Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 465. (Read 3839163 times)
Guys! I just built a pair of new miners and both of them have 1 gpu hashing at 1/4 of its regular speed. Anyone knows the reason or how to solve that problem?
is anyone using a R9 290 non-x and R9 290x together?
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
Not much difference....
GPU0 and GPU2 on risers = 290s, GPU1 in PCI slot = 290x. All 3 x GPUs are modded with Stilt ROM.
Claymore v8, -i 6, W10, Celeron 1840 on ASrock H81 Pro BTC, 8GB RAM, 24-34GB Windows Virtual Memory.
=====
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
GPU0 t=78C fan=99%, GPU1 t=80C fan=99%, GPU2 t=77C fan=99%
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:53 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:02 - New job from cn1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 810.672 H/s, Total Shares: 78457, Rejected: 32, Time: 73:43
ZEC: GPU0 267.759 H/s, GPU1 280.460 H/s, GPU2 262.452 H/s
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:07 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (79 ms)!
=====
The 290X speed is 280 while the 290 speed is 264. So that is about 6% differece. If the frequency is the same, that is still some increase.
I have way more rejected shares
Why fans all 99% ?
I bought them used for a test rig. The 290s are notorious for being loud and hot.
So -fanmax 99 is better than an overheated GPU, you can always replace fans....
I have seven 280x, I take down the originals fans and put on fans that I buy on the web, I think the price was about 1.3 eur for one fan, I put 3 fans per card. Supply for that fans I take directly 12V so they are always on 100%. When they starts slowing down, I just take some silicon oil in spray and they run like new. Beacuse they always run on 100%, my cards run cooler.
Link to fans http:http://www.banggood.com/3-Pin-80mm-15mm-PC-CPU-Cooling-Fan-Heatsink-Cooler-Radiator-For-Computer-12V-p-997476.html
is anyone using a R9 290 non-x and R9 290x together?
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
Not much difference....
GPU0 and GPU2 on risers = 290s, GPU1 in PCI slot = 290x. All 3 x GPUs are modded with Stilt ROM.
Claymore v8, -i 6, W10, Celeron 1840 on ASrock H81 Pro BTC, 8GB RAM, 24-34GB Windows Virtual Memory.
=====
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
GPU0 t=78C fan=99%, GPU1 t=80C fan=99%, GPU2 t=77C fan=99%
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:53 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:02 - New job from cn1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 810.672 H/s, Total Shares: 78457, Rejected: 32, Time: 73:43
ZEC: GPU0 267.759 H/s, GPU1 280.460 H/s, GPU2 262.452 H/s
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:07 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (79 ms)!
=====
The 290X speed is 280 while the 290 speed is 264. So that is about 6% differece. If the frequency is the same, that is still some increase.
I have way more rejected shares
Why fans all 99% ?
I bought them used for a test rig. The 290s are notorious for being loud and hot.
So -fanmax 99 is better than an overheated GPU, you can always replace fans....
I have seven 280x, I take down the originals fans and put on fans that I buy on the web, I think the price was about 1.3 eur for one fan, I put 3 fans per card. Supply for that fans I take directly 12V so they are always on 100%. When they starts slowing down, I just take some silicon oil in spray and they run like new. Beacuse they always run on 100%, my cards run cooler.
is anyone using a R9 290 non-x and R9 290x together?
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
not 290 and 290x but i do have a 390 8GB in there between my 290's
i'm using 2 R9 290, 1 R9 290x, and 1 R9 390.
i get with V8 =
ZEC: GPU0 242.587 H/s, GPU1 224.467 H/s, GPU2 300.549 H/s, GPU3 260.493 H/s
is anyone using a R9 290 non-x and R9 290x together?
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
Not much difference....
GPU0 and GPU2 on risers = 290s, GPU1 in PCI slot = 290x. All 3 x GPUs are modded with Stilt ROM.
Claymore v8, -i 6, W10, Celeron 1840 on ASrock H81 Pro BTC, 8GB RAM, 24-34GB Windows Virtual Memory.
=====
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
GPU0 t=78C fan=99%, GPU1 t=80C fan=99%, GPU2 t=77C fan=99%
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:53 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:02 - New job from cn1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 810.672 H/s, Total Shares: 78457, Rejected: 32, Time: 73:43
ZEC: GPU0 267.759 H/s, GPU1 280.460 H/s, GPU2 262.452 H/s
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:07 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (79 ms)!
=====
The 290X speed is 280 while the 290 speed is 264. So that is about 6% differece. If the frequency is the same, that is still some increase.
I have way more rejected shares
Why fans all 99% ?
I bought them used for a test rig. The 290s are notorious for being loud and hot.
So -fanmax 99 is better than an overheated GPU, you can always replace fans....
is anyone using a R9 290 non-x and R9 290x together?
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
Not much difference....
GPU0 and GPU2 on risers = 290s, GPU1 in PCI slot = 290x. All 3 x GPUs are modded with Stilt ROM.
Claymore v8, -i 6, W10, Celeron 1840 on ASrock H81 Pro BTC, 8GB RAM, 24-34GB Windows Virtual Memory.
=====
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
GPU0 t=78C fan=99%, GPU1 t=80C fan=99%, GPU2 t=77C fan=99%
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:53 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:02 - New job from cn1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 810.672 H/s, Total Shares: 78457, Rejected: 32, Time: 73:43
ZEC: GPU0 267.759 H/s, GPU1 280.460 H/s, GPU2 262.452 H/s
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:07 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (79 ms)!
=====
The 290X speed is 280 while the 290 speed is 264. So that is about 6% differece. If the frequency is the same, that is still some increase.
I have way more rejected shares
Why fans all 99% ?
is anyone using a R9 290 non-x and R9 290x together?
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
Not much difference....
GPU0 and GPU2 on risers = 290s, GPU1 in PCI slot = 290x. All 3 x GPUs are modded with Stilt ROM.
Claymore v8, -i 6, W10, Celeron 1840 on ASrock H81 Pro BTC, 8GB RAM, 24-34GB Windows Virtual Memory.
=====
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
GPU0 t=78C fan=99%, GPU1 t=80C fan=99%, GPU2 t=77C fan=99%
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:53 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:02 - New job from cn1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 810.672 H/s, Total Shares: 78457, Rejected: 32, Time: 73:43
ZEC: GPU0 267.759 H/s, GPU1 280.460 H/s, GPU2 262.452 H/s
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:07 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (79 ms)!
=====
The 290X speed is 280 while the 290 speed is 264. So that is about 6% differece. If the frequency is the same, that is still some increase.
for me is fake
Nano pool is showing consitently less hash rate than Ethmon almost like 2k h/s lower anyone else experiencing this ? Might be time to switch back to flypool
is anyone using a R9 290 non-x and R9 290x together?
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
Not much difference....
GPU0 and GPU2 on risers = 290s, GPU1 in PCI slot = 290x. All 3 x GPUs are modded with Stilt ROM.
Claymore v8, -i 6, W10, Celeron 1840 on ASrock H81 Pro BTC, 8GB RAM, 24-34GB Windows Virtual Memory.
=====
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
GPU0 t=78C fan=99%, GPU1 t=80C fan=99%, GPU2 t=77C fan=99%
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:53 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:02 - New job from cn1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 810.672 H/s, Total Shares: 78457, Rejected: 32, Time: 73:43
ZEC: GPU0 267.759 H/s, GPU1 280.460 H/s, GPU2 262.452 H/s
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:07 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (79 ms)!
=====
is anyone using a R9 290 non-x and R9 290x together?
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
not 290 and 290x but i do have a 390 8GB in there between my 290's
saw this posted on the zcash forum. anyone know if the 1000 h/s per card screenshot is legit?
link to source: https://forum.z.cash/t/hey-guys-who-can-tell-me-what-this-is-single-card-speed-is-reached-1132h-s/9746
We need POV proof of video. Everything else can be drawn.
is anyone using a R9 290 non-x and R9 290x together?
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
The 290X should be about 10% faster than the 290. For the Claymore V8, the Core number makes a difference.
is anyone using a R9 290 non-x and R9 290x together?
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
I see some posts that V8 reached hardware limits and there is no way to improve speed anymore. It's not true.
I'm working on new version with another good speedup, though it takes more time and efforts.
I'm working on new version with another good speedup, though it takes more time and efforts.
And whats the point?? High temperatures, more electricity and same profit, cuz all are with the new miner. Your new versions are not helpful, do you know that? Also some cards have really bad speed
That is totally wrong
Wrong because?? My cards were at 60C, now are at 75C. The profit is same! Tell us your point!
@ioginx Your bad math cant make me a troll
What you're failing to describe is a product of the market of miners, not specifically Claymore's miner. How exactly do you expect a publicly released miner to make you more profit in mining than the rest of the public (public == windows amd miners)?? Please, explain that math to me. How do you expect Claymore to accomplish this? Only release next version to you? If your cards are hotter and using more electricity, then by all means, switch to an earlier version of the miner!
or it could be just a proxy for five rigs.
The picture could be real but its very easy to adjust your memory timings and get speeds like that, however it will produce mostly rejected shares.
For the AMD R89 390, with the 1500 MHz, the limiting factor is already the core speed. So adjusting the memory does not help.
I am not talking about memory clock, I am talking about memory timings. You can adjust them and get it to show like 1000-2000H/s however it will produce nothing but rejected shares or crash.
According to the screen shot, the green part means the shares are accepted. But that is not the Claymore miner.
The picture could be real but its very easy to adjust your memory timings and get speeds like that, however it will produce mostly rejected shares.
For the AMD R89 390, with the 1500 MHz, the limiting factor is already the core speed. So adjusting the memory does not help.
I am not talking about memory clock, I am talking about memory timings. You can adjust them and get it to show like 1000-2000H/s however it will produce nothing but rejected shares or crash.
The picture could be real but its very easy to adjust your memory timings and get speeds like that, however it will produce mostly rejected shares.
For the AMD R89 390, with the 1500 MHz, the limiting factor is already the core speed. So adjusting the memory does not help.
I've made some notes on hashrate and watt.
R390 eats 200W with 270 sols
R7970 eats 165W with 184 sols
R7950 eats 110W with 170 sols
Every card is undervolted.
Most efficient is 7950 1.54H/W.
R390 eats 200W with 270 sols
R7970 eats 165W with 184 sols
R7950 eats 110W with 170 sols
Every card is undervolted.
Most efficient is 7950 1.54H/W.
R7950 eats 110W with 170 sols <-- That is more efficient than the 400 series...
Sapphire nitro+ rx470 8gb Samsung :
70W -> 160H/s = 2.28H/W
What the application is telling you isn't accurate. Please provide measurements at the wall.
r9 nano 235 hs , 80 watt from wall (880mv , 800 core, 350 memory)
best buck is TAHITI
best buck for future is RX
the most efficient is NANO
sory guys TRUE KING IS NANO
on ETH tahiti have same watt with RX in heavy undervolted
Count hash per watt.
Jump to: