Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 450. (Read 3839163 times)
Haчaлacь бeгoтня пo пyллaм...
f2pool is giving me fair results, since they got a nice Pool hashrate , block finds are guaranted!
shadabahmed is ok ? because in dwarfpool you mine with your wallet ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal your wallet -zpsw x
thanks bro and is dwarfpool better than flypool?
shadabahmed is ok ? because in dwarfpool you mine with your wallet ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal your wallet -zpsw x
Dwarf pool started.
I am testing it. But the calculated speed is around 10% higher than the speed reported by Claymore. I also used the flypool, the speed is 6% below Claymore. I am not sure which one is better.
Like any other pool, dwarf will take some time before showing stable results
Yea give it some time. Dwarfpool is the most stable and consistent pool I've ever mined with.
can any one give me code for .bat file for DWARFPOOL i am using this code for 5 cards but getting error
zecminer64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.MYRIGNUMBER1 -zpsw x
Try changing your Port:
Main-Port (vardiff): 3333
Stratum-Port (diff=8): 3334 for CPU
Stratum-Port (diff=128): 3335 for videocards
Stratum-Port (diff=512): 3336 for rigs
Stratum-Port (diff=1024): 3337 for big rigs
is my code ok?
and rightnow i am using http://zcash.flypool.org
is dwarfpool is better than flypool?
Dwarf pool started.
I am testing it. But the calculated speed is around 10% higher than the speed reported by Claymore. I also used the flypool, the speed is 6% below Claymore. I am not sure which one is better.
Like any other pool, dwarf will take some time before showing stable results
Yea give it some time. Dwarfpool is the most stable and consistent pool I've ever mined with.
can any one give me code for .bat file for DWARFPOOL i am using this code for 5 cards but getting error
zecminer64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.MYRIGNUMBER1 -zpsw x
Try changing your Port:
Main-Port (vardiff): 3333
Stratum-Port (diff=8): 3334 for CPU
Stratum-Port (diff=128): 3335 for videocards
Stratum-Port (diff=512): 3336 for rigs
Stratum-Port (diff=1024): 3337 for big rigs
I am going to set one of my rigs to Dwarfpool to see how it works. Mine On
Working well but taking a long time to find blocks
Until they get their hash rate up, the variance will be high but overall on a daily basis amount mined should be more due to them not skimming.
I went ahead and put 4 rigs onto dwarfpool due to the higher reported hashrate (1400SOLs higher) and 0% Fees. Looking forward to a little higher ROI!
pls share me .bat files code for dwarfpool i am getting error
I am going to set one of my rigs to Dwarfpool to see how it works. Mine On
Working well but taking a long time to find blocks
Until they get their hash rate up, the variance will be high but overall on a daily basis amount mined should be more due to them not skimming.
I went ahead and put 4 rigs onto dwarfpool due to the higher reported hashrate (1400SOLs higher) and 0% Fees. Looking forward to a little higher ROI!
I'm seeing the same result. About a 10% increase in my hash. It's leveling out now. But what is great is it's actually on par with what claymore reports. Never came close on other pools Like I said tho def need to test for about a week see if it's real.
BR
Dwarf pool started.
I am testing it. But the calculated speed is around 10% higher than the speed reported by Claymore. I also used the flypool, the speed is 6% below Claymore. I am not sure which one is better.
Like any other pool, dwarf will take some time before showing stable results
Yea give it some time. Dwarfpool is the most stable and consistent pool I've ever mined with.
can any one give me code for .bat file for DWARFPOOL i am using this code for 5 cards but getting error
zecminer64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.MYRIGNUMBER1 -zpsw x
I am going to set one of my rigs to Dwarfpool to see how it works. Mine On
Working well but taking a long time to find blocks
Until they get their hash rate up, the variance will be high but overall on a daily basis amount mined should be more due to them not skimming.
I went ahead and put 4 rigs onto dwarfpool due to the higher reported hashrate (1400SOLs higher) and 0% Fees. Looking forward to a little higher ROI!
Only reasonable meter is wall.
At the moment i'm testing 470x and 480x.
480x doing 177sols with 110w.
At the moment i'm testing 470x and 480x.
480x doing 177sols with 110w.
I can assure you they are all set the same same voltage same memory everything
and thanks for bursting my bubble I was thinking I was actually getting 62.1 watts per card hahahahaha
and thanks for bursting my bubble I was thinking I was actually getting 62.1 watts per card hahahahaha
add around 30-40 watts to the GPUZ reading to get more realistic results, GPUZ only shows the power drawn by the PCI-E slot its self.
and WRONG again
(adding 40 watts is true for memory intensive algos > HINT HINT)
I am going to set one of my rigs to Dwarfpool to see how it works. Mine On
Working well but taking a long time to find blocks
Until they get their hash rate up, the variance will be high but overall on a daily basis amount mined should be more due to them not skimming.
I am going to set one of my rigs to Dwarfpool to see how it works. Mine On
Working well but taking a long time to find blocks
I can assure you they are all set the same same voltage same memory everything
and thanks for bursting my bubble I was thinking I was actually getting 62.1 watts per card hahahahaha
and thanks for bursting my bubble I was thinking I was actually getting 62.1 watts per card hahahahaha
add around 30-40 watts to the GPUZ reading to get more realistic results, GPUZ only shows the power drawn by the PCI-E slot its self.
going to let dwarfpool settle in but so far the vardiff port works great. Maybe other pools can try it for themselves and learn from it. Will see how it holds up over the next week. I had good luck with dwarf on eth and even better solo. Thats why i ask if claymore would provide a solo option. If i can point this miner to sammy proxy or something close im familiar with setting that up. Anyone know if that will work? Then i wouldnt need to bother claymore with feature to solo straight to wallet.
BR
BR
I am going to set one of my rigs to Dwarfpool to see how it works. Mine On
I can assure you they are all set the same same voltage same memory everything
and thanks for bursting my bubble I was thinking I was actually getting 62.1 watts per card hahahahaha
and thanks for bursting my bubble I was thinking I was actually getting 62.1 watts per card hahahahaha
Well in that case I'm pretty happy with my setup then with regards to Hashrate vs power drain on my RX480 cards
Please note my hashrate drops when I connect remotely to my rig
Average 180 H/s on 5 cards with 1 card for some unknown reason reaching 206 H/s
@ 62.1 Watts per card .
No idea why I get over 206 on 1 card each card is set exactly the same.
I have taken a screen shot but I don't know how to post it on here
Please note my hashrate drops when I connect remotely to my rig
Average 180 H/s on 5 cards with 1 card for some unknown reason reaching 206 H/s
@ 62.1 Watts per card .
No idea why I get over 206 on 1 card each card is set exactly the same.
I have taken a screen shot but I don't know how to post it on here
Well as it seems not all of your cards are set the same and 62.1 Watts per card, is that what GPU-z shows you? Because When GPU-z shows 62.1W that is actually like 110-115W at the wall
Well in that case I'm pretty happy with my setup then with regards to Hashrate vs power drain on my RX480 cards
Please note my hashrate drops when I connect remotely to my rig
Average 180 H/s on 5 cards with 1 card for some unknown reason reaching 206 H/s
@ 62.1 Watts per card .
No idea why I get over 206 on 1 card each card is set exactly the same.
I have taken a screen shot but I don't know how to post it on here
[imghttp://
][/img]
Please note my hashrate drops when I connect remotely to my rig
Average 180 H/s on 5 cards with 1 card for some unknown reason reaching 206 H/s
@ 62.1 Watts per card .
No idea why I get over 206 on 1 card each card is set exactly the same.
I have taken a screen shot but I don't know how to post it on here
[imghttp://
][/img] So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?
That's weird.
That's weird.
Yes that is correct because the miner is currently not well optimized for the RX series or its drivers. We need those optimizations ASAP
Mine get 207h/s @ 155w wall
Yes and when optimized should be doing probably at least 260 h/s @ 140w at wall
How do you know?
Jump to: