Too early for these two since v5.0 isn't published yet. But it will happen, no "worries".
Linux version doing 120 sols/s per RX470/480 with very little power draw (~100w per gpu @ the wall). Good luck matching that.
👏👏👏👏👏 pound that chest!! Ermmmergerd I've got the fastest miner. I'm gonna get an extra 100% on my 3$ a day for the next 12 hours 😂 Competition brings out rare sides of people. Ugly if you ask me. But as "they" say it's good for us. As far as an example on how not to be humble this should prove worthy! SilentArmy anything but! More like whinymilitia if you asky me.
BR
What did you expect from a user with this track record (see below) of calling Claymore a thief and whatnot. A Linux marxist on top of that. Worst combination.
Examples:
This makes you wonder how much of other people's code Claymore steals without giving credit.
Other of his binaries are "packed" to avoid disassembling. Gee, I wonder what he is hiding.
If i had to guess, either the licensing is being fixed or code functions are being rewritten or binary is being packed to prevent further auditing.
Take your pick
After throwing this at Claymore, I am wondering what this guy is still doing here?
He also said this about Claymore:
This isn't a question about the fee. This is about outright stealing other people's code and not giving credit where it is due.
Sounds good, right. A person driven by principles and fairness, or not?
Oh wait...
* The ability to remove (or share with the XMR dev fund) the (5%) Claymore fee (by appending ":Claymore" to your workers)
EG: ADDRESS.PAYMENTID.WORKERID:Claymore (Personally, i think that one is quite important as the XMR dev fund needs help)
5% is daylight robbery!
Hey, Hotmetal, so you POS really proposed that
miners and pools should defraud Claymore of his 5% dev fee for the XMR miner in 2014 by stealing the funds mined to his worker? You seem to have no problem stealing Claymore's money for his hard work. And you accuse him of theft? GTFO of here.
Who's next?!
