Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 542. (Read 3839204 times)

newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
v7.0:

- improved speed by about 15-25% (depends on card model). About 230H/s on stock 390X.
- added "-benchmark" option.
Is there any chance to upgrade miner versions using remote manager? Updating 2 or 3 miners is easy, but in case of big farm it takes lots of time.
I'm not complaining or something you have super speed and great miners, but this option would make it even better! Thanks!

You could use the "Execute reboot.bat" option in the miner manager to do it with something like this:

taskkill /f /im ZecMiner64.exe
robocopy \\server\share\claymore C:\claymore /XF config.txt
shutdown.exe /r /t 00

I haven't tested this but it should get you close.  I'm assuming reboot.bat goes on each mining rig.  Make sure each rig is logged in as a user with access to the network share.  /XF config.txt skips the config file so you don't lose your worker names.


legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001

I do not understand why everyone is happy? with each new version of the miner, money is less and less !!!

It is not about profitability, it is more about shady business.

Claymore is only giving home miners what those big farms with private kernels are doing already.

This is all about claymore vs 'big boys'.

And without the new versions there would be no more money left for us.. all money would be eaten up by botnets & private giant farms...

And botnets and private giant farms can't use Claymore miner for religious reasons, so... we win, they lose.
legendary
Activity: 1339
Merit: 1002
Damn claymore, mega hash increase on my R9 290, went from ~127 H/s to ~183 H/s. This is why I don't mind paying the fee, you deserve it.   Smiley

Developing software usually is a thankless deed that requires monumental amounts of time and effort. Anyone who says otherwise has no idea what they're talking about and anyone who complains about having to pay a small fee for these extreme hash rate increases (even if they used the -nofee flag, the hashrate is much higher than other miners), they should find another miner to use.

Cheers Claymore,

Mistercoin-

It's all a hoax, Claymore has much more power and does not want to release it, it is believed that we are happy with updates to the drop every 2 days

1 r9 290 = 1000 h/s  183 is shit!! Wink
legendary
Activity: 1051
Merit: 1000
https://r.honeygain.me/XEDDM2B07C
Damn claymore, mega hash increase on my R9 290, went from ~127 H/s to ~183 H/s. This is why I don't mind paying the fee, you deserve it.   Smiley

Developing software usually is a thankless deed that requires monumental amounts of time and effort. Anyone who says otherwise has no idea what they're talking about and anyone who complains about having to pay a small fee for these extreme hash rate increases (even if they used the -nofee flag, the hashrate is much higher than other miners), they should find another miner to use.

Cheers Claymore,

Mistercoin-
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
Hi all,

Version 7.0 keeps crashing at launch, this is all I get in the log, V6.0 worked great. Any ideas?

16:09:05:857   2674   args: - -zpool zcl.suprnova.cc:4042
16:09:05:857   2674   
16:09:05:857   2674   ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ»
16:09:05:857   2674   º            Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v6.0 Beta            º
16:09:05:872   2674   ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ
16:09:05:872   2674   
16:09:06:091   2674   ZEC: 1 pool is specified
16:09:06:091   2674   Main ZCash pool is zcl.suprnova.cc:4042
16:09:09:607   2674   OpenCL platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
16:09:09:623   2674   OpenCL initializing...

16:09:09:623   2674   AMD Cards available: 3
16:09:09:623   2674   GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 32 compute units
16:09:09:638   2674   GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
16:09:09:638   2674   GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 480
16:09:09:638   2674   GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
16:09:09:654   2674   GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 480
16:09:09:654   2674   POOL version
16:09:09:654   2674   b225
16:09:09:669   2674   Platform: Windows
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015

I do not understand why everyone is happy? with each new version of the miner, money is less and less !!!

It is not about profitability, it is more about shady business.

Claymore is only giving home miners what those big farms with private kernels are doing already.

This is all about claymore vs 'big boys'.

And without the new versions there would be no more money left for us.. all money would be eaten up by botnets & private giant farms...

The Pie.

Everyone want's a piece of it. You go out shopping for bigger forks but so did everyone else.

newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Just dowloaded the v7.0 but if i start them after 5 minutes the internet falls out and see socket can't connect 10054 Huh The internet normaly is working because i can with the phone on the wiffi, Is there something that i can do about this isue? I'm mining on -i 2 because that works the best for me at least in v6.0 where it was 34hours stable @ -i 4 my rig crashed always with the thread stuck in device driver also in v6.0
full member
Activity: 123
Merit: 100

I do not understand why everyone is happy? with each new version of the miner, money is less and less !!!

It is not about profitability, it is more about shady business.

Claymore is only giving home miners what those big farms with private kernels are doing already.

This is all about claymore vs 'big boys'.

And without the new versions there would be no more money left for us.. all money would be eaten up by botnets & private giant farms...
full member
Activity: 123
Merit: 100
I can't say nothing...
This version 7.0 is THE BEAST!
And no doubt the maker of this beast is THE BEST!

THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! 1000x
legendary
Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182
Now the money is free, and so the people will be
for the 470s, its latest amd drivers and win10, 280x its win7 with 16.something drivers (not latest but recent).  so far the new drivers from AMD actually work well, which is a refreshing change.
legendary
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
v7.0:

- improved speed by about 15-25% (depends on card model). About 230H/s on stock 390X.
- added "-benchmark" option.
Is there any chance to upgrade miner versions using remote manager? Updating 2 or 3 miners is easy, but in case of big farm it takes lots of time.
I'm not complaining or something you have super speed and great miners, but this option would make it even better! Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Big increase for the older 280x.  390s at 230sol/s.  niiiiiiiiiice.  175sol/s 470.
Which driver, which OS?
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015

I do not understand why everyone is happy? with each new version of the miner, money is less and less !!!

It is not about profitability, it is more about shady business.

Claymore is only giving home miners what those big farms with private kernels are doing already.

This is all about claymore vs 'big boys'.

maybe it's claymore vs claymore ?
Don't know, maybe he had a fast miner from the start that he sold to those big boys ?

You never know.

But this seems more like personal vendetta to me.

Sure claymore had inbox full of offers. Looking at hawaii power consumption and equihash nethash if is safe to say we have seen nothing yet.
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
Does anybody know, if it's normal when I start the miner, the shares are found at a really fast rate, then it slows down drastically. Hash rate is the same, but doesn't the rate or quantity of shares mean how much you mine?

Oh and Claymore, hats off, 280x -178 H/s

Pool diff will go up depending on how much hashrate you throw at it.

This is to not spam the pool with shares if you have a big hashrate but payouts are the same.

What if one would constantly restart the miner, or write a code for that?Smiley) Would the profit rise?

You are just throwing more low value shares even with restarts, so NO.

Ok thanks for the explanation, guys!
hero member
Activity: 565
Merit: 500
Does anybody know, if it's normal when I start the miner, the shares are found at a really fast rate, then it slows down drastically. Hash rate is the same, but doesn't the rate or quantity of shares mean how much you mine?

Oh and Claymore, hats off, 280x -178 H/s

Pool diff will go up depending on how much hashrate you throw at it.

This is to not spam the pool with shares if you have a big hashrate but payouts are the same.

What if one would constantly restart the miner, or write a code for that?Smiley) Would the profit rise?

You are just throwing more low value shares even with restarts, so NO.
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
Does anybody know, if it's normal when I start the miner, the shares are found at a really fast rate, then it slows down drastically. Hash rate is the same, but doesn't the rate or quantity of shares mean how much you mine?

Oh and Claymore, hats off, 280x -178 H/s

Completely normal.

The fast shares are actually pretty cool however at the start.

What if one would constantly restart the miner, or write a code for that?Smiley) Would the profit rise?
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Does anybody know, if it's normal when I start the miner, the shares are found at a really fast rate, then it slows down drastically. Hash rate is the same, but doesn't the rate or quantity of shares mean how much you mine?

Oh and Claymore, hats off, 280x -178 H/s

Completely normal.

The fast shares are actually pretty cool however at the start.
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
Does anybody know, if it's normal when I start the miner, the shares are found at a really fast rate, then it slows down drastically. Hash rate is the same, but doesn't the rate or quantity of shares mean how much you mine?

Oh and Claymore, hats off, 280x -178 H/s
legendary
Activity: 1891
Merit: 3096
All good things to those who wait
165 H/s for stock XFX 280x, 178 for Saphire tri-X, and 215-220 H/s for 390's. Not bad at all  Cool Still 280x are 3 times more profitable than ETH/ETC.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
When to expect support 1070 with 500sol/s?)))
Jump to: