Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 614. (Read 3839163 times)
Any speed updates? It seems other miners are ahead of this!
Claymore you don't update zcminer to 4.0, because it spends power as ETH miner 
.
Now ZEC crashs to 0.177 ZEC/BTC, it's overgame to older card
ZEC hasn't crashed as the valuation over ETH is about 15 times and ZCL is about 4 - 3 times the value of ETH. The actual value of your ZEC is actually closer to the valuation of ZCL to ETH so just chill out and enjoy the extra profit for now or just switch to ZCL since you mine more per day and ends up netting you more BTC. ZCL is on cryptopia.co.nz and c-cex the second exchange I don't recommend but you are free to do as you pls. .Now ZEC crashs to 0.177 ZEC/BTC, it's overgame to older card
Yup, zec is crashing hard...still more profitable to mine than ETH for me (which crashed to 10$ now...) but when ZEC reaches around 80$ I think I will return to ETH and just hold on to some of the ZECs I've mined, it might grow back again to the 200-300$ range.
you are not alone in your plans 
Yup, zec is crashing hard...still more profitable to mine than ETH for me (which crashed to 10$ now...) but when ZEC reaches around 80$ I think I will return to ETH and just hold on to some of the ZECs I've mined, it might grow back again to the 200-300$ range.
Claymore you don't update zcminer to 4.0, because it spends power as ETH miner .
Now ZEC crashs to 0.177 ZEC/BTC, it's overgame to older card
.Now ZEC crashs to 0.177 ZEC/BTC, it's overgame to older card
will Claymore compile linux ver. v4.0?
where is old v1.1 for linux?
Definitely no Linux! where is old v1.1 for linux?
V1.1 is gone. It's too slow anyway.
Yes definitely being sarcastic with the "LOL" at the end..
Thanks Claymore for working now to bring us this new miner
Thanks Claymore for working now to bring us this new miner
will Claymore compile linux ver. v4.0?
where is old v1.1 for linux?
where is old v1.1 for linux?
I think he was being sarcastic and predicting the whining coming to this thread in the near future.
I think we have a winner.
@adasab @Prelude: Congrats, well done... you have some special talent there.
It seems I must be here all the time, as soon as I decide to take a break, something interesting happens
Ok, I did not check this new Linux miner, but it seems it's faster than current version of my miner, at least in Linux.
So in a day I will release faster version.
Ok, I did not check this new Linux miner, but it seems it's faster than current version of my miner, at least in Linux.
So in a day I will release faster version.
Frontrunning: November 13
- Why you release faster miner? ? ? ? ?
Now we all must pay more for electricity and we will all mine same coins anyway, so much less profit!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
- Why so high fee? ? ? ? ? ? ? I think 2.5% is greedy. You already made millions!!! Why you not work for free so I can make millions too?!?!?! You are a thief!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Why no Linux version? ? ? ? ? ? You could make millions with big farms which all use Linux!!!!!!!! LOL!!!!
New invasion in 3... 2... 1...
There is just so much fail in this post. Where is that Star Trek dude Face palm gif
I think he was being sarcastic and predicting the whining coming to this thread in the near future.
EDIT: Also, this...
http://s22.postimg.org/fdm0tb1a9/screenshot_1.png
What is it? Previously, this was not! Video HD 7970 1000/1500
What is it? Previously, this was not! Video HD 7970 1000/1500
Claymore, optiminer is getting the following speed.
Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Is this linux or win?Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Linux only and that miner has a 15% dev fee.
But interestingly there is a windows port of the SA miner that im using. It's getting me some slightly better numbers, no fee and a nice cut in power.
My 290 rig is running 4c cooler on that port, id like to see what claymore can do seeing the competition.
Can you drop a link to that windows port please.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1666489.865
https://mega.nz/#F!iwYQhI6S!2vl0D3jz3fH3-bZxHUurBg
R6 is the newest one, make sure to read the windows doc as there is some setup involved.
I ran nicehash's own miner last night for a little bit to see what it suggested to me was the most profitable thing for me to mine.
according to it I'm best mining ZEC with my CPU and ETH with my GPU. Of course thats with their miners and not optimised ones like claymores
according to it I'm best mining ZEC with my CPU and ETH with my GPU. Of course thats with their miners and not optimised ones like claymores
Claymore, optiminer is getting the following speed.
Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Is this linux or win?Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Linux only and that miner has a 15% dev fee.
But interestingly there is a windows port of the SA miner that im using. It's getting me some slightly better numbers, no fee and a nice cut in power.
My 290 rig is running 4c cooler on that port, id like to see what claymore can do seeing the competition.
Can you drop a link to that windows port please.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1666489.865
Claymore, optiminer is getting the following speed.
Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Is this linux or win?Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Linux only and that miner has a 15% dev fee.
But interestingly there is a windows port of the SA miner that im using. It's getting me some slightly better numbers, no fee and a nice cut in power.
My 290 rig is running 4c cooler on that port, id like to see what claymore can do seeing the competition.
Can you drop a link to that windows port please.
Claymore, optiminer is getting the following speed.
Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Is this linux or win?Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Linux only and that miner has a 15% dev fee.
But interestingly there is a windows port of the SA miner that im using. It's getting me some slightly better numbers, no fee and a nice cut in power.
My 290 rig is running 4c cooler on that port, id like to see what claymore can do seeing the competition.
Claymore, optiminer is getting the following speed.
Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Is this linux or win?Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Its still Linux only
For those on about the Optimizer miner, I've heard the dev fee is 15% is that correct (mentioned in the SA thread)?
If so thats a crazy high dev fee and to think people were complaining about Claymores 2.5%
I'm getting this error with r9 270's
"Error: Compliation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!"
Has anyone experienced this?
"Error: Compliation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!"
Has anyone experienced this?
Claymore, optiminer is getting the following speed.
Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Is this linux or win? Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Claymore, optiminer is getting the following speed.
Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Example speed:
R9 Nano: 175S/s
R9 290: 135S/s
RX 470: 120S/s
Can you beat?
Jump to: