, hb time 102578
19:21:06:151 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:164 c5c watchdog - thread 14, hb time 102687
19:21:06:224 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:226 c5c watchdog - thread 15, hb time 102468
19:21:06:288 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:289 c5c watchdog - thread 16, hb time 103328
19:21:06:348 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:349 c5c watchdog - thread 17, hb time 104078
19:21:06:386 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:387 c5c watchdog - thread 18, hb time 104031
19:21:06:428 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:429 c5c watchdog - thread 19, hb time 103843
19:21:06:444 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:496 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0
19:21:06:500 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6
19:21:06:505 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12
19:21:06:510 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18
19:21:06:514 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24
19:21:06:516 1568 srv: remove pck 4
19:21:06:517 1568 srv bs: 4
19:21:06:518 1568 srv buf: \r\n
19:21:06:519 1568 sent: 151
19:21:06:572 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0
19:21:08:491 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6
19:21:08:491 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12
19:21:08:507 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18
19:21:08:507 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24
19:21:09:539 c5c Restarting OK, exit...
what is causing this issue? I'm seeing this problem on multiple rigs with V9 and V9.1
19:20:52:148 13fc srv: remove pck 4
19:20:52:148 13fc srv bs: 4
19:20:52:148 13fc srv buf: \r\n
19:20:52:148 13fc sent: 151
19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0
19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6
19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12
19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18
19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24
19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0
19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6
19:20:57:866 1568 recv: 54
19:20:57:867 1568 srv pck: 50
19:21:05:139 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12
19:21:05:156 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18
19:21:05:324 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24
19:21:05:325 c5c em hbt: 15, fm hbt: 93,
19:21:05:326 c5c watchdog - thread 0, hb time 103218
19:21:05:372 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:374 c5c watchdog - thread 1, hb time 103281
19:21:05:481 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:482 c5c watchdog - thread 2, hb time 103078
19:21:05:588 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:589 c5c watchdog - thread 3, hb time 103156
19:21:05:710 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:711 c5c watchdog - thread 4, hb time 103843
19:21:05:747 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:749 c5c watchdog - thread 5, hb time 104093
19:21:05:805 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:807 c5c watchdog - thread 6, hb time 104031
19:21:05:861 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:887 c5c watchdog - thread 7, hb time 103328
19:21:05:924 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:925 c5c watchdog - thread 8, hb time 104171
19:21:05:957 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:958 c5c watchdog - thread 9, hb time 104062
19:21:05:993 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:05:994 c5c watchdog - thread 10, hb time 104218
19:21:06:034 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:035 c5c watchdog - thread 11, hb time 104109
19:21:06:072 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:073 c5c watchdog - thread 12, hb time 103125
19:21:06:111 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:113 c5c watchdog - thread 13, hb time 102578
19:21:06:151 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:164 c5c watchdog - thread 14, hb time 102687
19:21:06:224 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:226 c5c watchdog - thread 15, hb time 102468
19:21:06:288 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:289 c5c watchdog - thread 16, hb time 103328
19:21:06:348 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:349 c5c watchdog - thread 17, hb time 104078
19:21:06:386 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:387 c5c watchdog - thread 18, hb time 104031
19:21:06:428 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:429 c5c watchdog - thread 19, hb time 103843
19:21:06:444 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
19:21:06:496 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0
19:21:06:500 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6
19:21:06:505 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12
19:21:06:510 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18
19:21:06:514 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24
19:21:06:516 1568 srv: remove pck 4
19:21:06:517 1568 srv bs: 4
19:21:06:518 1568 srv buf: \r\n
19:21:06:519 1568 sent: 151
19:21:06:572 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0
19:21:08:491 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6
19:21:08:491 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12
19:21:08:507 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18
19:21:08:507 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24
19:21:09:539 c5c Restarting OK, exit...
Quote
I believe you can get 300 H/s at 100W or 370 at 150W. I can't confirm as I don't own any. Also, Claymore is AMD only.
Yeah, that probably sounds more realistic... If that is the case, it would seem the 1070 is only a little more efficient than the RX 480.
RX 480: 100 watt consumption / 230 sols = .43 sol per watt...
GTX 1070: 150 watt consumption / 370 sols = .41 sol per watt...
Now, I guess for someone with a huge power bill, that would make sense for multiple rigs. But on my end... With only about 4 cents per kilowatt hour, I would need to get a 1070 for $350 or less to meet the same ROI as an RX-480. Plus, I only have two rigs.
I guess for multiple rigs, high power cost etc, it makes sense to go with 1070's. Less power consumption, more hashing power on a single rig (less boards, CPU and RAM to buy, etc... Not so much for me though, at least at the moment... Though if I could find a 1070 for $350, I'd buy several in a heartbeat considering all those factors...
Hey guys, just wondering what your hashrates were for a 1070? I hear they hash at about 100 watts, but I can't seem to get a solid figure on hashrate.
With my RX 480's (on Clay's 9.1 miner), I'm doing about 230 sol/s at 1333/2100 with a decent under-volt.
So I'm thinking of building a new rig, and so I'm wondering if I should go with maybe 2 1070's. My power is already cheap, but at current zcash price, it takes me about 4 months to ROI on an RX 480. So would 1070's ROI faster?
What is your guys' hashrates with a 1070 on Claymore 9.1, and approx what is your power consumption? Thanks so much!
With my RX 480's (on Clay's 9.1 miner), I'm doing about 230 sol/s at 1333/2100 with a decent under-volt.
So I'm thinking of building a new rig, and so I'm wondering if I should go with maybe 2 1070's. My power is already cheap, but at current zcash price, it takes me about 4 months to ROI on an RX 480. So would 1070's ROI faster?
What is your guys' hashrates with a 1070 on Claymore 9.1, and approx what is your power consumption? Thanks so much!
I believe you can get 300 H/s at 100W or 370 at 150W. I can't confirm as I don't own any. Also, Claymore is AMD only.
Funny to watch people turning their computers off and watch the network hashrate going down lol
Actually... Just did the math myself. My electricity is too cheap to make any significant difference, unless I had like 10 rigs...
If I could get a 1070 for $350 or under, it would. I just saw a 1070 founder's edition sale on Amazon, but it ended November 30th.
$339 after rebate!! Wish I'd have known.
What is the best 1070 deal right now that you guys know of?
If I could get a 1070 for $350 or under, it would. I just saw a 1070 founder's edition sale on Amazon, but it ended November 30th.
$339 after rebate!! Wish I'd have known.
What is the best 1070 deal right now that you guys know of?
Hey guys, just wondering what your hashrates were for a 1070? I hear they hash at about 100 watts, but I can't seem to get a solid figure on hashrate.
With my RX 480's (on Clay's 9.1 miner), I'm doing about 230 sol/s at 1333/2100 with a decent under-volt.
So I'm thinking of building a new rig, and so I'm wondering if I should go with maybe 2 1070's. My power is already cheap, but at current zcash price, it takes me about 4 months to ROI on an RX 480. So would 1070's ROI faster?
What is your guys' hashrates with a 1070 on Claymore 9.1, and approx what is your power consumption? Thanks so much!
With my RX 480's (on Clay's 9.1 miner), I'm doing about 230 sol/s at 1333/2100 with a decent under-volt.
So I'm thinking of building a new rig, and so I'm wondering if I should go with maybe 2 1070's. My power is already cheap, but at current zcash price, it takes me about 4 months to ROI on an RX 480. So would 1070's ROI faster?
What is your guys' hashrates with a 1070 on Claymore 9.1, and approx what is your power consumption? Thanks so much!
i have a very old HD7790 cards
this piece of sheet
gives
works perfectly on miner v9.1, win7x64, for 2 days w/o any troubles....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_HD_7000_Series
1000mhz cpu, 1500 mhz memory and only 896 cpu units.
one card takes 40w and another one 60w. so i guess 200-250w per system with 2 this cards.
and you can compare power to rx480 with 1266 mhz cpu, 2250mhz memory and 2304 cpu units.
in all benchmarks (WPA (56/200mh/s), FAH (50/250 PPD) etc) each rx480 gives about 3.5-5pcs of hd7790.
if ETH i can't get the hashrate because my cards is 1 gb, but on the net there are digits like 5-6mh/sec, so its 31/6=5.1 times...
and only in ZEC each rx480 gives 200/85=2.3 pcs of hd7790.
so, this digit looks very sad, like theoretical 2304/896=2.57 pcs....
i don't know why hd7790 works so good to compare to rx480, may be a very good core code for hd7790, or may be a very bad code for rx480, or may be i'm totally wrong in all
this piece of sheet
givesCode:
ZEC: 12/13/16-02:29:46 - New job from zec-ru1.dwarfpool.com:3333
target: 0x001ffffc (diff: 2048H)
ZEC - Total Speed: 171.054 H/s, Total Shares: 10100, Rejected: 70, Time: 48:54
ZEC: GPU0 85.628 H/s, GPU1 85.425 H/s
works perfectly on miner v9.1, win7x64, for 2 days w/o any troubles....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_HD_7000_Series
1000mhz cpu, 1500 mhz memory and only 896 cpu units.
one card takes 40w and another one 60w. so i guess 200-250w per system with 2 this cards.
and you can compare power to rx480 with 1266 mhz cpu, 2250mhz memory and 2304 cpu units.
in all benchmarks (WPA (56/200mh/s), FAH (50/250 PPD) etc) each rx480 gives about 3.5-5pcs of hd7790.
if ETH i can't get the hashrate because my cards is 1 gb, but on the net there are digits like 5-6mh/sec, so its 31/6=5.1 times...
and only in ZEC each rx480 gives 200/85=2.3 pcs of hd7790.
so, this digit looks very sad, like theoretical 2304/896=2.57 pcs....
i don't know why hd7790 works so good to compare to rx480, may be a very good core code for hd7790, or may be a very bad code for rx480, or may be i'm totally wrong in all
Have to try my 6970. 7770 is doing 70 with v9
V9.1 with my HD7990's i get 201H/S per chip (400-405 in total, MSI brand), really good increase!
That's it? I have a MSI 7950 heavy overclocked doing stable 220-225
Is it worth to rent hash power just to mine Zec?
It depends on price and duration, why not?
Is it worth to rent hash power just to mine Zec?
Jump to: