So, how much is 470/ 480 doing on 7.0? ZEC solo mining?
Stock Nitro+ 470 8G 1350/2100 getting 166 sol/s.
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 539. (Read 3839163 times)
Stock Nitro+ 470 8G 1350/2100 getting 166 sol/s.
So, how much is 470/ 480 doing on 7.0? ZEC solo mining?
Anyone?
166 with rx 480 8gb stock. Anyone?
while i appreciate the constant speed increases. am i the only one who thinks we are being dripfed these as the diff goes up and the price drops. these speed increases are only keeping our mining income roughly the same. why is it that we can't get the full speed right off and actually make some money from this rather than the same old story of the big money men make the most.
Completely optimizing the code to best work with a new algorithm takes time. Has nothing to do with price of the currency compared to the miner's new version release dates.
I believe we're getting pretty close to the limit on Sol/s.
you are very wrong
Well fkin speak up dude O.o, sure there's a great possibility Claymore has been holding out so he can make some big bucks on the side but unless you have evidence of this then you're just spitting conspiracy theories.
It's probably easier and more profitable just to release this with a dev fee.
I wonder more if they just don't know how to do math. R9 290/X & R9 390/X have a 512bit memory bus vs 256bit for the RX 480's & 470's
A base R9 290 has a 1250MHz memory clock multiply by 8, "64/512," and you get 10000
A base RX 480 8GB has a 2000MHz memory clock multiply by 4, "64/256," and you get 8000
so your memory bandwidth is 20% lower
As we all should know by now higher mem clocks = Higher latency
getting your ram to have a lower than 7.5ns turn around is ideal
If you don't believe just look at DDR3 vs DDR4, at same speed DDR3 wins almost hands down because of lower timings.
So, how much is 470/ 480 doing on 7.0? ZEC solo mining?
Anyone?
Anyone?
while i appreciate the constant speed increases. am i the only one who thinks we are being dripfed these as the diff goes up and the price drops. these speed increases are only keeping our mining income roughly the same. why is it that we can't get the full speed right off and actually make some money from this rather than the same old story of the big money men make the most.
Completely optimizing the code to best work with a new algorithm takes time. Has nothing to do with price of the currency compared to the miner's new version release dates.
I believe we're getting pretty close to the limit on Sol/s.
you are very wrong
Well fkin speak up dude O.o, sure there's a great possibility Claymore has been holding out so he can make some big bucks on the side but unless you have evidence of this then you're just spitting conspiracy theories.
It's probably easier and more profitable just to release this with a dev fee.
"Kate look who's being naive now" 
while i appreciate the constant speed increases. am i the only one who thinks we are being dripfed these as the diff goes up and the price drops. these speed increases are only keeping our mining income roughly the same. why is it that we can't get the full speed right off and actually make some money from this rather than the same old story of the big money men make the most.
Completely optimizing the code to best work with a new algorithm takes time. Has nothing to do with price of the currency compared to the miner's new version release dates.
I believe we're getting pretty close to the limit on Sol/s.
you are very wrong
Well fkin speak up dude O.o, sure there's a great possibility Claymore has been holding out so he can make some big bucks on the side but unless you have evidence of this then you're just spitting conspiracy theories.
It's probably easier and more profitable just to release this with a dev fee.
while i appreciate the constant speed increases. am i the only one who thinks we are being dripfed these as the diff goes up and the price drops. these speed increases are only keeping our mining income roughly the same. why is it that we can't get the full speed right off and actually make some money from this rather than the same old story of the big money men make the most.
Completely optimizing the code to best work with a new algorithm takes time. Has nothing to do with price of the currency compared to the miner's new version release dates.
I believe we're getting pretty close to the limit on Sol/s.
you are very wrong
Well fkin speak up dude O.o, sure there's a great possibility Claymore has been holding out so he can make some big bucks on the side but unless you have evidence of this then you're just spitting conspiracy theories.
It's probably easier and more profitable just to release this with a dev fee.
can we make a thread about conspiracy theories regarding miner developers in a separate thread?....you know.. i love stories and conspiracies but not here..i'll contribute to brainstorming in a separate thread
It looks like at least rx 470 seems to be more compute bound than memory bound with v7, my sapphire 4gb nitro cards get no benefit from putting memory clock above 1750mhz, but core clock improves speed a lot. In my tests it looks like 1000mhz = ~120 sol/s, 1100mhz = ~140 sol/s, 1200 mhz, ~155 sol/s . Those speed improvements come in with increased power draw, i was able to run 1000mhz at 800mv, 1100 requires 850 or 875mv depending on card ASIC quality. At 1000 mhz rx 470 isn't any faster with v7 version, it's pretty much exactly the same as v6.
Anoter ZEC low
while i appreciate the constant speed increases. am i the only one who thinks we are being dripfed these as the diff goes up and the price drops. these speed increases are only keeping our mining income roughly the same. why is it that we can't get the full speed right off and actually make some money from this rather than the same old story of the big money men make the most.
Completely optimizing the code to best work with a new algorithm takes time. Has nothing to do with price of the currency compared to the miner's new version release dates.
I believe we're getting pretty close to the limit on Sol/s.
you are very wrong
Well fkin speak up dude O.o, sure there's a great possibility Claymore has been holding out so he can make some big bucks on the side but unless you have evidence of this then you're just spitting conspiracy theories.
Its not about who is a better programmer. You might have missed this awesome thread from nerdralph talking about limits: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/limits-of-zec-mining-1679855
Mom and dad are so angry, why?
What do you mean and how old are you? 12?45. And that list stays.
edit:
Tried really hard and it looks like I am 46.
Someone is going to post soon here in this thread how he/she got fucked by claymore. rx 480 doing less than hd 290? This is someones fault. Who is paying?
It's probably easier and more profitable just to release this with a dev fee.
These type of comments seem to be coming only from the US in the evening. Most of the day everything is fine in the rest of the world.
175 sols
rx470-8gb nitro
~1626 strap
~1340 core 2080 mem
~90 watts
~-66mV
170 sols
rx 480 ref 8gb small increase in clocks otherwise stock
rx470-8gb nitro
~1626 strap
~1340 core 2080 mem
~90 watts
~-66mV
170 sols
rx 480 ref 8gb small increase in clocks otherwise stock
while i appreciate the constant speed increases. am i the only one who thinks we are being dripfed these as the diff goes up and the price drops. these speed increases are only keeping our mining income roughly the same. why is it that we can't get the full speed right off and actually make some money from this rather than the same old story of the big money men make the most.
Completely optimizing the code to best work with a new algorithm takes time. Has nothing to do with price of the currency compared to the miner's new version release dates.
I believe we're getting pretty close to the limit on Sol/s.
you are very wrong
Well fkin speak up dude O.o, sure there's a great possibility Claymore has been holding out so he can make some big bucks on the side but unless you have evidence of this then you're just spitting conspiracy theories.
It's probably easier and more profitable just to release this with a dev fee.
Mom and dad are so angry, why?
What do you mean and how old are you? 12?
Hahaha, silence.
Next phase is that someone made bad investment but it wasn't me.
Second phase fuck I bought these on credit.
Third, wtf need to pay some power too?
Fourth, how do I cash out??
Mom and dad are so angry, why?
Next phase is that someone made bad investment but it wasn't me.
Second phase fuck I bought these on credit.
Third, wtf need to pay some power too?
Fourth, how do I cash out??
Mom and dad are so angry, why?
#Wish AMD would release their top of the line cards soon.
I read somewhere, that they may not be good at mining. In Version 7 i have from time to time the error:
ZEC: Stratum - socket send failed 10053, disconnect
yes I am have this issue also ZEC: Stratum - socket send failed 10053, disconnect
"Jaw drop!" for the 7th time. Keep up the outstanding work. R9 390 214, R9 290 198, R480 166, R9 270x 91
Too bad the 480's, 470's can't be better but they do run more efficient. Wish AMD would release their top of the line cards soon.
Too bad the 480's, 470's can't be better but they do run more efficient. Wish AMD would release their top of the line cards soon.
Jump to: