Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 339. (Read 3839163 times)

great.... but if you need it check the last post from me on side 425 (1 side back)..... "word+number" works as worker name.... 

you were just faster then my horrible picture editing 

happy farming...

Happened when use only numbers! Thanks to everyone who helped me! 

nope working good also with "word+number" combination, just dont use any space/symbol between it...

Right example: "Steff1" (tested and working...)

Wrong example: "Steff 1" / "Steff-1" / "Steff_1" (not tested correct me if im wrong...)


Gl..

use only numbers for worker name

It depends on luck. Today you have earned 0.298 and 0.1 tomorrow, but in general you will get as much as you could get on flypool.

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal "my adress"."my workername" -zpsw x -allpools 1 -i 8 -mport -3333 -tstop 76

I use the dwarf port:3333 bcs. it auto adjust the diff.... working good for me....

Next try to use another "worker name" for example just a number or combination of word+number like "Stef1" maybee the underliner is causing a problem....

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-us1.dwarfpool.com:3335 -zwal t1MEdywxrBFBcBShD6ht4nXLhAzjLjQ3BeG.DStefanov_Home -zpsw x -allpools 1 -i 8 -mport 0 -logfile noappend.log ------------------> please use only numbers for workers not DStefanov_Home but numbers like 7790 or 7950 ....

The same errors:

ZEC: Stratum - Connected (zec-us1.dwarfpool.com:3335) (unsecure)
Pool sets new share target: 0x000ffffe (diff: 4096H)
ZEC: Authorization failed
: {"error":null,"id":2,"result":false}
ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'zec-us1.dwarfpool.com' <172.93.63.10> port 3335 (unsecure)
ZEC: Stratum - Connected (zec-us1.dwarfpool.com:3335) (unsecure)
Pool sets new share target: 0x000ffffe (diff: 4096H)
ZEC: Authorization failed
: {"error":null,"id":2,"result":false}
ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'zec-us1.dwarfpool.com' <172.93.63.10> port 3335 (unsecure)
ZEC: Stratum - Connected (zec-us1.dwarfpool.com:3335) (unsecure)
Pool sets new share target: 0x000ffffe (diff: 4096H)
ZEC: Authorization failed
: {"error":null,"id":2,"result":false}
ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'zec-us1.dwarfpool.com' <172.93.63.10> port 3335 (unsecure)
ZEC: Stratum - Connected (zec-us1.dwarfpool.com:3335) (unsecure)
Pool sets new share target: 0x000ffffe (diff: 4096H)
ZEC: Authorization failed
: {"error":null,"id":2,"result":false}
ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'zec-us1.dwarfpool.com' <172.93.63.10> port 3335 (unsecure)
ZEC: Stratum - Connected (zec-us1.dwarfpool.com:3335) (unsecure)
Pool sets new share target: 0x000ffffe (diff: 4096H)
ZEC: Authorization failed
: {"error":null,"id":2,"result":false}
ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'zec-us1.dwarfpool.com' <172.93.63.10> port 3335 (unsecure)
ZEC: Stratum - Connected (zec

Hi, guys,

Is there any summarised info about Equihash hash-power different GPUs are able to achieve?
I can only find this one:
https://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=ZCash_mining_GPU_Comparison

Is there anything else with more data in it, like for example was the Eliovp's http://mininghwcomparison.com/ for Ethash.

That happened to the DEV mining. For the normal mining, the shares are not rejected.

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-us1.dwarfpool.com:3335 -zwal t1MEdywxrBFBcBShD6ht4nXLhAzjLjQ3BeG.DStefanov_Home -zpsw x -allpools 1 -i 8 -mport 0 -logfile noappend.log

What to write in * .bat file?

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal t1MEdywxrBFBcBShD6ht4nXLhAzjLjQ3BeG.DStefanov_Home -zpsw 1

I write this, but gives me an error! Where am I wrong?

ZEC: Authorization failed
: {"error":null,"id":2,"result":false}

There are big delays for the service in other continents as well.

With 2300 sol/s

on flypool for 24 h mining 0.2 zec
on dwarfpool for 24 h mining 0.298 zec

this is what I get in my wallet

well noticed the delays 30 min ago, up to 6000-7000 ms but accepted...

Now it looks normal, 47-93 ms....

I have no problem with delay on dwarfpool, using eu server.

Hi, need some help. i like to undervolt my AMD gpu 's+ best settings for zec mining. gpu's saphire 280x  7970, 7950. (not all hynix), Asrock 970 extreme4, 8gb memory. using claymore's zec miner. mining 280/7970 185 sol, 7950 170 sol. faster is possible. too much watt...):  test on win7, win 8.1, win 10, what is best?  (win 7 max 4 gpu, more sol)

Best  easy option?. 1. Custom bios? 2. Hacked Modified Memory Strap  3. overclocking tools 4. claymore's -mclock -cclock setting.
what to do, not to do. for newbie   Thx appreciate your help!

1. New bios/ Custom bios created by other zec miners)
https://www.techpowerup.com/rbe/
https://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/
https://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/124572/ati-hd7950-3072-120706   etc

2. Hacked Modified Memory Strap BIOS Database for ZEC MINING
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1676474.0;all
http://www.overclock.net/t/1554360/tahiti-memory-timings-patch-for-hynix-vram

3. Overclocking tools
http://www.overclock.net/a/getting-started-with-radeon-hd-7970-overclocking
https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/how-to-enable-core-voltage-control-on-amd-cards.2262996/
http://www.overclock.net/t/1609782/watttool-a-simple-tool-that-combines-overclocking-with-vrm-monitoring-tweaking-for-rx-400-series
Setting??:
gpu 1070
mem 1500
vddc 1.094

4. Claymore's: -mclock 1900 -cclock 1300 setting
1150/1450  -mclock  1200 -cclock  1500 ?
Best clock settings for:
Saphire r9 280x 1500/ 1150 ?
Saphire hd 7970 ?
Saphire hd 7950  ?
Bat.file
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool pool -zwal wallet.name -zpsw x -i 4 -mclock 1900 -cclock 1300

I have mail them about this.

@Claymore,
looks like something strange there...  v9.1 (and maybe other versions - not tested) send shares below target after diff change (vardiff). So all of these shares rejected by pool. Why new diff ignored?  Can you please check?  I can be wrong and I have limited debug data - not sure if this happens always or only sometimes at some conditions.

3 hours ago, after the dwarf problem was sorted out, I set miner back to EU server and the connection was OK - 78ms.
Now, half hour ago, I've checked it and it's again @ 3000ms+.
It will be nice if we would have a switch in CM to change pools automatically depending on the connection lag.