Topic: closed - page 5. (Read 126705 times)

Nobody knows a dev to take that over? I'm not really enjoying seeing my money divided by 15000...

Sunk? Not invested? And what of the people that had a 10:1 loss, Bosman? Do you think of those traders? You may have driven the price up but in your own words you had to use your own BTC to manipulate the price. Value is not the same as price and would've been added from any kind of development; development you refused to speculate on because you were "focused on fair coin distribution".


You're the project leader. You sold coins for your project. If the project has not been completed, why wouldn't a ICO refund be in order?

Again, I'll ask as I get no answer: Why can't a refund for the ICO be rolled out?

I don't expect you'll do it, but the least you can do is account to the investors who lost out why an ICO was necessary and why even a partial refund for original ICO GPC addresses is not possible.

I agree. Malicious intent wasn't the sole motivation for Bosman; but it's pretty damned close whn you knowingly take on a project you know you have no time to develop. Let's face it, Bosman expected everyone else to come up with the ideas and then develop it. He'd manage the ICO and spearhead the project.

Bosman could be proud if he hadn't used an ICO. The way to do this is either on community backing, or with a pre-ANN. in this case community backing only came from bag holders. It's a shame but at least I've experienced a very small ICO scam loss firsthand.

So why wouldn't a refund be in order, hypothetically?

The winner of the logo contest is : yweetot : Congratulations !

Please send me and bosman a link with all the size of the logo you have made, and if you can also provide the "coin" version (circle) it would be really cool.

Also post here your GPC adress to receive the 10k bounty.  

Worst fake fud atempt ever. 

I had a chance to sell for x10 profit but I didn't. I kept my coin ....so It's my fault. Blaming each other don't bring the price up  We need to work hard and make a new plan. Hire a dev? Pumping?.... I can help with 10btc

its over , besides  there is some lie in the air GPC is not only 10m coins i think!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the current price still higher than what the ICO cost (at least on the selling side of things)?

I can't fathom how anyone who got in on the ICO couldn't possibly be in profit by now.

And we are talking about mighty sums of like .01-.05ish? I can understand some ICO coins requiring a buywall, but this surely isn't one of them.

I received 60000 coins for 0.025 BTC , sold half of those and I'm still holding half.

Price is 45 sats. Remind me the ICO price?
I'm not holding a bagload of GPC. You're holding none.
So the fair distribution is for you to pump and dump? Got ya.

We can learn Doge burning coins

Quit whining like a crybaby, price is still a little bit higher than it was at the first phase of the ICO, I'm sorry that you weren't smart enough to sell coin at all time highs, no one to blame but yourself for that, and no one forced you to join the ICO either. It's called freedom of choice, learn to use it wisely.

How's this sound Bosman...

You refund shareholder BTC in exchange for GPC? Ie a reverse ICO.

This seems fair considering you pledge fairness and have not delivered. Clearly the bounty/dev costs are not an issue. If you're truly jaded right this wrong, or do so to the best of your ability with refunds.

Though, let's see what our community votes first...

I vote yes. I want a refund.

You're jaded? Why, have you invested or lost money here? You certainly put in no work except ICO spreadsheets to keep it "fair". And now bc a dev won't step up to develop the coin you sold shares of, you're saying you're jaded! Wow.

The idiom "fail to plan, plan to fail" would be appropriate except your plan never extended past collecting BTC and using ICO shares (ie bag holder fear) to get the shareholders to rally Bittrex.

Ask yourself, why would a dev step up to fix your ICO coin if he could do it himself?

You've clearly got no development skills at all. You've simply bought a copy/paste coin, then transferred according to a spreadsheet.

If any shareholders disagree then that's fine. But to hear this bullshit from the dev who said the whole point of the coin was not to screw investors ... Then to hear HE'S jaded?! Wow.

It is worthwhile to a certain degree, yeah... I just know I personally wish new coins were reviewed by a coder ... then I'd consider it a bit more trustworthy. I know one guy out there has been reviewing some coins for free, so maybe see if you can join up with him or something. I forget his username, but he's posted here in the altcoin forum a bit.

The only other issue you may run into is that people may not care. I know it sounds odd,  as people cry scam here seemingly all the time. But to them, scam means 'I lost money on this coin'. Not that the dev was pulling a scam.

And a lot of times people seem to look the other way even when the coin they have invested in or promoting is clearly on the scammy side of things. I recall during the early days of the anonymity craze,  certain coins, like liberty/dream/bank coin all made wild promises -- I believe all three promised zerocoin compatibility and in bankcoin's case, they threw in darksend. Nevermind that darksend wasn't opensourced yet, and zerocoin didn't actually exist. Even with those facts provided, people looked the other way. So long as the coins were being pumped, they turned a blind eye, cried 'fud' and so on.

I don't mean this to sound like this project isn't worth doing. Just saying that you should have realistic expectations.

Edit: And here is the guy doing code reviews that I was referring to --
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/code-reviews-for-altcoins-748766

CoinsSource does the above to a certain degree, although I disagree with how they go about their trust rating thing.

I don't want to throw a monkey wrench into your plans, but there is one problem... same problem with CoinsSource reviews -- unless you have a coder analyze the code for the coin, reviews will be of limited help. Sure, they are better than nothing, but any coin can look great from the start, but if the code has a hidden premine, or looks shoddy, it won't matter much.

ok time to speak up,
1st bosman you no need to leave the leadership "this your project"
2nd what you need is team, small team with great skill
3th how can get them join us? not like "hire" but mostly like friendly i think
4th seriously are you have think clearly about leave leadership of your own coin project(currently YOU DOING SO GREAT JOB)
5th if i'm not in 2 team dev i will join your team 
6th i just ask you to consider to invite some dev other coins, that have great potential skill,
7th i will try to contact some people that was great promoter
8th i will back silent reader hahaha(need to finish some project)

BUT, after all thanks bosman for your great jobs..
but please consider to back being leadership(and i think you must)

regard

nkcom

Each time i look at my bittrex account i have less and less and less and less money ...

If what i have left can still be considered money and not dust, of course